SiD Vertexing and Tracking Contribution to the LOI Bill Cooper Marcel Demarteau Ron Lipton Rich Partridge Dong Su For the SiD Vertex/Tracking Group SiD.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Impact parameter studies with early data from ATLAS
Advertisements

Proposal for a new design of LumiCal R. Ingbir, P. Ruzicka, V. Vrba October 07 Malá Skála.
Striplet option of Super Belle Silicon Vertex Detector Talk at Joint Super B factory workshop, Honolulu 20 April 2005 T.Tsuboyama.
1 Hadronic In-Situ Calibration of the ATLAS Detector N. Davidson The University of Melbourne.
1 Benchmarking the SiD Tim Barklow SLAC Sep 27, 2005.
1 Physics Impact of Detector Performance Tim Barklow SLAC March 18, 2005.
Tracker Performance Benchmarks for High-pT Tracks ALCPG Winter SLAC January 7, 2004 Richard Partridge Brown University.
Simulating SiD for the LOI Norman Graf (SLAC) SiD Phone Meeting July 30, 2008.
LBNE R&D Briefing May 12, 2014 LBNE R&D Briefing May 12, 2014 LArIAT and LBNE Jim Stewart LArIAT EPAG Chair BNL LBNE LARIAT-EPAG J. Stewart BNL T. Junk.
Silicon Detector: Simulation & Reconstruction Norman Graf SiD Advisory Meeting September 14, 2009.
 k0k0 ++ -- -- p ILC Technical Design Report Physics and Detectors – Detailed Baseline Design Juan A. Fuster Verdú, IFIC-Valencia PAC Meeting, KEK.
Charge to the SiD Workshop Andy White University of Texas at Arlington.
E. Devetak - LCWS t-tbar analysis at SiD Erik Devetak Oxford University LCWS /11/2008 Flavour tagging for ttbar Hadronic ttbar events ID.
1 The ILD LoI IDAG Referees for ILD Benchmarking – J.A. Hewett, W.G. Li Tracking – R. Nickerson Calorimetry – D. Green MDI – T. Himmel.
IDAG Tracking Review  Groups have not yet submitted LOI  Avoid ‘temptation’ to regard as a Technical Design Review  Rules Specified –leave groups to.
SiD Tracking Simulation: Status and Plans Richard Partridge for the SiD Tracking Group Vancouver Linear Collider Workshop July 19-22, 2006.
1 Realistic top Quark Reconstruction for Vertex Detector Optimisation Talini Pinto Jayawardena (RAL) Kristian Harder (RAL) LCFI Collaboration Meeting 23/09/08.
SiD R&D on PFA and Calorimetry -> IDAG guidance. -> Present PFA situation. -> Developing a timeline for PFA development. -> Calorimetry aspects.
Octobre MPI Munich FCAL Workshop in Munich W. Lohmann, DESY The 14 mrad X-angle, two IPs The push-pull option The next calendar dates Where we are.
1http:// 22/4/2010 Introduction WG4 Outline: Mandate of the WG Timescale How to proceed? Vertex detector requirements Collecting input on.
Sim/Recon DBD Editors Report Norman Graf (SLAC) Jan Strube (CERN) SiD Workshop SLAC, August 22, 2012.
Tracking Simulation Richard Partridge Brown / SLAC November 15, 2008.
Preparing for the SiD LoI SiD Parallel Session TILC08 March 5, 2008 John Jaros.
Impact parameter resolution study for ILC detector Tomoaki Fujikawa (Tohoku university) ACFA Workshop in Taipei Nov
ILC DBD Common simulation and software tools Akiya Miyamoto KEK ILC PAC 14 December 2012 at KEK.
How we’re organizing ourselves Rich Partridge, Marcel Demarteau for the Tracking Group SiD Advisory Meeting December 11, 2006 Tracking Review at Beijing.
1Frank Simon ALCPG11, 20/3/2011 ILD and SiD detectors for 1 TeV ILC some recommendations following experience from the CLIC detector study
SiD R&D tasks for the LOI - Subsystem R&D tasks - Summary of SiD R&D - Prioritization of R&D tasks -> Document for DoE/NSF ~Feb 2009 (Mainly based on Marty’s.
Philip Burrows SiD meeting, Chicago 15/11/081 Progress on the LoI Philip Burrows John Adams Institute Oxford University Thanks to: Hiro Aihara, Mark Oreglia.
Performance and occupancies in a CCD vertex detector with endcaps Toshinori Abe and John Jaros 04/21/04.
Overview of SiD Tracking Rob Kutschke,Fermilab LSWS07 June 1, 2007 (Layer 5) (Layer 1) VXD.
CLICdp achievements in 2014 and goals for 2015 Lucie Linssen, CERN on behalf of the CLICdp collaboration CLIC workshop, January 30 th
Calorimeter in front of MUCh Mikhail Prokudin. Overview ► Geometry and acceptance ► Reconstruction procedure  Cluster finder algorithms  Preliminary.
Impact parameter resolutions for ILC detector Tomoaki Fujikawa (Tohoku university) ACFA Workshop in Taipei Nov
February, INP PAN FCAL Workshop in Cracow W. Lohmann, DESY The BCD (Baseline Configuration Document) The next calendar dates Where we are with FCAL.
Benchmarking Tracking & Vertexing Andrei Nomerotski (Oxford) SiD Tracking Meeting, 7 December 2007.
1 FPCCD VTX Work Plan Y. Sugimoto 2010/1/22. 2 FPCCD: Features and R&D issues (1/2) Small pixel size (~5  m) –Sensor development Small size chip; ~6mm.
How to Get Involved in SiD Richard Partridge Brown / SLAC LCWS 07.
Jet Tagging Studies at TeV LC Tomáš Laštovička, University of Oxford Linear Collider Physics/Detector Meeting 14/9/2009 CERN.
J-C Brient-DESY meeting -Jan/ The 2 detector options today …. SiD vs TDR [ * ] [ * ] J.Jaros at ALCPG-SLAC04 ECAL ECAL tungsten-silicon both optionsHCAL.
ILD Vertex Detector Y. Sugimoto 2012/5/24 ILD
SiD Vertex Detector Mechanical R&D (May Apply to Other Concepts) Bill Cooper Fermilab.
Software Tools for Layout Optimization (Fermilab) Software Tools for Layout Optimization Harry Cheung (Fermilab) For the Tracker Upgrade Simulations Working.
WORKSHOP CHARGE ACFA Physics and Detector Workshop Tsukuba, Apr 17, 2009 Hitoshi Yamamoto Tohoku University.
July 7, 2008SLAC Annual Program ReviewPage 1 Silicon Tracking / Silicon Readout R&D Richard Partridge SLAC / Brown.
Andrei Nomerotski, University of Oxford ILC VD Workshop, Menaggio 22 April 2008 SiD Vertex Detector.
LCWS11 – Tracking Performance at CLIC_ILD/SiD Michael Hauschild - CERN, 27-Sep-2011, page 1 Tracking Performance in CLIC_ILD and CLIC_SiD e + e –  H +
Printing: This poster is 48” wide by 36” high. It’s designed to be printed on a large-format printer. Customizing the Content: The placeholders in this.
Philip Burrows SiD Workshop, SLAC 2/03/091 Status of the SiD LoI Philip Burrows John Adams Institute Oxford University Hiro Aihara, Mark Oreglia.
RECFA September Kenneth Österberg, University of Helsinki Experimental e + e - physics – LEP&LC DELPHI Major finnish LEP contribution analysis.
3 October, 2006GLD Meeting1 The Detector Chapter of The Detector Concept Report GLD Meeting 3 October, 2006 Akiya Miyamoto.
CLIC - CDR Status (Volume 2) Hermann Schmickler, ILCW2010.
SiD Tracking Status Richard Partridge Brown / SLAC Fermilab ALCPG Meeting.
Palaiseau, 13/1/ 2005 P. Colas - Optimising tracking 1 Optimising a Detector from the Tracking Point-of-View P.Colas, CEA Saclay constraints role Optimisation.
DØ Beauty Physics in Run II Rick Jesik Imperial College BEACH 2002 V International Conference on Hyperons, Charm and Beauty Hadrons Vancouver, BC, June.
8/12/2010Dominik Dannheim, Lucie Linssen1 Conceptual layout drawings of the CLIC vertex detector and First engineering studies of a pixel access/insertion.
SiD Tracking in the LOI and Future Plans Richard Partridge SLAC ALCPG 2009.
Eunil Won/Korea U1 A study of configuration for silicon based Intermediate Trackers (IT) July Eunil Won Korea University.
Simulation Plan Discussion What are the priorities? – Higgs Factory? – 3-6 TeV energy frontier machine? What detector variants? – Basic detector would.
Tracking: An Experimental Overview Richard Partridge Brown / SLAC Fermilab ALCPG Meeting.
Status of the ALCPG simulation & reconstruction Norman Graf (SLAC) TILC09, Tsukuba April 19, 2009.
How to organize ourselves Rich Partridge, Marcel Demarteau for the Tracking Group SiD Tracking Meeting December 8, 2006 Tracking Review at Beijing.
Standard Monte Carlo Event Samples Norman Graf SLAC November 11, 2004.
Towards Snowmass Jul. 13, 2005 Y.Sugimoto. Charge for Detector WGs Charge for Concept Groups: work towards a baseline design define performance criteria.
Alpine, very forward, EOS…
Electroweak Physics Towards the CDR
ILD Technical Coordination
Upgrade Tracker Simulation Studies
Linear Collider Simulation Tools
Linear Collider Simulation Tools
Presentation transcript:

SiD Vertexing and Tracking Contribution to the LOI Bill Cooper Marcel Demarteau Ron Lipton Rich Partridge Dong Su For the SiD Vertex/Tracking Group SiD Workshop SLAC, March 2-4, 2009

Latest version of section on Vertex and Track detector dated February 25 – – Contains driver, all source LaTex files and all eps figures Total of 35 pages, with 21 figures Received but yet to be incorporated: –Sensor testing results from Bruce and Sally –Module description and tracker hit digitization from Tim Promised: –Results on calorimeter assisted tracking (Dima) –Write-up on track fitter (Rob) –More text on frequency interferometry alignment (Keith) –More performance results (Rich) –Nominal hit multiplicity as function of angle (Sudong) –Figure of sensor test results (Bruce) A big thank you to all those who have contributed to the loi and have proofread the write-up so far. LOI SiD Workshop, SLAC, March 2-4, M. DemarteauSlide 2

Figures Beam profile plot included (Maruyama) Need a quantitative description of background –Number of background hits per layer for various machine options SiD Workshop, SLAC, March 2-4, M. DemarteauSlide 3

Figures SiD Workshop, SLAC, March 2-4, M. DemarteauSlide 4

Figures SiD Workshop, SLAC, March 2-4, M. DemarteauSlide 5

Figures Lampshade geometry mentioned as baseline, but Monte Carlo simulation carried out with disk geometry SiD Workshop, SLAC, March 2-4, M. DemarteauSlide 6

Figures SiD Workshop, SLAC, March 2-4, M. DemarteauSlide 7 Tracker details Detail of support of cylinders from barrels is still missing

Figures Tracker SiD Workshop, SLAC, March 2-4, M. DemarteauSlide 8

Figures Material budget as modeled in the Monte Carlo SiD Workshop, SLAC, March 2-4, M. DemarteauSlide 9

Figures SiD Workshop, SLAC, March 2-4, M. DemarteauSlide 10

Figures Module plus cable plus readout. Good figure is missing SiD Workshop, SLAC, March 2-4, M. DemarteauSlide 11

Monte Carlo Description SiD Workshop, SLAC, March 2-4, M. DemarteauSlide 12 Vertex detector Tracker

Figures SiD Workshop, SLAC, March 2-4, M. DemarteauSlide 13 Cast the momentum resolution in a more standard format Also plot as function of angle

Figures SiD Workshop, SLAC, March 2-4, M. DemarteauSlide 14

Figures SiD Workshop, SLAC, March 2-4, M. DemarteauSlide 15

Figures SiD Workshop, SLAC, March 2-4, M. DemarteauSlide 16

SiD Workshop, SLAC, March 2-4, M. DemarteauSlide 17 List of Figures for LOI 1. Elevation view of sub-detector; all silicon for vertex 2. R-phi view of sub-detector, barrels, disks, forward disks 3. Detail on vertex detector support from beam pipe and servicing 4. Detail on barrel/disk support for tracker Detail on module design 6. Number of charged particles/cm 2 as function of radius for various z locations including beam backgrounds; occupancy as function of radius for barrels Material budget as function of cos(theta) 8. Double-metal sensor layout + a characteristic (CV-curve?) Track reconstruction efficiency as function of integrated # bunch crossings Impact parameter resolution as function of p T and tan(lambda) Track reconstruction efficiency as function of track p T and cos(theta) 12. Fitted track momentum resolution as function of p T and cos(theta) 13. Efficiency of V-reconstruction (K s,  ) with calorimeter assisted tracking ---

SiD Workshop, SLAC, March 2-4, M. DemarteauSlide 18 Figures Contributed to Benchmarking Tracker contributions to benchmarking section 1.Higgs recoil mass measurement precision from ZH production (mandatory reaction) 2. Secondary vertex reconstruction efficiency from ZH, H-> cc (mandatory reaction 3.Heavy flavor tagging performance: b-tag efficiency versus purity ?

SiD Workshop, SLAC, March 2-4, M. DemarteauSlide 19 List of Tables for LOI 1.Main parameters of the vertex-tracker system: barrels / disks Radii of layers, extend of layers, z-position of disks, number of channels, number of modules, stereo angle for disks 2.Sensor technology options for vertex detector with pros and cons--- 3.Estimated power consumption and thermal budget description

SiD Workshop, SLAC, March 2-4, M. DemarteauSlide 20 IDAG Questions Sensitivity of different detector components to machine background as characterized in the MDI panel –Addressed through different vertex sensor detector technologies Calibration and alignment schemes –University of Michigan system Status of an engineering model describing the support structures and the dead zones in the detector simulation –Described in the main text Plans for getting the necessary R&D results to transform the design concept into a well-defined detector proposal –Will be addressed in the description about sensor technologies and R&D Push-pull ability with respect to technical aspects –Defer to overall write-up on push-pull A short statement about the energy coverage, identifying the deterioration of the performances when going to energies higher than 500 GeV and the considered possible detector upgrades. –Background plot will include 1 TeV running How was the detector optimized: for example the identification of the major parameters which drive the total detector cost and its sensitivity to variations of these parameters –No optimization done as of yet

Missing Parts I IDAG related Sensitivity of different detector components to machine background as characterized in the MDI panel –Background files exist with 1, 10 and 100 bunch crossings. No bunch crossing information, just cumulative hits. Rich is running his track finder on these files. Expect results this week. –Different vertex sensor detector technologies not addressed. Will be addressed in R&D section Calibration and alignment schemes –Text is thin on alignment, but maybe adequate. The text does not really address adequacy of alignment for push-pull. –What is missing is physics feedback on the alignment requirement. Energy coverage –Will run some track finding efficiency for a benchmark process at different centre of mass energies. Suggest ttbar events How was the detector optimized? –Not addressed in any quantitative way SiD Workshop, SLAC, March 2-4, M. DemarteauSlide 21

Missing Parts II Non-IDAG related Performance –More quantitative characterization of the performance of the detector with the full simulation would be beneficial B-tagging efficiency Tau-identification … R&D section; may be the most crucial piece, but is as of today completely missing. –Vertex detector sensor technologies Have we excluded any technologies? –Power delivery –… SiD Workshop, SLAC, March 2-4, M. DemarteauSlide 22

Final Remarks We are finally in a position to quantitatively compare tracker designs. It would be good if we embarked on a systematic study of various tracker designs. R&D section could be a sensitive section. A proper balance needs to be found, especially in vertex detector sensor technology between the needs for SiD and R&D efforts world-wide. If everyone pulls together, the companion vertex and tracking section to the LOI should be publishable as a NIM paper. We hope each and everyone will help accomplishing this goal. SiD Workshop, SLAC, March 2-4, M. DemarteauSlide 23