Thinking about Change Cedu 527 – Mequon Cohort Spring 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PA School Performance Profile 1 WHITEHALL-COPLAY SCHOOL DISTRICT.
Advertisements

SEED – CT’s System for Educator and Evaluation and Development April 2013 Wethersfield Public Schools CONNECTICUT ADMINISTRATOR EVALUATION Overview of.
Revised Recommendations: System Agreement for the Use of Smarter Balanced 11 th Grade Assessment in Washington Higher Education Placement Process April.
The WINSS School Improvement Planning Tool: An Overview.
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation August 20, 2014 Elizabeth M. Osga, Ph.D.
Student Growth Goals Sorting it out. Over- arching Goal 2.
OVERVIEW OF H.B HB 555  Revises benchmarks for Indicators Met and Performance Index to 90% for A  Raises performance proficiency benchmark to.
The SCPS Professional Growth System
Closing the Loop: Using Assessment Results Assessment Brown Bag Series April 14-15, 2009.
PROPOSED MULTIPLE MEASURES FOR TEACHER EFFECTIVENESS
Building an Accurate SBPR RECORD KEEPING ASSESSMENT AND INSTRUCTION GRADE LEVEL STANDARDS SBPR 1.
Introduction to Need Indicators. Where We Are in the Process 1.Concern Statements – Hypotheses 2.Test hypotheses 3.Test by collecting data that shows.
Graduate School of Education Leading, Learning, Life Changing Graduate School of Education Leading, Learning, Life Changing Data Review: Multnomah County.
Large Scale Assessment Conference June 22, 2004 Sue Rigney U.S. Department of Education Assessments Shall Provide for… Participation of all students Reasonable.
Effective Grading Practices and Strategies Lynn Kelting-Gibson Ed.D. Department of Education.
WTCS Framework for Student Success WTCS Board Meeting March
How to Write Goals and Objectives
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures of Performance Conducting High-Quality Self-Assessments.
Principal Performance Evaluation System
DRIVING INSTRUCTION THROUGH DATA WITHOUT DATA IT IS JUST AN OPINION.
Van Hise Elementary School Improvement Plan (SIP) UPDATE October 29, 2013.
 What is it?  Summative process of collecting evidence to provide the learner, teacher, administration, parents, etc with information about student.
What Needs to Be in Place for High-Level Learning-- Meeting the Needs of High Potential Students With Appropriate Policies, Procedures, and Practices!
November 7, 2014 WILLMAR PUBLIC SCHOOLS WORLD’S BEST WORKFORCE SUMMARY.
Title III Accountability. Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives How well are English Learners achieving academically? How well are English Learners.
Connecting Principal Evaluation to Student Academic Progress Student Academic Progress Goals 1.
Data for Student Success Regional Data Initiative Presentation November 20, 2009.
Preparing to Use This Video with Staff: Materials/Resources: 1.Print copies for each person of the following from the Resource Tab: a)Grain Size Visual.
CONNECT WITH CAEP | | CAEP Standard 3: Candidate quality, recruitment and selectivity Jennifer Carinci,
Targeted Assistance Programs: Requirements and Implementation Spring Title I Statewide Conference May 15, 2014.
Assessment in Early Childhood Legislation. Legislation for Young Children The need for measurement strategies and tests to evaluate federal programs led.
CHOLLA HIGH MAGNET SCHOOL Plc Workshop
Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.
Blue Springs Elementary School Standards Based Report Card Parent Meeting.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Update 11/29/12.
NCATE for Dummies AKA: Everything You Wanted to Know About NCATE, But Didn’t Want to Ask.
NJ ASSESSMENTS CYCLE II REPORT GRADES 3-8 and 11 October 30, 2008 Haddonfield Public Schools.
South Dakota Student Learning Objectives Dianna Tyler.
2012 – th Grade SRI Proficiencies – th Grade SRI Proficiencies.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 4: Professional Growth Plan Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
Assessment Report October 26, Types of Assessments Given Formative Summative Aptitude/Achievement Curriculum Based Assessments.
Understanding and Communicating About New Performance Standards on New Performance Standards on Michigan’s Standardized Tests RAISING EXPECTATIONS.
Inquiry Team and Student Growth. “Best” Practices Think about some best practices within the last 20 years in the field of science. In the field of education,
Drilling Down to Individual Students: Using Academic Intervention Plans to Make AYP Attainment Personalized Jennifer D. Morrison, SDT Baker Middle School.
Cornerstones  Formative Classroom Assessment  Quality Feedback for Learning  Motivation  Summative Evaluation for Student Evidence.
Performance Monitoring COURTNEY MILLS SCPCSD DIRECTOR OF ACADEMIC PROGRAMS.
The WINSS School Improvement Planning Tool: An Overview.
6 Standards: Governance, Curriculum, Diversity, Assessment, Faculty, and Clinical  Spring Self Study Completed  June Submit Report  Fall.
+ Literature Review: Domain B Authors: Nancy Safer & Steve Fleischman Title: How Schools Improve, “Research Matters / How Student Progress Monitoring Improves.
Inquiry Team and Student Growth. “Best” Practices Think about some best practices within the last 20 years in the field of science. In the field of education,
Public School Accountability System. Uses multiple indicators for broad picture of overall performance Uses multiple indicators for broad picture of overall.
Assessment and the Quality of Learning  Summative assessment: Gives a numerical mark or grade at the conclusion of a term of study.  Formative assessment:
U SING D ATA TO ASSESS AND INFORM SCHOOL CHANGE Data for change Presenter: Judith Marty Principal Mater Academy Charter Middle High.
© 2013, KDE and KASA. All rights reserved. FOUNDATIONS OF STUDENT GROWTH GOAL SETTING: DETERMINING STUDENT NEEDS SETTING A BASELINE What do my students.
Checklists EDUC 307. What is an Observation Checklist?  The observation checklist is a strategy to monitor specific skills, behaviors, or dispositions.
1.  Developed to meet the criteria set by the Learning Community and OPS Assessment Steering Committee  Developed as a measure to monitor student progress.
State Standards The standards provide a clarity of focus for all students, staff and parents. The clarity of focus will present a picture of a well-educated.
Connecticut Mastery Test Fourth Generation Grades 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 Connecticut Academic Performance Test Third Generation Grade 10 Presented to the.
PLCs Professional Learning Communities Staff PD. Professional Learning Committees The purpose of our PLCs includes but is not limited to: teacher collaborationNOT-
 Develop SMART Goal aligned to your building’s School Improvement Plan.  Goals should be single year goals with benchmarks throughout the.
Focus Questions What is assessment?
Student Growth 2.0 NCESD Fellows November 17 th,
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Standards Based Grading
Lead Evaluator for Principals Part I, Series 1
Mississippi Succeeds Madison County Business League & Foundation
Local District G ENGLISH LEARNER / CCR REVIEW FINDINGS
Santa Ana Unified School District Dept. of Research and Evaluation
State of Wisconsin School Report Cards Fall 2014 Results
Presentation transcript:

Thinking about Change Cedu 527 – Mequon Cohort Spring 2010

Who Moved My Cheese? Think about the characters… StrengthsWeaknesses Sniff Scurry Hem Haw

You Majority of your staff Sniff Scurry Hem Haw

It’s not that people are fundamentally opposed to change - it’s just that change requires effort, and change causes discomfort to those who are asked to change. And besides, when you get right down to it, we all try to avoid discomfort if at all possible. And besides, when you get right down to it, we all try to avoid discomfort if at all possible. - Ian Jukes - Ian Jukes

Systems Thinking

Waters Foundation (2007) Systems thinking in schools.

School Improvement Planning

Step 1: Review Data - Identify Concerns Review both WINSS and local data. Review both WINSS and local data. “Evidence of Success” data: “Evidence of Success” data: Describes student achievement and behavior.Describes student achievement and behavior. Data in other characteristics: Data in other characteristics: Provides a picture of potential influences on student performance.Provides a picture of potential influences on student performance.

How are students performing academically? Examining School Performance on Statewide Tests Examining School Performance on Statewide Tests How did students perform on state tests at grades 3-8 and 10? (Percents and totals include continuing students only, not newly enrolled students). Look at and compare subgroups.How did students perform on state tests at grades 3-8 and 10? (Percents and totals include continuing students only, not newly enrolled students). Look at and compare subgroups. How did performance of all students enrolled compare to continuing students only?How did performance of all students enrolled compare to continuing students only?

How are students performing academically? Reviewing Other Student Performance Indicators Reviewing Other Student Performance Indicators What other evidence of student proficiency is available locally?What other evidence of student proficiency is available locally? What percent of students did not advance to the next grade level?What percent of students did not advance to the next grade level? How did students perform on college admissions and placement tests?How did students perform on college admissions and placement tests? What are the high school completion rates? (Schools with grade 12 only)What are the high school completion rates? (Schools with grade 12 only) What are students' postgraduation plans? (Schools with grade 12 only)What are students' postgraduation plans? (Schools with grade 12 only)

Data Sources? WINSS data WINSS data District assessments District assessments School/department assessents School/department assessents Teacher created assessments Teacher created assessments May include formative and summative assessments as appropriate May include formative and summative assessments as appropriate

Step 2: Refine Concerns

Step 3: Prioritize Concerns

Step 4: Develop Hypotheses

Step 5: Set SMARTGoals Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Realistic, Timebound Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Realistic, Timebound

Step 6: Identify Strategies

Step 7: Evaluation Criteria Define the criteria that will determine if goals and strategies have been successful. Define the criteria that will determine if goals and strategies have been successful. Strategies often require multiple assessments. Strategies often require multiple assessments.