Social Information Processing March 26-28, 2008 AAAI Spring Symposium Stanford University 010011011 01100001 11110 011 0101110011010 0111011010 001001.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Data Mining and the Web Susan Dumais Microsoft Research KDD97 Panel - Aug 17, 1997.
Advertisements

1 Opportunities and Challenges of Social Computing Kirsti Ala-Mutka European Commission, JRC Institute for Prospective Technological Studies Information.
Scary, interesting, fun, creative, Exciting! Community & Information Portal for Engineers.
Laurie E Damianos, MITRE September 2008 Approved for Public Release; Distribution Unlimited. MITRE Case # ©2008 The MITRE Corporation. All rights.
Creating Collaborative Partnerships
Publishing and the Web. What do online customers want? The Google generation expect: To find everything quickly & efficiently Websites to be easy to use.
Social Information Processing March 26-28, 2008 AAAI Spring Symposium Stanford University
SOCIAL SEMANTIC WEB INTRO Paola Monachesi. RING … RING... Hello? Hi Pete, it’s Lucy. I’m at the doctor’s office. Mom needs to see a specialist and then.
The Complex Dynamics of Collaborative Tagging Harry Halpin University of Edinburgh Valentin Robu CWI, Netherlands Hana Shepherd Princeton University WWW.
Web 2.0 and Collective Intelligence Mark Levene (Follow the links to learn more!)
EFQUEL 2008 Forum, June 2008, Lisbon 1 Learning2.0 Kirsti Ala-Mutka, Christine Redecker & Yves Punie European Commission, JRC Institute for Prospective.
1 DCETECH.COM Web 2.0: Is it a Whole New Internet? ANKIT JAIN 4 th Year, Computer Engg Head DCETECH.COM.
Planning for Flexible Integration via Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA) APSR Forum – The Well-Integrated Repository Sydney, Australia February 2006 Sandy.
Ontologies, Web 2.0 and Beyond Tom Gruber TagCommons.org tomgruber.org.
At first the Web was just reading. 250,000 sites visited for 45 million users.
1 genSpace: Community- Driven Knowledge Sharing for Biological Scientists Gail Kaiser’s Programming Systems Lab Columbia University Computer Science.
THE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG WEB BY DANIEL CHURCHILL 2.0.
Adaptive Book: A Platform for teaching, learning and student modeling Ananda Gunawardena School of Computer Science Carnegie Mellon University.
Recommender Systems; Social Information Filtering.
 2008 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved What Is Web 2.0?  Web 1.0 focused on a relatively small number of companies and advertisers.
The Social Web: A laboratory for studying s ocial networks, tagging and beyond Kristina Lerman USC Information Sciences Institute.
Ronán Kennedy; NUI Galway e-merging technologies for education and libraries Setting The Scene -- Web 2.0 & Library 2.0.
Business Driven Technology Unit 4
Web ©Minder Chen, 2014 Web 2.0 and Beyond Minder Chen, Ph.D. Professor of MIS Martin V. Smith School of Business and Economics CSU Channel Islands.
School of something FACULTY OF OTHER School of Computing FACULTY OF ENGINEERING Sharing of Community Practice through Semantics: A Case Study in Academic.
Web 2.0: Concepts and Applications 4 Organizing Information.
Copyright © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. 1 It's what you learn after you know it all that counts. John Wooden Key Terms and Review (Chapter 5)
Sharing Online Resources Social Bookmarking. Ambition in Action Facilitators Stephan Ridgway, Workforce Development.
1 Web 2.0 and Government September /Translates to… Why care? IBM 2006 Global CEO Study identifies the key problems that Web 2.0 can help with.
BLOG. WHAT IS A BLOG ? We have a lot of definition of blog.. A blog is a personal diary. A daily pulpit. A collaborative space. A political soapbox. A.
Kristina Lerman Aram Galstyan USC Information Sciences Institute Analysis of Social Voting Patterns on Digg.
By Crystal Mosley 1. Need Collaboration and sharing information Global diversity Flexibility and convenience Common work and storage space 2.
Personalized Interaction with Web Resources First Sino-German Symposium on KNOWLEDGE HANDLING: REPRESENTATION, MANAGEMENT AND PERSONALIZED APPLICATION.
HPVIS and the "Architecture of Participation" Presented at First U.S. Conference on Characterizing Chemicals In Commerce: Using Data on High Production.
PLoS ONE Application Journal Publishing System (JPS) First application built on Topaz application framework Web 2.0 –Uses a template engine to display.
Reading Discussions Metcalfe’s Law paper What is metcalfe’s Law? Examples from the Web? How can we utilize it? How semantics contribute to social networks,
Social Media Social media is not new – Opinion pages – Telephone – Others? What is new – Fewer intermediaries – Individual ability to broadcast – Massive.
Future Learning Landscapes Yvan Peter – Université Lille 1 Serge Garlatti – Telecom Bretagne.
Web 2.0: Helene Blowers Moving Libraries Forward to Web 2.0 Infopeople Webcast May 9, 2007 What Library Managers Need to Know.
This work is by Georgia Koutrika, published on CIDR'09 All the figures & tables in these slides are from that paper.
Lecture 1 Jan 08, Outline Course logistics Introducing tools to be used in the course Overview of Social Web and Web 2.0 Definition History Key.
Human Interaction with Data “Meaningful Interpretations” “The Power of Crowdsourcing” &
Scholarship and OER in the 21st Century Open Educational Resources in Teaching, Learning and Research December 11, 2008 Joseph Hardin University of Michigan.
NGCWE Expert Group EU-ESA Experts Group's vision Prof. Juan Quemada NGCWE Expert Group IST Call 5 Preparatory Workshop on CWEs 13th.
Leveraging Web 2.0 for Prelicensure Education A Presentation for the 2009 CNIA Conference Christine A. Hudak, Ph.D., RN-BC, CPHIMS Case Western Reserve.
WEB 2.0 PATTERNS Carolina Marin. Content  Introduction  The Participation-Collaboration Pattern  The Collaborative Tagging Pattern.
Social Computing Social networking, Social software.
What is Web 2.0? And why should you care?. Web 2.0 is…  Web 2.0 is the era when people have come to realize that it's not the software that enables the.
Web Review The Web Web 1.0 Web 2.0 Future of the Web Internet Programming - Chapter 01:XHTML1.
Web School Shannon McNeice, CEMA/CECA 2007 Joyce Valenzia, AASL 2007 David Bilmes, NMPS 2007.
With each device or application that expands the bandwidth of available information, the computer ’ s understanding of us remains unchanged.
© 2006 Jan-Paul Nachtwey & Enrico Schnepel, FHTW Berlin Social Software Social Software and its influences.
Copyright © 2012 Certification Partners, LLC -- All Rights Reserved Do not turn on your computers.
User Modeling and Recommender Systems: Introduction to recommender systems Adolfo Ruiz Calleja 06/09/2014.
Lecture 5 Web 2.0 Teaser Instructor: Jie Yang Department of Computer Science University of Massachusetts Lowell Exploring the Internet, Fall 2011.
Web 2.0: Making the Web Work for You, Illustrated Unit A: Research 2.0.
Semantic Web Technologies Brief Readings Discussion Class work: Projects discussion Research Presentations.
A Portrait of the Semantic Web in Action Jeff Heflin and James Hendler IEEE Intelligent Systems December 6, 2010 Hyewon Lim.
Web 2.0 – A New Beginning Web 2.0, a phrase coined by O'Reilly Media in 2004 refers to a supposed second generation of Internet-based services— such.
SOCIAL MEDIA, AN INTRODUCTION NE UNION WOMEN’S SUMMER SCHOOL Donna L. Schulman, SMLR, Rutgers, University.
Chapter 8: Web Analytics, Web Mining, and Social Analytics
 GEETHA P.  Originally coined by Tim O’Reilly Publishing Media  Second generation of services available on www.  Lets people collaborate and share.
Wikis and Socially-Constructed Text
Stochastic Models of User-Contributory Web Sites
Web 2.0.
SOCIAL Networks Introduction Modified from
American Library Association Online Resource Center
Overview Blogs and wikis are two Web 2.0 tools that allow users to publish content online Blogs function as online journals Wikis are collections of searchable,
Lesson 2: Internet Communication
ece 627 intelligent web: ontology and beyond
Presentation transcript:

Social Information Processing March 26-28, 2008 AAAI Spring Symposium Stanford University

ISI USC Information Sciences Institute March 2008AAAI Social Information Processing Symposium Definition  Social Information Processing is ­an activity through which collective human actions organize knowledge ­process which allows us to collectively solve problems far beyond any individual’s capabilities ­a new information processing paradigm enabled by the Social Web

ISI USC Information Sciences Institute March 2008AAAI Social Information Processing Symposium The Social Web  The Social Web is a collection of technologies, practices and services that turn the Web into a platform for users to create and use content in a social context ­Authoring tools  blogs ­Collaboration tools  wikis, Wikipedia ­Tagging systems  del.icio.us, Flickr, CiteULike ­Social networking  Facebook, MySpace, Essembly ­Collaborative filtering  Digg, Amazon, Yahoo answers

ISI USC Information Sciences Institute March 2008AAAI Social Information Processing Symposium Social Web features  Users create content ­Articles, opinions, creative products  Users annotate content ­Metadata (e.g., tags) ­Ratings  Users create connections ­Between content and metadata ­Between content or metadata and users ­Among users (social networks)  Users interact ­Discuss and rate content

ISI USC Information Sciences Institute March 2008AAAI Social Information Processing Symposium Social Web is interesting  Social Web as a complex dynamical system ­Complex collective behavior emerges from actions taken by many users  Patterns emerge on large scale ­Variety of interactions between users  Coordination, collaboration, conflict …  Network vs environment-mediated

ISI USC Information Sciences Institute March 2008AAAI Social Information Processing Symposium Social Web is interesting  Social Web as a knowledge-generating system ­Users express personal knowledge (through articles, tags, links, …) or modify knowledge expressed by others  Tailor information to individual user …  Personalization and recommendation  … or combine users’ knowledge to create a knowledgebase  Wikipedia, wikis  folksonomy  FAQs, …

ISI USC Information Sciences Institute March 2008AAAI Social Information Processing Symposium Social Web is interesting  Social Web as a problem-solving system ­By exposing human activity, Social Web allows users to harness the power of collective intelligence to solve problems  Manage the commons  Help the visually impaired get around in new places  Figure out who to trust

ISI USC Information Sciences Institute March 2008AAAI Social Information Processing Symposium Social Web is interesting  Lots of data for empirical studies ­Large-scale experimenation ­Social Web is amenable to analysis ­Design systems for optimal performance

ISI USC Information Sciences Institute March 2008AAAI Social Information Processing Symposium Social Web is challenging  Social Web is enormous and growing rapidly ­Some popular sites have >1 million users and >1 billion objects ­2G/day of “authored” content ­10-15G/day of user generated content [From Andrew Tomkins, Yahoo! Research]  Need new computational techniques to process massive data

ISI USC Information Sciences Institute March 2008AAAI Social Information Processing Symposium Social Web is challenging  Social Web is highly dynamic ­New users and content ­Links are created and destroyed  Need new computational approaches to deal with dynamic data

ISI USC Information Sciences Institute March 2008AAAI Social Information Processing Symposium Social Web is challenging  Social Web is highly heterogeneous ­Variety of content and media types ­Variety of information domains  Needs to be even more heterogeneous ­Ability to express knowledge at different granularity levels  Micro-tagging: tag data within pages ­Ability to express more complex knowledge  Specify relations: e.g., semantics of links  Need algorithms to combine heterogeneous data

ISI USC Information Sciences Institute March 2008AAAI Social Information Processing Symposium Social Web is challenging  Social Web is highly diverse ­User participation has power law distribution ­User expertise has power law distribution  Need approaches that go beyond ‘wisdom of crowds’ to combine knowledge from users ­Averaging is not always the best solution ­How do we best exploit diversity?  Understand incentives for user participation ­Methods for improving content/metadata quality