U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Monitoring Surface-Water-Quality in the Tongue River Watershed of Montana and Wyoming Stacy Kinsey.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
شبكة محطات الرصد الهيدرولوجي Hydrological Monitoring Stations Network By (DGWRM) Presented to 5 th World Water Forum.
Advertisements

Common Data Repository and Water Resource Assessment for the Southern and Northern Piceance Basin Northwest Colorado Oil and Gas Forum June 2008 Jude Thomas,
Streamgaging Task Force Final Report Advisory Committee on Water Information Herndon, Virginia April 3, 2002.
Chris Gammons, John Babcock, Bev Plumb, Steve Parker Montana Tech, Butte, MT Spatial and temporal variations in nutrient concentration and speciation in.
Stream Monitoring in Loudoun County David Ward, Water Resources Engineer Department of Building and Development, Department of Building and Development,
May 2005 Petition for Rulemaking for Regulation of CBM Development Bob Bukantis Water Quality Standards DEQ Planning Division.
Water Quality Standards for Protection of Irrigated Agriculture in the Powder River Basin Bob Bukantis MT Dept Environ Quality.
Page 1 PRB Infiltration StudyMBOGC & ALL Consulting Powder River Basin (MT & WY) Coal Bed Methane Infiltration Study Project Workplan Prepared by Montana.
Walker River Basin Project Water PlantSoil Interactions Interactions.
U.S. Geological Survey Presentation to the New York Drought Management Task Force August 10, 1999 Data-Collection Network Funded in Cooperation with other.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Transport of Agricultural Chemicals: Tile Drains to Surface Water Wesley W. Stone.
Please note: this presentation has not received Director’s approval and is subject to revision.
Koktuli River Instream Flow Reservation Cathy Flanagan Bristol Bay Native Association.
Getting the Big Picture How to Look at Your Watershed Indiana Watershed Planning Guide,
West Virginia Non-tidal Monitoring Network: 2010 Update West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection West Virginia Department of Agriculture USGS.
Review of the 2009 Snowmelt and Rain Streamflow Forecasts & Snow Survey Advisory Team Ron Abramovich, Hydrologist Water Supply Specialist USDA Natural.
Apalachicola/Chattahoochee/Flint Focus Area - USGS WaterSMART NIDIS SE Climate Forum Lake Lanier Islands, GA December 2, 2011.
 How are the data used  New data collection technologies  New ways to make the data available.
Monitoring Design, Available Data, and Filling Data Gaps for Determining Whether Shale Gas Development Activities Contaminate Surface Water or Groundwater.
Nutrient and Sediment Concentrations, Yields and Loads in Impaired Streams and Rivers in the Taunton River Basin, Massachusetts, Jeffrey R. Barbaro.
Water Systems Mrs. Bader. Water Systems In this exercise, you will learn more about what makes up a watershed, track the movement of water through the.
Long Island Sound Prospects for the Urban Sea- John Mullaney  Chapter 5: Metals, Organic Compounds, and Nutrients in Long Island Sound: Sources, Magnitudes,
Ecosystems Climate and Land-Use Change Water Natural Hazards Core Science Systems Energy and Minerals, and Environmental Health U.S. Geological Survey.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Evaluations of Heavy Metal Listings on the State of Massachusetts Integrated List of Waters Assabet.
Water-Quality Monitoring for Environmental Management and Source-Water Protection U.S. Geological Survey New England Water Science Center in cooperation.
USGS Water Resource Monitoring and Assessment Activities Salinity and other topics presented to the Garfield County Energy Advisory Board Dec. 1, 2005.
Rogue Basin Water Quality Implementation Plans Greg Stabach, Natural Resources Project Manager Rogue Valley Council of Governments.
Overview of USGS Groundwater Quality Assessment Activities and Related Data in Alabama 2011 Alabama Water Resources Conference September 9, 2011, Perdido.
Tongue River Information Program (TRIP) Sponsored by: Montana Board of Oil & Gas Conservation.
Status of USGS Surface-Water Programs and Networks: An OSW Prospective Robert Mason Data Chiefs’ Meeting December 4, 2013 The Role of the GOES DCS in the.
Claytor Hydroelectric Project Water Quality Study Mark Hutchins, Project Manager January 25, 2007.
Gathering Background Information and the Role of Technicians in Negotiations Doug Oellermann, P.E.
Loudoun County Water Resources Monitoring Presented to Loudoun Valley High School May 9, 2012 David Ward and Scott Sandberg Loudoun County Department of.
Bureau of Reclamation Pacific Northwest Region Partnerships.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Dr. Robert M. Hirsch Associate Director for Water April 16, 2007 USGS: Water Resources Program.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Water-Quality Monitoring: Data Collection and Analysis Strategies for Designing Program.
Collaborative Water-Quality Monitoring in the Big Thompson Watershed Juliane B. Brown USGS-BTWF Liaison Colorado District Rob R. Buirgy BTWF Coordinator.
GROUND WATER MONITORING TO EVALUATE EFFECTS OF LAND USE ON WATER QUALITY Mike Trojan Erin Eid Jennifer Maloney Jim Stockinger Minnesota Pollution Control.
Automated Continuous Streamflow and Water-Quality Monitoring in the Blackstone River at the Massachusetts-Rhode Island State Line U.S. Geological Survey.
CE 424 HYDROLOGY 1 Instructor: Dr. Saleh A. AlHassoun.
Engineering Hydrology (ECIV 4323)
Price Creek Watershed Project A joint project of the Iowa & Benton County Soil and Water Conservation Districts IOWATER Meeting – November 13, 2007.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Groundwater Study For Malad and Bear Rivers Drainages, Box Elder County Bear River Water Conservancy.
Advisory Committee on Water Information Streamgaging Task Force Charge: Determine the streamflow information needs of the Nation, identify the optimal.
HYDROLOGIC DATA. BACKGROUND Analysis and synthesis of data is required to perform any hydrologic computation. The engineer needs to: Identify and define.
Equus Beds ASR Program A Case Study in Success Texas Innovative Water 2010 Seminar October 11, 2010 Texas Innovative Water 2010 Seminar October 11, 2010.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS Streamgage Network: Implication of Budget Cuts Michael Lewis USGS ID Water Science Center.
South Platte Decision Support System Colorado Water Conservation Board and Division of Water Resources.
Regional Integrated Science Projects - Opequon Creek/Shenandoah River Basins Agencies Involved – USGS Water, Geology, GIO/ Geography, and Biology Disciplines,
Afghan Water Task Progress Report September 7, 2006 EROS Data Center, Sioux Falls, SD Gregg J. Wiche Doug G. Emerson U. S. Geological Survey Bismarck,
U.S. Geological Survey Presentation to the New York Drought Management Task Force September 3, 1999 Data-Collection Network Funded in Cooperation with.
Ground-Water Quality Trends in the South Platte River Alluvial Aquifer, Colorado Suzanne S. Paschke, Shana L. Mashburn, Jennifer L. Flynn, and Breton Bruce.
Flatford Swamp Hydrologic Restoration Feasibility Study (H089)
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Integrated Water-Quality Assessment using Conventional, Passive-Sampling, and Metabolic Assay Techniques:
Estimating the Volume of Fine-Grained Sediments Behind Four Low-Head Dams, Kalamazoo River, Michigan. In cooperation with the Michigan Department of Environmental.
Integrating the NAWQA approach to assessments in rivers and streams By Donna Myers, Bill Wilber, Anne Hoos, and Charlie Crawford U.S. Geological Survey,
EPA HWI Comments on CA Assessment June 26, 2013 HSP Call 2 major categories of comments: – Report writing (we will work on this) – Content/Analysis/Discussion.
Streamflow Information for the Next Century A Plan for the National Streamflow Information Program December 2, 1999.
Impacts of Salinity on El Paso’s Surface Water Supply presented at the Annual Salinity Management and Desalination Summit December 8, 2003 Michael P. Fahy.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Missouri River Basin Cooperative Plains Snow Survey Kevin Grode, P.E. Reservoir Regulation Team Lead Missouri.
Coalbed Methane Assessment and Analysis of Produced Water Disposal Options, Northern Cheyenne Reservation, Montana Project FEW Shaochang Wo, Principal.
Water Quality Sampling, Analysis and Annual Load Determinations for the Illinois River at Arkansas Highway 59 Bridge, 2008 Brian E. Haggard Arkansas Water.
Montana’s Regional Ground – Water Monitoring Program in the Powder River Basin Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology.
The Importance of Groundwater in Sustaining Streamflow in the Upper Colorado River Basin Matthew Miller Susan Buto, David Susong, Christine Rumsey, John.
Kacey Myers Senior undergraduate student Department of Animal Science
Dave Clark and Michael Kasch
Central Valley Salinity Coalition
Flood Monitoring Tools 2011 OFMA Annual Conference
Engineering Hydrology (ECIV 4323)
Engineering Hydrology (ECIV 4323)
Presentation transcript:

U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Monitoring Surface-Water-Quality in the Tongue River Watershed of Montana and Wyoming Stacy Kinsey Peter Wright, David Nimick, Thomas Chapin U.S. Geological Survey Billings, Montana

Talk Outline  What is the network?  Need for network  Objectives & methods  Hydrology  Some results  Concluding thoughts  Cooperators Tongue River above State Line

Where is the study?

Network  Started in January 2004  7 mainstem sites  5 tributary sites  Streamflow and water quality

Need for Monitoring Network Well completed before 1997 Well completed after 1997 (BLM 2003 EIS) Coal Bed Methane (CBM) What is it? How is it extracted? Why is this a concern?

Need for Monitoring Network  Discharge of CBM production water has potential to affect surface water quality  Increased sodium in irrigation water could affect soils Tongue River CBM wells Irrigated hay

Sodium Adsorption Ratio (SAR) SAR is the proportion of sodium ions relative to magnesium and calcium When SAR gets above a certain level, the soils permeability is reduced, thus the water less available for plants.

Monitoring Objectives  Document water quality in Tongue River and major tributaries and detect changes, if any, over time  Provide real-time water- quality information for parameters of greatest concern (i.e., SC and SAR) CBM discharge in Montana near State Line

Monitoring Approach  Collect periodic water-quality samples  Frequency  Non-irrigation season Monthly  Irrigation season – Twice monthly  Parameters collected  Major ions  Trace elements  Sediment  Water temp., D.O., pH, SC Water-quality sampling at Tongue R. at State Line

Monitoring Approach  Collect continuous SC data in real-time  Provide estimates of SAR (from SC data) in real-time  Develop techniques to measure SAR in real-time  Provide information to the public CBM Discharge to the Tongue River

Methods – Water Quality  Methods in USGS National Field Manual “Clean hands/dirty hands” sampling at Tongue R. at State Line

Methods – Continuous SC  Methods in USGS WRIR SC probe installation, Tongue R. at Monarch

Methods – Streamflow  Measure stage & flow periodically to develop a rating  Record stage continuously and convert to flow Cableway at Tongue R. at Tongue R. Dam

Methods  Data Management and Reporting monitoring.cr.usgs.gov/

Hydrologic Conditions

Hydrologic Conditions during

SC  2004 irrigation season  Monthly means from continuous SC data

SAR  2004 irrigation season  SAR data from periodic water samples

SAR estimation  SC-SAR relation based on water- sample data

SAR estimation

Real-time SAR Tongue River at State Line

SAR Trends

Synoptic – Fall 2005/Spring 2006 Canoed a 30 mile stretch of Tongue River Took SC measurements periodically on the mainstem and before/after any inputs Measured SC and discharge from all CBM outfalls, along with samples from 5 of the 15 outfalls

Synoptic Study Area

Synoptic Findings Specific conductance measurements along the Tongue River, September 2005

Synoptic Findings Potential effects of CBM on SAR at Tongue River at State Line

Concluding Thoughts  SAR values during appear slightly elevated, perhaps because of drought or CBM  Agencies, industry, irrigators, and stakeholders have been supportive  Long term monitoring is essential for objective analysis  Hopefully needs to continue to monitor changes Tongue River below Tongue River Reservoir

Funding Sources  USGS (including Congressional earmark)  Bureau of Land Management (Miles City office)  T & Y Irrigation District / Fidelity Exploration  Montana DNRC  Northern Cheyenne Tribe  Wyoming State Engineer  Montana DEQ  Wyoming DEQ Tongue River Dam

Questions??