Presence Data Model Jonathan Rosenberg Cisco Systems.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
VON Europe /19/00 SIP and the Future of VON Protocols SIP and the Future of VON Protocols: Presence and IM Jonathan Rosenberg.
Advertisements

XCAP Tutorial Jonathan Rosenberg.
FpML Versioning An AWG Discusion Document. Namespace URIs & Versions An XML parser locates the schema for a document based on its namespace URI To be.
SIP Working Group Jonathan Rosenberg dynamicsoft.
1 Web Data Management XML Schema. 2 In this lecture XML Schemas Elements v. Types Regular expressions Expressive power Resources W3C Draft:
XML Flattened The lessons to be learned from XBRL.
Review of draft-ietf-sidr-arch-01.txt Steve Kent BBN Technologies.
March 2004SIMPLE - IETF 59 (Seoul)1 Rich presence: RPID, CIPID, future-presence draft-ietf-simple-rpid draft-ietf-simple-cipid draft-ietf-simple-future.
PRJ566: PROJECT PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT Class Diagrams.
GRUU Mechanism Jonathan Rosenberg. Status Draft-rosenberg-sipping-gruu-reqs-01 defines the problem Draft-rosenberg-sip-gruu submitted with proposed solution.
1 SIPREC Recording Metadata format (draft-ram-siprec-metadata-format- 01) IETF-80 SIPREC MEETING R Parthasarathi On behalf of the team Team: Paul Kyzivat,
March 20, 2006IETF65 PANA WG PANA Specification Updates (draft-ietf-pana-pana-11.txt) Yoshihiro Ohba
XP New Perspectives on XML Tutorial 4 1 XML Schema Tutorial – Carey ISBN Working with Namespaces and Schemas.
Locating objects identified by DDI3 Uniform Resource Names Part of Session: Concurrent B2: Reports and Updates on DDI activities 2nd Annual European DDI.
XML and XSL Institutional Web Management 2001: Organising Chaos.
WG RAQMON Internet-Drafts RMON MIB WG Meeting Washington, Nov. 11, 2004.
WSDL Usage Experience with XML Schema 1.0 Jonathan Marsh Chair, WS Description WG.
Developing a common set of federal NDR’s Mark Crawford Draft April 28, 2005.
WebDAV Issues Munich IETF August 11, Property URL encoding At present, spec. allows encoding of the name of a property so it can be appended to.
© 2012 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved. For internal MITRE use 13 June 2013 Meeting #3 hData Record Format Taskforce 1 © 2012 The MITRE Corporation.
Clue data model Design team meeting 30/09/2014 Roberta Presta, Simon Romano.
Presence Data Model Jonathan Rosenberg. Changes in -02 Split out data and processing models Allow multiple devices, services, person with same URI/device.
July 27, 2009IETF NEA Meeting1 NEA Working Group IETF 75 Co-chairs: Steve Hanna
XCAP Needed Diffs Jonathan Rosenberg Cisco Systems.
An OO schema language for XML SOX W3C Note 30 July 1999.
Software Diagnostics and Conformance Testing Division Medical Device Communication Test Effort Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise, IEEE and NIST.
4395bis irireg Tony Hansen, Larry Masinter, Ted Hardie IETF 82, Nov 16, 2011.
Sheet 1XML Technology in E-Commerce 2001Lecture 2 XML Technology in E-Commerce Lecture 2 Logical and Physical Structure, Validity, DTD, XML Schema.
Lecture: Web Design Assis. Prof. Freshta Hanif Ehsan Faculty of Computer Science Kabul Polytechnic University Spring Semester
XCAP Jonathan Rosenberg dynamicsoft. Changes in Main Spec Removed POST usage Clarified the meaning of PUT for inserts vs. modifies Added AUID grammar.
C. Huc/CNES, D. Boucon/CNES-SILOGIC Producer-Archive Interface Specification.
SIP PUBLISH draft-ietf-simple-publish-01 Aki Niemi
1 SIPPING Working Group IETF 74 Dale Worley Martin Dolly Dan Petrie Profile Datasets draft-ietf-sipping-profile-datasets-03.
Caller Prefs and Friends Jonathan Rosenberg dynamicsoft.
SIP Connection Reuse Efficiency Rohan Mahy—Airespace
KMIP Support for PGP Things to take out Things to put in.
Abierman-netconf-mar07 1 NETCONF WG 68 th IETF Prague, CZ March 19, 2007.
TURN Jonathan Rosenberg Cisco Systems. Changes since last version Moved to behave terminology Many things moved into STUN –Basic request/response formation.
OMA Presence 1.0 Presence attribute, composition issues Krisztián Kiss
Slide #1 Nov 6 – 11, 2005XCON WG IETF54 Conference Package Extensions draft-levin-xcon-conference-package-ext-00 by Orit Levin The Discussion Starter.
SIP PUBLISH Method Jonathan Rosenberg dynamicsoft.
- 1 -P. Kyzivatdraft-sipping-gruu-reg-event-00 Reg Event Package Extensions draft-sipping-gruu-reg-event-00 IETF64 Nov-2005.
Presence Authorization Rules Jonathan Rosenberg Cisco Systems.
14 October 2002GGF6 / CGS-WG1 Working with CIM Ellen Stokes
OWL Web Ontology Language Summary IHan HSIAO (Sharon)
DC Architecture WG meeting Wednesday Seminar Room: 5205 (2nd Floor)
June, 2005 NCSC Component Library National Center for State Courts & URL Integration June, 2005
KeyProv PSKC Specification Philip Hoyer Mingliang Pei Salah Machani 74 nd IETF meeting, San Francisco Nov
Portable Symmetric Key Container (PSKC) Mingliang Pei Philip Hoyer Dec. 3, th IETF, Vancouver.
GJXDM Tool Overview Schema Subset Generation Tool Demo.
GRUU Jonathan Rosenberg Cisco Systems. Main Changes Up front discussion of URI properties Opaque URI parameter for constructing GRUU Procedure for EP.
1 SIPREC Recording Metadata format (draft-ram-siprec-metadata- format-01) 9 th May 2011 Interim SIPREC MEETING R Parthasarathi On behalf of the team Team:
Globally Identifiable Number (GIN) Registration Adam Roach draft-martini-roach-gin-01 IETF 77 – Anaheim, CA, USA March 22, 2010.
Maite Barroso – WP4 Workshop – 10/12/ n° 1 -WP4 Workshop- Update on Status of Fabric Global Schema Maite Barroso 10/12/2002
Web Design Principles 5 th Edition Chapter 3 Writing HTML for the Modern Web.
Nokia Internal Use Only Outline Status of the PAWS protocol document Open Issues – Review extensibility and IANA registries.
CLUE protocol CLUE design team meeting 07/10/ /10/2013.
KeyProv PSKC Specification Mingliang Pei Authors: P. Hoyer, M. Pei and S. Machani 73 nd IETF meeting, Minneapolis, Nov
PerfSONAR Schema and Topology Martin Swany. Schema Key Goals: Extensibility, Normalization, Readability Break representation of performance measurements.
© 2010 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Cisco Confidential 1 © 2010 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Cisco Confidential.
Stephen Banghart Dave Waltermire
Hitchhikers Guide to SIP
Heppenheim Prototype for the MOT design and for the Transfer follow-up
Request-URI Param Delivery
draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-yang-04
YANG Mount draft-clemm-netmod-mount IETF 98 Chicago, 30 March 2017
STIR WG IETF-100 PASSPorT Extension for Resource-Priority Authorization (draft-ietf-stir-rph-01) November, 2017 Ray P. Singh, Martin Dolly, Subir Das,
Jonathan Rosenberg dynamicsoft
Henning Schulzrinne Columbia University
Interface extensions YANG & VLAN sub-interface YANG Status update
Presentation transcript:

Presence Data Model Jonathan Rosenberg Cisco Systems

Changes Schema alignment with RPID- 07 Schema rules –MUST create valid –No expectation of validation on receipt –SHOULD be prepared to receive invalid ones IANA registrations removed from and –Status still discussed Lack of information follows RFC3840 rules Terminology change; instance -> ocurrence Additional occurrence ID construction discussion –UUID URN –Properties Devices with no services Example updated and validated Namespaces and extensibility –Can reuse a namespace if its parent is a leaf

Issue 1: UUID for Phones How does a device without a MAC address construct a UUID? –Do we care, actually? UUID has several versions –Version 1: time based Uses MAC –Version 3/5: name based Uses namespace ID –Version 4: Randomly generated Based on random number Proposal: recommend version 4 for now

Issue 2: Aliasing Document doesn’t really talk about aliases and their impact Alias = IMS public ID Proposal –Add a paragraph discussing –Suggest its just a characteristic –Do not define any actual attribute for it

Issue 3: Schema design issues fromUntil vs. sinceUntil –RPID defined type as “fromUntil” –But value of the attributes are “since” and “until” –Proposal: align schema name with actual name deviceID –Currently a global type in common schema –But defined as an element twice Data model RPID –Proposal: global element instead

Issue 4: PIDF-LO Integration Need spec somewhere that describes how pidf-lo gets used Data model discusses location generally Proposed to keep formal definition of PIDF-LO encapsulation out of data model

Next steps Minor revision Proceed to WGLC