MDI 9 th Meeting - 22 nd January 2016 FCC Experimental Caverns - Feasibility and Excavation C. Cook (GS), J. Osborne (GS),

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
General Infrastructures Services Department LIU-SPS external beam dump - Internal Review Civil Engineering Aspect for Option B (LSS4) 30/7/2014 Martin.
Advertisements

MODULE TRANSPORT CLIC Module Working Group 27 September 2010 Keith Kershaw CERN EN-HE.
Plasma Wakefield (AWAKE) Project Meeting 18 October 2012 Civil Engineering Feasibility Issues for the West Area EDMS : John Osborne GS-SE.
CFS challenges for a linear collider J.Osborne CERN ILC-GDE Dubna - 4 June 2008 OUTLINE : Introduction Civil Engineering -Geology (water, stability issues.
SOIL, GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING AND FOUNDATION ENGINEERING
TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION Substructure design, manufacturing and new concepts Stockholm, 2009 September 15 th INNOVATIONS IN DESIGN AND INSTALLATION.
Foundation Engineering CE 483
3/2011 CFS BTR Global Design Effort 1 Americas Region Civil Design Tom Lackowski.
NATM NEW AUSTRIAN TUNNELING METHOD.
John Osborne GS/SE March 2013
Infrastructure & Operation 27 th May 2015 Infrastructure & Operation 27 th May 2015 Update on optimisation of tunnel footprint and location Charlie Cook.
Construction and Installation of the CLIC Experimental Area
Investigation of FCC position Impacts on Hadron Injectors John Osborne, Charlie Cook, Yung Loo (ARUP) 16/09/2014.
General meeting LAGUNA LAGUNA – Fréjus site
Laughton 7/04 Long Baseline Neutrino Program Tunneling Chris Laughton, Fermilab.
TOT-FCC: Tunnel Optimisation Tool for the Future Circular Collider Introduction and lessons learnt C. Cook, J. Osborne, P. Lebrun, Y. Robert, M. Jones,
Geotechnical & Civil Engineering Studies Future Circular Colliders (FCC)
Global Design Effort - CFS ILC CFS and Global Systems Meeting 1 ILC CFS AND GLOBAL SYSTEMS MEETING CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES AND SITING GROUP GENERAL.
1 Alternative assembly option of ILD Y.Sugimoto 2010/10/18 ILD Integration
Department of Civil Engineering,
1. Civil Engineering works for Linear Colliders* : -Brief introduction on the overall machine layout (just for CLIC at this stage) -Experimental Area.
ILC CFS AD&I Daresbury Lab Summary J.Osborne / V.Kuchler / A.Enomoto.
FCC Tunnel Civil Engineering and Geology John Osborne (CERN GS-SE) 4 April 2014.
Introduction: Excavations and other engineering constructions in the ground are central to many civil and mining projects. Ground reinforcement includes.
ILC experimental area - How to ‘develop’ CFS details for TDP (cavern size, number of shafts, HVAC, EL spec etc) ? - KEK site specific issues CFS V.Kuchler.
November 17, st XFEL / ILC Meeting 1 ILC GLOBAL Design Effort The Current ILC Twin Tunnel Design Wilhelm Bialowons and Nicholas Walker · MPY.
Global Design Effort - CFS ILC Accelerator Design and Integration Meeting 1 ILC AD&I MEETING CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES AND SITING GROUP UPDATE V.
10/2010 IWLC2010 Global Design Effort 1 Brief Overview of Interaction Region Conventional Facilities in RDR Times Presenter Tom Lackowski.
CENF – Civil Engineering Extension B887 Status – 02 October 2014 Done: (1/2) Preliminary civil engineering drawing and Functional specification approved.
CLIC Experimental Area Layout Design Considerations & ARUP Study A. Gaddi, H. Gerwig, M. Herdzina, H. Hervé, N. Siegrist, F. D. Ramos.
MDI Meeting 13 th MDI: Latest news on civil engineering and services First draft concept for the ventilation system in the CLIC experimental area 11/06/2010.
EAR2 Beam Line Report on the Status C. Weiss EAR2 Beam Line - Report on the Status1.
Modern GROUND IMPROVEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR HIGHWAYS
CENF – Civil Engineering Extension B887 Status – 18 September 2014 Done: (1/2) Preliminary civil engineering drawing and Functional specification approved.
General Infrastructures Services Department Civil Engineering planning for LSS4 Option, presented at review workshop 30/7/ months Planning and Resources:
Report from ARUP meeting Andrea Gaddi, CERN Physics Department.
FHI 32: FCC tunnel layout and transferline update Tuesday, 9 February 2016 CE Updates: Comparison of 100km Intersecting and Non-Intersecting options New.
Europe / CERN studies for SB2009 ILC Re-Baseling J.Osborne CERN (CFS & CES) 2009 Linear Collider Workshop of the Americas 28 September - 4 October 2009.
FCC-hh MDI 5 th Meeting Friday 13 th March 2015 Civil Engineering Layouts for Experimental Caverns – First Draft Charlie Cook (GS), John Osborne (GS)
Infrastructure and Operation meeting 20 th January 2016 Amberg’s Report Summary : Comparison of 100km Intersecting and Non-Intersecting options C. Cook.
CLIC MODULE TRANSPORT AND INSTALLATION Keith Kershaw CES, 8 October 2008.
Review of FCC tunnel footprint & implementation Introduction & scope Philippe Lebrun Review of FCC tunnel footprint & implementation CERN, 11 June 2015.
MDI Meeting 13 th MDI: Latest news on civil engineering and services First draft concept for the ventilation system in the CLIC experimental area 11/06/2010.
CENF CIVIL ENGINEERING UPDATE : - SITE INVESTIGATION - CALL FOR TENDER FOR DESIGN & CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION SERVICES John Osborne GS/SE 16 May 2013.
5 December 2011 Task 2 Cavern Study Ground model and 3D cavern layout Matt Sykes Eden Almog Alison Barmas Yung Loo Agnieszka Mazurkiewicz Franky Waldron.
PRESENTED BY- Namrata M. Lolge (09CM16F) M. Tech. 1 st sem NITK.
WP 17.1 Civil Engineering Platform height / vs option Status on M. Manfredi on behalf of WP17.1 team.
COOLING & VENTILATION PLANTS M. Nonis – CERN EN Department / CV Group Annual Meeting of the FCC study – Rome 14 th April 2016.
DIAPHRAGM WALLS.
Experimental Hall in Mountain Regions
RISK ASSESSMENT FCC draft, 2. September 2015.
FCC Underground Infrastructure
Civil Engineering for FCC-eh and LHeC
Civil Engineering update - alignment configuration
FCC Civil Engineering Optimisation and Design Development
CLIC Civil Engineering Update
CLIC Civil Engineering Update
FCC Civil Engineering John Osborne, Jo Stanyard, Matt Stuart(SMB - Site Engineering - FAS Section) Cost & schedule Phase 3 - specification 10th May 2017.
FCC Civil Engineering John Osborne & Jo Stanyard (SMB - Site Engineering - FAS Section) FCC week outline 10th May 2017.
Acknowledgements to all FCC study teams
$150K Chicago/ANL seed funding for Braidwood site investigation
Interaction Region Alternative Layouts
5th FCC Infrastructure & Operation meeting
FCC Civil Engineering update
Latest ILC tunnel cross section May 2017
FCC-ee MDI Civil Engineering update
Civil Engineering for FCC-eh IR
CLIC Civil Engineering Update
ILC CFS AD&I Daresbury Lab Summary
FCC Week 2019 Civil Engineering Summary
Presentation transcript:

MDI 9 th Meeting - 22 nd January 2016 FCC Experimental Caverns - Feasibility and Excavation C. Cook (GS), J. Osborne (GS),

Introduction FCC schematic Report: Comparison of 100km FCC options (AMBERG) Excavation techniques for experimental caverns and shafts Next steps

FCC Schematic 100km ring 4 Experimental points 8 Access points 8 RF tunnels 2 beam dump tunnels 2 injection tunnels Service caverns – 90 x 20 x 13 (LxWxH) w. single access shaft – diameter tbc

Report contents Geological and Geotechnical conditions Risks applicable to FCC options. Basis of 5. and 6. First look at excavation methods for tunnel, shafts and caverns based on varying geological conditions Comparison of options Introduction and description of options Conclusion

Construction of shafts Experimental Shafts If moraines is firm, cohesive or consolidated => conventional excavation. Lattice girder rings, shotcrete and steel mesh as support If loose or below water table => pile walls up to 25m deep, diaphragm walls >25m Through moraine layer Through molasse layer Drill & blast recommended. Support similar to moraines but less required

Access Shafts Excavation through moraines is the same as for the experimental shaft. For the molasse, shaft boring machines or drill and blast are possible. Drill & blast may prove the less risky choice (flexibility, previous projects failed with machine, non-specialised workfoce). Construction of shafts

Experimental Caverns Excavation sequence based on ‘good’ geological conditions (stable rock) Support: rock bolts, lattice girders and reinforced shotcrete Excavation of caverns

Experimental Caverns Excavation sequence based on ‘moderate’ geological conditions (Flysch and soft clay rock) Support: micro piles, rock bolts, lattice girders and reinforced shotcrete Excavation of caverns

Experimental Caverns Excavation of caverns

Service and access caverns Service Caverns with a span of 20 m and Access Caverns with a span of 15 m Excavated like the Experimental Caverns, in partial sections An important point for planning the location of the Service Cavern is the stability of the rock pillar between Experimental Cavern and Service Cavern This rock pillar has to transfer the additional burden of half of the two caverns and has to be probably 40 to 50 m wide. The necessary dimension can be determined only after exploring the geological conditions in this area. Caverns can be closer together only with concrete pillar (as with CMS) Excavation of caverns

6. Comparison of FCC options Data

6. Comparison of FCC options Data

Report Conclusions Conclusion “It can be concluded that the foreseen caverns and shafts, with their proposed dimensions, are possible to excavate under the given geological circumstances… it will become more a question of time and costs than constructability.” “neither engineering nor logistic limits are met although special equipment with limited availability is needed for certain structures.” “With the information available so far, no changes of the project, with respect to the given dimensions for shafts and caverns, are mandatory.” “it is strongly recommended to execute further geological and geotechnical investigations. Based on the results of these investigations, additional risks can be detected or currently defined risks can be adjusted for each option.” “A final recommendation of one of the two options is very difficult to make at this stage of the project and would lead to a premature decision based on insufficient data. However, if a decision had to be made by CERN based purely on the available data, the Intersecting Option would seem the better choice due to the avoidance of the Flysch section in the Pré-Alps with high overburden and squeezing potential. In addition, for this option, the excavation of the Experimental and Access Points are assumed to lie entirely in Moraine and Molasse with good rock conditions." Note: CE recommendation remains 93km Option 1. This was outside the scope for Amberg’s report

Experimental points -Next steps Drawings for: Experimental cavern Experimental shaft Service cavern Service shaft General arrangement – inc. connection tunnels Working with MDI on: exp. cavern plan, crane, metallic structures, equipment in exp. & service cavern, separation of caverns, connection tunnels etc.

Access Shaft PM54 12m diameter

Access Shaft Concept – double lift Diameter tbc Pressurised Stairwell Main lift (pressurised) Backup lift (pressurised)

Access Shaft Concept – magnet shaft Oblong, dimensions TBC Main lift (pressurised) Trémie Pressurised Stairwell