Headline. The Controversial Classroom Nick Einterz & Olivia Conner A Survey to Get Started: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/6V9VCV9.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Adult Learning and Participatory Training
Advertisements

The Vision Socrates believed that enabling students to think for themselves was more important than filling their heads with right answers.
Teaching Controversy with News Literacy Peter Adams Chicago Program Manager The News Literacy Project November 9, 2010
The Core Principles of Media Literacy Education
April Heaney LeaRN edu APPROACHING CONTROVERSIAL ISSUES IN CLASS DISCUSSION.
D e b r i e f i n g DEBRIEFING Reflecting on our experiences of the workshops and how they relate to our lives!
Student Survey Results and Analysis May Overview HEB ISD Students in grades 6 through 12 were invited to respond the Student Survey during May 2010.
Using Mathematical Practices to Promote Productive Disposition
1. 2 The Vision Socrates believed that enabling students to think for themselves was more important than filling their heads with “right answers.”
Creator: Wendi South Diffusion and Integration of Technology in Education.
Communication Essentials Oral Communication Skills Workshop.
Effective Partnership in Special Education Advocating in Harmony
Teaching American History
Classroom Discussion and Debate Mike, Matt, Chris, Jason, Bobby.
KMU English Workshop January 2008 English Speaking Skills.
Using Debates in English Lessons A Communicative Approach.
Topics in Moral and Political Philosophy Democracy.
Rights Respecting Schools: Workshop Series
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
Developing a Teaching Philosophy Batya Elbaum Department of Teaching and Learning Preparing Future Faculty Workshop March 28, 2009.
Literature Circles.
Thinking Actively in a Social Context T A S C.
DEVELOPING THE PARTNERSHIP SKILLS OF SOCIAL WORK STUDENTS MONDAY 10 TH MARCH 2008 Institute of Applied Social Studies Kathryn Farrow Joy Fillingham UB.
Where questions, not answers, are the driving force in thinking.
Where questions, not answers, are the driving force in thinking.
 What is the KCLM model?  How can my school use this model?  Why was I chosen as an interventionist?  What will I learn about this literacy intervention.
©2015 Paul Read 5.5 Writing Opinion Essays in Part Two /sizes/z/in/photostream/
CANADIAN COAST GUARD AUXILIARY - PACIFIC CONFLICT RESOLUTION CANADIAN COAST GUARD AUXILIARY - PACIFIC 2009.
Opposing Viewpoints Teaching American History In Miami-Dade County December 14, 2012 Fran Macko, Ph.D.
Professional Learning Materials © 2014 The Regents of the University of California1 Promoting Discussion How can we nurture discussion about science ideas.
©2003 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Longman Publishers. Study Skills Topic 4 Communication Skills PowerPoint by JoAnn Yaworski.
Welcome to the New School Year!!! Mr. Lusk 5 th Grade Teacher North Intermediate School.
Resources Print slide 6 as handout for activity 1.
CHAPTER 6 THE COMMUNICATION PROCESS.  ‘Communicate’ Comes Form Communicare (Latin) – To Share, To Make Common.  Based Upon This Root, Communication.
Debate 101 Brand. Class Rules We are respectful We are considerate We listen the first time We will be present We are responsible What are some of the.
Facilitate Group Learning
The New York State Education Department is reviewing the Common Core Learning Standards to ensure the standards are right for New York’s students An online,
Valley View Secondary School The content of the Research Project comprises the:  Capabilities  Research framework.  In the Research Project students.
Parent Satisfaction Surveys What is the Parent Satisfaction Survey?  Each year schools from our district are selected to participate in the.
1 AVID’s mission is to close the achievement gap by preparing all students for college readiness and success in a global society. Philosophical Chairs.
“THE UNEXAMINED LIFE IS NOT WORTH LIVING…”
UNITS 7 & 8: ADVOCATING FOR MY NEEDS IN & AFTER HIGH SCHOOL.
7. Making Suggestions Business English Conversation and Listening Instructor: Hsin-Hsin Cindy Lee, PhD.
ACADEMIC LANGUAGE AND PERSPECTIVE TAKING EDC 448 WORKSHOP Building/Supporting Critical Thinking from Multiple Perspectives.
Teachers that matter Effective teachers Gingerlee Lackey Graduate Student University of Alabama A presentation based on Chapter 3, “The argument: Visible.
RENA LYSTYA NINGRUM DINA NOVITA WIJAYANTI KHARISMA CLEVERIAN HESNY NENO.
Teachers that matter Effective teachers Gingerlee Lackey Graduate Student University of Alabama A presentation based on chapter 3, “The argument: Visible.
Candidate Support. Working Agreements Attend cohort meetings you have agreed upon. Start and end on time; come on time and stay for the whole time. Contribute.
1. 4:00 - 4:05 PM Welcome 4:05 – 6:15 PMShared Expertise 6:15 - 6:30 PMPrayer Break 6:30 - 7:15 PMDebate in science classes 7:15 - 7: 30 PMSurvey and.
Aim: To investigate the role of schools in the religious education of young people. Goal: To consider the importance of religious education in the lives.
CONFLICT RESOLUTION. THINK. PAIR. SHARE. What are some positive ways to solve a conflict? What conflicts have you had in the past? What are some negative.
Development of 4Cs among students in the framework of Content and Language Integrated Learning through debates CLIL demands a reconceptualisation of the.
Harkness debates.
Going Deeper with Academic Talk
Work Ethic Vocabulary Quiz on 9/28/2017
The Effects of Classism on Educational Development
Supreme Court Summer Institute for Teachers
K-3 Student Reflection and Self-Assessment
Foundation of Socratic Seminars
Session 2 Challenges and benefits of teaching controversial issues
Session 4 Creating a safe climate for discussion
“THE UNEXAMINED LIFE IS NOT WORTH LIVING…”
Socratic Seminars.
Philosophical Chairs.
In My Students’ Shoes.
Critical thinking.
Learning outcomes Knowledge Skills
AVID Standard 2.8 Refine oral language skills
Socratic Seminars.
Socratic Seminars.
Presentation transcript:

Headline

The Controversial Classroom Nick Einterz & Olivia Conner A Survey to Get Started:

Outline of Workshop Presenter background Survey Results Objectives of workshop Defining Key Terms Background of controversy in the classroom Discussion about controversy for attendees Research on controversy Case study evaluation and discussion Summary

Presenter Background & Experience Nick Einterz Instructor and Technology Coordinator at an IEP Teaches mostly intermediate and advanced students Uses controversy in classes often Olivia Conner Instructor and Assessment Coordinator at an IEP Teaches mostly intermediate and advanced students. Uses controversy in classes often

Survey Results and Discussion Discuss your answers with someone near you. Look at the group answers and discuss what is surprising. Upon reflection, what caused you to answer the way you did?

Objectives of the Workshop Distinguish between controversy and argument. Inspire discussion and a sharing of classroom practices and experiences. Consider solutions when confronted with controversy or argument in class.

Defining Key Terms Controversy: a disagreement, especially about a public policy or a moral issue that a lot of people have strong feelings about. Argument: An exchange of diverging or opposite views, typically a heated or angry one. Source: Macmillan Dictionary Online

Why Controversy? Background & Research Controversy in the Classroom: The Democratic Power of Discussion, Diana E. Hess (2009) "…fewer adults engage in cross-cutting political talk now than in the past because they have chosen to live in ideologically homogeneous communities" (Hess, 2009). Read excerpt from book: sociological experiment in Colorado

Why Controversy? Background & Research "Advocates of classroom discussion view it as a particularly powerful instrument for developing critical thinking skills, teaching content, and increasing tolerance" (Hess, 2009).

Why Controversy? Background & Research "...the clash of ideas, when skillfully handled, can not only deepen student involvement with the English content but can expand student understanding of the perspectives of others and the complexity of the ideas of the present and past" Hurlbert and Totten, 1992, Social Issues in the English Classroom

Attendee Experiences Discuss the following Questions: Have you ever experienced controversy in your classroom? – Have your experiences been negative or positive, or both? What is your experience with both “natural” controversy and “manifested” controversy? – Should teachers react differently when faced with one or the other?

Sharing Experiences Would anyone like to share their experiences? – 2-3 examples from audience

Should teachers give their opinions on controversial topics? Discussion Do you think teachers should mediate controversy? – Should a teacher mediate an argument? Should teachers contribute opinions to controversial discussions? – If so, what methods do you have to contribute to these opinions? – If not, why? What influence do teachers have when they either abstain from participating or involve themselves in these discussions? In your opinion, when does a discussion about a controversy become an argument that requires classroom management?

Sharing Experiences Would anyone like to share their experiences? – 2-3 examples from audience

Research: Opinions on the Teacher's Role According to a survey in 2009, teachers and students differ in their opinions on whether or not teachers should disclose their opinions (Hess). –Teachers were divided: 52% of teachers did not disclose their opinions due to "fear of influence" or "indoctrination". 47% chose to disclose since, according to a teacher, "neutrality was impossible" and that, according to a student, "… students want to hear their teacher's views out of curiosity."

Research: Opinions on the Teacher's Role "...teacher neutrality could just as easily send the alternative message that the teacher trusts the students’ ability to reason. It shows respect for the students’ ability to listen to the voice of reason rather than to the voice of the teacher" (Warnick and Smith, 2014). Do you agree or disagree?

Research: Opinions on the Teacher's Role 80% of students believed that it is "fine" that teachers share their opinions. However, there were two sides of this argument: –"… students were amiable to allowing teachers to share their views … with one important caveat: if they believed that the teacher wanted students to adopt the same political views, then they became less supportive of disclosure." –Hess

Classroom Case Studies: Controlled Controversy Review case studies in groups and discuss questions: 1.What can students learn from this controversy? 2.What materials or language learning outcomes would support this controversy? 3.How would you mediate the controversy? 4.What steps would you take after the controversy is resolved?

Groups Report 1.Case Study #1- Abortion Question Controversy 2.Case Study #2- Student Bias Based on Religious Belief 3.Case Study #3- Lopsided Student Discussion 4.Case Study #4-Student Shares Beliefs on Own Accord Task: 1.Summarize your case study 2.Present main points of your discussion 3.Discuss what questions arose.

Questions & Summary Questions? What was learned? How to move forward?

References Hess, D. (2009). Controversy in the classroom: The democratic power of discussion. New York: Routledge. Hurlbert, M. & Totten, S. (1992). Social Issues in the English Classroom. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English. Warnick, B. R. and Spencer Smith, D. (2014), The Controversy Over Controversies: A Plea for Flexibility and for “Soft-Directive” Teaching. Educational Theory, 64: 227–244. doi: /edth.12059

Contact Information Business Cards Available Upon Request Power Point is Uploaded to the Wiki