Detector for a Linear Collider 8th Topical Seminar on Innovative Particle and Radiation Detectors Siena, 21 – 24 October 2002 Joachim Mnich RWTH Aachen.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TIME 2005: TPC for the ILC 6 th Oct 2005 Matthias Enno Janssen, DESY 1 A Time Projection Chamber for the International Linear Collider R&D Studies Matthias.
Advertisements

Freiburg Seminar, Sept Sascha Caron Finding the Higgs or something else ideas to improve the discovery ideas to improve the discovery potential at.
Guoming CHEN The Capability of CMS Detector Chen Guoming IHEP, CAS , Beijing.
P5 Meeting - Jan , US LHC University M&O Personnel University with major hardware responsibility at CERN Based on > 10 years of US Zeus experience.
The ATLAS B physics trigger
Testbeam Requirements for LC Calorimetry S. R. Magill for the Calorimetry Working Group Physics/Detector Goals for LC Calorimetry E-flow implications for.
LHC SPS PS. 46 m 22 m A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS - ATLAS As large as the CERN main bulding.
The new Silicon detector at RunIIb Tevatron II: the world’s highest energy collider What’s new?  Data will be collected from 5 to 15 fb -1 at  s=1.96.
Neil Collins Birmingham Masterclass Tuesday 24 April 2007 ATLAS and the LHC.
Part II ILC Detector Concepts & The Concept of Particle Flow.
Dean Karlen University of Victoria & TRIUMF APS NW Section Meeting 2005 Victoria, Canada.
Paris 22/4 UED Albert De Roeck (CERN) 1 Identifying Universal Extra Dimensions at CLIC  Minimal UED model  CLIC experimentation  UED signals & Measurements.
J.E. Garcia RTN – December 03 PHD Work SCT beam test analysis: Tracking efficiency, noise occupancy, collected charge, S/N but also several studies: tracking.
Fabiola Gianotti, Physics at LHC, Pisa, April 2002 PART 2.
05/11/2006Prof. dr hab. Elżbieta Richter-Wąs Physics Program of the experiments at L arge H adron C ollider Lecture 5.
Application of Neural Networks for Energy Reconstruction J. Damgov and L. Litov University of Sofia.
The CMS Muon Detector Thomas Hebbeker Aachen July 2001 Searching for New Physics with High Energy Muons.
PhD students meeting 01/27/2010 Philippe Doublet 1 Designing a detector for a future e - e + linear collider Precision measurements based on Particle Flow.
Precision Tracking COLLID04 Novosibirsk May 2004 Joachim Mnich.
Experimental Challenges and Techniques for Future Accelerators Joachim Mnich DESY XI ICFA School on Instrumentation in Elementary Particle Physics San.
Ties Behnke: Lepton Photon 2003, Detector R&D1 Detector R&D or R&D for Future Detectors Ties Behnke, DESY The next big detector projects Challenges for.
Development of Particle Flow Calorimetry José Repond Argonne National Laboratory DPF meeting, Providence, RI August 8 – 13, 2011.
W properties AT CDF J. E. Garcia INFN Pisa. Outline Corfu Summer Institute Corfu Summer Institute September 10 th 2 1.CDF detector 2.W cross section measurements.
Contents 1. Introduction 2. Analysis 3. Results 4. Conclusion Constraint on new physics by measuring the HVV Couplings at e+e- LC In collaboration with.
Physics Opportunities and Experimental Techniques for the Next Large Scale Facility in Accelerator Particle Physics The International Linear Collider Marco.
Precise Measurements of SM Higgs at the ILC Simulation and Analysis V.Saveliev, Obninsk State University, Russia /DESY, Hamburg ECFA Study Workshop, Valencia.
Higgs Properties Measurement based on HZZ*4l with ATLAS
Silicon Sensors for Collider Physics from Physics Requirements to Vertex Tracking Detectors Marco Battaglia Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, University.
10 October 2002Stefania Xella - RAL The next linear collider Stefania Xella Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
STAR Spin Related Future Upgrades STAR Spin Physics Program Current Capabilities Heavy Flavor Physics W Program Transverse Program Upgrades: Plans & Technologies.
C. K. MackayEPS 2003 Electroweak Physics and the Top Quark Mass at the LHC Kate Mackay University of Bristol On behalf of the Atlas & CMS Collaborations.
Development of a TPC for the Future Linear Collider on behalf of the LC TPC groups Aachen, Berkeley, Carleton, Cracow, DESY, Hamburg, Karlsruhe, MIT, Montreal,
P ARTICLE D ETECTORS Mojtaba Mohammadi IPM-CMPP- February
SiD R&D tasks for the LOI - Subsystem R&D tasks - Summary of SiD R&D - Prioritization of R&D tasks -> Document for DoE/NSF ~Feb 2009 (Mainly based on Marty’s.
CLICdp achievements in 2014 and goals for 2015 Lucie Linssen, CERN on behalf of the CLICdp collaboration CLIC workshop, January 30 th
Contents 1. Introduction 2. Analysis 3. Results 4. Conclusion Presice measurement of the Higgs-boson electroweak couplings at Linear Collider and its physics.
Detector for a Linear Collider 8th Topical Seminar on Innovative Particle and Radiation Detectors Siena, 21 – 24 October 2002 Joachim Mnich RWTH Aachen.
1 Methods of Experimental Particle Physics Alexei Safonov Lecture #15.
Electroweak physics at the LHC with ATLAS APS April 2003 Meeting – Philadelphia, PA Arthur M. Moraes University of Sheffield, UK (on behalf of the ATLAS.
Bangalore, India1 Performance of GLD Detector Bangalore March 9 th -13 th, 2006 T.Yoshioka (ICEPP) on behalf of the.
Research for the International Linear Collider Professor Andy White October 2005.
Tracking in a TPC D. Karlen / U. Victoria & TRIUMF for the LCTPC collaboration.
CP violation in B decays: prospects for LHCb Werner Ruckstuhl, NIKHEF, 3 July 1998.
Abstract Several models of elementary particle physics beyond the Standard Model, predict the existence of neutral particles that can decay in jets of.
From the Standard Model to Discoveries - Physics with the CMS Experiment at the Dawn of the LHC Era Dimitri Bourilkov University of Florida CMS Collaboration.
Susan Burke DØ/University of Arizona DPF 2006 Measurement of the top pair production cross section at DØ using dilepton and lepton + track events Susan.
Randall- Sundrum Gravitons and Black Holes at the LHC Kevin Black Harvard University For the ATLAS and CMS Collaborations.
12 March 2006, LCWS06, BangaloreS. Bhattacharya 1 Satyaki Bhattacharya The Standard Model Higgs Search at the LHC University of Delhi.
1 Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Fergus Wilson, RAL 1.Introduction & Accelerators 2.Particle Interactions and Detectors (2) 3.Collider Experiments.
Régis Lefèvre (LPC Clermont-Ferrand - France)ATLAS Physics Workshop - Lund - September 2001 In situ jet energy calibration General considerations The different.
5 May 2006Paul Dauncey1 The ILC, CALICE and the ECAL Paul Dauncey Imperial College London.
La Thuile, March, 15 th, 2003 f Makoto Tomoto ( FNAL ) Prospects for Higgs Searches at DØ Makoto Tomoto Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (For the.
Higgs Summary Alexei Raspereza On behalf of Higgs Working Group ECFA Workshop, Warsaw 12/06/2006 Outline  Current Status  Contributions in Warsaw  Theory.
Ties Behnke: Lepton Photon 2003, Detector R&D1 Detector R&D or R&D for Future Detectors Ties Behnke, DESY The next big detector projects Challenges for.
Backup slides Z 0 Z 0 production Once  s > 2M Z ~ GeV ÞPair production of Z 0 Z 0 via t-channel electron exchange. e+e+ e-e- e Z0Z0 Z0Z0 Other.
Study of the MPPC for the GLD Calorimeter Readout Satoru Uozumi (Shinshu University) for the GLD Calorimeter Group Kobe Introduction Performance.
Gaseous Tracker R&D ILC Detector Test Beam Workshop Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory January 17-19, Madhu Dixit Carleton University & TRIUMF.
Suyong Choi (SKKU) SUSY Standard Model Higgs Searches at DØ Suyong Choi SKKU, Korea for DØ Collaboration.
Electroweak physics at CEPC
IOP HEPP Conference Upgrading the CMS Tracker for SLHC Mark Pesaresi Imperial College, London.
SiD Calorimeter R&D Collaboration
Silicon Pixel Detector for the PHENIX experiment at the BNL RHIC
Particle detection and reconstruction at the LHC (IV)
Detectors for Linear Colliders - ILC and CLIC -
Report about “Forward Instrumentation” Issues
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Putting it all together Lecture 4 6th May 2009 Fergus Wilson, RAL.
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Putting it all together Lecture 4 28th April 2008 Fergus Wilson. RAL.
SUSY SEARCHES WITH ATLAS
M. Ohlerich, A. Raspiareza, W. Lohmann DESY and MPI Munich
Susan Burke, University of Arizona
Presentation transcript:

Detector for a Linear Collider 8th Topical Seminar on Innovative Particle and Radiation Detectors Siena, 21 – 24 October 2002 Joachim Mnich RWTH Aachen

e + e – - Linear Collider Projects Physics at a 1 TeV e + e – - Linear Collider Implications for Detector Design Vertex Detector Tracking Detector Calorimeter Detector for a Linear Collider Outline:

Concepts for an e + e – - Linear Collider (  s = 500 GeV – 1 TeV) Cavities: superconductive normal Frequency: 1.3 GHz X- (11.4 GHz) or C-Band (5.7 GHz ) Route to higher energies (  s = 5 TeV): CLIC: Acceleration by Drive-Beam

A) cms-energy: TESLA-Project (DESY): Technical Design Report March MV/m   s = 800 GeV already achieved with improved manufacturing (electropolishing) Superconductive cavities Acceleration gradient 23 MV/m   s = 500 GeV

 800 GeV Very recent result from 4 nine cell modules:

B) Luminosity Strong focussing at the interaction point Simulation Generation of small bunches: Final-Focus-Test (SLAC/DESY) Collision of bunches: Fast feedback system (Bunch separation: 337 ns) use beam deflection/widening after collision kicker magnets, Piezo-crystals

TESLA Electron-Positron-Collider Project:

Electron-Positron-Annihilation: Cross sections of SM- and MSSM-processes up to 1 TeV e + e –  ff   pb e + e –  HZ   10 fb (m H <<  s)  LC   LEP II /10 Luminosity: LEP II L = /cm 2 /s LC L  /cm 2 /s  Higgs-factory: 100/fb/year = 1000 HZ/year  Giga-Z (  s = m Z ) 10 9 Z-bosons in 1/2 year

Comparison of physics at LC and LHC LHC discovery machine for Higgs & SUSY LC precison measurements cf. discovery of W-and Z bosons at hadron collider then precision tests at LEP & SLC Physics at a 1 TeV e + e – - Linear Collider Keep in mind: Linear Collider comes probably after major discoveries at LHC Higgs physics Supersymmetry (SUSY) Alternative Theories Top-quark physics Standard Model (Giga-Z)...

Detection of Higgs Bosons independent of decay e + e –  H Z  H e + e – (  +  – )  Higgs branching ratios: Couplings to fermions: g f = m f /v Couplings to gauge bosons: g HWW = 2 m W 2 /v g HZZ = 2 m Z 2 /v  Determination of Higgs couplings: Higgs physics: Higgs-Strahlung

Spin: Energy scan at threshold (e.g. 3 points, 20 fb -1, 1/2 year) Determination of the quantum number of the Higgs: SM: J PC =0 ++ Parity: Angular distribution (continuum) Discriminate SM Higgs and 0 –+ -boson A

Verification of Higgs potential: H H H H H H H g HHH g HHHH Measurement of double Higgs strahlung e + e –  HHZ:  g HHH / g HHH = 0.22 Measurement of g HHHH not possible

Comparison of Higgs physics e + e – linear collider and LHC: m H = 120  160 GeV Linear collider will be in Higgs physics what LEP was in W- and Z-physics

Supersymmetry: If m SUSY < 2 TeV  discovery at the LHC Possible particle spectra: Advantage of Electron-Positron-Collider: Mass measurements by energy scans at kinematic threshold Polarisation of electrons (and possibly positrons) Separation of SUSY partners, e.g.: Skalar partners of fermions Fermionic partners of bosons  2 Higgs doublets SUSY will be new Standard Model

Detector R&D for an e + e – - Linear Collider: Higher particle energies from GeV to TeV More complex final states e + e –  ZHH  6 jets/leptonen e + e –  H + H –  tb tb  8 jets Resolution e + e –  ZH  e + e – (  +  – ) + X SUSY (missing energy) Accelerator background, luminosity, bunch separation...we want to build the best apparatus... Why new & improved e + e – detector?

More differences to LEP Small cross section of signal  two-photon background Large Lorentz boost  high particle density in jets, e.g. 1/mm 2 in vertex detector Trigger: (example TESLA) bunch trains 1 ms, 5 Hz repetition rate bunch separation 337 ns but 199 ms between two trains 200 ms 1 ms  no hardware trigger No dead time Store data of whole train in front end Software selection within 200 ms

Detector R&D for an e + e – - Linear Collider: World wide R&D effort started Use most modern technology for best suited LC detector I. Vertex detectorIII. CalorimeterII. Tracker Here 3 examples:

I. Vertex detector Precise reconstruction of primary and secondary event vertices Identification of b- and c-quarks,  - leptons in Higgs decays  Multi-layer pixel detector TESLASLD Inner radius15 mm 28 mm Single point resolution < 5  m 8  m Material per layer (X 0 )0.06% X 0 0.4% X 0 Total material budget< 1% X 0 Impact Parameter 300  m for  > 3 (independent of  s) Goal: reconstruction of primary vertex  (IP) < 5  m  10  m / (p sin 3/2  ) SLD: 8  m  33  m / (p sin 3/2  )

1. Material budget: Thin detectors  60  m (= 0.06% X 0 ) Minimise support stretched silicon 3  m sagitta for 1.5 N tension Three main issues: Baseline design with 5 layers: Stand alone tracking Internal calibration

3. Readout speed: Integration of background during long bunch train small pixel size (20  m  20  m) to keep occupancy low read 10 times per train 50 MHz clock CCD design 2. Radiation hardness: High background from beam-strahlung and beam halo Much less critical than LHC But much more important than at LEP TESLA (r i = 1.5 cm) CMS (r i = 4.3 cm) Dose ( ,e –,h  ) 10 kGy1000 kGy Neutron flux10 10 /cm /cm 2

Vertex detector: Three technologies under consideration 1. Charge Coupled Device Create signal in 20  m active layer etching of bulk to keep total thickness  60  m 800 million pixels (SLD 300 million pixel) Coordinate precision 2-5  m Low power consumption (10 W) But very slow!  use column parallel readout CCD classic CP CCD

2. DEPFET (DEPleted Field Effect Transistor) Fully depleted sensor with integrated pre-amplifier Low power: 1 W/sensor Low noise: 10 e – at room temperature! Thinning to 50  m possible Result from a 64 × 64 pixel matrix: 50  m × 50  m pixel 9  m reolution To be shown: Column wise readout with 50 MHz 1987 (Kemmer,Lutz)

3. MAPS (CMOS Monolithic Active Pixel Detectors) Standard CMOS wafer, integrates all functions 1999 Same unique wafer for sensor and electronics i.e. no connections like bump bonds Very small pixel size achievable Radiation hardness proven Power consumption pulse power?

II. Tracker Study of Higgs production independent of Higgs decay  lepton momenta ideally: recoil mass resolution limited by Z width SUSY mass measurements - Pair production of scalar leptons (decay to lepton + neutralino) - Mass determination from end points of Momentum spectra Precise measurement of charged particle momenta:  Momentum resolution  (1/p t ) < 5 × (GeV/c ) -1 (full tracker)

Large Si-Tracker à la LHC experiments? much lower particle rates at linear collider keep material budget low  Large TPC 1.7 m radius 3% X 0 barrel (30% X 0 endcap) high magnetic field (4 Tesla) Goals: 200 points (3-dim.) per track 100  m single point resolution dE/dx 5% resolution 10 times better performance than at LEP

New concept for gas amplification at the end flanges: Replace proportional wires with Micro Pattern Gas Detectors - Finer dimensions - Two- dimensional symmetry (no E×B effects) - Only fast electron signal - Intrinsic ion feedback suppression GEM or Micromegas Wires GEM

Gas Electron Multiplier (GEM) (F. Sauli 1996) 140  m Ø 75  m 50  m capton foil, double sided copper coated 75  m holes, 140  m pitch GEM voltages up to 500 V yield 10 4 gas amplification Use GEM towers for safe operation, e.g. COMPASS

Micromegas (Y. Giomataris 1996) asymmetric parallel plate chamber with micromesh saturation of Townsend coefficient mild dependence of amplification on gap variations ion feedback suppression 50  m pitch

Disadvantage of electron signal: No signal broadening by induction Signal collected on one pad No centre-of-gravity Possible Solutions: Smaller pads Replace pads by bump bonds of pixel readout chips Capacitive or resistive coupling of adjacent pads Alternative pad geometries Strip couplingchevrons

III. Calorimeter Hermiticity to exploit missing energy signature of SUSY  No cracks Calorimeter inside magnet coils Fast readout & good time resolution to avoid event pile up Excellent energy and angular resolution - Mass reconstruction e.g. e + e –  t t - Distinguish hadronic W- and Z-decays e + e –  t t at threshold Goal for jet energy resolution

Jet energy resolution: W/Z identification by mass reconstruction in 4 jets: Include Fig from TDR

To get best jet energy resolution: measure every particle in the jet Energy distribution in typical multijet event: 60% charged particles  Tracker 30% photons  Ecal 10% neutral hadrons  Ecal + Hcal + good lepton ID Fine granularity (in 3 dim.) of electromagnetic and hadron calorimeters Combine tracks and clusters From energy flow to particle reconstruction!

Highly granular calorimeter: Electromagnetic: identify particles down to low energies longitudinal segmentation  X 0 X 0 / small transversal segmentation  r M no cracks, magnet coil outside Hadron calorimeter: cell size close to X 0 good cluster separation good energy resolution Si/W natural choice r M = 9 mm ECAL, HCAL with different absorbers and sampling  non compensating

But very expensive! particle Silicon-tungsten electromagnetic calorimeter: 1 cm 2 silicon pads 40 layers energy resolution  E/E < 0.1/  E/GeV  0.01

0.1 ATLAS CDF GLAST CMS NOMAD AMS01 CDF LEP DO Silicon Area (m²)  2000 m² Required silicon: 1 – 3  10 3 m 2 Price today: 5 $/cm 2

Alternative design for electromagnetic calorimeter: Tile fibre calorimeter (lead scintillator) Challenge: Fibre readout in 4 T field Optimize light yield of fibres Hadron calorimeter Use same design & components Coarser segmentation Compensation (lead/scint. 4/1) Use stainless steel ( ) Coarser granularity e.g. 5  5 cm 2

Digital hadron calorimeter Alternative design for hadron calorimeter: Highly segmented 1 cm 2 pads Binary readout per RPC or small wire chambers Simple frontend electronics

Precision measurements at Linear Collider  high demands on detector performance LEP/SLC like detector not sufficient Summary Flavour tagging H  cc Momentum resolution - e + e –  H Z  H e + e – (  +  – ) from lepton recoil mass - endpoint mass spectra in SUSY cascade Jet energy resolution - Higgs self-coupling HZZ - Multi-jet final states like ttH...

World wide R&D projects started: TPC Europe, US, Canada (TPC Working group alephwww.mppmu.mpg.de/~settles/tpc/welcome3.html) Calorimeter Europe, Asia, US ( CALICE coll. polyww.in2p3.fr/tesla/calice_offic.html) Much more R&D effort needed! International Linear Collider Detector R&D committee

Production of Higgs bosons Higgs-strahlung and WW-fusion:  (ZZ  H) = 1/10  (WW  H ) Higgs-strahlung: detection of Higgs bosons independent of decay e + e –  HZ  H e + e – (  +  – )

Measurement of Higgs-strahlung and WW-fusion cross sections Determination of Higgs couplings to W- and Z-bosons g HWW and g HZZ e + e – - physics: precise absolute measurements and theoretical predictions of cross sections 350 GeV 500 GeV

Higgs mass measurement: Kinematic fit Energy scale determined by E beam 500 fb -1 e + e –  HZ  bb qqe + e –  HZ  bb l + l – (Compare measurements of m W at LEP and Tevatron)  m H  40 MeV (independent of m H )

Measurement of the total width Γ H : Heavy Higgs (m H > 2 m Z ): broad Higgs because of H  WW,ZZ direct measurement of Γ H possible  Γ H / Γ H  10% Light Higgs m H < 160 GeV Higgs is very narrow Γ H < 10 MeV Measurement at LC through a) Γ H  WW from WW fusion b) BR(H  WW) = Γ H  WW / Γ H  Γ H / Γ H  5% Γ H (m H ) in the Standard Model: 2m W

Determination of Higgs couplings: g HZZ  0,012 g HWW  0,012 g top  0,030 g bottom  0,022 g charm  0,037 g tau  0,033 Relative precision of Higgs couplings: ( m H = 120 GeV, 500 fb -1 )

Examples of other precision measurements Test of electroweak radiative corrections  r W Top mass W couplings (TGC) 3 parameter (SM values):   Measurement at threshold m t = 175  0,1 GeV 100 fb -1   m t  200 MeV

Giga-Z: Production of 10 9 Z bosons 100-fold LEP I statistics Polarisation (like SLC) 30 fb -1 = 1/2 year Comparison SM fits 2001 and Giga-Z: Compare with directly measured Higgs mass