Accelerator Physics GroupSNS, ORNL ORBIT J. A. HolmesORNL FNAL: September 11, 2001.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Current Status of Virtual Accelerator at J-PARC 3 GeV Rapid Cycling Synchrotron H. Harada*, K. Shigaki (Hiroshima University in Japan), H. Hotchi, F. Noda,
Advertisements

1 ILC Bunch compressor Damping ring ILC Summer School August Eun-San Kim KNU.
July 22, 2005Modeling1 Modeling CESR-c D. Rubin. July 22, 2005Modeling2 Simulation Comparison of simulation results with measurements Simulated Dependence.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  We consider motion of particles either through a linear structure or in a circular ring USPAS, Knoxville, TN, Jan , 2014 Lecture.
Introduction Status of SC simulations at CERN
GRD - Collimation Simulation with SIXTRACK - MIB WG - October 2005 LHC COLLIMATION SYSTEM STUDIES USING SIXTRACK Ralph Assmann, Stefano Redaelli, Guillaume.
Topic Three: Perturbations & Nonlinear Dynamics UW Spring 2008 Accelerator Physics J. J. Bisognano 1 Accelerator Physics Topic III Perturbations and Nonlinear.
Loss maps of RHIC Guillaume Robert-Demolaize, BNL CERN-GSI Meeting on Collective Effects, 2-3 October 2007 Beam losses, halo generation, and Collimation.
SciDAC Accelerator Simulation project: FNAL Booster modeling, status and plans Robert D. Ryne, P. Spentzouris.
PTC ½ day – Experience in PS2 and SPS H. Bartosik, Y. Papaphilippou.
1 Tracking code development for FFAGs S. Machida ASTeC/RAL 21 October, ffag/machida_ ppt & pdf.
Oliver Boine-FrankenheimSIS100-4: High current beam dynamics studies SIS 100 ‘high current’ design challenges o Beam loss in SIS 100 needs to be carefully.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
Development of Simulation Environment UAL for Spin Studies in EDM Fanglei Lin December
Details of space charge calculations for J-PARC rings.
Beam dynamics on damping rings and beam-beam interaction Dec 포항 가속기 연구소 김 은 산.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
Oliver Boine-Frankenheim, High Current Beam Physics Group Simulation of space charge and impedance effects Funded through the EU-design study ‘DIRACsecondary.
Recent Upgrades to BBSIM Code V. H. Ranjbar † † Tech-X Corporation We have made several improvements to BBSIM, a parallel beam dynamics simulation code.
Accelerator PhysicsOak Ridge National Laboratory Jeff Holmes, Slava Danilov, and Sarah Cousineau SNS/ORNL October, 2004 ICFA Advanced Beam Dynamics Workshop.
Update Chris Rogers, Analysis PC, 13/07/06. State of the “Accelerator” Simulation Field model now fully implemented in revised MICE scheme Sanity checking.
1 FFAG Role as Muon Accelerators Shinji Machida ASTeC/STFC/RAL 15 November, /machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf/machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf.
 Advanced Accelerator Simulation Panagiotis Spentzouris Fermilab Computing Division (member of the SciDAC AST project)
HB’2008 August 25-29, 2008M. Martini1 Evolution beam parameters during injection and storage of the high brightness beams envisaged for the Linac4 injection.
Stephan I. Tzenov STFC Daresbury Laboratory,
Beam Loss Simulation in the Main Injector at Slip-Stacking Injection A.I. Drozhdin, B.C. Brown, D.E. Johnson, I. Kourbanis, K. Seiya June 30, 2006 A.Drozhdin.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Containing a.
Main Ring + Space charge effects WHAT and HOW … Alexander Molodozhentsev for AP_MR Group May 10, 2005.
Accelerator Physics GroupSNS, ORNL Simulation of Collective Effects in High Intensity Proton Rings J. A. HolmesORNL S. CousineauORNL V. DanilovORNL A.
Overview of Booster PIP II upgrades and plans C.Y. Tan for Proton Source group PIP II Collaboration Meeting 03 June 2014.
28-May-2008Non-linear Beam Dynamics WS1 On Injection Beam Loss at the SPring-8 Storage Ring Masaru TAKAO & J. Schimizu, K. Soutome, and H. Tanaka JASRI.
Collimator wakefields - G.Kurevlev Manchester 1 Collimator wake-fields Wake fields in collimators General information Types of wake potentials.
E-cloud studies at LNF T. Demma INFN-LNF. Plan of talk Introduction New feedback system to suppress horizontal coupled-bunch instability. Preliminary.
Midwest Accelerator Physics Meeting. Indiana University, March 15-19, ORBIT Electron Cloud Model Andrei Shishlo, Yoichi Sato, Slava Danilov, Jeff.
1 EMMA Tracking Studies Shinji Machida ASTeC/CCLRC/RAL 4 January, ffag/machida_ ppt & pdf.
Accelerator Systems DivisionOak Ridge National Laboratory March 10-12, 2003 ORBIT SIMULATIONS AND RESULTS Jeff Holmes Accelerator Physicist September 30,
PTC-ORBIT code for CERN machines (PSB, PS, SPS) Alexander Molodozhentsev (KEK) Etienne Forest (KEK) Group meeting, CERN June 1, 2011 current status …
Benchmark and Study of PSR Longitudinal Beam Dynamics Sarah M. Cousineau, Jeffrey A. Holmes, Slava Danilov MAP Workshop March 18, 2004.
By Verena Kain CERN BE-OP. In the next three lectures we will have a look at the different components of a synchrotron. Today: Controlling particle trajectories.
Orbits, Optics and Beam Dynamics in PEP-II Yunhai Cai Beam Physics Department SLAC March 6, 2007 ILC damping ring meeting at Frascati, Italy.
July LEReC Review July 2014 Low Energy RHIC electron Cooling Jorg Kewisch, Dmitri Kayran Electron Beam Transport and System specifications.
Main activities and news from the Impedance working group.
Ion effects in low emittance rings Giovanni Rumolo Thanks to R. Nagaoka, A. Oeftiger In CLIC Workshop 3-8 February, 2014, CERN.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  We consider motion of particles either through a linear structure or in a circular ring USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2015 Longitudinal.
RMS Dynamic Simulation for Electron Cooling Using BETACOOL He Zhang Journal Club Talk, 04/01/2013.
FFAG’ J. Pasternak, IC London/RAL Proton acceleration using FFAGs J. Pasternak, Imperial College, London / RAL.
ISIS Beam and MICE Target Simulation MICE Collaboration Meeting Adam Dobbs 19 th Oct 2008.
1 IMPACT: Benchmarking Ji Qiang Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory CERN Space-Charge Collaboration Meeting, May 20-21, 2014.
Beam-beam Simulation at eRHIC Yue Hao Collider-Accelerator Department Brookhaven National Laboratory July 29, 2010 EIC Meeting at The Catholic University.
BBFP J. Wei’s Fokker-Planck solver for bunched beams November 21 st, 2007 CLIC Beam dynamics meeting Y. Papaphilippou.
Vacuum specifications in Linacs J-B. Jeanneret, G. Rumolo, D. Schulte in CLIC Workshop 09, 15 October 2009 Fast Ion Instability in Linacs and the simulation.
Intra-Beam scattering studies for CLIC damping rings A. Vivoli* Thanks to : M. Martini, Y. Papaphilippou *
Lecture 4 Longitudinal Dynamics I Professor Emmanuel Tsesmelis Directorate Office, CERN Department of Physics, University of Oxford ACAS School for Accelerator.
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Python ORBIT in a Nutshell Jeff Holmes Oak Ridge National Laboratory Spallation Neutron Source Space.
1 Tracking study of muon acceleration with FFAGs S. Machida RAL/ASTeC 6 December, ffag/machida_ ppt.
Longitudinal Dynamics of Charged Particle
402.5 MHz Debunching in the Ring
Electron Cooling Simulation For JLEIC
Code description: pyORBIT
Coupling Correction at the Australian Synchrotron
Sabrina Appel, GSI, Beam physics Space charge workshop 2013, CERN
Jeffrey Eldred, Sasha Valishev
The Strong RF Focusing:
M. Pivi PAC09 Vancouver, Canada 4-8 May 2009
Simulation with Particle Studio
Electron Rings Eduard Pozdeyev.
ICFA Mini-Workshop, IHEP, 2017
Physics 417/517 Introduction to Particle Accelerator Physics
Alejandro Castilla CASA/CAS-ODU
Presentation transcript:

Accelerator Physics GroupSNS, ORNL ORBIT J. A. HolmesORNL FNAL: September 11, 2001

Accelerator Physics GroupSNS, ORNL 2 Colleagues, Collaborators, Contributers SNS, ORNL –S. Cousineau, V. Danilov, J. Galambos, J. Holmes BNL –J. Beebe-Wang, M. Blaskiewicz, A. Luccio, N. Malitsky, A. Shishlo TRIUMF –F. Jones FNAL –J. MacLachlan

Accelerator Physics GroupSNS, ORNL 3 Motivation for ORBIT High intensity proton rings such as FNAL Booster, AGS Booster, PSR, and SNS are characterized by low energy, high beam intensity, and low beam loss requirements for high availability. These requirements of high intensity and low losses necessitate a detailed understanding of beam dynamics in this regime. Under these conditions collective effects due to space charge and wakefields will strongly affect the beam behavior, and single particle models alone will not apply. Because of the complexity of collective phenomena for bunched beams in high intensity rings, a computational approach is productive.

Accelerator Physics GroupSNS, ORNL 4 ORBIT History In response to this need, the SNS AP group at ORNL, with help from BNL colleagues, developed the ORBIT code. We started with ACCSIM (provided by Fred Jones of TRIUMF) as the core to build a beam dynamics code around, but decided to begin again with an object-oriented approach. The basic classes are herds and nodes. Nodes operate on herds. ORBIT began as a C++ rewrite of ACCSIM, developed under the SuperCode driver shell, but has since undergone extensive independent development. With the completion of the 3D spacecharge routine, ORBIT has become a good candidate for massively parallel computing. Because of the parallel computing need and the desire to inherit sophisticated mapping and general error treatment capabilities, ORBIT is now being included into the Unified Accelerator Libraries (UAL).

Accelerator Physics GroupSNS, ORNL 5 ORBIT: General Description and Approach ORBIT is a particle (herd)-tracking code in 6D phase space. ORBIT is designed to simulate real machines: it has detailed (node) models for –transport through various types of lattice elements –injection foil and painting –RF and acceleration –2.5D space charge with or without conducting wall beam pipe –longitudinal impedance and 1D longitudinal space charge –Transverse impedance –3D space charge –apertures and collimation ORBIT has an excellent suite of routines for beam diagnostics.

Accelerator Physics GroupSNS, ORNL 6 ORBIT: Particle-Tracking in 6D Phase Space ORBIT coordinates utilize the usual accelerator expansion –Transverse phase space horizontal x, x_prime –Transverse phase space vertical y, y_prime –Longitudinal phase space phi, dE The coordinates are taken with respect to a reference particle on a reference closed orbit. The independent variable is the machine location s. This has interesting implications in the representation of 3D space charge and transverse impedance.

Accelerator Physics GroupSNS, ORNL 7 ORBIT: Transport Through Lattice ORBIT lattices can be constructed by reading MAD or DIMAD output files. There are also special facilities to specify lattices directly or to create uniform focusing channels. Linear transport through drifts, bends, or quadrupoles is carried out through symplectic matrix multiplication. Nonlinear elements, such as higher order multipoles, are evaluated in the thin lens approximation. Higher order single particle transport terms, such as chromaticity, are evaluated using second order transport matrices. There is no specific facility for the treatment of errors. Inclusion of ORBIT in UAL will alleviate these last two shortcomings.

Accelerator Physics GroupSNS, ORNL 8 ORBIT: Injection and Foil ORBIT can inject particles turn-by-turn or utilize a complete distribution from the start. –A variety of distributions can be generated internally. –Any externally generated distribution can be read in. Injection painting schemes can be simulated by time-dependent closed orbit bumps. ORBIT contains an injection foil model taken from ACCSIM. Not all of the ACCSIM model physics has been implemented. –At present, the model keeps track of foil hits and applies transverse kicks based on multiple Coulomb scattering. –Particles that miss the foil at injection are removed from the beam.

Accelerator Physics GroupSNS, ORNL 9 ORBIT: RF and Acceleration ORBIT contains an RF cavity model which provides longitudinal kicks based on a time-dependent waveform with multiple user-specified harmonics. For nonaccelerating cases, the synchronous phase is assumed to be zero, and the harmonics and time-dependent voltages are all that need to be specified. For accelerating cases, the harmonics, time-dependent voltages, and time-dependent dipole fields must be specified. –The synchronous phase and the resulting kicks are then solved by the model. –Transverse phase space is adjusted to conserve normalized emittance.

Accelerator Physics GroupSNS, ORNL 10 ORBIT: 2.5D Transverse Space Charge Particles are binned in 2D rectangular grid –2nd order momentum-conserving distribution of charges to grid (see Hockney and Eastwood) Potential is solved on transverse grid –Fast FFT solver is used –Conducting wall boundary conditions (circular, elliptical, or rectangular beam pipe) Particle kicks are obtained by interpolating the potentials –2nd order momentum-conserving interpolation scheme is used (see Hockney and Eastwood) –Kicks are weighted by the local longitudinal density to account for bunch factor effects There is also a free space direct force solver without beam pipe.

Accelerator Physics GroupSNS, ORNL 11 ORBIT: Longitudinal Impedance and Space Charge ORBIT treats longitudinal impedances and/or space charge in a similar fashion as ESME. –The longitudinal impedance is represented by its harmonic content in terms of the fundamental ring frequency. –Particles are binned longitudinally. –The binned distribution is Fourier transformed. –The space charge contribution to the impedance is combined with the external impedance. –The Fourier transformed distribution is multiplied by the impedance and the results applied to give longitudinal kicks to the particles. Typically (for SNS anyway), it is sufficient to evaluate the longitudinal impedance and space charge kicks once each turn, since the synchrotron period is more than a thousand turns. More evaluations may be required for applications with higher synchrotron frequencies.

Accelerator Physics GroupSNS, ORNL 12 ORBIT: Transverse Impedance Model Transverse impedance treated as localized node in ORBIT –Element length must be short compared to betatron oscillation wavelength –If physical impedance is not short, multiple impedance nodes are required Impedance representation –User inputs Fourier components of impedance at betatron sidebands of the ring frequency harmonics –Velocities less than light speed included in formulation Particle kicks –Convolution of beam current dipole moment with impedance –Current evaluation assumes dipole moment evolves from previous turn according to simple betatron oscillation

Accelerator Physics GroupSNS, ORNL 13 ORBIT: 3D Space Charge Model Particles are binned in 3D rectangular grid –2nd order momentum-conserving distribution of charges to grid (see Hockney and Eastwood) –Typically, for rings, longitudinal spacing greatly exceeds transverse spacing Potential is solved on transverse grid for each longitudinal slice –Fast FFT solver is used –Conducting wall boundary conditions (circular, elliptical, or rectangular beam pipe) “tie together” the transverse solutions Particle kicks are obtained by interpolating the potentials in 3D –2nd order momentum-conserving interpolation scheme is used (see Hockney and Eastwood)

Accelerator Physics GroupSNS, ORNL 14 ORBIT: Apertures and Collimation Apertures can be defined in ORBIT. –The apertures can be circular, elliptical, or rectangular. –The apertures can be set either to allow particles to pass through and simply tabulate the hits, or –to remove the particles from the beam and tabulate the locations. A collimation model has been added to ORBIT. –In addition to the aperture shapes, the collimators can include single or combinations of edges at arbitrary angles. –Physics includes multiple Coulomb scattering, ionization energy loss, nuclear elastic and inelastic scattering, and Rutherford scattering. –Monte Carlo algorithms are used for particle transport inside the collimator, and step sizes are carefully adjusted near collimator boundaries.

Accelerator Physics GroupSNS, ORNL 15 ORBIT: Diagnostics A list of useful diagnostics in ORBIT includes the following: –Dumps of particle coordinates. –Dumps of particle tunes. –Dumps of particle emittances. –Histograms of particle distributions in x, y, phi, and emittance. –rms emittances versus turn or versus position –Beam moments versus turn or versus position –Statistical calculation of beta functions –Longitudinal harmonics of the beam centroid

Accelerator Physics GroupSNS, ORNL 16 Where We’ve Been: Typical High Intensity Ring Tracking Simulation, SNS Injection. Linear transports. Nonlinear 2(+) D transverse space charge, evaluated using periodic FFT solver with 128 x 128 grid, as described by Hockney and Eastwood. Longitudinal dynamics including RF and longitudinal space charge. Beam accumulation ~1000 turns. Inject ~200 macroparticles / turn -> 200K macroparticles at finish. ~300 linear transports / turn interspersed with nonlinear space charge kicks. Run time ~6 hours on my laptop (650 MHz Pentium III).

Accelerator Physics GroupSNS, ORNL 17 Where We’re Going: New Physics in High Intensity Ring Tracking Code. Impedance models - longitudinal and transverse. –Longitudinal involves straightforward combination with longitudinal space charge. –Transverse requires dipole moment of current resolved along the bunch. Proper treatment of space charge in presence of transverse impedance requires 3D space charge model. –This involves binning the beam longitudinally. –Each bin will contain a complete 2D space charge solution. Higher order maps (nonlinearities) in particle transport. –This will increase time for transports. Error terms. –This will increase time for transports. Electron cloud model - this is another subject, and work is just beginning.

Accelerator Physics GroupSNS, ORNL 18 Where We’re Going: Typical Future Ring Tracking Simulation, SNS Injection. Nonlinear map transports with errors. Longitudinal and transverse impedances. 3D space charge, evaluated using 128 longitudinal bins (this may not be enough - aspect ratio), each with periodic 2D FFT solver with 128 x 128 grid, as described by Hockney and Eastwood, and conducting wall boundary correction as described by Jones. Longitudinal dynamics including RF and longitudinal impedance. Beam accumulation ~1000 turns. Inject ~200 macroparticles / turn / bin -> 25.6M macroparticles at finish. ~300 transports / turn interspersed with space charge and impedance kicks. Run time >1000 hours on my laptop (650 MHz Pentium III).

Accelerator Physics GroupSNS, ORNL 19 Where We’re Going: Merger With Unified Accelerator Library (UAL). We have been working with our SNS colleagues (N. Malitsky and A. Shishlo) at BNL to incorporate the ORBIT models into their Unified Accelerator Library. In addition to all the ORBIT capabilities described above the resulting product will support –An MPI parallelization of the time-consuming space charge routines. –TEAPOT and ZLIB for nonlinear symplectic tracking. –Other capabilities of UAL, including errors. Status –ORBIT impedance and space charge routines have been implemented, parallelized, and tested in UAL. –Some ORBIT diagnostic routines have been implemented, but this task remains to be completed. –Collimation and aperture routines have not yet been implemented.