Comparison between aircraft and A-Train observations of midlevel, mixed-phase clouds from CLEX-10/C3VP Curtis Seaman, Yoo-Jeong Noh, Thomas Vonder Haar.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Anthony Illingworth, + Robin Hogan, Ewan OConnor, U of Reading, UK and the CloudNET team (F, D, NL, S, Su). Reading: 19 Feb 08 – Meeting with Met office.
Advertisements

Robin Hogan Department of Meteorology University of Reading Cloud and Climate Studies using the Chilbolton Observatory.
Robin Hogan, Richard Allan, Nicky Chalmers, Thorwald Stein, Julien Delanoë University of Reading How accurate are the radiative properties of ice clouds.
Robin Hogan Julien Delanoe University of Reading Remote sensing of ice clouds from space.
Modelling radar and lidar multiple scattering Modelling radar and lidar multiple scattering Robin Hogan The CloudSat radar and the Calipso lidar were launched.
Integrated Profiling at the AMF
Boundary Layer Clouds & Sea Spray Steve Siems, Yi (Vivian) Huang, Luke Hande, Mike Manton & Thom Chubb.
The A-Train: How Formation Flying Is Transforming Remote Sensing Stanley Q. Kidder J. Adam Kankiewicz and Thomas H. Vonder Haar Cooperative Institute for.
Improved Automated Cloud Classification and Cloud Property Continuity Studies for the Visible/Infrared Imager/Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) Michael J. Pavolonis.
Satellite based estimates of surface visibility for state haze rule implementation planning Air Quality Applied Sciences Team 6th Semi-Annual Meeting (Jan.
Earth System Science Teachers of the Deaf Workshop, August 2004 S.O.A.R. High Earth Observing Satellites.
Steven Siems 1 and Greg McFarquhar 2 1 Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia 2 University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, USA Steven Siems 1 and Greg McFarquhar.
1 A First Look at Mid-Level Clouds Using CloudSat, CALIPSO, and MODIS Data Stanley Q. Kidder, J. Adam Kankiewicz, Thomas H. Vonder Haar Cooperative Institute.
1. The problem of mixed-phase clouds All models except DWD underestimate mid-level cloud –Some have separate “radiatively inactive” snow (ECMWF, DWD) –Met.
16/06/20151 Validating the AVHRR Cloud Top Temperature and Height product using weather radar data COST 722 Expert Meeting Sauli Joro.
Atmospheric structure from lidar and radar Jens Bösenberg 1.Motivation 2.Layer structure 3.Water vapour profiling 4.Turbulence structure 5.Cloud profiling.
CoRP Symposium, 10-11August 2010, Fort Collins, CO 1 A daytime multispectral technique for detecting supercooled liquid water- topped mixed-phase clouds.
Lee Smith Anthony Illingworth
Initial 3D isotropic fractal field An initial fractal cloud-like field can be generated by essentially performing an inverse 3D Fourier Transform on the.
Profiling Clouds with Satellite Imager Data and Potential Applications William L. Smith Jr. 1, Douglas A. Spangenberg 2, Cecilia Fleeger 2, Patrick Minnis.
Satellite basics Estelle de Coning South African Weather Service
1 Satellite Remote Sensing of Particulate Matter Air Quality ARSET Applied Remote Sensing Education and Training A project of NASA Applied Sciences Pawan.
The Aerosol Cloud Ecosystem Mission was recommended by the 2007 NRC decadal survey. ACE is presently in pre-formulation and will be realized in some form.
Remote Sensing Allie Marquardt Collow Met Analysis – December 3, 2012.
Metr 415/715 Monday May Today’s Agenda 1.Basics of LIDAR - Ground based LIDAR (pointing up) - Air borne LIDAR (pointing down) - Space borne LIDAR.
Evaluation of the VIIRS Cloud Base Height (CBH) EDR Using CloudSat
Characterization of Arctic Mixed-Phase Cloudy Boundary Layers with the Adiabatic Assumption Paquita Zuidema*, Janet Intrieri, Sergey Matrosov, Matthew.
DoD Center for Geosciences/Atmospheric Research at Colorado State University Annual Review April 17-19, Development of Satellite Products for the.
Case Study Example 29 August 2008 From the Cloud Radar Perspective 1)Low-level mixed- phase stratocumulus (ice falling from liquid cloud layer) 2)Brief.
GV Sites in Canada David Hudak Paul Joe Environment Environnement Canada 2nd International GPM Ground Validation Workshop, September, Taipei, Taiwan.
GIFTS - The Precursor Geostationary Satellite Component of a Future Earth Observing System GIFTS - The Precursor Geostationary Satellite Component of a.
Julie Haggerty National Center for Atmospheric Research Friends and Partners of Aviation Weather October July 2014.
CloudSat/VIIRS CBH Validation Activities at CIRA Curtis Seaman, Yoo-Jeong Noh, Steve Miller, Dan Lindsey 10 September 2012.
Estimation of Cloud and Precipitation From Warm Clouds in Support of the ABI: A Pre-launch Study with A-Train Zhanqing Li, R. Chen, R. Kuligowski, R. Ferraro,
COSMIC GPS Radio Occultation Temperature Profiles in Clouds L. LIN AND X. ZOU The Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida R. ANTHES University Corporation.
STAR JPSS 2015 Annual Science Team Meeting
Water Vapour & Cloud from Satellite and the Earth's Radiation Balance
Group proposal Aerosol, Cloud, and Climate ( EAS 8802) April 24 th, 2006 Does Asian dust play a role as CCN? Gill-Ran Jeong, Lance Giles, Matthew Widlansky.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Using CALIPSO to Explore the Sensitivity to Cirrus Height in the Infrared.
CBH statistics for the Provisional Review Curtis Seaman, Yoo-Jeong Noh, Steve Miller and Dan Lindsey CIRA/Colorado State University 12/27/2013.
Yuying Zhang, Jim Boyle, and Steve Klein Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Jay Mace University.
Cloud Mask: Results, Frequency, Bit Mapping, and Validation UW Cloud Mask Working Group.
Radiative Impacts of Cirrus on the Properties of Marine Stratocumulus M. Christensen 1,2, G. Carrió 1, G. Stephens 2, W. Cotton 1 Department of Atmospheric.
Distribution of Liquid Water in Orographic Mixed-Phase Clouds Diana Thatcher Mentor: Linnea Avallone LASP REU 2011.
DoD Center for Geosciences/Atmospheric Research at Colorado State University Annual Review March 8-9, Mixed-phase clouds and icing research. Part.
Use of Solar Reflectance Hyperspectral Data for Cloud Base Retrieval Andrew Heidinger, NOAA/NESDIS/ORA Washington D.C, USA Outline " Physical basis for.
Towards a Characterization of Arctic Mixed-Phase Clouds Matthew D. Shupe a, Pavlos Kollias b, Ed Luke b a Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental.
Retrieval of Cloud Phase and Ice Crystal Habit From Satellite Data Sally McFarlane, Roger Marchand*, and Thomas Ackerman Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.
ASAP In-Flight Icing Research at NCAR J. Haggerty, F. McDonough, J. Black, S. Landolt, C. Wolff, and S. Mueller In collaboration with: P. Minnis and W.
Instrument location ceilo pyro radar 10m Ground-based remote sensing instruments of clouds and precip at Princess Elisabeth.
Earth Observing Satellites Update John Murray, NASA Langley Research Center NASA Aviation Weather Satellites Last Year NASA’s AURA satellite, the chemistry.
Jetstream 31 (J31) in INTEX-B/MILAGRO. Campaign Context: In March 2006, INTEX-B/MILAGRO studied pollution from Mexico City and regional biomass burning,
Horizontal Variability In Microphysical Properties of Mixed-Phase Arctic Clouds David Brown, Michael Poellot – University of North Dakota Clouds are strong.
Cloud property retrieval from hyperspectral IR measurements Jun Li, Peng Zhang, Chian-Yi Liu, Xuebao Wu and CIMSS colleagues Cooperative Institute for.
Nowcasting Aircraft Icing Conditions Using GOES- Derived Cloud Products Cory A. Wolff Ben C. Bernstein Frank McDonough World Weather Research Program Symposium.
The Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research A partnership between CSIRO and the Bureau of Meteorology Southern Ocean Clouds Characterization.
DoD Center for Geosciences/Atmospheric Research at Colorado State University January 29, Assimilation of Geostationary Infrared Satellite Data to.
MODIS, AIRS, and Midlevel Cloud Phase Shaima Nasiri CIMSS/SSEC, UW-Madison Brian Kahn Jet Propulsion Laboratory MURI Hyperspectral Workshop 7-9 June, 2005.
Shaima Nasiri University of Wisconsin-Madison Bryan Baum NASA - Langley Research Center Detection of Overlapping Clouds with MODIS: TX-2002 MODIS Atmospheres.
UNIVERSITY OF BASILICATA CNR-IMAA (Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche Istituto di Metodologie per l’Analisi Ambientale) Tito Scalo (PZ) Analysis and interpretation.
NASA, CGMS-44, 7 June 2016 Coordination Group for Meteorological Satellites - CGMS SURFACE PRESSURE MEASUREMENTS FROM THE ORBITING CARBON OBSERVATORY-2.
SIGMA: Diagnosis and Nowcasting of In-flight Icing – Improving Aircrew Awareness Through FLYSAFE Christine Le Bot Agathe Drouin Christian Pagé.
Roger A. Stocker 1 Jason E. Nachamkin 2 An overview of operational FNMOC mesoscale cloud forecast support 1 FNMOC: Fleet Numerical Meteorology & Oceanography.
Satellite Meteorology Laboratory (METSAT) 위성관측에서 본 한반도 강수 메카니즘의 특성 서울대학교 지구환경과학부 손병주, 유근혁, 송환진.
A-Train Symposium, April 19-21, 2017 Pasadena, California
W. Smith, D. Spangenberg, S. Sun-Mack, P.Minnis
Horizontally Oriented Ice and Precipitation in Maritime Clouds Using CloudSat, CALIOP, and MODIS Observations Alexa Ross Steve Ackerman Robert Holz University.
Cloud Property Retrievals over the Arctic from the NASA A-Train Satellites Aqua, CloudSat and CALIPSO Douglas Spangenberg1, Patrick Minnis2, Michele L.
Understanding warm rain formation using CloudSat and the A-Train
Mike Pavolonis (NOAA/NESDIS/STAR)
Presentation transcript:

Comparison between aircraft and A-Train observations of midlevel, mixed-phase clouds from CLEX-10/C3VP Curtis Seaman, Yoo-Jeong Noh, Thomas Vonder Haar ( DoD Center for Geosciences/Atmospheric Research, CIRA/Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO) David Hudak, Peter Rodriguez (Cloud Physics and Severe Weather Section, Environment Canada, Toronto, ON) Background and Motivation Mixed-phase and supercooled liquid clouds are a serious aviation hazard. Rapid ice accretion on wings and frames from supercooled liquid droplets can directly cause aircraft crashes. These clouds also impact pilot visibility and the visibility of surface targets. They are a particular hazard for small, lightweight, unmanned aircraft, which must be grounded when these cloud occur. In addition, the fields of remote sensing and numerical weather prediction (NWP) commonly utilize gross assumptions about mixed-phase cloud properties, limiting our ability to accurately forecast and detect icing conditions. In this study, extensive in situ observations of mixed-phase clouds have been collected from a research aircraft with coincident remote sensing data from the A-Train satellite constellation (Aqua, CloudSat, CALIPSO, PARASOL, Aura) during the joint Canadian CloudSat/CALIPSO Validation Project (C3VP) and 10 th Cloud Layer EXperiment (CLEX-10) field experiments. Coincident aircraft observations have been analyzed and compared with satellite observations and retrievals from CloudSat, CALIPSO and MODIS (Aqua) for mid-level, mixed-phase clouds. The goals are to assess the use of A-Train data products in mixed-phase clouds and to improve forecasting and detection of icing conditions UTC on 05 Nov 2006 Aqua MODIS: Cloud top temperature CloudSat CPR cloud classification Convair-580 Supercooled liquid layer from CALIPSO CloudSat (left) Experimental set-up. The Convair- 580 research aircraft was flown along the CloudSat ground track while the A-Train satellites passed overhead, providing coincident observations of mixed-phase cloud conditions from in situ and remote sensing instrument platforms. MODIS Cloud Phase 05 November February 2007 Supercooled Liquid Water Profiles Analysis of 55 vertical cloud profiles from CLEX-9 and CLEX-10 aircraft data shows that supercooled liquid water is poorly correlated with temperature (above) and absolute height (above right). Relative to cloud top (right), however, we see LWC typically peaks at or near cloud top. 41 of the 55 supercooled liquid layers are less than 1 km thick. 29 of the 55 profiles exhibit a LWC profile that is (or is nearly) adiabatic. Conclusions Aircraft observations during C3VP/CLEX-10 reveal significant amounts of supercooled liquid water at temperatures down to -32 o C. This contradicts the CloudSat cloud water content retrieval, which assumes all cloud water below -20 o C is ice. This is clearly seen in the 25 February 2007 case shown above. The MODIS Cloud Phase algorithm also classified this case as “ice”. CloudSat uses a simple temperature parameterization to distinguish liquid from ice that is common to many NWP and climate models. This parameterization does not work for most mid-level, mixed-phase clouds. Water content amounts retrieved by CloudSat agree with the aircraft within the range of values of the microphysical probes, except in terms of cloud phase. For the 5 November 2006 case, CloudSat likely sees precipitating ice virga (based on ground based lidar data not shown), yet assumes it is liquid. A majority of the supercooled liquid layers observed by aircraft have an adiabatic LWC profile, with maximum LWC at or near cloud top. This is contrary to the CloudSat retrievals. No significant relationship with temperature has been found. It may be possible to correct the 2B-CWC- RO/RVOD retrievals using CALIPSO backscatter + adiabatic assumption to retrieve more accurate LWC/IWC profiles. The C3VP/CLEX-10 data set is providing valuable information for understanding and improving forecasts and retrievals of mixed-phase clouds and icing. This data is now being used to provide improvements to satellite retrieval algorithms as well as numerical model parameterizations for these clouds. and This research was supported by the Department of Defense Center for Geosciences/Atmopheric Research at Colorado State University under Cooperative Agreement W911NF with the Army Research Laboratory. Comparisons between Satellite and Aircraft Data For the two cases here we have Aqua MODIS 12  m T b with aircraft and CloudSat track overlayed (above left), True Color images with target region circled (above right), and IR Cloud Phase algorithm results (Collection- 5 MYD06) with CloudSat track and target region circled. The 5 Nov 2006 case had patchy cirrus overhead and was classified as “uncertain”, while the 25 Feb 2007 case had no cirrus overhead and was classified as “ice”. CloudSatAircraft KaCALIPSO 05 November February 2007 CloudSatAircraft KaCALIPSO LWC & cloud mask IWC & cloud mask LWC & cloud mask IWC & cloud mask On 5 Nov 2006, the A-Train and the Convair-580 aircraft sampled a broad Ac cloud. CALIPSO saw a distinct liquid layer at cloud top (top right). CloudSat saw the aircraft and a deep layer of precipitating ice virga (top left). The airborne Ka- band radar did not see as much virga (top middle), due to differences in sensitivity and sample volume. The 2B-CWC-RO algorithm (left) mis-identified the ice virga as mostly liquid due to its use of a simple temperature-based algorithm to separate liquid from ice. The aircraft saw a much thinner layer of supercooled liquid than is shown by CloudSat (below). altitude LWC icing temperature Aircraft LWC CloudSat LWC On 25 Feb 2007, the A-Train and the Convair-580 aircraft sampled a broad altostratus cloud. This cloud was classified as “ice” by MODIS as well as CloudSat. 2B-CWC-RO had LWC only at cloud base where temperatures were above -20 o C (left). Significant amounts of supercooled LWC were observed by the aircraft at cloud top (below left and right) at temperatures down to -32 o C. CALIPSO saw some parcels of LWC also (above right). The 2B-CWC-RO assumption that no liquid water can exist at temperatures below -20 o C is incorrect. Aircraft IWC CloudSat IWC Aircraft LWC CloudSat LWC Aircraft IWC CloudSat IWC altitude LWC icing temperature