Numerics of Parametrization ECMWF training course May 2006 by Nils Wedi  ECMWF.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Finite Difference Discretization of Hyperbolic Equations: Linear Problems Lectures 8, 9 and 10.
Advertisements

Numerics of physical parametrizations
Parametrization of surface fluxes: Outline
Governing Equations IV
ECMWF Governing Equations 3 Slide 1 Numerical methods IV (time stepping) by Nils Wedi (room 007; ext. 2657) In part based on previous material by Mariano.
Introduction Irina Surface layer and surface fluxes Anton
The equations of motion and their numerical solutions I by Nils Wedi (2006) contributions by Mike Cullen and Piotr Smolarkiewicz.
School of something FACULTY OF OTHER School of Computing An Adaptive Numerical Method for Multi- Scale Problems Arising in Phase-field Modelling Peter.
Predictable Chaotic Exhibits memory Equilibrium Towards non-equilibrium Acknowledgements LD is supported by NERC CASE award NER/S/A/2004/ Conclusions.
Formal Computational Skills
Reduction of Temporal Discretization Error in an Atmospheric General Circulation Model (AGCM) Daisuke Hotta Advisor: Prof. Eugenia Kalnay.
Level set based Image Segmentation Hang Xiao Jan12, 2013.
Training course: boundary layer IV Parametrization above the surface layer (layout) Overview of models Slab (integral) models K-closure model K-profile.
(c) MSc Module MTMW14 : Numerical modelling of atmospheres and oceans Staggered schemes 3.1 Staggered time schemes.
Günther Zängl, DWD1 Improvements for idealized simulations with the COSMO model Günther Zängl Deutscher Wetterdienst, Offenbach, Germany.
A Cloud Resolving Model with an Adaptive Vertical Grid Roger Marchand and Thomas Ackerman - University of Washington, Joint Institute for the Study of.
Numerical Uncertainty Assessment Reference: P.J. Roache, Verification and Validation in Computational Science and Engineering, Hermosa Press, Albuquerque.
Coupling Continuum Model and Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics Methods for Reactive Transport Yilin Fang, Timothy D Scheibe and Alexandre M Tartakovsky Pacific.
Non-hydrostatic IFS at ECMWF
Coupled Fluid-Structural Solver CFD incompressible flow solver has been coupled with a FEA code to analyze dynamic fluid-structure coupling phenomena CFD.
Combating Dissipation. Numerical Dissipation  There are several sources of numerical dissipation in these simulation methods  Error in advection step.
“Assimilating” Solar Data into MHD Models of the Solar Atmosphere W.P. Abbett SSL UC Berkeley HMI Team Meeting, Jan 2005.
Earth Systems Science Chapter 6 I. Modeling the Atmosphere-Ocean System 1.Statistical vs physical models; analytical vs numerical models; equilibrium vs.
Network and Grid Computing –Modeling, Algorithms, and Software Mo Mu Joint work with Xiao Hong Zhu, Falcon Siu.
Numerical weather prediction: current state and perspectives M.A.Tolstykh Institute of Numerical Mathematics RAS, and Hydrometcentre of Russia.
Exploring strategies for coupled 4D-Var data assimilation using an idealised atmosphere-ocean model Polly Smith, Alison Fowler & Amos Lawless School of.
Wavelets Series Used to Solve Dynamic Optimization Problems Lizandro S. Santos, Argimiro R. Secchi, Evaristo. C. Biscaia Jr. Programa de Engenharia Química/COPPE,
Tutorial 5: Numerical methods - buildings Q1. Identify three principal differences between a response function method and a numerical method when both.
Towards Developing a “Predictive” Hurricane Model or the “Fine-Tuning” of Model Parameters via a Recursive Least Squares Procedure Goal: Minimize numerical.
M. Baldauf, DWD Numerical contributions to the Priority Project ‘Runge-Kutta’ COSMO General Meeting, Working Group 2 (Numerics) Bukarest,
A Look at High-Order Finite- Volume Schemes for Simulating Atmospheric Flows Paul Ullrich University of Michigan.
Most physically significant large-scale atmospheric circulations have time scales on the order of Rossby waves but much larger than the time scales.
1 ESTIMATING THE STATE OF LARGE SPATIOTEMPORALLY CHAOTIC SYSTEMS: WEATHER FORECASTING, ETC. Edward Ott University of Maryland Main Reference: E. OTT, B.
1 A Framework for The Analysis of Physics-Dynamics Coupling Strategies Andrew Staniforth, Nigel Wood (Met Office Dynamics Research Group) and Jean Côté.
Implementation of an Advection Scheme based on Piecewise Parabolic Method (PPM) in the MesoNH The main goal of this study was to estimate if the RGSW model.
A dual mass flux framework for boundary layer convection Explicit representation of cloud base coupling mechanisms Roel Neggers, Martin Köhler, Anton Beljaars.
Comparison of Different Approaches NCAR Earth System Laboratory National Center for Atmospheric Research NCAR is Sponsored by NSF and this work is partially.
© Crown copyright Met Office A Framework for The Analysis of Physics-Dynamics Coupling Strategies Andrew Staniforth, Nigel Wood (Met O Dynamics Research)
ALADIN NH Recent progress Petra Smolíková, Radmila Brožková.
A Course in Scientific Simulation Mike O’Leary Shiva Azadegan Towson University Supported by the National Science Foundation under grant DUE
+ Numerical Integration Techniques A Brief Introduction By Kai Zhao January, 2011.
Ocean Instabilities Captured By Breeding On A Global Ocean Model Matthew Hoffman, Eugenia Kalnay, James Carton, and Shu-Chih Yang.
Corrective Dynamics for Atmospheric Single Column Models J. Bergman, P. Sardeshmukh, and C. Penland NOAA-CIRES Climate Diagnostics Center With special.
The status and development of the ECMWF forecast model M. Hortal, M. Miller, C. Temperton, A. Untch, N. Wedi ECMWF.
Engineering Analysis – Computational Fluid Dynamics –
Using the Segregated and Coupled Solvers
A Numerical Study of Early Summer Regional Climate and Weather. Zhang, D.-L., W.-Z. Zheng, and Y.-K. Xue, 2003: A Numerical Study of Early Summer Regional.
EWGLAM Oct Some recent developments in the ECMWF model Mariano Hortal ECMWF Thanks to: A. Beljars (physics), E. Holm (humidity analysis)
Large Timestep Issues Lecture 12 Alessandra Nardi Thanks to Prof. Sangiovanni, Prof. Newton, Prof. White, Deepak Ramaswamy, Michal Rewienski, and Karen.
ECE-7000: Nonlinear Dynamical Systems Overfitting and model costs Overfitting  The more free parameters a model has, the better it can be adapted.
FlowFixer: Using BFECC for Fluid Simulation ByungMoon Kim Yingjie Liu Ignacio Llamas Jarek Rossignac Georgia Institute of Technology.
Numerical Analysis – Differential Equation
Gas-kineitc MHD Numerical Scheme and Its Applications to Solar Magneto-convection Tian Chunlin Beijing 2010.Dec.3.
Markus Gross PDC14 Setting the scene. ftp://ftp.cicese.mx/pub/divOC/ocefisica/PDC14.
ECE 576 – Power System Dynamics and Stability Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Towards Future Navier-Stokes Schemes Uniform Accuracy, O(h) Time Step, Accurate Viscous/Heat Fluxes Hiroaki Nishikawa National Institute of Aerospace.
Météo-France / CNRM – T. Bergot 1) Methodology 2) The assimilation procedures at local scale 3) Results for the winter season Improved Site-Specific.
Computational Modeling of 3D Turbulent Flows With MC2 Claude Pelletier Environment Canada MSC / MRB.
Representing Effects of Complex Terrain on Mountain Meteorology and Hydrology Steve Ghan, Ruby Leung, Teklu Tesfa, PNNL Steve Goldhaber, NCAR.
Time Integration Schemes Bill Skamarock NCAR/MMM 1.Canonical equations for scheme analyses. 2.Time-integration schemes used in NWP models.
Seamless turbulence parametrization across model resolutions
“Consolidation of the Surface-to-Atmosphere Transfer-scheme: ConSAT
Multiscale aspects of cloud-resolving simulations over complex terrain
Convergence in Computational Science
Models of atmospheric chemistry
Operational Aladin-Belgium
Comparison of CFEM and DG methods
Conservative Dynamical Core (CDC)
6th Lecture : Numerical Methods
Baltic Sea Research Institute Warnemünde, Germany
Presentation transcript:

Numerics of Parametrization ECMWF training course May 2006 by Nils Wedi  ECMWF

Overview Introduction to ‘physics’ and ‘dynamics’ in a NWP model from a numerical point of view Potential numerical problems in the ‘physics’ with large time steps Coupling Interface within the ‘physics’ and between ‘physics’ and ‘dynamics’ Concluding Remarks References

Introduction... ‘physics’, parametrization: “the mathematical procedure describing the statistical effect of subgrid-scale processes on the mean flow expressed in terms of large scale parameters”, processes are typically: vertical diffusion, orography, cloud processes, convection, radiation ‘dynamics’: computation of all the other terms of the Navier-Stokes equations (eg. in IFS: semi- Lagrangian advection)

Different scales involved

Introduction... Goal: reasonably large time-step to save CPU-time without loss of accuracy Goal: numerical stability achieved by…treating part of the “physics” implicitly achieved by… splitting “physics” and “dynamics” (also conceptual advantage)

Introduction... Increase in CPU time substantial if the time step is reduced for the ‘physics’ only. Iterating twice over a time step almost doubles the cost.

Introduction... Increase in time-step in the ‘dynamics’ has prompted the question of accurate and stable numerics in the ‘physics’.

Potential problems... Misinterpretation of truncation error as missing physics Choice of space and time discretization Stiffness Oscillating solutions at boundaries Non-linear terms correct equilibrium if ‘dynamics’ and ‘physics’ are splitted ?

Equatorial nutrient trapping – example of ambiguity of (missing) “physics” or “numerics” Effect of insufficient vertical resolution and the choice of the numerical (advection) scheme A. Oschlies (2000) observation Model A Model B

Discretization Choose: e.g. Tiedke mass-flux scheme

Discretization Stability analysis, choose a solution: Always unstable as above solution diverges !!!

Stiffness e.g. on-off processes, decay within few timesteps, etc.

Stiffness

Pic of stiffness here Stiffness: k = 100 hr -1, dt = 0.5 hr

Stiffness No explicit scheme will be stable for stiff systems. Choice of implicit schemes which are stable and non-oscillatory is extremely restricted.

Boundaries Classical diffusion equation, e.g. tongue of warm air cooled from above and below.

Boundaries

Pic of boundaries here T 0 =16 0 C, z=1600m,  =20m 2 /s, dz=100m, cfl=  *dt/dz 2

Non-linear terms e.g. surface temperature evolution

Non-linear terms

Pic of non-linear terms here predic-corr non-Linear terms: K=10, P=3

Wrong equilibrium ?

Compute D+P(T) independant

Compute P(D,T)

Coupling interface... Splitting of some form or another seems currently the only practical way to combine “dynamics” and “physics” (also conceptual advantage of “job-splitting”) Example: typical time-step of the IFS model at ECMWF (2TLSLSI)

2-tl-step

Sequential vs. parallel split vdif - dynamics parallel split sequential split A. Beljaars

‘dynamics’-’physics’ coupling

Noise in the operational forecast eliminated through modified coupling

Splitting within the ‘physics’ ‘Steady state’ balance between different parameterized processes: globally P. Bechtold

Splitting within the ‘physics’ ‘Steady state’ balance between different parameterized Processes: tropics

Splitting within the ‘physics’ “With longer time-steps it is more relevant to keep an accurate balance between processes within a single time-step” (“fractional stepping”) A practical guideline suggests to incorporate slow explicit processes first and fast implicit processes last (However, a rigid classification is not always possible, no scale separation in nature!) parametrizations should start at a full time level if possible otherwise implicitly time-step dependency introduced Use of predictor profile for sequentiality

Splitting within the ‘physics’ Predictor-corrector scheme by iterating each time step and use these predictor values as input to the parameterizations and the dynamics. Problems: the computational cost, code is very complex and maintenance is a problem, tests in IFS did not proof more successful than simple predictors, yet formally 2 nd order accuracy may be achieved ! (Cullen et al., 2003, Dubal et al. 2006) Previous operational: Currently operational: Choose:  =0.5 (tuning) Inspired by results!

Concluding Remarks Numerical stability and accuracy in parametrizations are an important issue in high resolution modeling with reasonably large time steps. Coupling of ‘physics’ and ‘dynamics’ will remain an issue in global NWP. Solving the N.-S. equations with increased resolution will resolve more and more fine scale but not down to viscous scales: averaging required! Need to increase implicitness (hence remove “arbitrary” sequentiality of individual physical processes, e.g. solve boundary layer clouds and vertical diffusion together) Other forms of coupling are to be investigated, e.g. embedded cloud resolving models and/or multi-grid solutions (solving the physics on a different grid; a finer physics grid averaged onto a coarser dynamics grid can improve the coupling, a coarser physics grid does not !) (Mariano Hortal, work in progress)

References Dubal M, N. Wood and A. Staniforth, Some numerical properties of approaches to physics- dynamics coupling for NWP. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 132, Beljaars A., P. Bechtold, M. Koehler, J.-J. Morcrette, A. Tompkins, P. Viterbo and N. Wedi, Proceedings of the ECMWF seminar on recent developments in numerical methods for atmosphere and ocean modelling, ECMWF. Cullen M. and D. Salmond, On the use of a predictor corrector scheme to couple the dynamics with the physical parameterizations in the ECMWF model. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 129, Dubal M, N. Wood and A. Staniforth, Analysis of parallel versus sequential splittings for time- stepping physical parameterizations. Mon. Wea. Rev., 132, Kalnay,E. and M. Kanamitsu, Time schemes for strongly nonlinear damping equations. Mon. Wea. Rev., 116, McDonald,A.,1998. The Origin of Noise in Semi-Lagrangian Integrations. Proceedings of the ECMWF seminar on recent developments in numerical methods for atmospheric modelling, ECMWF. Oschlies A.,2000. Equatorial nutrient trapping in biogeochemical ocean models: The role of advection numerics, Global Biogeochemical cycles, 14, Sportisse, B., An analysis of operator splitting techniques in the stiff case. J. Comp. Phys., 161, Wedi, N., The Numerical Coupling of the Physical Parameterizations to the “Dynamical” Equations in a Forecast Model. Tech. Memo. No.274 ECMWF.