Modification of JASON rain flag for MLE4 processing J.Tournadre 1IFREMER.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Robin Hogan, Richard Allan, Nicky Chalmers, Thorwald Stein, Julien Delanoë University of Reading How accurate are the radiative properties of ice clouds.
Advertisements

RA-2 & MWR QWG meeting – ESA/ESRIN – 24 March, 2003 Envisat RA-2 and MWR Events since October 2002 Pierre Féménias ESA/ESRIN.
Page - 1 RA2 CCVT meeting March 2003 F-PAC validation context CMA chain has to be inline with the algorithms approved by ESA and used for the prototype.
TOPEX & Jason Retracking OSTST ‘07 Retracking and SSB Splinter TOPEX and Jason Retracking Ernesto Rodriguez, Phil Callahan, Ted Lungu March 13, 2007 Jet.
Professor Bill Mullarkey
Retracking & SSB Splinter OSTST ‘07 Retracking and SSB Splinter Report Juliette Lambin and Phil Callahan March 14, 2007 Hobart, Tasmania.
26/11/2012 – Observatoire de Paris Analysis of wind speed evolution over ocean derived from altimeter missions and models M. Ablain (CLS)
Time & Frequency Products R. Peřestý, J. Kraus, SWRM 4 th Data Quality Workshop 2-5 December 2014 GFZ Potsdam Recent results on ACC Data Processing 1 SWARM.
Signal Level Control (AGC)
Page 1 Operational use of dual- polarisation: lessons learned at Météo France after 8 years of experience at all wavelengths (S / C / X) P. Tabary Météo.
Amplitude correction Important methods:
MCST – MODLAND Eric F. Vermote –MODLAND representative.
Update of EXT Stripline BPM Electronics with LCLS-style Digital BPM Processors Glen White, with slides by Steve Smith 15 December 2009 ATF2.
SAR Altimetry in Coastal Zone: Performances, Limits, Perspectives Salvatore Dinardo Serco/ESRIN Bruno Lucas Deimos/ESRIN Jerome Benveniste ESA/ESRIN.
Preserving Cloud Information Bruce R. Barkstrom & John J. Bates NCDC.
Page 1 Singular Value Decomposition applied on altimeter waveforms P. Thibaut, J.C.Poisson, A.Ollivier : CLS – Toulouse - France F.Boy, N.Picot : CNES.
Error bar estimates Estimates of the uncertainties on input LwN Estimates of the error model Estimates of the uncertainties on outputs Chla, bbp,cdm (Co-variance.
Evaluation of the ground retracking algorithms on Jason-1 data P.Thibaut, S. Labroue Collecte Localisation Satellite : Toulouse, France.
1 Abstract This paper presents a novel modification to the classical Competitive Learning (CL) by adding a dynamic branching mechanism to neural networks.
Advancing Wireless Link Signatures for Location Distinction J. Zhang, M. H. Firooz, N. Patwari, S. K. Kasera MobiCom’ 08 Presenter: Yuan Song.
Page 1 1 of 100, L2 Peer Review, 3/24/2006 Level 2 Algorithm Peer Review Polarization Vijay Natraj.
Spaceborne Weather Radar
Proportional/Integral/Derivative Control
The ESA NRT River&Lake System J.L. Wheeler P.A.M. Berry R.G. Smith J.L. Wheeler P.A.M. Berry R.G. Smith.
How low can you go? Retrieval of light precipitation in mid-latitudes Chris Kidd School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Science The University of.
Lecture 1 Signals in the Time and Frequency Domains
Spaceborne Radar for Snowfall Measurements
PowerPoint presentation to accompany Research Design Explained 6th edition ; ©2007 Mark Mitchell & Janina Jolley Chapter 7 Introduction to Descriptive.
Chapter 10 Boosting May 6, Outline Adaboost Ensemble point-view of Boosting Boosting Trees Supervised Learning Methods.
ICESat TM 04/21/20031 MIT Activities Two main areas of activity: –Validation of atmospheric delays being computed for ICESat –Assessment of statistics.
UF S.Klimenko LIGO-G Z l Introduction l Goals of this analysis l Coherence of power monitors l Sign X-Correlation l H2-L1 x-correlation l Conclusion.
SeaWinds Empirical Rain Correction Using AMSR January 17, 2005 Bryan Stiles, Svetla Hristova-Veleva, and Scott Dunbar.
OSTST Hobart 2007 – SLA consistency between Jason-1 and TOPEX data SLA consistency between Jason-1 and TOPEX/Poseidon data M.Ablain, S.Philipps,
Colorado Center for Astrodynamics Research The University of Colorado 1 STATISTICAL ORBIT DETERMINATION Satellite Tracking Example of SNC and DMC ASEN.
SMOS QWG-5, 30 May- 1 June 2011, ESRIN Ocean Salinity 1 1.Commissioning reprocessing analysis 2.New processor version: improvements and problems detected/solved.
Point-wise Wind Retrieval and Ambiguity Removal Improvements for the QuikSCAT Climatological Data Set May 9 th 2011 – IOVWST Meeting Alexander Fore, Bryan.
Precipitation and altimeter missions Jean Tournadre Laboratoire d’Océanographie Spatiale IFREMER Plouzane France.
IRI Workshop 2005 TEC Measurements with Dual-Frequency Space Techniques and Comparisons with IRI T. Hobiger, H. Schuh Advanced Geodesy, Institute of Geodesy.
Boundary layer temperature profile observations using ground-based microwave radiometers Bernhard Pospichal, ISARS 2006 Garmisch-Partenkirchen AMMA - Benin.
Statistical Sampling-Based Parametric Analysis of Power Grids Dr. Peng Li Presented by Xueqian Zhao EE5970 Seminar.
OSTST Hobart 2007 – Performance assessment Jason-1 data M.Ablain, S.Philipps, J.Dorandeu, - CLS N.Picot - CNES Jason-1 GDR data Performance assessment.
OS-ESL meeting, Barcelona, February nd, 2011 OTT sensitivity study and Sun correction impact J. Gourrion and the SMOS-BEC team SMOS-BEC, ICM/CSIC.
OSTST - March Hobart 1 Impacts of atmospheric attenuations on AltiKa expected performances J.D. Desjonquères (1), N. Steunou (1) A. Quesney (2)
Jeff J. Orchard, M. Stella Atkins School of Computing Science, Simon Fraser University Freire et al. (1) pointed out that least squares based registration.
Effects of Cloud/rain on Ka band altimeter J. Tournadre et al Ifremer Brest.
VALIDATION AND IMPROVEMENT OF THE GOES-R RAINFALL RATE ALGORITHM Background Robert J. Kuligowski, Center for Satellite Applications and Research, NOAA/NESDIS,
Recent Results from the Corsica Calibration Site P. Bonnefond (1), P. Exertier (1), O. Laurain (1), Y. Ménard (2), F. Boldo (3), E. Jeansou (4), G. Jan.
Dual-Frequency Precipitation Radar Status- 5/22/14 Sidelobes surface return seen in sidelobes at both nadir incidence and off-nadir in Ku data; not evident.
IOVWST Meeting May 2011 Maryland Calibration and Validation of Multi-Satellite scatterometer winds Topics  Estimation of homogeneous long time.
Ensemble Methods in Machine Learning
Ocean Surface Topography Science Team, Reston, VA, USA, October, 2015 References Feng et al., Splin based nonparametric estimation of the altimeter.
Jason-1/Envisat cross-calibration Y. Faugere (CLS) J. Dorandeu (CLS) N. Picot (CNES) P. Femenias (ESA) Jason-1 / Envisat Cross-calibration.
Joint OS & SWH meeting in support of Wide-Swath Altimetry Measurements Washington D.C. – October 30th, 2006 Baptiste MOURRE ICM – Barcelona (Spain) Pierre.
TRMM TMI Rainfall Retrieval Algorithm C. Kummerow Colorado State University 2nd IPWG Meeting Monterey, CA. 25 Oct Towards a parametric algorithm.
1 Chapter 8: Model Inference and Averaging Presented by Hui Fang.
Data Analysis Algorithm for GRB triggered Burst Search Soumya D. Mohanty Center for Gravitational Wave Astronomy University of Texas at Brownsville On.
1 Information Content Tristan L’Ecuyer. 2 Degrees of Freedom Using the expression for the state vector that minimizes the cost function it is relatively.
JASON2 Status in NOAA Gary Petti Office of Satellite Data Processing and Distribution.
Wet tropospheric correction comparison for Jason-1 mission between GPD V2.0 (FCUP) and GPD V1.1 corrections The GPD V2.0 correction is referred to as GPD_V2.0.
SCM x330 Ocean Discovery through Technology Area F GE.
Validation strategy MARCDAT-III meeting - Frascati, Italy - May 2011 The validation phase to compare all the algorithms together and to select the best.
Wet tropospheric correction comparison GPD V2.0 (FCUP) and GPD V1.1 corrections for ERS-1, ERS-2, Envisat, Jason-1, Jason- 2, TOPEX/Poseidon Synthesis.
Alberto A. Colavita, INFN, TS
6.7 Practical Problems with Curve Fitting simple conceptual problems
Radiometer Physics GmbH
Chap II. Radar Hardware (PART 1)
Spaceborne Radar for Snowfall Measurements
Advancing Wireless Link Signatures for Location Distinction
Volume 75, Issue 5, Pages (September 2012)
Mosaic artifacts reduction in SIPS Backscatter
Presentation transcript:

Modification of JASON rain flag for MLE4 processing J.Tournadre 1IFREMER

Since October 21, 2005, new Jason-1 operational processing chain for IGDR and GDR products. Change from MLE 3 to MLE4 retracking algorithm. Based on a second-order altimeter echo model, MLE4 simultaneously retrieves epoch, SWH,  and off- nadir angle (  2). New instrumental corrections tables and rain flag has been updated using a Ku/C band  relation computed from the first 30 version A GDR cycles. MLE4 algorithm is certainly more robust for large o- nadir angles, However, the simultaneous retrieval of  and off-nadir angle significantly modifies the behavior of Ku and C band . Modification of the rain flagging process

Analysis of 3 JASON cycles : Comparison of AGC and s0 Cycle 20 v. A and B Cycle 50 v. A Cycle 160 v. B AGC: Automatic gain control use to modulate the waveform amplitude MLE4 modification of the AGC /s0 relation. Rms of difference grows from 0.15 dB to 0.45dB for Ku band

Sample to Sample noise MLE 4 introduces noise in  Ku signal 0.45 dB compared to 0.15dB for AGC and  version A

Operational Rain flag Detection of significant attenuation of Ku band  compared to C band  Use of Ku/C band  « rain free » relation Criterion on JMR liquid water content Lz to insure the presence of cloud.

Change of the Ku/C band relation For MLE3  and AGC Ku/C band relations are identical Rms at the same level. For MLE4 large difference for s0>15dB Rms 20 to 50% larger

Comparison of Ku/C band relations

Distribution of  /rms  AGC/rms Same Gaussian distribution

Impact of MLE4 on  distribution Version A : weak dependency of  and  agc on  ² Version B: strong dependency of  on  ² MLE4 estimation of  ² impact the  Ku

Difference in rain flagging Red dots samples flagged using the  relation Green dots: flagged using the AGC relation For Version A AGC and  flagged ensemble are only marginally different For version B the two ensembles are statistically different

Latitudinal distributions of flagged samples Small difference of latitudinal distribution

Distribution of off-nadir angle for flagged samples Gaussian distribution slightly skew toward + values for V.A Larger rms and strong bias toward negative values for V.B

Solution : change from  to AGC for rain flagging Compute the Ku/C band AGC for the whole Jason archive. Mean relation defined Program available for rain flagging

Rain products are also available on Cersat web site

Conclusion: Any change modify more things than was originally planed.