Topics  What is the personal promotion system?  Applicable Rules  Procedure followed  Problematic issues  Staff Union priorities.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TEN-T Info Day for AP and MAP Calls 2012 EVALUATION PROCESS AND AWARD CRITERIA Anna Livieratou-Toll TEN-T Executive Agency Senior Policy & Programme Coordinator.
Advertisements

Understanding the Federal Hiring Process
Regional BIG Briefing on the MD-715 and 462 Reports
MYTHS, WIVES’ TALES & URBAN LEGENDS DEBUNKING ER MISCONCEPTIONS JUNE 2014.
WP4 – Task 4.4 LCA Activities
Ohio’s Options for a High School Diploma Jennifer Felker, Associate Superintendent Division of Learning and School Choice November 7, 2014.
UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES Human Resources Development Office UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES Human Resources Development Office OUTLINE 1.Scope and Coverage.
1 The Revised PEP Process Presented by… Rick Losemann Director, Employee Relations Division Office of Personnel Services and Benefits.
1 PULASKI TECHNICAL COLLEGE Classified Staff Performance Evaluation To insert your company logo on this slide From the Insert Menu Select “Picture” Locate.
Academic Scholars/Other Scholarships PHF Conference Center July 22, 2014 Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education.
New Principals’ Workshop October 5, GOVERNANCE The Principal’s Role New Principals’ Workshop.
Topics  What is it all about ?  Conditions and Criteria  Procedure followed  Special cases  Staff Union priorities.
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU. Civil Service Performance Assessment in Lithuania: Current.
NAMES COUNCIL MEETINGS PROCESS AND PROCEDURAL RULES.
NGSU Regional Councils: Jan-Mar 2015 Performance Rating Appeals Nationwide Group Staff Union.
Grab your name tent and find a spot! No more than three per table.
1 Hybrid Collaboration and Conversion AFGE National VA Council.
EVULATION OF RESULTS OF WORK OF CIVIL SERVANTS Yuriy Pizhuk, Director of the Department of the Personnel of Government Bodies and Local Self-Government.
Performance Appraisal in the Serbian Civil Service
Managing Performance i.e. Performance Appraisal in the Serbian Civil Service Svetlana Tomic, Senior Advisor – career development of civil servants, Sector.
Identifying Content and Specifying Behaviors
3rd session: Corporate Governance
N EW P ERFORMANCE evaluation form training UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AGRICULTURE and NATURAL RESOURCES Spring 2007.
Impact Assessment Board Quality support and control European Commission Impact Assessment Discussion with Stakeholders 28 June 2007.
Internal Mobility and Separation
Teacher Assistant Guidelines Student Services 2009.
Chapter 11 Application for Present-Use Value 1. Application for PUV The present-use value program is a voluntary program that provides the owner with.
Accessibility Resources: An Introduction to the Memo Professor and student sitting and talking.
SESSION ONE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT & APPRAISALS.
STAFFING VAIBHAV VYAS.
‘Developing the appraisal process in the wider context of the Sport and Fitness sector of Higher Education’. Welcome & Introductions.
ACE TESOL Diploma Program – London Language Institute OBJECTIVES You will understand: 1. The basic principles that serve as the foundation for all adult.
Developing an accessibility strategy. In this talk we will discuss an accessibility strategy an accessibility policy getting started - steps to consultation.
Building experience and breaking barriers So what’s new? How can we exploit changes in the law? What can we do? What local steps can we take?
Topics  What is grading ?  The applicable procedure  Appeals  Exceptions & Tricky cases.
Equivalent Record Form (ERF)
1. Learn how data tools can be used to: ◦ help staff get started with School-wide PBIS ◦ check implementation fidelity ◦ monitor progress and establish.
A new Procedure for Recruitment and Selection in the ILO Global Meeting of ILO Staff Union Representatives Geneva, August 2001.
What is NIJAC Established in June 2005 under the Justice Northern Ireland Acts 2002 and 2004 as an independent public body –to bring about a new system.
GENDER MAINSTREAMING AT THE INTERNATIONAL LABOUR OFFICE Presentation by the BUREAU FOR GENDER EQUALITY International Labour Office.
MHSAA ACADEMIC ELIGIBILITY Children First Act of 2009 REVISED HIGH SCHOOL GUIDELINES Middle School / Junior High Guidelines Have Not Changed Posted 6/30/10.
QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE ALLOCATION September
Survey Of KOICA Training Programs Evaluation Dear Participants This questionnaire survey is designed to evaluate the KOICA training program you attended.
Guidelines and Process. AIAA TCM Membership Selection Guidelines (page 1 of 2) A formal education in both the technical (engineering and/or science) and.
Job Analysis and Evaluation. Definition Job - Consists of a group of tasks that must be performed for an organization to achieve its goals Position -
Highlights of Student Progression Plan Policy (revised 4/09/09) Refer to the Promotion/Retention folder in the ESE Specialist Resources Complete.
Learning objectives Develop an understanding of: selecting the best employees, interviews, assessment criteria and tests Learning outcomes Describe the.
DG Justice and Consumers Project Modifications DG Justice and Consumers.
December 13,  Current policy  Required employees to complete Individual Development Plans (IDPs) for Milestone and Exemplary Merit increases.
LGS – HR POLICY.  OVERALL POLICY STATEMENT  The most valued assets of the Service are the people who individually and collectively contribute to the.
Collectif Agreement On procedures for recruitment and management of staff, concluded between the ILO and the Union on 6 October 2000.
Roll-out of the NORTHRAIL PMS
Procedure for the resolution of grievances in the ILO
VAIBHAV VYAS.
Performance Appraisal and Management at CERN
Human Resources Section
Performance Appraisal and Management at CERN
Internal Audit Quality Assurance and Improvement Program
Staff Recommendations for the 2016 Texas Higher Education Star Awards
Ohio’s Options for a High School Diploma
Ohio’s Options for a High School Diploma
ESTABLISHING A TRAINING COMMITTEE
Human Resources Office, Naples
Personal Promotions Introduction Générale.
The Appraisal and Promotion System of the European Commission
HEA Fellowship Workshop
Some Background Long-established tradition of a non-political, career Public Service Recent Public Service Reform The Top Management structure Appointments.
Your Guide to Financial Aid
Full-Time Faculty Contract
Career and College Promise Webinar November 25, 2014
Presentation transcript:

Topics  What is the personal promotion system?  Applicable Rules  Procedure followed  Problematic issues  Staff Union priorities

What is the personal promotion system ? Personal Promotion means promotion to the grade immediately above that of the grade corresponding to the tasks performed There are two kinds of personal promotion: - By seniority, i.e. after 25 years of satisfactory service and 13 years in the same grade( Circular 6/517 of 21 December 1994) - By merit (Circular 6/334 of 20 July1985, revised in1989)

The Applicable Rules For personal promotions based on merit, the overall number is restricted to 5 % of the positions of a category (G, NO, P). - A personal promotion is granted only once in the official’s career - It applies to FT and WLT staff in the P, NO and G category, not to Technical Cooperation staff. - It cannot result in a “jump” from one category to another (G to NO or P, NO to P, P to D). A personal promotion does not change the grade of the job performed by the official BUT is recognized for entitlement to transfers at equal (higher) grade !

The Procedures (I) For Personal Promotion by seniority: HRD checks eligibility (25 years of satisfactory service and 13 years in the same grade), then the PP follows automatically (only 1 PP over the whole career period).

For personal promotion based on merit: HRD draws up a list of officials having completed 13 years of service in the same grade, but not yet 25 years if satisfactory service, and who have not received a PP already, then A Selection Board of 3 persons ( HRD, independent, SUC ) The Procedures (II) submits a recommendation to the DG on the basis of the following elements: - assessment of merit provided by the official’s responsible chief (on standard form) - statement of experience, qualifications and other relevant information provided by the official (on standard form) - review of the official’s personal file.

Problematic Issues Barriers established between categories Personal promotions viewed as a substitute for career development IS ACCESS TO ONE MERIT PERSONAL PROMOTION OVER A WORKING LIFE NOT ENOUGH, OR ALREADY TOO MUCH AS TESTIFYING TO A FAILURE BY THE ILO TO USE RECOGNIZED TALENTS ?

The Union Agenda  Keep this ILO specificity immune from the Common System  Insist upon career development in lieu of personal promotions  Look after situation of colleagues at top grade of category  Promote the idea of moving towards a unique grade structure