Peer Review Roisin Donnelly For the collaborative Peer Review Process in IJAP.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
AUTHORSHIP SKILLS: QUESTIONS SCIENTISTS FREQUENTLY ASK ABOUT THE WRITING AND PUBLISHING OF JOURNAL ARTICLES.
Advertisements

Session 3 LITERACY GUIDED WRITING Autumn 2007.
An introductory tutorial
Doug Elliott Professor, Critical Care Nursing The final step: Presentation and publication Research Workshop: Conducting research in a clinical setting.
QAA-HEA Education for Sustainable Development Guidance Document Consultation 5 November 2013, Birmingham Professor James Longhurst Assistant Vice Chancellor.
FLINDERS INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC POLICY AND MANAGEMENT Peer Support Grant Writing Workshop Why Apply for Funding? Developing your Research Ideas Gerry Redmond.
Associate Teacher Symposium 13 June 2009 Associate Teacher Symposium 13 June 2009 Beginning Associate Teachers Debora Lee.
Rationale To encourage all students to take a full part in the life of our school, college, workplace or wider community. To provide opportunities to enable.
Northern Convening Butte College April 26, 2013 College Team Facilitators’ Presentation Student Support (Re)defined.
Essay and report writing. Learning outcomes Identify your own strengths & weaknesses in writing Consider the function of writing a report This PPT is.
1 Family-Centred Practice. What is family-centred practice? Family-centred practice is characterised by: mutual respect and trust reciprocity shared power.
Quotes about Peer Coaching from your Reflect and Review documents With my associate learner we have had chats along the way… Our roles are rather different.
Peer Feedback and Assessment: Students as Partners in Designing Inclusive Assessment and Feedback Regina Pauli 1 and Marcia Worrell 2 1 Department of Psychology,
[Add presentation title, presenter name here]
DR N. MPOFU-HAMADZIRIPI ACADEMY OF TEACHING AND LEARNING 21 March 2013.
Integrating Writing in the Statistics Curriculum 1 Dean Poeth and Jane Oppenlander Union Graduate College eCOTS, May 19-23, 2014.
Principled Teaching for Deep Progress - Improving mathematical learning beyond methods and materials An NCETM research study module.
The “Highly Effective” Early Childhood Classroom Environment
Professor Ian Richards University of South Australia.
Four ‘whys’ for referencing Sue Gill, QuILT. Why reference? 1.So we know what you’ve read 2.To show how your ideas formed 3.Building on the work of others.
School of Town and Regional Planning Professor Jenny Dixon Presentation to The Geddes Institute PhD Seminar Series 3 November 2005 GETTING PUBLISHED.
School Development Planning Initiative
PeeQuality Assurance for dyslexia specialist 1:1 tutors Janet Skinner, Chair of ADSHE QA working party Devon and Cornwall ADSHE regional group 22 nd November.
Critical Colleagues Grant development and writing support Research and Graduate Studies.
Responding to student writing: promoting engagement and understanding through peer review Sheffield Hallam University Outside Speaker Programme, Quality.
Classroom observation and post-observation interview 呂曉娟
Peer Review and Enhancement of Teaching Ginny Saich & Ruth Watkins (DAICE)
 E-learning forum Thursday 12 th May Introductions Daniel Clark University Learning Technologist Louise.
Brent Gloy, July 2008 Increasing the Odds of Publishing Academic Research 2008 AAEA Annual Meetings Grad Student Section Symposium Brent A. Gloy Cornell.
Getting published (during your PhD studies) Professor Jennifer Rowley Department of Information and Communications Manchester Metropolitan University.
Feedback and Next Step Marking
The context of the interface Ian Ruthven University of Strathclyde.
TLE Challenge – Session 2
Angela Hammond University of Hertfordshire Putting internationalisation into practice: how to inform and develop your teaching. SEDA Spring Conference.
A Curriculum Design Toolkit: developing and enhancing your practice Angela Hammond Jackie Willis
IGather learners as responsible audio collectors of tutor, peer and self-reflection Andrew Middleton, Anne Nortcliffe and Rosie Owens SHARPENS YOUR THINKING.
Aims of Workshop Introduce more effective school/University partnerships for the initial training of teachers through developing mentorship training Encourage.
Rhona Sharpe, Head of OCSLD Liz Turner, Head of APQO 11 th April 2013 CHAIRING VALIDATION PANELS.
Ensuring that Professional Development Leads to Improved Mathematics Teaching & Learning Kristen Malzahn Horizon Research, Inc. TDG Leadership Seminar.
Inquiry and the IB. Stuents do not learn by doing. on what they have done. Rather, they learn by and.
Creativity – Session 2 CHALLENGE – EVALUATION – CREATIVITY – CLARITY – FOUNDATIONS – COLLABORATION.
Successful publishing managing the review process Professor Janet R. McColl-Kennedy, PhD 2004 Services Doctoral Consortium Miami, Florida 28 October.
Descriptive Essay Peer Edit Take out both copies of your rough draft, grab a post it, and find a partner for editing! You need to be sitting together!
Student Peer Review An introductory tutorial. The peer review process Conduct study Write manuscript Peer review Submit to journal Accept Revise Reject.
Students seizing responsibility: A revolution of collegiality Amie Speirs, Zoe Welsh, Julia Jung and Jenny Scoles Introduction: In our project Students.
Lunch & Learn – PMO Feb – March 2014 Summary March 31 st 2014.
Auriol Junior School Guidance for Marking
Assessment ModellingTasks LessonsAssessment Reflecting.
Australian Teacher Performance and Development Framework Consultation proposal.
 An article review is written for an audience who is knowledgeable in the subject matter instead of a general audience  When writing an article review,
PEER COACHING INTRODUCTION Lisa Bruno Tanza Shuy.
Intensive Course in Research Writing Barbara Gastel, MD, MPH Texas A&M University Summer 2011.
Reflective Teaching Practices
Writing Exercise Try to write a short humor piece. It can be fictional or non-fictional. Essay by David Sedaris.
DISCUSS WORKSHOPS AND PEER EDITING How to get the most out of your Peer Review.
Reading and Writing Connections Karen Y. Silvestri.
Assessment & Feedback Working Group Developing Departmental Assessment & Feedback Practices The ‘Quick Wins’ Paper.
Peer review in the preparation of Practice Teachers Valerie Keating Catherine Dawe.
The Potential of UKPSF at NU
“PRACTICE BASED ASSESSMENTS” An update for 2017/18
Writer’s Workshop (for a written poem, short story, etc.)
Critical Reflective Practice
Peer Observation & Review of Teaching (P.O.R.T.)
Event Toolkit Practical guidance for running an event.
What are the key elements of observing and giving feedback?
Reflective Teaching Practices
Academic Writing and Publishing
Professional Tutor Conference 20th September 2018
Handout 5: Feedback and support
July 24, 2009 Peer Critiques.
Presentation transcript:

Peer Review Roisin Donnelly For the collaborative Peer Review Process in IJAP

Academic Writing Academic writing is neither plain nor simple It is a way of writing that we have to learn It is highly particular, demanding and complex professional work Our written products are crafted works Crafting a journal article is both a time intensive and extensive process Feedback is really important Peer review offers interesting possibilities

Peer Review As a group you are peers on multiple levels; As professionals; As academics; As students All of you in the group are engaged in a journey of learning in this module as you seek to produce a journal article. Peer review is proposed as an important pedagogic principle in supporting group-based research writing (Aitchison & Lee, 2006).

Peer Review Gives you a chance to see how others react to and understand your developing paper Responses can provide affirmation and encouragement for the writing project as well as guidance and suggestions that challenge or highlight particular aspects of the paper Actively considering these responses enables authors to gain clarity about their ideas, recognise when some ideas are not working and become aware of what others found interesting in their writing projects Important to share work with colleagues early and often as writing a journal article requires others’ assistance

Peer Review – Some questions What was the best/most interesting part of the paper? Was there any part of the paper where you wanted more information because you were interested? What else did you want to know? Was there any part of the paper where you needed more information just to understand? What else did you want to know? List everything you liked about this draft If you had to reduce the length of the paper, what would you eliminate? Do you have any additional comments or suggestions?

Peer Review Work in groups of 2 Read your colleague’s draft Make marginal comments as you read Write 4/5 comments identifying strengths and suggesting improvements Aim for constructive comments Give feedback to colleague

Response Listen carefully to comments of colleagues about your draft Read the comments you receive and respond to them Note what you agree with Think how you might change something your colleague commented on