The earth matter effect in T2KK Based on work with K. Hagiwara, N. Ken-ichi Senda Grad. Univ. for Adv. Studies &KEK.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MINOS+ Starts April 2013 for three years April
Advertisements

Sergio Palomares-Ruiz June 22, 2005 Super-NO A Based on O. Mena, SPR and S. Pascoli hep-ph/ a long-baseline neutrino experiment with two off-axis.
Atmospheric Neutrinos Barry Barish Bari, Bologna, Boston, Caltech, Drexel, Indiana, Frascati, Gran Sasso, L’Aquila, Lecce, Michigan, Napoli, Pisa, Roma.
Parametric Resonance by the Matter Effect SATO, Joe (Saitama) Koike, Masafumi (Saitama) Ota, Toshihiko (Würzburg) Saito, Masako (Saitama) with Plan Introduction.
MiniBooNE: (Anti)Neutrino Appearance and Disappeareance Results SUSY11 01 Sep, 2011 Warren Huelsnitz, LANL 1.
Seismic Profiles of Earth’s Interior
Incoming energy crucial for your physics result, but only badly known (~50%) Incoming energy crucial for your physics result, but only badly known (~50%)
Sinergia strategy meeting of Swiss neutrino groups Mark A. Rayner – Université de Genève 10 th July 2014, Bern Hyper-Kamiokande 1 – 2 km detector Hyper-Kamiokande.
Searching for an underground national lab in China Yifang Wang July 23, 2008.
Measuring CP violating phase from long baseline neutrino experiments Naotoshi Okamura (YITP, Kyoto Univ.) ICFP2005 Oct. 07, NCU.
F Axis Off Axis Physics Potential Cambridge Off-Axis Meeting 12 January 2004 Gary Feldman.
CP-phase dependence of neutrino oscillation probability in matter 梅 (ume) 田 (da) 義 (yoshi) 章 (aki) with Lin Guey-Lin ( 林 貴林 ) National Chiao-Tung University.
November 19, 2005 Sergio Palomares-Ruiz Physics of Atmospheric Neutrinos: Perspectives for the Future Topical Workshop on Physics at Henderson DUSEL Fort.
NuMI Offaxis Near Detector and Backgrounds Stanley Wojcicki Stanford University Cambridge Offaxis workshop January 12, 2004.
T2K experiment at J-PARC Epiphany 2010D. Kiełczewska1 For T2K Collaboration Danuta Kiełczewska Warsaw University & Sołtan Institute for Nuclear Studies.
Wave Theory Essential Question: What is a wave?. Answer Me!!!  Give an example of a wave. Then describe what that wave carries.
JHF2K neutrino beam line A. K. Ichikawa KEK 2002/7/2 Overview Primary Proton beamline Target Decay Volume Strategy to change peak energy.
Seismic reflection Ali K. Abdel-Fattah Geology Dept.,
Summary of WG1 – Phenomenological issues Osamu Yasuda (TMU)
LBL neutrinos; looking forward to the future Hisakazu Minakata Tokyo Metropolitan University.
TAUP2007 Sep , 2007 Sendai, Japan Shiou KAWAGOE The Graduate University for Advanced Studies (SOKENDAI) / NAOJ JSPS Research Fellow T. Kajino, The.
Probing the Octant of  23 with very long baseline neutrino oscillation experiments G.-L. Lin National Chiao-Tung U. Taiwan CYCU Oct Work done.
Layers of the Earth.
How Shallow Earth Structure Is Determined A Classroom Exercise Demonstrating Seismic Refraction Use in the Real World NSTA, Boston, 2008 Michael Hubenthal,
Caren Hagner CSTS Saclay Present And Near Future of θ 13 & CPV in Neutrino Experiments Caren Hagner Universität Hamburg Neutrino Mixing and.
Resolving neutrino parameter degeneracy 3rd International Workshop on a Far Detector in Korea for the J-PARC Neutrino Beam Sep. 30 and Oct , Univ.
Osamu Yasuda Tokyo Metropolitan University Model independent analysis of New Physics interactions and implications for long baseline experiments INTERNATIONAL.
1 PHYSICS IN THE NuMI BEAM with a ~10 kiloton LARTPC prototype ASH RIVER or SOUDAN J.Schneps PRELIMINARY,UNFINISHED, & ROUGH Sept. 27, 2007.
The Earth Matter Effect in the T2KK Experiment Ken-ichi Senda Grad. Univ. for Adv. Studies.
Physics with a very long neutrino factory baseline IDS Meeting CERN March 30, 2007 Walter Winter Universität Würzburg.
Dec. 13, 2001Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Neutrino and Anti-Neutrino Cross Sections and CP Phase Measurement Yoshihisa OBAYASHI (KEK-IPNS) NuInt01,
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Lecture 1 – Waves & Sound b) Wave Motion & Properties.
The NOvA Experiment Ji Liu On behalf of the NOvA collaboration College of William and Mary APS April Meeting April 1, 2012.
Monday, Feb. 19, 2007PHYS 5326, Spring 2007 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 5326 – Lecture #7 Monday, Feb. 19, 2007 Dr. Jae Yu 1.Neutrino Oscillation Experiments 2.Long.
Long Baseline Neutrino Beams and Large Detectors Nicholas P. Samios Istanbul, Turkey October 27, 2008.
Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Oct. Neutrino Oscillation Experiment between JHF – Super-Kamiokande Yoshihisa OBAYASHI (Kamioka Observatory, ICRR)
Degeneracy and strategies of LBL Osamu Yasuda Tokyo Metropolitan University NuFACT04 workshop July 28, 2004 at Osaka Univ.
Getting the most in neutrino oscillation experiments Hisakazu Minakata Tokyo Metropolitan University.
Mass Hierarchy Study with MINOS Far Detector Atmospheric Neutrinos Xinjie Qiu 1, Andy Blake 2, Luke A. Corwin 3, Alec Habig 4, Stuart Mufso 3, Stan Wojcicki.
Measuring Earth Matter Density and Testing MSW Hisakazu Minakata Tokyo Metropolitan University.
Proposal for the study to define what is really necessary and what is not when the data from beam, ND and SK are combined A.K.Ichikawa 2008/1/17.
CP phase and mass hierarchy Ken-ichi Senda Graduate University for Advanced Studies (SOKENDAI) &KEK This talk is based on K. Hagiwara, N. Okamura, KS PLB.
Water Cherenkov detector - brief status report - Kenji Kaneyuki Research Center for Cosmic Neutrinos, ICRR, Univ. of Tokyo.
Future neutrino oscillation experiments J.J. Gómez-Cadenas U. Valencia/KEK Original results presented in this talk based on work done in collaboration.
1 Study of physics impacts of putting a far detector in Korea with GLoBES - work in progress - Eun-Ju Jeon Seoul National University Nov. 18, 2005 International.
2. Internal Structure of the Earth Earth ’ s Internal Structure: Compositional Layers Crust:  Continental crust (20-70 km)  Oceanic crust (~6 km) Mantle.
Geology 5640/6640 Introduction to Seismology 13 Apr 2015 © A.R. Lowry 2015 Read for Wed 15 Apr: S&W (§3.6) Last time: Ray-Tracing in a Spherical.
Matter Effects on Neutrino Oscillations By G.-L. Lin NCTU Nov. 20, 04 AS.
T2K Experiment Results & Prospects Alfons Weber University of Oxford & STFC/RAL For the T2K Collaboration.
WAVE Visualization—Draw the image you have in your mind of a wave. Association – What is it like? Synonyms? Examples? Definition—What is the technical.
Proposal for the 2 nd Hyper-K detector in Korea Sunny Seo Seoul National University Mark Hartz (IPMU), Yoshinari Hayato (ICRR), Masaki Ishitsuka (TIT),
Enhancement of CP Violating terms
Structure of the Earth.
Waves/Brain Pop Vocabulary
Introduction to Seismology
What is the earth like inside?
LBL Oscillation H. Minakata (Tokyo Metropolitan U.)
Report of the T2KK Workshop
Parameter Degeneracy in Neutrino Oscillations (and how to solve it?)
T2KK sensitivity as a function of L and Dm2
T2KK Sensitivity of Resolving q23 Octant Degeneracy
Naotoshi Okamura (YITP) NuFact05
Science Vocabulary 3 Week 3.
Toward realistic evaluation of the T2KK physics potential
Determination of Neutrino Mass Hierarchy at an Intermediate Baseline
Mass Hierarchy in LBL experiments
Probing non-standard neutrino physics at T2KK and neutrino factory
hep-ph Prog. Theor. Phys. 117 Takashi Shimomura (Saitama Univ.)
Will T2KK see new physics?
Intae Yu Sungkyunkwan University (SKKU), Korea KNO 2nd KNU, Nov
Presentation transcript:

The earth matter effect in T2KK Based on work with K. Hagiwara, N. Ken-ichi Senda Grad. Univ. for Adv. Studies &KEK

Matter effect and mass hierarchy -Why the matter effect is important?- matter effectCP phase The sign of the matter effect term in A e depends on that of δm 2 13 →One detector experiment cannot solve the correlation between sinθ RCT and the matter effect. In T2KK, this correlation is solved by comparing two oscillation amplitudes with same L/E but different energy (distance).

Seismic wave reflection One of the method to survey the undergrounds is measurement of the seismic (sound) wave reflection. The origin of the error to the density is mainly uncertainty of the model which converts the sound velocity to the average density. In LND model, the uncertainty of the conversion is about 6%. This error is expected to be smaller by combining the other type measurements. Ludwig, Nafe, Drake (1970)

Seismic wave data around the baseline Zhao, Horiuchi, Hasegawa Tectonophys. (1992) Sato et. al. Geohys. Geochemi. Geosys (2006) H-J. Kim et. al. Tectonophys. (2003) H-M. Cho et. al. Geophys. Res. Lett (2006)

Matter profile along the baselines Tokai-to-Kamioka case Tokai-to-Korea case Main layer where the neutrino travels mud stone layer : 2.5 g/cm 3 upper crust : 2.8g/cm 3 average density : 2.6g/cm 3 error ±6% Main layer where the neutrino travels upper crust : 2.8g/cm 3 lower crust : 2.9g/cm 3 upper mantle : 3.3g/cm 3 average density : 2.98g/cm 3 (L = 1000km) 3.03g/cm 3 (L = 1200km) error: ±6% ( ~ 0.18g/cm 3 )

The effect of the matter distribution The difference between the highest density and the lowest density in the cross section view : about 11% to the average for Tokai-to-Kamioka, about 17% for Tokai-to- Korea →Is there any effects of the matter distribution ? Such effects in the K2K experiment was studied by the Fourier expansion. [M. Koike, J. Sato, Mod. Phys. Lett. A (1997)] average symmetric distributionasymmetric distribution ● The only real part of a k in Ae gives non- negligible contribution. ● That term is sensitive to the mass hierarchy. ● Because of factor 1/k 2, large k modes is not important.

Fourier modes of the density distribution Tokai-to-Kamioka case Tokai-to-Korea case Largest coefficient : [Reρ 1 ]/ρ 0 = 1% distribution: symmetric → The real parts are large. Largest coefficient : ( L=1000km ) [Reρ 1 ]/ρ 0 =-3.3 %

The effect on χ 2 analysis Previous work (hep-ph/ ) detector in Korea: 100kt Water cerenkov running time: 5years (5.0×10 21 POT) density: 2.8 g/cm 3 (Tokai-to-Kamioka) 3.0 g/cm 3 (Tokai-to-Korea) error of density: 3% Fourier mode: not included The best combination to determine the neutrino mass hierarchy ( L=1000km ) Δχ 2 = 22.2 We check the effect of changing the conditions for the matter density to the Δχ 2 of this combination. OLD ρ SK 2.8 →2.6g/cm 3+ error 3%→6% + Fourier mode Total Δχ 2 = The difference of the matter effect gets large. Larger error makes the Δχ 2 smaller Fourier mode helps determining the sign of Δ 13

Summary ● We estimate the matter distribution along the baseline from the recent seismic wave analysis. ● The main origin of the error is uncertainty of the velocity- density conversion, 6%. ● Average density: Tokai-to-Kamioka 2.6 g/cm 3 ± 6% Tokai-to-Korea 3.0 g/cm 3 ± 6% ● We find the Fourier mode along the baseline is important as well as the error to the average matter density: [Re(ρ 1 )/ρ 0 ]: Tokai-to-Kamioka: 1% Tokai-to-Korea: 3.3% ● The effect of the earth matter effect in chi square analysis. OLD ρ SK 2.8 →2.6g/cm 3+ error 3%→6% + Fourier mode Total Δχ 2 =

Tokai-to-Kamioka-and-Korea experiment OAB SK Down side of the T2K beam will appear in Korea while the T2K is running. →We can operate two LBL experiments, Tokai-to- Kamioka and Tokai-to- Korea.

mass hierarchy and the matter effect in T2KK When we choose the combinatino of the off- axis angles as SK:2.5°-3°, Korea : 0.5°-1.0°, we can compare the amplitudes near the oscillation maximum. The difference of the amplitudes near the oscillation maximum. Significance to the mass hierarchy pattern (rough estimation)