WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Progress report WLTP-DTP-E-LabProc-081 Leader: Per Ohlund / Kazuki Kobayashi

Lab proc EV group Meetings 6 th of November, phone meeting Japan reported validation phase 2 result 15 th of November F to F meeting in Brussels. Validation phase 2 result was reported by ACEA. Open issues were discussed. Some of open issues were closed. 9 th of January,phone meeting Discussed some open issues and proposal

Validation phase 2 result ItemsValidation resultsConclusion Time after Range test until start of charging. Current proposal within [30 minutes] 30 minutes is too short.Within 2 hours (same as ISO) Order of CD and CS test There is no impact.Order of test should be flexible. RCB correction Regulated pollutant (NOx,HC,CO,PM,PN) There is no impactRegulated pollutant should not be corrected RCB correction Additional pollutant There is no impactAdditional pollutant should not be corrected. Closed

Validation phase 2 result ItemsValidation resultsConclusion RCB correction window Current proposal Within 1 % To be analyzed VP2 result. To be discussed at beginning of March. Vehicle classification Current proposal 30 minute maximum power 30 minutes power is not appreciate ? To be discussed at beginning of March. Break off criteria for Range test Japanese proposal 4sec and within 15sec stop VP2 were conducted by 4sec. According to test result, deceleration within 15 sec is dangerous at high speed. To be discussed at beginning of March. TBD

Vehicle classification for BEV Revision of PMR ⇒ Current PMR ＊ coefficient X ％ for BEV ? Definition of Power & Speed: 30min max power/30min max speed Is “out of scope” necessary for the vehicle that cannot keep the target speed tolerance of Low phase ? The information for the customer regarding driving range that measured by different test cycle shall be considered. OVC-HEV,NOVC-HEV has same issues. Matters of concern PMR Maximum speed

Validation phase 2 result ItemsValidation resultsConclusion CD to CS mode break off clitella. Japan proposed the criteria based on fuel consumption. To be discussed at beginning of March Break time between cycle Current :10minutes Proposal is too short. Especially diesel vehicle needs at least 40 min. Not only E-Lab ->MCTF TBD

Open issues ItemsProposalConclusion Run in mileage. BEV 300 km OVC HEV and NOVC HEV should be same as ICE vehicle km Agreed Soak condition Forced cooling Not allow forced cooling condition Because electrified vehicle performance does not depends on water and oil temperature. To be discussed at beginning of March Utility FactorACEA will propose a calculation method. To be discussed at beginning of March Closed TBD

Open issues ItemsProposalConclusion Mode constructionJapan propose to conduct 4 phase test Counterproposal for BEV Consider shorten test procedure for EV range test. Counterproposal for OVC HEV To be discussed with data base. To be discussed at beginning of March TBD

Base test matrix Based on the idea to measure the emission and fuel economy (or CO2) by each phase, ● marked cold & hot tests will be necessary for each type of vehicles.

Confirmation test Shorten test procedure for BEV range test. Calculation method for each phase range by complete WLTC. CD to CS break off criteria confirmation RCB correction window confirmation Soak condition with charging Break time between the cycle To be prepared “Confirmation item list and action plan” until March. DRAFT

Road map 2012JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugOctNovDec Meeti ngs E-lab action Confirmation test Ad-hoc GRPE 66th GRPE 65 th GRPE DTP gtr Ver1 Closed open issues Reflect Still open issues Prepare test parameter gtr Ver2 Ad-hoc WLTP gtr Ver3gtr final E-Lab meeting