ATF status M. Ross October 15, 2004 The ATF is the largest test facility built exclusively for linear collider RD –Utility not reduced by the selection.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Page 1 Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010 Mike Spata February 24, 2010 Collider Review Retreat International Linear Collider.
Advertisements

Damping ring K. Ohmi LC Layout Single tunnel Circumference 6.7 km Energy 5 GeV 2 km 35 km.
SuperB and the ILC Damping Rings Andy Wolski University of Liverpool/Cockcroft Institute 27 April, 2006.
June 15, 2005Marc Ross (ILC) – Instrumentation Development ILC Instrumentation Development Marc Ross, SLAC.
Overview of ILC Plans D.Rubin April 17, D. Rubin2 ILC R&D Activities and Plans 1.Positron Source 2.Damping Ring 3.Low Emittance Transport - damping.
Demonstration of the Beam loading compensation (Preparation status for ILC beam loading compensation experiments at ATF injector in this September) (PoP.
Conventional Source for ILC (300Hz Linac scheme and the cost) Junji Urakawa, KEK LCWS2012 Contents : 0. Short review of 300Hz conventional positron source.
ATF2 Status and Plan K. Kubo ATF2, Final Focus Test for LC Achievement of 37 nm beam size (Goal 1) – Demonstration of a compact final focus.
Accelerator R&D on LC - Activities of ATF & STF - 1. Introduction 2. ATF 3. STF 4. Summary Seiya Yamaguchi, KEK The US/Japan Collaboration in High Energy.
1 Plans for KEK/ATF 1. Introduction 2. Related Instrumentations at ATF 3. Experimental Plans for Fast Kicker R&D at ATF Junji Urakawa (KEK) at ILC Damping.
1 Experience at ATF To get a low emittance beam Junji Urakawa KEK Circumference: m Arc Cell Type: FOBO Number of Arc Cells: 36 Energy: GeV.
Report on the Damping Ring Meeting at CERN, Nov , 2005 J. Gao IHEP, Beijing, China Nov. 24, 2005, ILC-Asia Meeting.
March 7, 2007 LET Issues (Cai/Kubo/Zisman) Global Design Effort 1 Low-Emittance Tuning Issues and Plans Yunhai Cai, Kiyoshi Kubo and Michael S. Zisman.
ALCW at SLAC, January 7, 2004J. Rogers, A Damping Ring Primer1 A Damping Ring Primer J. Rogers Cornell University Linear collider emittance requirements.
Fast Ion Instability Studies in ILC Damping Ring Guoxing Xia DESY ILCDR07 meeting, Frascati, Mar. 5~7, 2007.
Beam dynamics on damping rings and beam-beam interaction Dec 포항 가속기 연구소 김 은 산.
ATF2 beam commissioning status and beam time request Toshiyuki Okugi 2008 / 11 / 12 ATF2 Commissioning Meeting.
Marc Ross Saturday, June 5, 2004 nanometer BPM status and plans.
Electron Source Configuration Axel Brachmann - SLAC - Jan , KEK GDE meeting International Linear Collider at Stanford Linear Accelerator Center.
1 Proposal for a CESR Damping Ring Test Facility M. Palmer & D.Rubin November 8, 2005.
Results on recent technology developments at ATF - Beam extraction study by a Fast Kicker - N. Terunuma, KEK LER11, Heraklion, Crete, Greece, 2011/Oct/5.
ATF2 Commissioning Toshiyuki Okugi 2008 / 7 /9 ATF2 beam commissioning meeting, KEK.
Low emittance tuning in ATF Damping Ring - Experience and plan Sendai GDE Meeting Kiyoshi Kubo.
Greeting for 10 th ATF2 project and TB/SGC joint meeting 1.
Multibunch beam stability in damping ring (Proposal of multibunch operation week in October) K. Kubo.
Status of ATF Collaboration The unique test facility for ILC with a low emittance beam. Junji Urakawa, KEK LCPAC at KEK
Damping Ring Parameters and Interface to Sources S. Guiducci BTR, LNF 7 July 2011.
1 H. Hayano ATF Status June/2004 H. Hayano ATF: emittance status beam study status plan nm-project collaboration & plan ATF review 6/17/2004.
Beam stability in damping ring - for stable extracted beam for ATF K. Kubo.
The SPS as a Damping Ring Test Facility for CLIC March 6 th, 2013 Yannis PAPAPHILIPPOU CERN CLIC Collaboration Working meeting.
Marc Ross T9 – Snowmass 2001 Closing Plenary T9 – Diagnostics M. Ross/R. Pasquinelli Thursday, July 19 RD: 1) determine mixing between z and x/y 2) determine.
ILC R&D at KEK Beam Control Technology –ATF –ATF2 Acceleration Technology –High-gradient Cavities L-band R&D Stand –Linac System  STF –Construction of.
1 Fast kicker study Machine Time 2011/10/18~10/29(2 weeks) TB meeting 2011/01/14 T.Naito.
Simulations - Beam dynamics in low emittance transport (LET: From the exit of Damping Ring) K. Kubo
Welcome and the ATF2 international collaboration in future 1.Introduction 2.Mission of ATF/ATF2 3.Organization of ATF/ATF2 4.International Collaboration.
Design of a one-stage bunch compressor for ILC PAL June Eun-San Kim.
Japan-US Collaboration /3/7 Japan-US Collaboration /3/7 Fast kicker development The beam extraction design from DR to the extraction line and.
Electron cloud study for ILC damping ring at KEKB and CESR K. Ohmi (KEK) ILC damping ring workshop KEK, Dec , 2007.
Global Design Effort ILC Damping Rings: R&D Plan and Organisation in the Technical Design Phase Andy Wolski University of Liverpool and the Cockcroft Institute,
1 Experiments with pulse supplies and strip-lines at ATF, Plans for fast extraction kicker for ATF2 1. Fast Kicker R&D at ATF 2. Instrumentation at ATF.
IoP HEPP/APP annual meeting 2010 Feedback on Nanosecond Timescales: maintaining luminosity at future linear colliders Ben Constance John Adams Institute,
CESR as Light Source David Rubin for the CESR Operations Group Cornell University Laboratory for Elementary-Particle Physics.
ILC Damping Rings: Configuration Status and R&D Plans Andy Wolski Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory January 19, 2006.
Instrumentation at ATF / TTF Accelerator Test Facility (KEK) Tesla Test Facility – FLASH (DESY) ESA / LCLS (SLAC) Marc Ross, SLAC.
1 1 H. Hayano and ATF group ATF Status August/2004 H. Hayano and ATF group Multibunch emittance Instrumentation developments Plans for run Multibunch.
Characterization of the Fast Ion Instability at CesrTA David Rubin Cornell University.
ISG – Damping Ring Physics and Design Group ATF – 2003// focus on the TRC challenge Marc Ross – 1.Instability about which little is known: Fast ion,
THE NEXT LINEAR COLLIDER DAMPING RING COMPLEX J.N. Corlett, S. Marks, R. Rimmer, R. Schlueter Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley,
V.Shiltsev 1 Comments on What Kind of Test Facility(ies) the ILC Needs Vladimir Shiltsev/ Fermilab.
ILC R&D Activities at KEK Superconducting Linac Development Beam-handling Technology Development.
ALCW at SLAC, January 7, 2004J. Rogers, Novel Schemes for Damping Rings1 Novel Schemes for Damping Rings J. Rogers Cornell University Improving dynamic.
3/10/2006Marc Ross - SLAC1 RDR Instrumentation – Bangalore ILC-GDE meeting, 3/10/2006 Development and specification process Operations and Beam Dynamics.
ILC DR Lower Horizontal Emittance, preliminary study
Experiments on Fast Ion Instability at PLS
For Discussion Possible Beam Dynamics Issues in ILC downstream of Damping Ring LCWS2015 K. Kubo.
Auxiliary Positron Source
Status of Fast Ion Instability Studies
CLIC Damping ring beam transfer systems
Oversea collaborators
Fast Ion Experiments at ATF
Recent Electron Cloud Studies at CESR and Future Plans
Junji Urakawa (KEK) for ATF International Collaboration
Electron Source Configuration
M. Tigner, R. Helms, M. Palmer, D. Rubin, D. Sagan Cornell University
The Proposed Conversion of CESR to an ILC Damping Ring Test Facility
CLIC damping rings working plan towards the CDR
Instability measurement plans at ATF
Status of CTC activities for the Damping rings
Instrumentation, Controls and MPS
Proposal for a CESR Damping Ring Test Facility
Presentation transcript:

ATF status M. Ross October 15, 2004 The ATF is the largest test facility built exclusively for linear collider RD –Utility not reduced by the selection of SCRF technology Parameters: linac is 100 m long, 140m circumference ring and 30 m long extraction line. –Comparable in size to the TTF2-VUV FEL, 250m long linac / undulator system. The ATF collaboration (includes KEK, SLAC, CERN, DESY, etc.) is headed by Junji Urakawa. Since the system is intended for LC work, ATF program will be directed through GD organization.

Achievements Generation of nominal LC beams Demonstration of critical technology Instrumentation to validate performance Operation –The ATF operates approximately 2000 hours per year in short 4 day (M-F) blocks. There are about 6 KEK FTE’s assigned to ATF operation, a dozen students at any given time and several contractors who provide various kinds of support. In addition, the lab provides safety-watch shift leaders. –even though the total number of operation hours is limited, we have complete control over the configuration –Cost of operation is difficult to judge directly because Japanese accounting is different than either US/Europe.

General Status – Fall 2004 Typical extracted (damped) beam operation is at 3Hz, single bunch, 1.3e10 electrons/bunch, 1.28GeV. Up to 200 mA has been stored in the ring (about 10e10 in each of 60 bunches) 1.7e10 is the max achieved single bunch intensity. Typical extracted emittance is 2 nm (x) by 20 pm (y) 5 um x 50nm normalized. The vertical emittance in the ring is 5 x lower than extracted ε (0.3% coupling), there remains a source of coupling in the extraction channel we have been unable to fix. The injection system is capable of injecting 3 20-bunch trains, with 2.8ns inter-bunch spacing. At nominal emittance and train intensity, the last few bunches in the train are unstable. We think this is due, in part, to poor ring vacuum. The average ring pressure is about 6nTorr (design 10nTorr). There is a high pressure section inside the extraction kicker. The ring wiggler magnets have been modified and adapted in the last two months. Studies with them will begin this year.

The ATF (near term) program has 3 parts: 1.ring beam dynamics 2.instrumentation (many) & supporting technology development Kicker  Alignment 3.source development –compton e+ –S-band photocathode guns Ideal facility for instrumentation studies –stable extracted beam; controlled environment

Beam Dynamics includes single particle effects such as coupling and dispersion correction, with supporting beam based alignment and optical error analysis tools –rms residual dispersion: 2mm –coupling: 0.3% extraction x-y coupling (as at SLC)  5x εy blowup Collective effects associated with fast ion instability (FBII) and coupled bunch instabilities. FBII has emittance dependent threshold  must be studied at ATF –clearly seen at ATF for 2.8 ns bunch spacing, 3e9 ppb, avg P 6 nT, εy ~ 6pm (beam size in arc cell: 2.5 to 5 um). –work on modeling, diagnostic strategies and measurements needed this year Wiggler –12 m wiggler prepared (9% circumference)

Instrumentation / subsystem Key instrumentation issues: position & size –state of the art exceeded at ILC for many aspects; reliance/trust also beyond present level –secondary, more specialized, monitors also critical BPM is the dominant instrumentation cost (10% of total instrumentation/controls cost) and dominant importance –ATF RD on cavity BPM will be a key element for next few years (small, stable beams enable RD) –applications across ILC complex (DR, linac, BD, MDI) –present status: 2 triplets of copper cavity BPM’s with movers; expected performance should enable studies of offsets, stability, coupling. demonstrated resolution ~ 0.5um equivalent for 70mm BPM diameter Beam size monitor –ATF ‘in the ring’ laserwire is the best ‘resolution’ precision beam size monitor  1% 5um (typ ‘best’ SLC 5%; typ. usual 10%) –many issues: dynamic range, linearity, correction algorithms, aspect ratio, operational –present status: strong RD for ‘in the ring’ monitor; UK (with KEK/SLAC) monitor to be installed 2005

Kicker Demonstrated ‘kicker achromat’ jitter suppression (3x) existing layout accomodates 3MHz, single bunch extraction but …  pulser requirements beyond what is described in TDR –long pulse extraction / single bunch fill sequence allows generation of 2-3 bunch TESLA train in extraction line –short pulse kicker one year later – 20 extracted bunches with ILC emittance and spacing

Sources e+ Compton γ yield demonstrated; preliminary positron polarization measurement done S-band RF gun performance excellent; 1) online and in use for damping ring studies 2) complete test stand for laser studies

Long term program emittance ~ 1pm-rad creation of ILC damped beam final focus optics tests

Summary ‘Controversial’ (i.e. important to pursue): –Kicker development (SLAC group – conventional pulser/stripline; KEK novel approaches) –Beam optics and collective effects (FBII) –Beam Position monitoring –Beam size monitors ATF is a proven tool for the development of international collaboration