International Civil Aviation Organization ADREP/ECCAIRS End-user course Module N° 7 Analysis and Codification Mexico City- 22-26 November, 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Human Factors in Flight Operations A CAA Perspective
Advertisements

ENROUTE COCKPIT INSPECTIONS
Crew Compliment. OBJECTIVES The importance of Safety & the effects of reduce crew.
Module N° 6 – Prescription/Performance based environment.
Integra Consult A/S November 2005Dhaka, Bangladesh Reporting - Inspired by ESARR 2 Workshop Dhaka, November 2005.
Module N° 4 – ICAO SSP framework
Session No. 4 Implementing the State’s Safety Programme Implementing Service Providers SMS
The LOSA Archive: The data and how it can be used
TEM & LOSA: The State of Affairs
Robert L. Helmreich, Ph.D. FRAes The University of Texas
Normal Operations Data: Air Traffic Facility Evaluations and NOSS
ATS INCIDENT REPORTING AND INVESTIGATIONS
ICAO State Safety Program Requirements Canadian Perspective.
VERRES VLTA Emergency Requirement Research Evaluation Study Crew Co-operation in VLTA The Fourth Triennial International Aircraft Fire and Cabin Safety.
The pilot and airline operator’s perspective on runway incursion hazards and mitigation options Session 3 Presentation 1.
NZ’s STATE SAFETY PLAN W hat the CAA has to do to implement its SMS CAA/AIA/GAPAN South Pacific Aviation Symposium on SMS Simon Clegg General Manager -
Management Of Human Factors Risk Conference - RAeS 11 th May 2006 Managing Human Factors Risk Captain Steve Sheterline General Manager Training British.
Incident Review Meeting Guidance Material & Presentation Template
Runway Incursion Avoidance
1 ICAO Runway Safety ICAO/ASPA Regional Seminar on Safety Management Systems (SMS) Mexico March 2006 Gustavo De León Technical Officer, ATM ICAO-Montreal.
Overview of Phase 4 Performance Validation Methods and Techniques.
ICAO/ASPA Safety Management System Seminar Air Traffic Management Occurrence Reporting Mexico City, Mexico, 14 – 16 March 2006 Jeremy Jackson – Civil Aviation.
24 October 2002 ICAO NAM/CAR/SAM RUNWAY SAFETY/INCURSION CONFERENCE 1 Retrospective Human Factors Analysis of US Runway Incursions (Focus: Air Traffic.
CAR/SAM Regional Guidance Material on Air Traffic Services Quality Assurance Programmes NAM/CAR/SAM Quality Assurance Workshop Gustavo De León Regional.
Session No. 4 Implementing Service Providers SMS Implementing the State’s Safety Programme SMS Senior Management Workshop Rome, 21 May 2007.
The reporting, analysis and follow-up of occurrences in civil aviation
Focus on Incident reporting
Incident Reporting Procedure
System Intro ECCAIRS End-User Course
PILOT PROJECT: External audit of quality assurance system on HEIs Agency for Science and Higher Education Zagreb, October 2007.
Mission Aircrew School Chapter 14: Crew Resources Management (March 2011)
Threat and Error Management in Aviation
Module N° 3 – Introduction to safety management
Outcome: Zero fatalities resulting from runway incursions.
0 Downloaded from FAA Runway Safety Briefing Sun ‘n Fun EAA Fly-In April 2002.
Guidance Notes on the Investigation of Marine Incidents
Intro to Threat & Error Management
1. Objectives  Describe the responsibilities and procedures for reporting and investigating ◦ incidents / near-miss incidents ◦ spills, releases, ◦ injuries,
Module N° 3 – Introduction to safety management
Module N° 8 – SSP implementation plan. SSP – A structured approach Module 2 Basic safety management concepts Module 2 Basic safety management concepts.
IISU Project N. de Beler. 3tha/c Fire& Cabin Safety Research Oct IISU Objective Improve identification of usable exits and passengers guidance Plan.
Lesson Timeline AHF 2203 – Aviation Human Factors  24 Credit hours per semester Class duration: (4 hrs /week)  Week 1-3: Lecture  Week 4: Mid term.
1 18 March 2010AGNA meeting EASAC update Yves Morier.
The Air Accidents Investigation Branch Keith Conradi Chief Inspector of Air Accidents.
Air Transport Association of Canada Safety Advisory Committee Larry Lachance Assistant Vice President, Operational Support November 7, 2010.
LECTURE 4: ICAO CHART requirements
ACCEPTABLE METHODOLOGY AND STANDARDS Carey Edwards CRM Advisory Panel.
Gretchen Haskins Chief Exec. Safety Through Collaboration What is HeliOffshore? An alliance of global Helicopter Operators & their stakeholders. Committed.
1 Stéphane DEHARVENGT F-DGAC SFACT/R.E 3rd International Aircraft Fire and Cabin Safety Research Conference - October 22-25, Atlantic City (USA)
ORLANDO FSDO-15 FLIGHT INSTRUCTOR SPECIAL EMPHASIS PROGRAM.
Evolution Cabin Crew Training & Assessment for the Future.
2005 Annual U.S./Europe International Aviation Safety Conference Improving Aviation Safety: The need for a multilateral approach Paul Lamy International.
International Civil Aviation Organization Global Runway Safety Symposium ICAO’s Harmonization Initiatives John Illson Air Navigation Bureau 25 May 2011.
ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION HUMAN FACTORS. WHAT HAVE WE LEARNED TO PREVENT FUTURE ACCIDENTS A. TRAINING B. TESTING.
International Civil Aviation Organization ADREP/ECCAIRS End-user course Module N° 4 Preliminary Data Entry at the BEA Mexico City November, 2010.
ADREP/ECCAIRS End-user course
European Aviation Safety Agency Standardisation Workshop – Cologne – Germany – EASA HQ Data standardisation Reinhard Menzel Safety Analysis.
International Civil Aviation Organization Welcome to the ADREP/ECCAIRS End-user Course – SSP/SMS Module N° 1 Appreciation of ADREP and ECCAIRS Mexico City.
AVIATION HUMAN FACTOR LECTURE 1: INTRODUCTION TO HUMAN FACTOR
Revision N° 11ICAO Safety Management Systems (SMS) Course01/01/08 Module N° 9 – SMS operation.
AIRCRAFT ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION MOOC THE INVESTIGATIVE PROCESS ACCIDENT REPORTS.
International Civil Aviation Organization ADREP/ECCAIRS End-user course Module N° 6 Data Entry Mexico City November, 2010.
Gustavo De León Technical Officer, ATM ICAO-Montreal
ICAO/ASPA Safety Management System Seminar
Where We Are OVERVIEW Lesson 1: Course Overview
Global Runway Safety Symposium ICAO’s Harmonization Initiatives
Triggering Mechanisms as Barriers to PM Effectiveness
Global Runway Safety Symposium ICAO’s Harmonization Initiatives
NAM/CAR/SAM Quality Assurance Workshop Gustavo De León
PROPRIETARY © 2018 Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association.
Presentation transcript:

International Civil Aviation Organization ADREP/ECCAIRS End-user course Module N° 7 Analysis and Codification Mexico City November, 2010

Safety Culture SOPs ECCAIRS 4 ADREP 2000 Same database TRAINING Common taxonomy Sharing concepts Encoding procedures? Harmonized training Production of consistent data Exchanging data ICAO BFU Striving for more consistency 2ADREP/ECCAIRS End-user Course (Rev. #3)

Explanatory factor Descriptive factor Event / phase of flight Analyses on occurrence categories (CFIT, RI, etc.) Analyses on symptoms Statistics n Occurrence Who, where, when ? What ? How ? WHY ? Analyses on causes (HF) Investigating, encoding and analyzing in ADREP 3ADREP/ECCAIRS End-user Course (Rev. #3)

Explanatory factor Descriptive factor Event / phase of flight Analyses on occurrence categories (CFIT, RI, etc.) Analyses on symptoms Statistics n Occurrence (1) Who, where, when ? (2) What ? (3) How ? (4) WHY ? Analyses on causes (HF) Four levels of data quality 4ADREP/ECCAIRS End-user Course (Rev. #3)

Who, where, when ? Complete initial factual information with data entry procedures and electronic tools. What ? How ? Why ? Content of a database Scale of Data Quality Inc1 Inc2 Inc3 … Inc n Acc1 Acc2... S-Inc1 Inc n+1 … Complete analyzed information with encoding methodology Statistics, trends Safety studies on occurrence categories Analyses on Symptoms Initial data Analyses on causes (HF) Summary: What tool and what type of data? 5ADREP/ECCAIRS End-user Course (Rev. #3)

Based on current general way of writing investigation reports (nothing revolutionary) Most of the analysis reflect a sequence of events associated with phase of flight (ICAO causal approach)  The codification should reflect the report analysis where causal factors are discussed Accident Latent failures Active failure(s) * cf. Application of ADREP 2000 taxonomy for the analysis and the encoding of aviation accidents and incidents: a human factors approach, Human Factors and Aerospace Safety 4(1), 19-48, 2004, Ashgate Publishing Proposed methodology* for encoding events and factors 6ADREP/ECCAIRS End-user Course (Rev. #3)

1) Sequence of events 2) Encoding version “0” Events/phase of flight descriptive factors 3) Explanatory factors (SHELL) 4) Table linking factors to factual elements 5) Drafting Analysis in line with codification Process of Analysis/Encoding 7ADREP/ECCAIRS End-user Course (Rev. #3)

Application of the methodology Example: loss of control accident on 6 March 2003 at Tamanrasset Report released in September ADREP/ECCAIRS End-user Course (Rev. #3)

Accident at Tamanrasset on 6 March ADREP/ECCAIRS End-user Course (Rev. #3)

Date and timeAircraft Thursday 6 March 2003 at 14 h 15 UTC Boeing registered 7T-VEZ Site of accident Owner Tamanrasset Aguenar aerodrome Type of flight Operator Public transport of passengers Scheduled domestic flight DAH6289 Tamanrasset - Ghardaïa - Algiers Air Algérie Persons on board 97 passengers 2 Flight crew 4 Cabin crew Air AlgérieSynopsis 10ADREP/ECCAIRS End-user Course (Rev. #3)

CVRFDRwreckage radiocoms witness statements Radar/GPS… Events Accident 1) Sequence of events 11ADREP/ECCAIRS End-user Course (Rev. #3)

Events, phases of flight Descriptive factors, modifiers Example: 2) Encoding version « 0 » 12ADREP/ECCAIRS End-user Course (Rev. #3)

3) Explanatory factors Identification of explanatory factors using SHELL SHELL, modified by Hawkins 1987 Human / machine Human / human Human / environment Human / system support Environment Hardware SoftwareLiveware Machines, ergonomics, calculators... Manuals, procedures, documentation Physical, psychological, workload... Social, operational factors, ATC... Communication, CRM… 13ADREP/ECCAIRS End-user Course (Rev. #3)

SHELL model

Event, phase of flight Descriptive factors Explanatory factors Factual elements justifying the codification Flight preparation related event during standing The chosen modifiers describe the absence of pre-flight checks and the fact that the Captain was not in the cockpit at that time (CVR data) Pre-flight preparation: missing, not monitored Flight crew : Psychological distraction (L) Copilot prepares the flight alone; discussions and interruptions in the cockpit Flight crew : pre-flight planning : underestimated (L) It seems to them that it was a normal (routine) situation (result of deviations) Flight crew related event during taxiing to runway Flight crew’s interpretation of SOPs not observed … Elements from the CVR 4) Table linking chosen factors to factual elements of the investigation 15ADREP/ECCAIRS End-user Course (Rev. #3)

Complete codification : Scenario : failures in action Second part : systemic issues 5) Drafting the report analysis based on the codification 16ADREP/ECCAIRS End-user Course (Rev. #3)

1) Sequence of events 2) Encoding version “0” Events/phase of flight descriptive factors 3) Explanatory factors (SHELL) 4) Table linking factors to factual elements 5) Drafting Analysis in line with codification – Iterative – Based on teamwork – Illustrates the depth of the investigation Process of Analysis/Encoding 17ADREP/ECCAIRS End-user Course (Rev. #3)

B737 Engine Failure After Take-off […] « Among the lessons learnt from this report are the importance of pre-flight briefings and formalised hand-over/takeover procedures. The report is of particular relevance given our recent formalisation of the Engine Fire, Failure, Malfunction Procedures. » […] Qantas Safety, Flight Ops Newsletter, Vol 4. No 6 December 2004 Feedback for training 18ADREP/ECCAIRS End-user Course (Rev. #3)

ICAO standard (aggregation of results and know-how of worldwide investigations) – From 88 causes (ADREP 76) to 552 (ADREP 2000) – Standardized and structured support Convincing and tangible analysis tool for multi-national investigation teams – Taxonomy = same safety concepts, keywords i.e. language – Clear breakdown between events and explanatory factors Facilitates deeper and more systemic investigations Provides human factors data for future safety analysis Pros of using a method based on ADREP ADREP/ECCAIRS End-user Course (Rev. #3)

20 Module N° 7 Analysis and Codification