California’s Flood Future Recommendations for Managing the State’s Flood Risk Flood Risk Management & Silver Jackets Workshop August 21, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THE GHANA POVERTY REDUCTION STRATEGY Integration and Progress of Environmental Issues By Winfred Nelson NDPC November
Advertisements

Integrating Water Management The Future of Integrated Water Management: Moving the Program Forward Gary Bardini, Deputy Director CA Department of Water.
Raising the Standard for Improved Flood Risk Management in the Midwest Raising the Standard for Improved Flood Risk Management in the Midwest Interagency.
AGENDA ITEM 4: FOLLOW-UP ON THE DECISIONS OF THE WORLD METEOROLOGICAL CONGRESS ON THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL BOARD ON CLIMATE SERVICES AGENDA ITEM 4.1: IMPLEMENTATION.
Using Mitigation Planning to Reduce Disaster Losses Karen Helbrecht and Kathleen W. Smith United States: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) May.
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level The Economy and Conservation Agendas:
Tracie Billington, P.E. Chief Financial Assistance Branch Department of Water Resources.
1 Rebuilding the System Reducing the Risk California Water Plan – Advisory Committee August 16, 2007.
1 Preparing Washington for a Changing Climate An Integrated Climate Change Response Strategy Department of Ecology Hedia Adelsman, Executive Policy Advisor.
Session 301 Factors in Assessing Risk Mitigation Actions Impact reducing the identified risks and vulnerabilities in the community Probability that each.
Alachua County Post-Disaster Redevelopment Plan Alachua County Board of County Commissioners Meeting April 27, 2010.
What’s next in California's flood future? Finding answers: California Water Management Investment Strategy FEMA Region IX - CHARG Stakeholder Meeting July.
2 1)Familiarize State agency staff with Water Plan Update 2013 information, tools and resources 2)Identify opportunities for State agencies to derive.
2 First published in 1957 as Bulletin 3 Updated 10 times  Update 2013 released Summer 2014 Water Code requires DWR to update Water Plan every 5 years.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Missouri River Flood Task Force (MRFTF) Concept Briefing
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Flood Risk Management Update Stephanie Bray 12/10/2013.
Flood Risk Management Program Rolf Olsen Institute for Water Resources U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
Strengths 1.Describes clearly the intrinsic value of the Delta and its economy and documents the many public-good services provided by the Delta 2.Provides.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Flood Risk Management Approaches As Being Practiced in Japan, Netherlands, United Kingdom, and United States.
N AVIGATING THE T URN : F LOOD R ISK A SSOCIATED WITH L EVEES Sam Riley Medlock, J.D., CFM Association of State Floodplain Managers May 2011.
California’s Flood Future Recommendations for Managing the State’s Flood Risk National Association of Flood & Stormwater Management Agencies December 10,
Integrating Water Management Statewide Integrated Water Management (IWM) Gary Bardini, Deputy Director IWM Rijkswaterstaat & California Coordination Kickoff.
Presentation to Contra Costa County Climate Leaders October 3, 2013.
Dam Hazard Consequences Assessment
Louisiana’s 2012 Comprehensive Master Plan for a Sustainable Coast Path Forward on Nonstructural Program Implementation CPRA Meeting - October 17, 2012.
Partnership for Urban South Hampshire Sustainable Growth.
Module 11 STEPS 4 & 5 Conduct Reconnaissance Study & Report Certification Civil Works Orientation Course - FY 11.
1 The Rise of Regionalism in Water Resources John K. Woodling California Department of Water Resources North Bay Watershed Association Conference April.
Relevant, Ready, Responsive, Reliable 1 Addressing the Flood Risk Challenge.
Hazard Mitigation Planning and Project Funding. Agenda Objectives Overview of Hazard Mitigation Hazard Mitigation Planning Mitigation Project Funding.
American River Basin Integrated Regional Water Management Plan Update Process SCGA Board Meeting July 13, 2011.
1 Slide1 THINGS WE NEED TO UNDERSTAND ABOUT LEVEES: CURRENT INITIATIVES AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS Presentation to Association of State Flood Plain Managers.
Wetland Monitoring What Do We Need? Integration of Wetland Monitoring and Wetland Management Wetlands and Waterways Program Maryland Dept. of the Environment.
Mitigation Plan for Four New Jersey Counties Municipal Mitigation Measures prepared for: Camden, Cumberland, Gloucester, and Salem Counties prepared by:
Community Resilience Planning in Coastal North Carolina Sixth Annual Unifour Air Quality Conference June 15, 2012 Linda B. Rimer Ph.D. 10/20/20151 U.S.
Briefing to the Central Valley Flood Protection Board June 28, 2013 Status of State-Led Basin-Wide Feasibility Studies.
1 Slide1 Examples in Communicating Flood Risk: National Flood Risk Management Initiative Presentation to National Flood Risk Management Policy Summit U.S.
Paying for Water: Floods CEAC Flood Control & Water Resource Policy Committee Caitrin Chappelle Supported by the S.D. Bechtel, Jr. Foundation September.
Guide for Rural Local Officials Evaluating Your Input into the Statewide Transportation Planning Process Developed by the National Association of Development.
1 An Ocean Blueprint for the 21st Century. 2 The U.S. Commission on Ocean Policy 16-member, independent, bi- partisan group 26 scientific advisors 16.
THE COUNTY OF YUBA OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES The Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000.
1 NOAA Priorities for an Ecosystem Approach to Management A Presentation to the NOAA Science Advisory Board John H. Dunnigan NOAA Ecosystem Goal Team Lead.
1 Status of AC Input from Last Meeting. 2 Overview  Input received on Strategic Planning Elements (Mission, Vision, Guiding Principles) & the 7 Key Content.
September 23, 2010 Overview of DWR’s Flood Management Activities Related to the Delta A Briefing to the Delta Stewardship Council 1.
Melinda Terry, Executive Director CA Central Valley Flood Control Association 1.
California’s Flood Future Recommendations for Managing the State’s Flood Risk Terri Wegener, P.E., DWR Briefing for Central Valley Flood Protection Board.
Watershed Stewardship Program Status of Marin County Public Works Watershed Program 11/7/08 11/7/08.
Sonoma Valley Groundwater Management Planning. 2 Presentation Overview SCWA/USGS Groundwater Study Stakeholder Assessment Groundwater Management Work.
Life-Cycle Flood Risk Management
USACE Flood Risk Management and Silver Jackets Workshop Sandra K. Knight, PhD, PE, D.WRE Deputy Associate Administrator for Mitigation, FEMA August.
Rebuilding the System Reducing the Risk California Water Plan Plenary Session October 22-23, 2007.
California Water Plan Update Advisory Committee Meeting January 20, 2005.
California Water Plan Old and New Steve Macaulay, Executive Director.
CVFPB Executive Committee Meeting – Agenda Item No. 4C Central Valley Flood Protection Board.
Department of Water Resources Delta Levees Program Presentation for Delta Stewardship Council.
California Energy Action Plan December 7, 2004 Energy Report: 2004 and 2005 Overview December 7, 2004.
Water Conservation and Recycling Roundtable Interim Federal Action Plan for the California Bay-Delta April 8, 2010.
BUILDING STRONG ® 1 Risk Management Center Silver Jackets Program Overview Jennifer Dunn USACE, Institute for Water Resources Silver Jackets Program Manager.
Climate Literacy 201 Department of Water Resources May 22, 2013.
Integrated Regional Water Management Grant Program Implemented Jointly by Department of Water Resources and State Water Resources Control Board.
Draft Central Valley Flood Protection Plan Investment Strategy
THE COUNTY OF YUBA OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES
Silver Jackets Orientation
CRUE – The Way Forward Vicki Jackson
Investing in Source Water Protection
Responding to Changing Climate Washington State Department of Ecology
Water scarcity and droughts
Can insert photo or graphic in this space
Basic principles Overview on proposals Clustering proposals
American River Basin Integrated Regional Water Management Plan Update Process SCGA Board Meeting July 13, 2011.
Presentation transcript:

California’s Flood Future Recommendations for Managing the State’s Flood Risk Flood Risk Management & Silver Jackets Workshop August 21, 2012

Report Purpose Make recommendations for managing California’s flood risk Guide decisions about: – Policies – Financial investments 2

California’s Flood Future Report 3 Unprecedented effort – Collaboration: DWR and USACE – Statewide coverage – Accelerated timeframe In consultation with: – Over 140 local agencies – CEAC – FEMA

Problem

California is at risk for catastrophic flooding 7.2 million Californians exposed Major flooding in all counties Flood insurance policyholders have tripled since

Flood Impacts The impacts of a major flood would be devastating to California and to the nation Critical infrastructure is damaged and could be out of service for long periods Vital services become isolated or are closed Vast areas of agricultural lands become unproductive, possibly for long periods Water supplies and water quality are affected 6

Many different types of flooding in California 7

7.2 million Californians live in floodplains 8 Number of People in Floodplain

$575 billion in structures are at risk 9 Number of Structures in Floodplain

California’s agricultural economy is at risk 10 Crop Value in Floodplain

Sensitive species live in floodplains 11 Number of Species in Floodplain

Flood management authority is complex and fragmented 12 Number of Agencies

Complex array of existing infrastructure More than 11,000 miles of levees More than 1,700 dams More than 600 debris basins 36 major reservoirs Other facilities 13

Flood Infrastructure does not meet current and future project needs 14 More than 900 projects identified statewide – 20% do not have cost estimates – $30 to $50 billion improvements and projects – Will not provide a 100-year level of protection statewide

Funding is limited and unreliable Inconsistent and insufficient funding Declining local resources Reduced Federal cost shares Challenging revenue structure Inadequate understanding by public and policy makers about benefits and costs of flood management 15

Solution

Flood Management using an Integrated Water Management approach High value, multiple benefits Large range of solutions Collaboration and cooperation Regional and systemwide approach Array of funding sources 17

Land Use Planning Regional, Systemwide, and Statewide Planning Risk Assessments Flood Risk Awareness Flood Readiness Actions IWM Benefits - Public Safety - Environmental Stewardship - Economic Stability ResultsPlansTools Alignment -Governance - Policies Funding - Investment Priorities - Sufficient and Stable Funding Recommendations for managing California’s flood risk 18

Conduct regional flood risk assessments to understand statewide flood risk. Identify regional flood risk evaluation methods Collect flood risk data Identify regional flood risk Set regional flood risk reduction goals Identify restoration opportunities Assess climate change and sea level rise impacts 19 1

Increase public and policymaker awareness about flood risks to facilitate informed decisions. Consistent messaging Provide outreach resource materials Catalog (online) flood risk information Share research data and other flood information 20 2

Support flood emergency preparedness, response, and recovery programs to reduce flood impacts. Provide increased funding for flood readiness More robust flood emergency management plans Conduct regular flood emergency exercises Identify data/forecasting needs 21 3

Encourage land-use planning practices that reduce the consequences of flooding. Develop planning principles for development in floodplains Facilitate coordination between all types of planners and emergency response managers Link funding to best management practices 22 4

Conduct flood management from regional, systemwide, and statewide perspectives to maximize resources. Regional flood planning areas Regional project prioritization State and Federal processes improvements Regional water management and flood management coordination Link funding to IWM approach 23 5

Facilitate public agency alignment to improve flood management governance, planning, and policies. Address permitting, planning, and implementation through regional working groups Fund regional planning programs Align resources to implement priority projects and programs 24 6

Develop statewide flood management investment priorities, and establish sufficient and stable funding mechanisms to reduce flood risk. Assess potential funding sources and propose new funding options Facilitate access to funding sources Develop a methodology to prioritize funding Increase funding for priority projects 25 7

Path Forward Flood management is at a crossroads: status quo or progress DWR and USACE are committed to using an IWM approach Short-term and long-term solutions are necessary 26

We Must Take Action Now California’s future depends on: Agencies at all levels working together Implementing policies and projects using an IWM approach Stakeholder and policymaker awareness of the cost and consequences of flooding Establishing investment priorities and sufficient and stable funding 27 Actions Results PlansTools Public Safety Public Safety Environmental Stewardship Environmental Stewardship Economic Stability Economic Stability

California’s Flood Future Report Recommendations for Managing the States Flood Risk August 2012 For more information: Terri Wegener: Terri Wegener: Stu Townsley: Stu Townsley:

California’s Flood Future Recommendations for Managing the State’s Flood Risk Presentation to Silver Jackets Program August 21, 2012