CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Technology: Stationary Sources and Demand-Side Management Session Two Air Pollution as Climate Forcing: A Workshop Honolulu, Hawaii May 1, 2002 Terry Surles California Energy Commission
CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION How do we Resolve Uncertainties? Radiative forcing by black carbon is a new issue Need to have a better understanding of inventory and magnitude of impacts w Synfuels sage Need to factor BC into the rest of the integrated soup Inform decision makers and public
CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION World Electricity Generation by Fuel Source (IEA)
CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION
“Soup” - The Need for Integration Must incorporate externalities - other environmental parameters, security (post 9/11) public opinion (Luddites, labor, industry, environment) Governments must respond with support for R&D and enabling regulations Industry must be supportive Public must be informed
CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Good Planning and Proper Integration are Critical Diverse technology portfolio Act globally, think locally Integration includes laws, financial instruments and public outreach We must be prepared to manage a system in transition
CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Carbon Management: An Approach for Integrated Energy Systems R&D Carbon Management Btu GSP < Decarbonization CO 2 Btu < CO 2 atm CO 2 emitted < Sequestration Efficiency
CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Maintaining a Balanced Technology Portfolio More efficient use of energy is the best way to reduce all pollution Fossil fuels will continue to dominate energy mix Renewables will become more viable Distributed energy resources can develop a viable, economic niche Nuclear power must remain an option
CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Primary Energy Intensity (UNDP) (Energy Consumption per GDP in 1990 US $ using exchange rates) Megajoules / GDP China and centr. planned Asia Former Soviet Union Central and Eastern Europe North America Western Europe reportedprojected
CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Electricity Generating Capacity for 150 Million Refrigerators and Freezers in the US
CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION California and United States Electricity per Capita Trends Since 1976
CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Reducing Electricity Use by 8% Leads to Additional Environmental Benefits (Emissions Reduction) 2,044 tons CO 2,307 tons NO x 175 tons SO x 263 tons PM 10 600,000 MT CO 2
CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Vision 21: A Microcosm of the Three-legged Stool New technologies will increase efficiency of central stations Fuel switching will improve H/C ratio Sequestration may be a future option w Capture and separation w Geologic and ocean disposal w Terrestrial and ocean uptake w Advanced chem and bio
CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Particulate Matter Concentration from Combustion of Coal, Oil and Natural Gas (US EPA)
CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION
COALGAS NUCLEAR WINDPHOTOVOLTAIC Combustion Fuel Cycle Construction CO 2 emiss. [g/kWh] due to (1996)(Near future) CO 2 Emissions Related to Electricity Generation
CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Renewable Technologies can be Inserted Where They Have Value Wind - dispatchability, regimes Biomass - gasification, health, environment PV - local Hydro - environmentally benign, run-of-river Geothermal - environmental
CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Externalities of the Biomass Fuel Cycle N 2 O Power gen. CH 4 Power gen. CO 2 Other stages CO 2 Power gen.
CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Nuclear Should Remain an Option BUT Cost Waste disposal Health and safety Proliferation
CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Act Globally, Think Locally Be cognizant of local culture and values Don’t “parachute” technologies into developing countries Benefits must be obvious to community w Industrial acceptance w Ease of use Requires a portfolio approach
CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Government is a Critical Part of the Equation Financial instruments must be available to overcome “Valley of Death” Laws should promote the insertion of new, environmentally-acceptable technology w Level the playing field Should be in the lead for public education and information dissemination
CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Prepare to Manage a System in Transition Vision can be one of a “Hydrogen Future” w Integration of transportation and generation systems w Incremental improvements Insertion of renewables into grid requires changes from central station strategies w Regulations that reduce interconnection burden w Better understanding of grid impacts
CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION A General Consensus We have the technologies We need to reduce uncertainties We need to be cognizant of public concerns Climate change issues should be seen as opportunities on the road to sustainability
CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Driving to a Sustainable Future: The “E”s are Linked Environment Energy Economics Equity Education