Corporate Library Collection Policy A Comparative Document Analysis Paula R. Davidson Emporia State University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Non-Academic References
Advertisements

Capturing Academic Grey Literature: Starting at Home Gretta E.Siegel, Science Librarian Portland State University, Portland, OR USA GL5: 5th International.
The Messy World of Grey Literature in Cyber Security 8 th Grey Literature Conference 4-5 December 2006 New Orleans, Louisiana Patricia Erwin – I3P Senior.
MSc Dissertation Writing
FINAL YEAR PROJECT 2013/2014 UNIVERSITI MALAYSIA PERLIS
IMPACT OF JOURNAL CANCELLATIONS ON INTERLIBRARY LOAN DEMAND Rachel Fleming, Serials Librarian, Western Carolina University Kristin Calvert, Electronic.
Project Proposal.
Master’s thesis – a piece of cake? Per Ertbjerg Department of Food and Environmental Sciences University of Helsinki, Finland.
I NFORMATION L ITERACY R ESEARCH AND A SSESSMENT P APERS.
Steve Yip Head of Reference and Research Services HKUST Library Research Support Provided by HKUST Library and other JULAC Libraries in HK 1 Date : March.
SWRK 292 Thesis/Project Seminar. Expectations for Course Apply research concepts from SWRK 291. Write first three chapters of your project or thesis.
Public Finance Public Policy Paper Igor Baranov Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg University.
Evaluation Research A review. Setting the Context Attention to mission, vision, and goals of our institution. Evaluating service and quality Assessing.
Designing Your Project Output Achieving your objectives by targeting your audience Ken Peffers UNLV February 2004.
Problem Identification
Introduction to Implementing an Institutional Repository Delivered to Technical Services Staff Dr. John Archer Library University of Regina September 21,
Why search again and again? Encore and next-generation searching at UQ Keith Webster University Librarian & Director of Learning Services.
Employers’ Expectation for Entry-Level Catalog Librarians: What Position Announcement Data Indicate.
Mine or theirs, where do users go? A comparison of collection usage at a locally hosted platform versus a publisher platform.
Commission on Colleges of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS) Reaffirmation of Accreditation.
Elizabeth Newbold and Samantha Tillett GL8 New Orleans, December 2006
Grey Literature in Scholarly Communication Current Thinking from Libraries and Publishers James Neal and Kate Wittenberg.
THE NEW TEXAS CORE CURRICULUM (OCTOBER 27, 2011).
Integrating the Life Sciences from Molecule to Organism The American Physiological Society Transform a Cookbook Lab Moving Toward More Student-Centered.
What is Business Analysis Planning & Monitoring?
© L.A.C.E. Research Group, 2003 University of Cadiz Eudoxos Project Teaching Science with a Robotic Telescope EVALUATION OF THE EUDOXOS PROJECT The evaluation.
21st Century Skills Initiatives
05/16/001 MRKT 520-MARKETING MANAGEMENT DR. Ugur Yucelt Office Phone: Summer 2002 MW:6:00-9:10 pm Office Hours: MW: 5:00-6:00pm.
Global Information Literacy Moves Toward Web 3.0 by Valerie Hill, PhD by Valerie Hill, PhD TWU School of Library & Information Studies, LISD School Librarian.
Overview of the Department’s ABET Criterion 3 Assessment Process.
Proposition: Digital Collections Are Easier to Find and Use through DLF Aquifer’s American Social History Online Katherine Kott, Aquifer Director Library.
Water Supply Planning Initiative State Water Commission November 22, 2004.
International Network for the Availability of Scientific Publications (INASP) Health Information Forum, London, 15th May Programme for the Enhancement.
Commission on Colleges of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS) Reaffirmation of Accreditation.
Maryland Library Association and Delaware Library Association 2012 Joint Library Conference, Ocean City, MD Nedelina Tchangalova Engineering, Physical.
SCHOLARS’ SHOWCASE Birdville ISD 8 th grade Gifted/Talented Students.
Simone Görl │ 18th may 2006 Preserving Authentic Electronic Records: The InterPARES Project & The InterPARES Model DIGITAL PRESERVATION.
Course and Syllabus Development Presented by Claire Major Assistant Professor, Higher Education Administration.
A Principled Approach to Accountability Assessments for Students with Disabilities CCSSO National Conference on Student Assessment Detroit, Michigan June.
© 2008 Pearson Prentice Hall, Electronic Commerce 2008, Efraim Turban, et al. Chapter 14 E-Commerce Strategy and Global EC.
ICOLIS 2007 AN ATTEMPT TO MAP INFORMATION LITERACY SKILLS VIA CITATION ANALYSIS OF FINAL YEAR PROJECT REPORTS N.N. Edzan Library and Information Science.
1 of 27 How to invest in Information for Development An Introduction Introduction This question is the focus of our examination of the information management.
CBSOR,Indian Statistical Institute 30th March 07, ISI,Kokata 1 Digital Repository support for Consortium Dr. Devika P. Madalli Documentation Research &
MISSOURI PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENTS An Overview. Content of the Assessments 2  Pre-Service Teacher Assessments  Entry Level  Exit Level  School Leader.
 Collection Development Policy?  Content Development & Management Policy?  Collection Management Policy  Content Development Policy.
Historical Thinking Why Historical Thinking Matters.
23 November Review of Literature Dr.Najwa Karout.
Giving Your Vitae a JOLT Michelle Pilati Professor of Psychology Rio Hondo College Edward H. Perry Professor of Mechanical Engineering University of Memphis.
RSU #4 Library Media Program Preparing Students for the 21st Century.
Unesco / WSIS+1026 February 2013 ENUMERATE: Measuring the progress of digital heritage in Europe Marco de Niet (DEN Foundation, NL) Unesco WSIS+10 Review.
Digital Libraries1 David Rashty. Digital Libraries2 “A library is an arsenal of liberty” Anonymous.
GMBA Thesis Workshop Thesis Workshop Professor Chan-Jane Lin Director, GMBA Program November 25, 2015.
UTA/ARRI. Enterprise Engineering for The Agile Enterprise Don Liles The University of Texas at Arlington.
Corporate Social Responsibility RIINVEST COLLEGE Business Ethics - Academic Year Saxhide Mustafa-
UEF // University of Eastern Finland How to publish scientific journal articles? 10 STEPS TO SUCCESS lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll.
Perspectives on Information Course Introduction January 25, 2016.
Rebecca L. Mugridge LFO Research Colloquium March 19, 2008.
1.0/20071 Basic Information Organization: A Search for Common Concepts to Support Information Integration A Research Status Report Don Drumtra University.
A.5.2: TECHNOLOGY PLANNING WHY? WHO? WHAT? HOW? For Students in LS5043: Information and Communication Technology Fall 2014 Judi Moreillon, M.L.S., Ph.D.
Understanding and Critically Appraising the Literature Review
Outline What is Literature Review? Purpose of Literature Review
WRTC Courses.
Introduction to Implementing an Institutional Repository
Individual Engineering Projects:
IRMA 102: Introduction to Information Science
Individual Engineering Projects:
Curriculum Coordinator: Patrick LaPierre February 1, 2016
Curriculum Coordinator: Patrick LaPierre February 3, 2017
Kansas Social Studies Standards
Presentation transcript:

Corporate Library Collection Policy A Comparative Document Analysis Paula R. Davidson Emporia State University

Introduction  Interest in corporate libraries and particular companies  Value of corporate librarianship  Organizer and custodian of information  In-house storyteller  Paper, electronic, archives

Definition  Policy: a definite course or method of action selected from among alternatives and in light of given conditions to guide and determine present and future decisions ( (  Any formal, written document that addresses collections management, archives, resource selection, or acquisitions will be considered.

Research Questions  What collection criteria are used to select, maintain and discard electronic and hard copy resources in large American retail suppliers with international customers?  What collection criteria are used to select and preserve archival materials within these same corporations?  How do collection development policies compare between three similar organizations?

Literature Review  Planned and logical building of collection to meet current and future needs  Acquisition and discarding ideally based on regularly reviewed policy  Differ for company libraries  Hall and Russell, 1996

Literature Review  Four global corporation library selection activities assessed  Towards developing a theory of corporate collection development  Performance, operation (cost, centralization, formalization)  Include ideas within content, choose from vast amount of content, contain cost, support browsing  Edgar, 2003

Literature Review  Frito-Lay Corporate Library  Engineering library  Categories of standards, sources for standards, access points to collection  Ogden, 1990

Methodology  Obtain collection policy documents  Components, structure, criteria  Contextually placed  Viewed with models  Actual – corporate, academic, special collection  Theoretical  Gather more documents?

Setting & Environment  Starbucks – Seattle, WA  REI – Sumner, WA  Hallmark – Kansas City, MO Analysis will take place in Kansas City, MO

Data Analysis  Summary documents  Spreadsheets – consistencies/discrepancies  Reformulated and reconciled  Conclusions  Suggestions

Timeline  November – Complete literature review  December – February – Obtain collection policy documents  March – April – Compare and analyze documents  May – Construct comparative documents, develop conclusions  June – Compose and submit final report

Obstacles  Will concrete documents be available?  Will additional corporations need to be approached?  Will there be unforeseen obstacles?  Can the timeline be met?

Stakeholders  Corporate librarians  Benefit by a better understanding of successfully implemented collection development policies  Benefit by suggestions resulting from a comparative analysis

Conclusion  Based on comparative analysis, conclusions can be drawn about the effectiveness of collections policies in large, international corporations  Suggestions for future collections developments can be made

References  Edgar, W. (2000). Corporate library resource selection and corporate core competencies: Exploring the connections. Tuscaloosa, AL. The University of Alabama.  Edgar, W. (2003) Toward a theory of collection development: An activities and attributes approach. Library Collections, Acquisitions, & Technical Services. 27(4), 393.  Green, L. (1995). Evaluating a corporate library collection. Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery & Information Supply. 6(1), 49.  Hall, H., & Russell, A. (1996). Resource management in the electronic environment: Company library web pages and collection development principles. In Proceedings of the International Online Information Meeting. United Kingdom.

References  Jones, A. A., Cantelon, P. L., & Adkins, E. W. (1995). Corporate archives and history: Making the past work. Libraries & Culture. 30(2), 226.  Nelke, M. (1999). The role of the corporate library in the knowledge management process. Information Services and Use. 19(1), 49.  Ogden, S. M. (1990). Standards in the Frito-Lay corporate library. Science & Technology Libraries. 10(3), 49.  Xie, H. (2006). Understanding human-work domain interaction: Implications for the design of a corporate digital library. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology : JASIST.. 57(1), 128.