1 BUILDING QUALITY LEARNING USING PERIODIC ASSESSMENTS Session Outcomes: Use diagnostic Periodic Assessments as instructional tools for quality enhancement.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Putting Together The Standards-Based Puzzle
Advertisements

A Guide to Implementation
USING THE INSTRUCTIONAL BLUEPRINT TO GUIDE TIER I WORK.
Curriculum & Instruction Webinar October 18, 2013.
Student Learning Targets (SLT) You Can Do This! Getting Ready for the School Year.
West Virginia Achieves Professional Development Series Volume II Standards-Based Curriculum.
1 Introduction to the Professional Teaching and Learning Cycle (PTLC)
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training Guide
Grade 12 Subject Specific Ministry Training Sessions
MATHEMATICS Support for Single Plan for Student Achievement.
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Standards Aligned System April 21, 2011 – In-Service.
Principles of Assessment
1 Let’s Meet! October 13,  All four people have to run.  The baton has to be held and passed by all participants.  You can have world class speed.
SAS Curriculum Mapping
1 Ohio’s Entry Year Teacher Program Review Ohio Confederation of Teacher Education Organizations Fall Conference: October 23, 2008 Presenter: Lori Lofton.
Professional Development Guide for Periodic Assessments A Tool for Analyzing Periodic Assessment Data and Using Results to Inform Instruction in Collaborative.
The Five New Multi-State Assessment Systems Under Development April 1, 2012 These illustrations have been approved by the leadership of each Consortium.
Student Learning Objectives 1 Phase 3 Regional Training April 2013.
1 Curriculum and Instruction Report Pocantico Hills School February 28, 2005.
Teacher Keys Effectiveness System Forsyth County Schools Orientation May 2013 L.. Allison.
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
Student Centered Teaching Through Universal Instructional Design Part II.
Supporting K-12 Mathematics Intervention Presenter: Jameson Rienick, Mathematics Project Specialist
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
TOM TORLAKSON State Superintendent of Public Instruction National Center and State Collaborative California Activities Kristen Brown, Ph.D. Common Core.
SASIT Thomas E. Gluck, Acting Secretary of Education Amy Morton, Deputy Secretary, Office of Elementary and Secondary Education Ed Vollbrecht, Ph.D., Director,
THE DANIELSON FRAMEWORK. LEARNING TARGET I will be be able to identify to others the value of the classroom teacher, the Domains of the Danielson framework.
Qua lity Special Education Programs in the School Turnaround Context: Focused Programmatic Improvements Lauren Morando Rhim September 16, 2015.
Designing Local Curriculum Module 5. Objective To assist district leadership facilitate the development of local curricula.
After lunch - Mix it up! Arrange your tables so that everyone else seated at your table represents another district. 1.
Literacy Framework: What Does It Look Like at Shawnee Heights? Tamara Konrade ESSDACK Educational Services and Staff Development Association of Central.
Agenda Introductions Objectives and Agenda Review Research Review Taking Stock Collect evidence Principal Practices & the Rubric End-of-the-Year Looking.
TEAM Coordinating Committee Training (TCC).  Introductions  Mission of the TEAM Program  Design of the TEAM Program  Overview of the Module Process.
Inclusion: Effective Practices for All Students, 1e McLeskey/Rosenberg/Westling © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved What.
Designing Common Assessments A Presentation at the ASCD Annual Conference March 19, 2007.
Using UDL to Set Clear Goals and Support Every Student’s Learning.
PLC Team Leader Meeting
Student Growth within the Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System (TPGES) Overview 1.
What Are the Characteristics of an Effective Portfolio? By Jay Barrett.
Standards Instruction Assessment Feedback. Session Outcomes Participants will:  Develop an understanding of the Test and Quizzes application in BCPS.
District One Administrator Institute Elementary Literacy Session August 17, 2005.
Fidelity of Implementation A tool designed to provide descriptions of facets of a coherent whole school literacy initiative. A tool designed to provide.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
Administrators Academy August 15, College Prepared and Career Ready.
ASSESSMENT and EVALUATION (seeing through the jargon and figuring out how to use the tools)
Continuous School Improvement Planning: Developing a School Improvement Plan October 24, 2011 Intermediate Unit 1 Instructional Support Services.
Professional Learning Project Update: Winter 2011.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.
1 BUILDING QUALITY LEARNING USING PERIODIC ASSESSMENTS Session Outcomes: Use diagnostic Periodic Assessments as instructional tools for quality enhancement.
Los Angeles Unified School District Comprehensive Assessment Program to Support Instruction Presented by Chris Mullins Specialist, Periodic Assessment.
New School Year Preview HISD Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment Tools & Resources TEAM HISD Literacy Support Network/Job Alike August 17, 2010.
Instructional Leadership and Application of the Standards Aligned System Act 45 Program Requirements and ITQ Content Review October 14, 2010.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
Student Growth Developing Quality Growth Goals STEPS Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System (TPGES)
1 BUILDING QUALITY LEARNING USING PERIODIC ASSESSMENTS Session Outcomes: Use diagnostic Periodic Assessments as instructional tools for quality enhancement.
1 BUILDING QUALITY LEARNING USING PERIODIC ASSESSMENTS Session Outcomes: Use diagnostic Periodic Assessments as instructional tools for quality enhancement.
1 BUILDING QUALITY LEARNING USING PERIODIC ASSESSMENTS Session Outcomes: Use diagnostic Periodic Assessments as instructional tools for quality enhancement.
Richard Woods, Georgia’s School Superintendent “Educating Georgia’s Future” gadoe.org Quality Comprehensive Improvement System Key School Performance Standards.
Teacher Work Sample. Lectures Objectives: 1.Define the teacher work sample. 2.Integrate lesson plans with a practice Teacher Work Sample in terms of the.
English Learner Subgroup Self-Assessment (ELSSA)
BUILDING QUALITY LEARNING USING PERIODIC ASSESSMENTS
Individual Thinking Time
Quarterly Meeting Focus
Interim Assessments: Do you know what you are buying and why
Unit 7: Instructional Communication and Technology
Teacher Practice Instruments
Presentation transcript:

1 BUILDING QUALITY LEARNING USING PERIODIC ASSESSMENTS Session Outcomes: Use diagnostic Periodic Assessments as instructional tools for quality enhancement in practices of: --planning standards-based instruction --assessing, accessing data and communicating learning progress --determining future teaching practices

2 CRITERIA FOR EVALUATING PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT SESSION OUTCOMES

3 Why Periodic Assessment?

4 K What I Know W What I Want to Know L What I Learned

5 PERIODIC ASSESSMENT PROGRAM COMPONENTS * Program Overview * Continuous Improvement Phases * Customer Service * Process for Scanning, Scoring & Reporting

6 Demonstration District

7 Phases of Formative/Diagnostic Periodic Assessment Process

8 Schedule of Periodic Assessment and Follow-Up Sessions for Analysis and Use of Data  Office of Instruction establishes calendars annually  Alternative calendar, Continuation, Options schools and Special Education Centers may create special calendars  Calendars available online on “InsideLAUSD”

9 Planning Phase a.Identify priority standard using the District’s Instructional Guides, State Curriculum Frameworks and “Standards Comparability Charts” to plan what students should know and be able to do and how learning can be expedited using research-based practices that are culturally relevant and responsive; b.Schedule collaborative time for teachers to use the data from each Periodic Assessment for determining future instruction/intervention

10 Correlations Between Students’ Performance on District Periodic Assessments (PAs) and the California Standards Tests (CSTs) Analyses by the District’s Program Evaluation and Research Branch showed strong correlations between student PA performance and CST performance.

11 The District Uses Two Types of Assessment Measures: Assessment OF Learning, California Standards Tests End of year or course Judgmental feedback Audits achievement Report on Program and final accountability Another example: the California High School Exit Exam (CAHSEE) Assessment FOR Learning, LAUSD Periodic Assessments Ongoing administration Descriptive feedback Measures progress Informs teacher practice and professional development Another example: Standards-aligned teacher- made assessments

12 What are the purposes and value of the Comparability Charts? (1) Provide a graphic display of the relationship between Periodic Assessments and the California Standards Tests (2) Confirm and validate the importance of learning going on in District classrooms (3) Delineate the instructional sequence as outlined in the District Instructional Guides

13 The Comparability Charts CST Blueprint for subject and grade Non-assessed or embedded standards are omitted Standards for each periodic assessment Shading corresponds to CST Blueprint Unshaded standards are not separately assessed on CST Number of questions by content strand Number of questions by standard Shading according to standard sets

14 Sample Activity for Using Comparability Charts Step 1. In your small group (at your table), select one chart to examine and discuss. (Ideally it will be a chart that relates to your current instruction) Step 2. Solicit someone to take notes as the group identifies which standards are emphasized in the end-of-year CST? Step 3. Use the chart to determine how those standards are sequenced and measured on the Periodic Assessments Step 4. Choose a quarter using the Instructional Guide for the subject and chart how much time will be devoted to each of the concepts in which the standards are embedded. Step 5. Think about what students should be able to do as a result of time spent on each of the concepts / standards. (Refer to CST released items and sample Periodic Assessment items so that teachers can begin to think about how these concepts/standard might be assessed) Step 6. Participate in follow-up meetings with other grade levels/subject teachers and/or by grade level/department sessions at your school site that follow receipt of Periodic Assessment results to use the data to: a.Plan future instruction based upon student strengths and needs. b.Identify lessons that were particularly effective for developing understanding in students. Think about the instructional strategies that might have contributed to a particular lesson’s success.

Planning Phase c. Review and experience sample Periodic Assessments by having teachers take assessments collaboratively in order to map the concepts/skills students are expected to demonstrate; d. Plan use of text-support materials and resources.

16 Analysis of Periodic Assessment Activity What concepts/skills do students need to learn? How can students most effectively learn these concepts/skills? (e.g. include strategies and resources)

17 Doing Phase a.Present content to students, implementing effective instructional strategies and appropriate materials

18 Doing Phase b. Administer school/classroom measures of learning and the District’s Periodic Assessments to preserve equity and consistency of expectations as scheduled in the District’s calendars of common measures; c. Score student work on Periodic Assessment; multiple choice (centrally score electronically) and performance/constructed response/writing sample (teacher-scored) evaluate data reports and provide timely feedback to students.