SRS Calibration Michael Phipps, Bob Azmoun, Craig Woody 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Sci-Fi tracker for IT replacement 1 Lausanne 9. December 2010.
Advertisements

6 Mar 2002Readout electronics1 Back to the drawing board Paul Dauncey Imperial College Outline: Real system New VFE chip A simple system Some questions.
With Real Detector: The MIP Apollo Go, NCU Taiwan Ped:  ADC cnts MIP: 39.0  12.6 ADC cnts S/N should be better with 3 time samples, better.
CMS GEM Workshop III, April 20, 2012
Adding electronic noise and pedestals to the CALICE simulation LCWS 19 – 23 rd April Catherine Fry (working with D Bowerman) Imperial College London.
LI Gain Curves Peter Litchfield Calibration Workshop, 6 th September 2005  Beginning to understand the LI system  Beginning to understand the software.
29 June 2004Paul Dauncey1 ECAL Readout Tests Paul Dauncey For the CALICE-UK electronics group A. Baird, D. Bowerman, P. Dauncey, C. Fry, R. Halsall, M.
Checking the Acd hardware veto setting The hardware veto is generated in the front-end electronics Discriminator with coarse and fine settings Both are.
CMS Physics Meeting, Dec. 6, Analysis Note on the Validation of the ORCA Simulation of the Endcap Muon CSC Front-end Electronics S. Durkin -- Ohio.
MDT-ASD PRR C. Posch30-Aug-02 1 Specifications, Design and Performance   Specifications Functional Analog   Architecture Analog channel Programmable.
6 June 2002UK/HCAL common issues1 Paul Dauncey Imperial College Outline: UK commitments Trigger issues DAQ issues Readout electronics issues Many more.
The first testing of the CERC and PCB Version II with cosmic rays Catherine Fry Imperial College London CALICE Meeting, CERN 28 th – 29 th June 2004 Prototype.
VELO ADC vs Charge Calibration Jianchun Wang April 16, 2008 This is an update to the presentation at April 11 st VELO Group Meeting. A new scan data of.
Tests of a 10cm by 10cm triple GEM detector
ECAL electronics Guido Haefeli, Lausanne PEBS meeting 10.Jan
Introduction to Transistors
Oct, 2000CMS Tracker Electronics1 APV25s1 STATUS Testing started beginning September 1 wafer cut, others left for probing 10 chips mounted on test boards.
Performance test of STS demonstrators Anton Lymanets 15 th CBM collaboration meeting, April 12 th, 2010.
Timing Jitter and Cross Talk in the SRS + Xray scan of FIT zigzag board Michael Phipps, Bob Azmoun, and Craig Woody 1.
1 System Description (2-4) Gains from single photo-electrons in vacuum at room temperature (5-8) Linearity Test at V in vacuum at room temperature.
Tests with JT0623 & JT0947 at Indiana University Nagoya PMT database test results for JT0623 at 3220V: This tube has somewhat higher than usual gain. 5×10.
Pierpaolo Valerio.  CLICpix is a hybrid pixel detector to be used as the CLIC vertex detector  Main features: ◦ small pixel pitch (25 μm), ◦ Simultaneous.
Cube Measurements Tent Crew. Scintillation BNL 241 Am Semi- collimated  Spectralon Diffuse UV Reflector SBD  -Trigger Scint. Light Poisson.
CCD Detectors CCD=“charge coupled device” Readout method:
Updates on GEMs characterization with APV electronics K. Gnanvo, N. Liyanage, K. Saenboonruang.
GEM MINIDRIFT DETECTOR WITH CHEVRON READOUT EIC Tracking Meeting 10/6/14 B.Azmoun, BNL.
A.Chekhtman1 GLAST LAT ProjectBeam test meeting, September 27, 2006 CsI afterglow - possible explaination of pedestal drift and excess of energy. Alexandre.
Preliminary Results of the Beetle Readout for the MaPMTs  Part 1: as presented on  Achievements since last LHCb week  Common Mode correction.
Development of Multi-pixel photon counters(2) M.Taguchi, T.Nakaya, M.Yokoyama, S.Gomi(kyoto) T.Nakadaira, K.Yoshimura(KEK)
NA62 Gigatracker Working Group Meeting 23 March 2010 Massimiliano Fiorini CERN.
Hold signal Variable Gain Preamp. Variable Slow Shaper S&H Bipolar Fast Shaper 64Trigger outputs Gain correction (6 bits/channel) discriminator threshold.
October, 2001CMS Tracker Electronics1 Module studies at IC OUTLINE laboratory setup description, APV I2C settings pulse shape studies (dependence on ISHA,
Jan, 2001CMS Tracker Electronics1 Hybrid stability studies Multi – chip hybrid stability problem when more then ~ 2 chips powered up -> common mode oscillation.
Collimator BPM electronics – Results from the lab, SPS and LHC
False asymmetries/Ground Loops David Bowman 4/27/12.
Trip-t testing progress report
Calibration of the gain and measurement of the noise for the apv25 electronics K. Gnanvo, N. Liyanage, C.Gu, K. Saenboonruang From INFN Italy: E. Cisbani,
 The zigzag readout board is divided into eight η-sectors; each sector has a length of ~12 cm and comprises 128 zigzag strips; zigzag strips run in radial.
LHCb VELO Upgrade Strip Chip Option: Data Processing Algorithms Giulio Forcolin, Abdul Afandi, Chris Parkes, Tomasz Szumlak* * AGH-Krakow Part I: LCMS.
LC Power Distribution & Pulsing Workshop, May 2011 Super-ALTRO Demonstrator Test Results LC Power Distribution & Pulsing Workshop, May nd November.
DESY BT analysis - MPPC Saturation Correction - S. Uozumi Feb Sci-ECAL meeting 1.MPPC Gain Measurement (with LED data) 2.Inter-calibration of readout.
DOM MB Test Results at LBNL Main Board Readiness Status Review LBNL, July 2003 Azriel Goldschmidt.
Predicting the In-System Performance of the CMS Tracker Analog Readout Optical Links Stefanos Dris CERN & Imperial College, London.
D. Attié, P. Colas, E. Delagnes, M. Riallot M. Dixit, J.-P. Martin, S. Bhattacharya, S. Mukhopadhyay Linear Collider Power Distribution & Pulsing Workshop.
Gain Curves Jason for the SB Crew June 5, Raw 55 Fe Spectra Start with 55 Fe spectrum from a MCA. Fit peak to gaussian. Calibration from a pulser.
Juan Valls - LECC03 Amsterdam 1 Recent System Test Results from the CMS TOB Detector  Introduction  ROD System Test Setup  ROD Electrical and Optical.
CM correction algorithm. Observations: Looking at the data for one analog link, a large fraction of the 32 strips are affected by the large signal deposit.
SRS Calibration Part II: Dynamic Range, Signal/Noise, Pulse Shape and Timing Jitter + initial results from scan of FIT zigzag board Michael Phipps, Bob.
Front-end Electronic for the CALICE ECAL Physic Prototype Christophe de La Taille Julien Fleury Gisèle Martin-Chassard Front-end Electronic for the CALICE.
Comparison Between AM and FM Reception. 21/06/20162 FM Receiver.
Analog Circuits Hiroyuki Murakami. CONTENTS Structure of analog circuits Development of wide linear range CSA system Problem of analog circuits How to.
SRS TIMING ANOMALY RD51 Mini-Week June 9, 2015 M. Phipps, BNL 1.
 13 Readout Electronics A First Look 28-Jan-2004.
FCal Energy Scale Predictions J.Rutherfoord 9 June 2003.
A General Purpose Charge Readout Chip for TPC Applications
Wide Dynamic range readout preamplifier for Silicon Strip Sensor
96-channel, 10-bit, 20 MSPS ADC board with Gb Ethernet optical output
The Silicon Drift Detector of the ALICE Experiment
L. Ratti, M. Manghisoni Università degli Studi di Pavia INFN Pavia
BNL electronics: first tests
Power pulsing of AFTER in magnetic field
Design of Digital Filter Bank and General Purpose Digital Shaper
A First Look J. Pilcher 12-Mar-2004
Electronics for the E-CAL physics prototype
VeLo Analog Line Status
Status of n-XYTER read-out chain at GSI
Direct Dump Tests Modify
BESIII EMC electronics
The Ohio State University USCMS EMU Meeting, FNAL, Oct. 29, 2004
CAL crosstalk issues and their implications
Presentation transcript:

SRS Calibration Michael Phipps, Bob Azmoun, Craig Woody 1

SRS Calibrations: At least 4 issues to be mindful of and/or correct 1)Nonlinearity 2)Hybrid Saturation 3)FEC Saturation 4)Channel-to-Channel Differences 2

1) Nonlinearity calibration MUX4 correction curve Average Response Across All Channels Across all Input Values -> measures response nonlinearity 3 Nonlinearity as function of MUXGAIN and IMUXIN Convert from electrons to corrected ADC Conclusions: 1)Each MUXGAIN needs its own calibration curve 2)IMUXIN is just an additive constant -> nonlinearity is in the hybrid and independent of location in FEC range 3)Correction applied AFTER pedestal subtraction FEC saturation

Internal Pulser Pedestal Shift 4 -Internal pulser causes a pedestal shift during pulse injection -To accurately measure the nonlinearity response the pedestal mean needs to be corrected for each time bin -This week: make corrected pedestal by using the average pedestal for all unused channels for each time bin (remember: internal pulser only injects 1 out of 8 channels)

2) Hybrid Saturation  SRS designed for silicon at CMS. GEM signal orders of magnitude larger -> primary charge saturates preamp inside the APV  MUXGAIN controls gain of multiplexer – located after the preamp/shaper, so cannot avoid saturation problem by changing MUXGAIN alone  Decreasing GEM gain to avoid saturation takes you below 10 mV discriminator threshold  Serious problem for wide readout strips (chevrons) or large drift detectors.  Time bin centroid measurements can help minimize by using many unsaturated samples 5 Clipping

3) FEC Saturation 6 Dynamic range between ~ ADC -Since largest MUX5 signal is ~2700 ADC, MUX5 should be avoided with GEMs -MUX3 and MUX4 pedestals have to be carefully aligned within the FECs dynamic range (modify the IMUXIN of the preamp) Upper limit: 3200 ADC Lower limit: 400 ADC Pedestal above threshold FEC Saturation

4) Channel-to-channel calibration APV Internal Pulser 7 Internal Pulser Mux 2 Internal Pulser Mux 4 Channel dependent non-linearity curves Signal response per channel

MUXGAIN: *Resistors for Mux3 and 4 appear to be switched in all APVs (ie Mux 4 is nominal Mux) 8 MUX GAIN Approximate Hybrid Range (Pedestal- subtracted ADC) Multiplexer Gain (mA/mip) (~11 bit) MUXGAIN 1 MUXGAIN 2 MUXGAIN 3 MUXGAIN 4 MUXGAIN 5

Signal to Noise of MUXGAIN Process 9 Crude measurement made from secondary peak using 2 nd Fe55 peak (nonsaturated/linear) -Signal taken as mean of Gaussian across all channels -Ped RMS taken as RMS of same channel in all four MUX values (same source/same position/measurements taken sequentially) -Suggests that MUX3 (which is really MUX4) has best S/N -Makes sense since Multiplexer gain comes before noise incurred from HDMI cables and FEC electronics

Operating conditions moving forward  MUXGAIN: 3 (which is actually MUX 4 -- highest MUX that doesn’t saturate the FEC – best S/N )  IMUXIN: 0x56  Hybrid saturation: Use time bin centroid routines whenever possible  Begin testing VMII chip to replace APV. Explore other readout systems 10