The Warren Court (1952-1969). Wordsplash Create one sentence per term using some clue words from below. DUE PROCESS Lawlegal principles No citizen may.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Supreme Court Cases You Need to Know
Advertisements

Chapter 14, Section 3 THE RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED
EOC PRACTICE JUDICIAL 3. EOC JUDICIAL 1.The Supreme Court ruled that an indigent defendant in a criminal trial has a fundamental right to the assistance.
Section 3 Introduction-1
The American Legal System
The Warren Court 1953 – – 1969 Chief Justice Earl Warren Chief Justice Earl Warren Liberal decisions Liberal decisions Supported the rights of.
POP QUIZ How did the Courts increase the political power of people in urban areas and those accused of a crime? GIVE AN EXAMPLE.
Warren Court. Warm-up Do you have rights when you are being arrested? What rights do you have?
USH2 unit 4: Equality and Power Lesson 4.2 = The Warren Court.
Supreme Court Decisions
The Judicial Branch. Court Systems & Jurisdictions.
Civil Liberties: Due Process Rights of Accused Persons.
GOVERNMENT CHAPTER 20 Read the chapter and these notes, then answer each part of the 6 questions.
Chapter 26 Section 2 The “Great Society”. Lyndon Johnson’s Rise to the Presidency Member of the House of representatives-1937 Won a Senate seat in 1948.
Cases and Terms – Chapter 8 – Rights of the Accused Module 8 Amendments 4 -7.
15.3 The American Legal System
Miranda v. Arizona. Facts of the Case Police arrest Ernesto Miranda after the victim identifies him in lineup Police interrogate Miranda for two hours.
LANDMARK SUPREME COURT CASES
Analyze this Lady Justice statue for symbolic things. What do you see? Design your own statue that you think represents justice. Bell Ringer.
Chapter 7 The Judicial Branch
Judicial Branch Test Review. Supreme Court What is the highest court in the Country?
Chapter 7 Judicial Branch. Review ???? 1.What is any behavior that is illegal called? 2.What laws are passed by lawmaking bodies? 3.What is an appeal?
Miranda vs. Arizona Right to Remain Silent.
The Judicial Branch Unit 5. Court Systems & Jurisdictions.
4 th 5 th and 6 th Amendments By: YOGI PATEL COLE DAURIZIO JASON TRAN STEPHANIE SCHRADER Nichelle Anderson Atia Harris Kathy Cooper Lucas Pincione.
Unit 4 Lesson 8: Miranda v. Arizona
USH2 Unit 4: Equality and Power Lesson 4.2 = The Warren Court.
Supreme Court Cases The Supreme Court came about with the Judiciary Act of 1789, which established the federal court system in the United States.
Homework: Read/OL 14.3 for Monday FrontPage: Have 3 worksheets on your desk.
How have the decisions of the Supreme Court protected people accused of crimes? What rights are accused people guaranteed? Landmark Supreme Court Cases.
Rights of Criminal Defendants
The 5th 6th and 7th Amendments Zone Andrew Kwak..……….Mehek Desai Lena Gavenas………….Sharon Bae Benny Feldmann……..Mariela Carrillo.
Chapter 20: Civil Liberties: Protecting Individual Rights Section 3.
Civics EOC Review The Judicial Branch and The Law Day 4.
AP U.S. GOVERNMENT & POLITICS – Civil Liberties Civil Liberties part 3.
The Warren Court ( ) Appointed by Eisenhower Liberal period in court’s history Protected Civil Liberties & First Amendment Rights Malapportionment.
Miranda V. Arizona By: Elise Kloppenburg. Facts of the Case Phoenix, Arizona 1963 Ernesto Miranda, 23 years old Arrested in his home Taken to the police.
THIS IS Welcome Contestants... Today ’ s Judicial Basics CourtsS.C. CasesCivil Liberties Vocabulary Grab Bag.
How have the decisions of the Supreme Court protected people accused of crimes? What rights are accused people guaranteed? Landmark Supreme Court Cases.
Supreme Court Cases of the 60s. Mapp v. Ohio, 1961 What happened? - illegal search of home found “obscene materials”. Mapp was convicted. Brought to court.
Objective: To examine the importance of the Supreme Court case of Brown v. Board of Education.
The Warren Court and judicial activism “The biggest damn fool mistake I ever made”, Dwight D. Eisenhower on Earl Warren, quoted in 1977 Chief Justice,
Warren Court SWBAT: Analyze the decisions of the Supreme Court led by E. Warren. Skim pages Earl Warren (who?): -Reapportionment (definition):
Judicial Change The Warren and Burger Court. Earl Warren.
Quote of the Day: “School officials do not possess absolute authority over their students. Students in school as well as out of school are "persons" under.
Unit 4 Seminar. Tell me what the Miranda warning is and what it means to you.
Article III: The Judicial Branch Chapters: 11,12
Warm-up List 5 types of laws and give an example of each.
The Warren Court 1953 – 1969 Chief Justice Earl Warren
The Judicial Branch and The Law Day 4
Judicial Branch Article 3.
Rights of Criminal Suspects
The Warren Court 1953 – 1969 Chief Justice Earl Warren
Important Court Cases of the 20th Century
"I would like the Court to be remembered as the people's court"
Liberalism vs. Conservatism
15.3 The American Legal System
Major Supreme Court Decisions
L.B.J. AND THE GREAT SOCIETY CHAPTER 20:3
Looking into the Important Cases in the Past
Lesson 4.2: The Warren Court
Chapter 7 The Judicial Branch
Judicial Branch.
Miranda v. Arizona Matthew & Noah.
The Warren Court AP US History.
Ch. 3-1 Criminal Procedure and the Constitution
Bellringer If a state is primarily represented by one political party, how might redistricting (redrawing of electoral district boundaries) create an.
Do Now: a) Finish up Rights Movement Packet b) Earl Warren Background
The 4th, 5th, and 6th Amendments
Presentation transcript:

The Warren Court ( )

Wordsplash Create one sentence per term using some clue words from below. DUE PROCESS Lawlegal principles No citizen may be denied Rightsfairly rules PRECEDENT Legal decisionguide Patternexample Based on previous Equal rightsjudicial decision

Due process 14 th Amendment—no state could deprive an individual of due process Law may not treat individuals unfairly Courts must follow rules and procedures when trying cases precedent a judicial decision that serves as an authority for deciding a later case an example or instance used to justify later similar occurrences

Earl Warren Former governor of California 1952  appointed by President “Ike” to Chief Justice of the Supreme Court ( ) What is the Supreme Court? What does it do?

Directions: Warren Court cases Read each court case and background Examine each precedent for the case. Read the arguments Decide as a group what argument to support and why.

Mapp v. Ohio (1961) Supreme Court ruled 6-3 in favor of Mapp “all evidence obtained by searches and seizures in violation of the Constitution…is inadmissable”

Gideon v. Wainright (1963) Courts ruled in favor of Gideon State courts under 6 th Amendment must provide counsel to those who can’t afford to find one.

Escobedo v. Illinois (1964) Court ruled in favor of Escobedo States must provide counsel during police interrogations under the 6 th Amendment

Miranda v. Arizona (1966) Supreme court ruled in favor of Miranda Prosecutors were not allowed to statements obtained from suspects who were not given their constitutional rights to remain silent and have an attorney

4 th Amendment—guards against unreasonable searches and seizures, along with requiring any warrant to be judicially sanctioned and supported by probable cause 5 th Amendment--nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; 6 th Amendment—speedy and public trial; informed of charge against him; have counsel; confront witnesses

The Warren Court Thought to be a conservative, BUT was more liberal than Eisenhower wanted – Rulings focused on civil rights, separation of church and state, and police arrest procedure in the United States. Warren Court focuses on citizens’ rights in application to the 14 th Amendment which deals with…

Makes sure all citizens are treated the same by the courts DUE PROCESS

Mystery Q: The Supreme Court What is the Supreme Court? Name two duties of the Supreme Court.

The U.S. Supreme Court Highest judicial court in the U.S. 1 Chief Justice and 8 Associate Justices settling disputes and interpreting the meaning of laws Settle disputes between states Hear appeals from state and federal courts. Determine the constitutionality of federal laws.

Changes by the Warren Court Summary of Earl Warren’s background The Warren Court focused on four distinct areas of controversy: – Reapportionment of Congressional Districts – Rights of the Accused – Separation of Church and State – Social Changes Read and describe the changes enacted by the Warren Court on the three areas Summary: Some Americans called for the impeachment of Earl Warren. Why do you think some Americans reacted negatively to some of the decisions made by the Warren Court?

Education “Separate but equal” was unconstitutional. Led to the desegregation of public schools

Social Issues 1957 Roth vs. United States  ruled that obscene materials were “utterly without social importance” 1965 Court struck down a Connecticut law that prohibited the use of birth control

Reapportionment The way in which states draw up political districts based on population changes Required that states reapportion their electoral districts to represent the shift from rural to urban living “one man, one vote”

Rights of the Accused State courts could not use evidence obtained illegally Defendant in state court had the right to a lawyer Suspect must have access to a lawyer and be informed of rights to remain silent Authorities had to give suspects a four-part warning  Miranda rights

Separation of Church and State States could not require prayers to be said in state public schools State-mandated Bible readings in public schools were not allowed

Summary: Some Americans called for the impeachment of Earl Warren. Why do you think some Americans reacted negatively to some of the decisions made by the Warren Court?