Peter Shawhan The University of Maryland & The LIGO Scientific Collaboration Penn State CGWP Seminar March 27, 2007 LIGO-G070195-01-Z Reaching for Gravitational.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A walk through some statistic details of LSC results.
Advertisements

LIGO-G Z Status and Plans for the LIGO-TAMA Joint Data Analysis Patrick Sutton LIGO Laboratory, Caltech, for the LIGO-TAMA Joint Working Group.
LIGO- G Z August 19, 2004August 2004 LSC Meeting 1 Towards an Astrophysics-Based Burst ETG Tuning Keith Thorne Penn State University Relativity.
Burst detection efficiency  In order to interpret our observed detection rate (upper limit) we need to know our efficiency for detection by the IFO and.
Update on S5 Search for GRB and Gravitational Wave Burst Coincidence Isabel Leonor University of Oregon.
LIGO-G Z Coherent Coincident Analysis of LIGO Burst Candidates Laura Cadonati Massachusetts Institute of Technology LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
A Grand Tour of Gravitational Wave Signals and Detection Methods Peter Shawhan Caltech / LIGO LIGO Seminar March 30, 2006 LIGO-G Z.
G Z April 2007 APS Meeting - DAP GGR Gravitational Wave AstronomyKeith Thorne Coincidence-based LIGO GW Burst Searches and Astrophysical Interpretation.
S.Klimenko, G Z, December 21, 2006, GWDAW11 Coherent detection and reconstruction of burst events in S5 data S.Klimenko, University of Florida.
LIGO-G Z LIGO Scientific Collaboration 1 Upper Limits on the Rate of Gravitational Wave Bursts from the First LIGO Science Run Edward Daw Louisiana.
LIGO-G Z Peter Shawhan, for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration APS Meeting April 25, 2006 Search for Gravitational Wave Bursts in Data from the.
LIGO-G Z The AURIGA-LIGO Joint Burst Search L. Cadonati, G. Prodi, L. Baggio, S. Heng, W. Johnson, A. Mion, S. Poggi, A. Ortolan, F. Salemi, P.
LIGO-G M GWDAW, December LIGO Burst Search Analysis Laura Cadonati, Erik Katsavounidis LIGO-MIT.
LIGO-G Z A Coherent Network Burst Analysis Patrick Sutton on behalf of Shourov Chatterji, Albert Lazzarini, Antony Searle, Leo Stein, Massimo.
S.Klimenko, December 2003, GWDAW Performance of the WaveBurst algorithm on LIGO S2 playground data S.Klimenko (UF), I.Yakushin (LLO), G.Mitselmakher (UF),
Searching for Gravitational Waves with LIGO Andrés C. Rodríguez Louisiana State University on behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration SACNAS
LIGO-G Z April 2006 APS meeting Igor Yakushin (LLO, Caltech) Search for Gravitational Wave Bursts in LIGO’s S5 run Igor Yakushin (LLO, Caltech)
S.Klimenko, August 2005, LSC, G Z Constraint likelihood analysis with a network of GW detectors S.Klimenko University of Florida, in collaboration.
Veto Selection for Gravitational Wave Event Searches Erik Katsavounidis 1 and Peter Shawhan 2 1 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139,
Amaldi-7 meeting, Sydney, Australia, July 8-14, 2007 LIGO-G Z All-Sky Search for Gravitational Wave Bursts during the fifth LSC Science Run Igor.
LIGO- G Z Analyzing Event Data Lee Samuel Finn Penn State University Reference: T030017, T
Searching for Gravitational Waves from Binary Inspirals with LIGO Duncan Brown University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
1 Status of Search for Compact Binary Coalescences During LIGO’s Fifth Science Run Drew Keppel 1 for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration 1 California Institute.
LIGO-G Data Analysis Techniques for LIGO Laura Cadonati, M.I.T. Trento, March 1-2, 2007.
LIGO- G D Experimental Upper Limit from LIGO on the Gravitational Waves from GRB Stan Whitcomb For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration Informal.
1 Laura Cadonati, MIT For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration APS meeting Tampa, FL April 16, 2005 LIGO Hanford ObservatoryLIGO Livingston Observatory New.
LIGO-G Z The Q Pipeline search for gravitational-wave bursts with LIGO Shourov K. Chatterji for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration APS Meeting.
S.Klimenko, G Z, December 2006, GWDAW11 Coherent detection and reconstruction of burst events in S5 data S.Klimenko, University of Florida for.
Search for Short-Duration GW Bursts Coincident with S2/S3/S4 Gamma-Ray Bursts S5 GRB-GWB Search: First Results Isabel Leonor (for External Triggers group)
S.Klimenko, G Z, December 21, 2006, GWDAW11 Coherent detection and reconstruction of burst events in S5 data S.Klimenko, University of Florida.
S.Klimenko, G Z, March 20, 2006, LSC meeting First results from the likelihood pipeline S.Klimenko (UF), I.Yakushin (LLO), A.Mercer (UF),G.Mitselmakher.
LIGO-G Z Confidence Test for Waveform Consistency of LIGO Burst Candidate Events Laura Cadonati LIGO Laboratory Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
S.Klimenko, March 2003, LSC Burst Analysis in Wavelet Domain for multiple interferometers LIGO-G Z Sergey Klimenko University of Florida l Analysis.
LIGO-G Z GWDAW9 December 17, Search for Gravitational Wave Bursts in LIGO Science Run 2 Data John G. Zweizig LIGO / Caltech for the LIGO.
LIGO-G Z 17 August ETG Sensitivity and Efficiency to Simulations: BlockNormal and SLOPE Amber L. Stuver Penn State University.
A Comparison of Burst Gravitational Wave Detection Algorithms for LIGO Amber L. Stuver Center for Gravitational Wave Physics Penn State University.
LIGO-G All-Sky Burst Search in the First Year of the LSC S5 Run Laura Cadonati, UMass Amherst For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration GWDAW Meeting,
Results From the Low Threshold, Early S5, All-Sky Burst Search Laura Cadonati for the Burst Group LSC MIT November 5, 2006 G Z.
LIGO-G Z Status of the LIGO-TAMA Joint Bursts Search Patrick Sutton LIGO Laboratory, Caltech, for the LIGO-TAMA Joint Working Group.
LIGO-G Z TFClusters Tuning for the LIGO-TAMA Search Patrick Sutton LIGO-Caltech.
S5 First Epoch BNS Inspiral Results Drew Keppel 1 representing the Inspiral Group 1 California Institute of Technology Nov LSC Meeting MIT, 4 November.
LIGO-G ZSearle LSC Mtg Aug A Coherent Network Burst Analysis Antony Searle (ANU) in collaboration with Shourov Chatterji, Albert Lazzarini,
LIGO-G Z 23 October 2002LIGO Laboratory NSF Review1 Searching for Gravitational Wave Bursts: An Overview Sam Finn, Erik Katsavounidis and Peter.
Igor Yakushin, December 2004, GWDAW-9 LIGO-G Z Status of the untriggered burst search in S3 LIGO data Igor Yakushin (LIGO Livingston Observatory)
LIGO-G Z Status of the LIGO-TAMA Joint Bursts Search Patrick Sutton LIGO Laboratory, Caltech, for the LIGO-TAMA Joint Working Group.
LIGO-G Z Peter Shawhan, for the LSC Burst Analysis Group LSC Observational Results Meeting November 4, 2006 The S4 LIGO All-Sky Burst Search.
G08XXXX-00-Z S. Chatterji, Cascina, Italy, 2008 November 261 Gravitational-wave data analysis and supernovae Shourov K. Chatterji INFN Sezione di Roma.
November, 2009 STAC - Data Analysis Report 1 Data Analysis report November, 2009 Gianluca M Guidi Università di Urbino and INFN Firenze for the Virgo Collaboration.
LIGO-G Z Peter Shawhan for the LSC-Virgo Burst Analysis Working Group LSC-Virgo Meeting July 23, 2007 Eyes Wide Open: Searching for Gravitational.
LIGO-G Z The Q Pipeline search for gravitational-wave bursts with LIGO Shourov K. Chatterji for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration APS Meeting.
LIGO-G Z Results from LIGO Observations Stephen Fairhurst University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee on behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
GRB triggered Inspiral Searches in the fifth Science Run of LIGO Alexander Dietz Cardiff University for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration LIGO-G Z.
Search for gravitational waves from binary inspirals in S3 and S4 LIGO data. Thomas Cokelaer on behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
Thomas Cokelaer for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration Cardiff University, U.K. APS April Meeting, Jacksonville, FL 16 April 2007, LIGO-G Z Search.
Data Analysis report November, 2009 Gianluca M Guidi
Detecting a Galactic Supernova with H2 or GEO
Detecting a Galactic Supernova with H2 or GEO
Searching for gravitational-wave transients with Advanced detectors
All-Sky Burst Searches for Gravitational Waves at High Frequencies
The Q Pipeline search for gravitational-wave bursts with LIGO
Coherent wide parameter space searches for gravitational waves from neutron stars using LIGO S2 data Xavier Siemens, for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
Igor Yakushin, LIGO Livingston Observatory
Searching for Gravitational-Wave Bursts (GWBs) associated with Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) during the LIGO S5 run Isabel Leonor University of Oregon (for the.
LIGO Scientific Collaboration meeting
Brennan Hughey for the LSC May 12th, 2008
Coherent detection and reconstruction
Coherent Coincident Analysis of LIGO Burst Candidates
Status and Plans for the LIGO-TAMA Joint Data Analysis
Performance of the WaveBurst algorithm on LIGO S2 playground data
Presentation transcript:

Peter Shawhan The University of Maryland & The LIGO Scientific Collaboration Penn State CGWP Seminar March 27, 2007 LIGO-G Z Reaching for Gravitational Wave Bursts

2 Overview ► LIGO is collecting lots of good data The S5 science run is 3/4 of the way to its goal of 1 year of coincident data GEO has collected a lot of data too; VIRGO beginning soon ► The LSC is carrying out “eyes wide open” searches for gravitational wave bursts Example: the S4 LIGO all-sky burst search ► We are trying to improve connections to astrophysics What could the S4 LIGO all-sky burst search have seen? Current and future ways of making connections ► Discussion time at the end …

3 Data Runs So Far S1S2S3S4S5?

4 The S4 LIGO All-Sky Burst Search ► Searched triple-coincident (H1+H2+L1) LIGO data for short (<1 sec) signals of arbitrary form with frequency content in the range 64–1600 Hz ► Used WaveBurst to generate triggers at times with excess power in data streams, followed by CorrPower cross-correlation tests ► Search done “blind” ► Studied background using time-shifted coincidences Preprint will be posted soon

5 WaveBurst in a Nutshell WaveBurst processed all 3 GW data channels simultaneously Wavelet decompositions with 6 different resolutions from 1/16 sec × 8 Hz to 1/512 sec × 256 Hz Time Frequency … Pixel power thresholding, cross-stream pixel coincidence, clustering Trigger properties: time, duration, frequency, amplitude, significance Z g

6 Time H2 L1 CorrPower in a Nutshell CorrPower run on raw data at times of WaveBurst triggers Calculates normalized cross-correlations (r-statistic) for pairs of detectors Integration window lengths: 20, 50, 100 ms Relative time shifts: up to 11 ms for H1-L1 and H2-L1 Find maximum correlation over window lengths and time shifts Calculate overall significance statistic  by combining the 3 pairs

7 Analysis Cuts and Vetoes All triggers After data quality cuts After H1-H2 consistency cuts After auxiliary- channel vetoes WaveBurst CorrPower

8 The Search Result Frequentist one-sided upper limit (90% C.L.) R 90% = = 0.15 per day 15.5 days 2.303

9 What Could the Search Have Seen? Use a Monte Carlo Simulation — “BurstMDC” Generate a strain waveform at a random time and sky position Calculate signal at each detector with correct time delay and antenna response (code by Amber Stuver and Keith Thorne) Add to real detector data and analyze with the same search pipeline Obtain efficiency of the search pipeline as a function of amplitude Our basic amplitude measure: root-sum-squared strain Ad-hoc waveforms used to evaluate S4 all-sky search Sine-Gaussians Gaussians Band-limited white noise bursts Linearly polarized Two independent polarizations

10 Example Efficiency Curves Generally expect similar sensitivity for different waveforms with similar frequency, bandwidth, and duration 50% efficiency at h rss = 1.3 × 10 –21

11 Connect with Energy Emission Instantaneous energy flux: Assume isotropic emission to get simple rough estimates For a sine-Gaussian with Q >>1 and frequency f 0 : For a 153 Hz, Q =8.9 sine-Gaussian, the S4 search could see energy emission as small as:  8 × 10 –8 M  c 2 at 10 kpc (typical Galactic distance)  0.2 M  c 2 at 16 Mpc (Virgo cluster)

12 Reach for Supernova Waveforms Ott, Burrows, Dessart and Livne, PRL 96, (2006) Estimate h rss sensitivity for these waveforms by relating to sine-Gaussians and white noise bursts used in Monte Carlo 11 or 15 M  progenitor: h rss (50%) ≈ 6×10 –21  reach ≈ 0.2 kpc 25 M  progenitor: h rss (50%) ≈ 8×10 –21  reach ≈ 8 kpc

13 Reach for Merger Waveforms Example: Baker et al, PRD 73, (2006)  3.5% of total mass is radiated Frequency Time Estimate h rss sensitivity for these waveforms by relating to low- Q sine-Gaussians used in Monte Carlo M  binary: h rss (50%) ≈ 5×10 –21  reach ≈ 1.5 Mpc M  binary: h rss (50%) ≈ 1.4×10 –21  reach ≈ 60 Mpc

14 Work in Progress Search the more sensitive S5 data ! The LSC-Virgo Burst Group Get full inspiral+merger+ringdown waveforms into BurstMDC Sean McWilliams (U of Maryland / GSFC) Interpret limits (or detections) in the context of a population of astrophysical sources Sam Finn and Penn State colleagues