E.Benedetto, 1/07/13, LIS Meeting, PSB chicane magnets: Inconel chamber PSB H- chicane magnets: Inconel vacuum chamber option & consequences on beam dynamics.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SESAME – TAC 2012: M. Attal Maher Attal SESAME Booster Characterization.
Advertisements

Method of beam extraction from a synchrotron by the instrumentality of multilayer Cu-Fe shield Bondarenko Alexey.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Considerations for Nonlinear Beam Dynamics in NSLS-II lattice design Weiming Guo 05/26/08 Acknowledgement: J. Bengtsson.
Space Charge meeting – CERN – 09/10/2014
E.Benedetto, 30/05/13, LIU-PSB Meeting, PSB chicane magnets: Inconel chamber PSB H- chicane magnets: Inconel vacuum chamber option & consequences on beam.
E. Benedetto SC meeting 19/3/15 Update on the LIU curve emittance vs. intensity.
Linac4 Beam Commissioning Committee PSB Beam Optics and Painting Schemes 9 th December 2010 Beam Optics and Painting Schemes C. Bracco, C. Carli, B. Goddard,
Alignment and Beam Stability
Review on PSB 160 MeV H- Injection Nov 9-10, 2011 Closeout by P. Cruikshank, M. Giovannozzi, D. Johnson, B. Jones, B. Pine, M. Plum, D. Tommasini.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
Optimization of dynamic aperture for the ESRF upgrade Andrea Franchi on behalf of the ASD Beam Dynamics Group Workshop on Accelerator R&D for Ultimate.
E. Benedetto, 29/04/14, OP Shutdown Lecture, Res. Compensation in the PSB Resonance compensation in the PS Booster (1 st part) E. Benedetto + M. McAteer.
PS Booster Studies with High Intensity Beams Magdalena Kowalska supervised by Elena Benedetto Space Charge Collaboration Meeting May 2014.
Details of space charge calculations for J-PARC rings.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
1 EPIC SIMULATIONS V.S. Morozov, Y.S. Derbenev Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility A. Afanasev Hampton University R.P. Johnson Muons, Inc. Operated.
Dynamic Aperture Study for the Ion Ring Lattice Options Min-Huey Wang, Yuri Nosochkov MEIC Collaboration Meeting Fall 2015 Jefferson Lab, Newport News,
H - injection simulations 13th October 2014 Jose L. Abelleira, Chiara Bracco.
“Beam Losses” Christian Carli PSB H - Injection Review, 9 th November 2011 Several topics more or less related to beam losses, a study still somewhat at.
Optimization of Field Error Tolerances for Triplet Quadrupoles of the HL-LHC Lattice V3.01 Option 4444 Yuri Nosochkov Y. Cai, M-H. Wang (SLAC) S. Fartoukh,
Frequency Map Analysis Workshop 4/2/2004 Peter Kuske Refinements of the non-linear lattice model for the BESSY storage ring P. Kuske Linear Lattice My.
Analysis of Multipole and Position Tolerances for the ATF2 Final Focus Line James Jones ASTeC, Daresbury Laboratory.
4 th Order Resonance at the PS R. WASEF, S. Gilardoni, S. Machida Acknowledgements: A. Huschauer, G. Sterbini SC meeting, 05/03/15.
Update on injection studies of LHC beams from Linac4 V. Forte (BE/ABP-HSC) Acknowledgements: J. Abelleira, C. Bracco, E. Benedetto, S. Hancock, M. Kowalska.
1 EMMA Tracking Studies Shinji Machida ASTeC/CCLRC/RAL 4 January, ffag/machida_ ppt & pdf.
Simulation of Spin Interference and Echo Effect Abstract Successively jumping across a depolarization resonance twice produces interesting spin dynamics.
Design options for emittance measurement systems for the CLIC RTML R Apsimon.
PTC-ORBIT code for CERN machines (PSB, PS, SPS) Alexander Molodozhentsev (KEK) Etienne Forest (KEK) Group meeting, CERN June 1, 2011 current status …
CERN/GSI beam dynamics and collective effects collaboration meeting 18 th February 2009 High Intensity Operation of the CERN PS Booster (PSB) Christian.
UPDATE IN PTC-ORBIT PSB STUDIES Space charge meeting ( ) * Vincenzo Forte * Follows LIS meeting presentation 16/04/2012.
Tunes modulation in a space charge dominated beam: The particles behavior in the “necktie” Space charge meeting – CERN - 21/11/2013 Vincenzo Forte Thanks.
Update on HI beams study Magdalena Kowalska supervised by Elena Benedetto BE/ABP/HSC 16 September 2015.
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
Space charge studies at the CERN PS A. Huschauer, Raymond Wasef H. Damerau, S. Gilardoni, S.Hancock, D. Schoerling, R. Steerenberg Acknowledgements: All.
PSB-PS TRANSFER AT 2 GEV - CONCEPTS AND OPTICS W. Bartmann, J. Abelleira et al. ABT LIU Review, 20-Nov-15.
PSB H- injection concept J.Borburgh, C.Bracco, C.Carli, B.Goddard, M.Hourican, B.Mikulec, W.Weterings,
Some ideas to optimise PSB injection chicane Wim, Brennan, Jan, Masamitsu.
Pushing the space charge limit in the CERN LHC injectors H. Bartosik for the CERN space charge team with contributions from S. Gilardoni, A. Huschauer,
The nonlinear dynamics of SIS100 at injection G. Franchetti Beam dynamics meet Magnets II 18/4/2012G.Franchetti1 Magnet multipoles: Dipole: Akishin et.
Suzie Sheehy DPhil Candidate, John Adams Institute 3/9/08 PAMELA lattice studies Dynamics of the Machida lattice.
PTC-ORBIT issues for PSB simulations V. Forte – E. Benedetto – M. Martini S.c. meeting (18/07/2013)
MTE commissioning status S. Gilardoni, BE/ABP With C. Hernalsteens and M. Giovannozzi.
Field Quality Specifications for Triplet Quadrupoles of the LHC Lattice v.3.01 Option 4444 and Collimation Study Yunhai Cai Y. Jiao, Y. Nosochkov, M-H.
First evaluation of Dynamic Aperture at injection for FCC-hh
Beam test of slow extraction from the ESR
RF-kick in the CLIC accelerating structures
Impact of the current debuncher limitations (…can we get rid of longitudinal painting?)
PSB injection: beam dynamics studies
Space charge studies at the SPS
NSLS-II Lattice Design Strategies Weiming Guo 07/10/08
Multi-Turn Extraction studies and PTC
Optimization of Triplet Field Quality in Collision
Impact of remanent fields on SPS chromaticity
Status and needs of dynamic aperture calculations
Field quality to achieve the required lifetime goals (single beam)
SC Overview 2013 White & Rouge The Codes in Comparison The Noise Issue
The new 7BA design of BAPS
Update on PTC/ORBIT space charge studies in the PSB
CNGS Proton beam line: news since NBI2002 OUTLINE 1. Overview
Preliminary results of the PTC/ORBIT convergence studies in the PSB
Studies for TBT optics measurements in the PSB
Impact of short dipoles on PSB performance (status)
PEPX-type BAPS Lattice Design and Beam Dynamics Optimization
Simulation of Multiturn Injection into SIS-18
Triplet corrector layout and strength specifications
Yuri Nosochkov Yunhai Cai, Fanglei Lin, Vasiliy Morozov
Progress on Non-linear Beam Dynamic Study
G.H. Wei, V.S. Morozov, Fanglei Lin Y. Nosochkov (SLAC), M-H. Wang
Integration of Detector Solenoid into the JLEIC ion collider ring
Presentation transcript:

E.Benedetto, 1/07/13, LIS Meeting, PSB chicane magnets: Inconel chamber PSB H- chicane magnets: Inconel vacuum chamber option & consequences on beam dynamics E. Benedetto, V. Forte, M. Martini Thanks: C. Carli, B. Balhan, J. Borburgh, G. Arduini, R. De Maria, L. Deniau, A. Molodozhentsev

E.Benedetto, 1/7/13, LIS Meeting, PSB chicane magnets: Inconel chamber Outline Introduction & ~order of magnitudes Simulations New correction settings Caveats Conclusions

E.Benedetto, 1/7/13, LIS Meeting, PSB chicane magnets: Inconel chamber Introduction Chicane magnets for H- injection – 46mm (  =66mrad), falls linearly to 0mm in 5ms Proposed corrugated Inconel vac. chamber new baseline Influence on beam dynamics of induced Eddy currents: – Delay of ~50us (hp: it is compensated by power supplies) – Higher order field components (sextupolar) Quadrupolar feed-down Excitation 3 rd order resonance  -- -- BSW4 BSW3BSW2 BSW1

E.Benedetto, 1/7/13, LIS Meeting, PSB chicane magnets: Inconel chamber Drawings from W.Weterings, 09/01/13

E.Benedetto, 1/7/13, LIS Meeting, PSB chicane magnets: Inconel chamber Drawings 66 mm 5.5 mm 32 mm 44 mm Bump height = 46 mm MAX from W.Weterings, 09/01/13

E.Benedetto, 1/7/13, LIS Meeting, PSB chicane magnets: Inconel chamber Order of magnitude of perturbation Edge effect (rectangular magnet): – k1L~  2 /2L~6e-3 Feed-down from sextupole: – Int(Bdl)~c0+c1 x+c2 x 2 +… – x0=-50mm –  k1L~3.4e-3 Cfr. presentatin by C. Carli 19/11/09 at PSB beam dynamics w. L4 WG

E.Benedetto, 1/7/13, LIS Meeting, PSB chicane magnets: Inconel chamber Extraction BSW multipoles Sextupolar component from eddy currents Took k2L=0.084 – assumed constant for 5ms – the same for the 4 BSW Quadrupolar component at BSW1 (similar for both chambers) not considered from B. Balhan 2.5ms

E.Benedetto, 1/7/13, LIS Meeting, PSB chicane magnets: Inconel chamber Implementation MADX-PTC/PTC-Orbit: Understand edge effects in PTC Time-varying fields w. Multipolar components (thanks A. Molodozhentsev) Misalignments BSW apertures (they are shifted!)

E.Benedetto, 1/7/13, LIS Meeting, PSB chicane magnets: Inconel chamber The beam Nb=35e11 (~twice) Ex,Ey=2, 2.3 um (...normalized are E*=1.20, 1.38um!!!) Bf=0.56, V1=8kV, V2=6kV, Brhodot=10 Tm/s Painting horiz and longitud (20 turns) 95% bucket acceptance after 20t-injection to remove uncapured particles (~0.4%) & avoid artifacts

E.Benedetto, 1/7/13, LIS Meeting, PSB chicane magnets: Inconel chamber The beam: tune footprint  Q~0.5  Q~0.4 Huge!!!!..to be an LIU or HL-LHC beam!!!  more reasonable param under consideration

E.Benedetto, 1/7/13, LIS Meeting, PSB chicane magnets: Inconel chamber RMS emittance evolution vs.Turn Qv=4.55 (Qh=4.28) Qv=4.45 (Qh=4.28) RED: ceramic chamber GREEN: inconel, only dipole edge compensation BLUE: inconel, new compensation settings Vertical Horizontal Vertical Horizontal Large growth in horizontal…due to (too) large  Q & integer x-ing Does it “hide” effect of multipoles?  Check ongoing For ISOLDE, Qh needs optimization

E.Benedetto, 1/7/13, LIS Meeting, PSB chicane magnets: Inconel chamber RMS normalized emittances Vertical Horizontal Vertical Qv=4.55 (Qh=4.28) Qv=4.45 (Qh=4.28)

E.Benedetto, 1/7/13, LIS Meeting, PSB chicane magnets: Inconel chamber Actual intensity (Nb=17.5e11)

E.Benedetto, 1/7/13, LIS Meeting, PSB chicane magnets: Inconel chamber Actual intensity (Nb=17.5e11) Qv=4.55 (Qh=4.28) Qv=4.45 (Qh=4.28) Horizontal Vertical Horizontal

E.Benedetto, 1/7/13, LIS Meeting, PSB chicane magnets: Inconel chamber Compensation settings Extra trims on QDE3, QDE14 Selected for active compensation of Vertical BetaBeating from edge effects (quad. error) – Cfr many presentation by C.Carli et al Used also for perturbation (feed-down from sextupolar errors) in Inconel vac. Chamber What is left uncorrected: – Almost no correction for the horizontal plane (what if Qx moves close to 0.5?) – Feed-down from sextupoles induces also small dipole error  COD of <1mm (not corrected, but could it be adjusted with delays?)

E.Benedetto, 1/7/13, LIS Meeting, PSB chicane magnets: Inconel chamber New settings QDE3,14 and QFO, QDE (w. Q-strips)

E.Benedetto, 1/7/13, LIS Meeting, PSB chicane magnets: Inconel chamber Not taken into account Transient for the multipoles rise/fall (discontinuities in Bdot)  foresee smooth transition? Delay (i.e. individual powering would compensate for it), i.e. bump is closed Quad. component at BS1 (septum), similar for both chambers  could it be reduced with poles shaping? Case if not perfect compensation ~10% off (  what could be achieved?) Operation/future beams: – High intensity (ISOLDE) beams  losses!!! – A more realistic LIU beam (w. no painting?) with  Q=-(0.2,0.3)

E.Benedetto, 1/7/13, LIS Meeting, PSB chicane magnets: Inconel chamber Summary Eddy current induced multipoles have an effect and need proper compensation, but do not seems to be a show-stopper TODO or ongoing: – Effects of a not perfect compensation should be evaluated (Question: what are the limits of power supplies? What about transients?) – Simulations for an ISOLDE beam (losses!!!) and for an LHC beam generated with no painting and lower intensity.

Back-up slides

E.Benedetto, 1/7/13, LIS Meeting, PSB chicane magnets: Inconel chamber

“Static” simulations 2ms (out of 5ms) Assumed: – trajectory bump – edge effects – multipoles Correction for the vertical BetaBeating with QDE3, QDE14

E.Benedetto, 1/7/13, LIS Meeting, PSB chicane magnets: Inconel chamber Horiz emittance vs. time

E.Benedetto, 1/7/13, LIS Meeting, PSB chicane magnets: Inconel chamber Vertical emittance vs time