HARQ Buffer Management for Aggressive HARQ transmission IEEE 802.16 Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE S802.16m-09/0891r1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
802.16m Frame Structure: Uplink Subframe Aggregation IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE S802.16m-08/099 Date Submitted:
Advertisements

Modified pilot patterns for 8 data streams IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE C80216m-09/1724 Date Submitted:
New Bit-Selection Method Suitable for Adaptive HARQ IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-09/0999 Date Submitted:
MBS Frame Structure Considerations IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE S802.16m-08/089 Date Submitted:
IEEE C802.16m-08/539 Coding for IEEE802.16m Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-08/539 Date Submitted: Source: Mohammed Nafie, Cairo University Ahmed.
Frame structure supporting the WirelessMAN-OFDMA frames IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE C80216m-09_0475r1 Date.
Relay DG Report (for Session #63.5 TGm Closing) IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: C80216m-09_2211 Date Submitted:
Common Header design in m IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-09/0178 Date Submitted: Source:
Discussion of Control Channel Power Control Design IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE S802.16m-09/2846 Date Submitted:
Unicast transmission assisted HARQ for enhanced MBS Document Number: IEEE S802.16m-08_1140 Date Submitted: Source: Xiaolong ZHU, Hongwei YANG,
Cumulated HARQ Reports IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE S802.16m-09/0526r2 Date Submitted: Source:
Analysis of BR preamble selection strategies in 5-step BR procedure IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE C80216m-10_1249r1.
Proposed Feature Rapporteur Group Timelines and Call for contributions IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-09/0762r2.
HARQ Operational Modes for m Document Number: S80216m-08/322 Date Submitted: Source: Yih-Shen Chen, Kelvin Chou, I-Kang Fu, and Paul Cheng.
Aggressive HARQ Transmission IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE S802.16m-09/0047r1 Date Submitted: Source:
Performance Evaluation of Transformation Codebook for 8TX IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-09/2731.
Network Entry Procedure with Multi-Carrier Support Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-09/0966 Date Submitted: 2009/04/27 Source: I-Kang Fu, Yih-Shen Chen,
Text Proposals of HR-MS Forwarding in 16n Network IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE S802.16n-11/0074 Date Submitted:
1 MIMO Supports for IEEE m Broadcast Channel IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-08/1416r1 Date.
Performance Evaluation of MIMO midamble design for IEEE m IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-09/1237.
Bit selection and repetition IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: C80216m-08_1271 Date Submitted: Source:
Notice: This document does not represent the agreed views of the IEEE Working Group or any of its subgroups. It represents only the views of the.
Synchronization Drafting Group Schedule Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-09/0379 Date Submitted: Source: Paul Cheng
MCS Adaptation and Feedback Mechanism in m MBS IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE S80216m-08/1151 Date Submitted:
1 Comparison of DL Pilot Patterns IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-08/798r1 Date Submitted:
DC RG Report Document Number: IEEE C802.16n-11/0088 Date Submitted: Source: Ming-Tuo Zhou, Sungcheol Chang DC RG.
Bit selection method for IEEE m Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-09/0674 Date Submitted: Source: Seunghyun Kang, Sukwoo Lee {sh_kang,
Uplink Control PHY Design for HARQ Tri-State Feedback IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE S802.16m-09/0890r1 Date.
MIMO HARQ IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-08_1227 Date Submitted: Source: Soma Bandyopadhyay.
MLD Performance for CL MU-MIMO with ZF precoding (AWD ) IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE C80216m-09/1312.
1 Miniband Permutation Formula Update for DL/UL PHY IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-09/0886r1 Date.
1 Equation revision for Frequency Partitioning in DL/UL PHY IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-09/0887r1.
Design of the CDMA Allocation A-MAP IE Document Number: IEEE S802.16m-09/1420 Date Submitted: Source: Heejeong Cho
Hybrid ARQ for synchronous allocation in distributed subcarrier mode Document Number: S80216m-08_290r1 Date Submitted: Source: Alexei Davydov.
Performance Evaluation of Transformation Codebook for 8TX IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-09/2731.
MIMO Ad-Hoc Group Report Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-09/2665r1 Date Submitted: Source: David Mazzarese MIMO.
MCS table design for 16m Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-09/1007 Date Submitted: Source: Zhou Liang
Proposal for the Bit Selection Scheme for HARQ Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-09/0879 Date Submitted: Source: 1 Chien-Yu Kao, Yu-Tao Hsieh,
1 Power Saving Considerations for IEEE m Femtocell IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-08/1411 Date.
Collaborative uplink MIMO techniques for IEEE m Document Number: C80216m-08/638 Date Submitted: 7/7/2008 Source: Mohamed Abdallah Mohammed Nafie.
Relay/EMBS Ad-Hoc Group Report Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-09/2678r1 Date Submitted: Source: Kanchei(Ken) Loa Relay/LBS/EMBS.
Proposed Change to Subband Partitioning and Frequency Partition Document Number: IEEE S802.16m-09/0498 Date Submitted: Source: Chang-Lan Tsai,
Multi-Level Codes Sequence for Simultaneous MCS Feedback IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE S80216m-08/1152 Date.
Uplink Control PHY Design for HARQ Tri-State Feedback Buffer Management IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE S802.16m-09/0894.
System Level Performance of 8TX Measurement Pilot IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE C802.16m-09/0808 Date Submitted:
Control Procedure for Direct Communication IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE C802.16n-11/0054 Date Submitted:
Session # Maintenance Task Group Opening and Agenda IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE maint-09/0006.
Enhancements for WirelessMAN-OFDMA IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE C802.16ppc-10/0069 Date Submitted:
Project Planning Committee (PPC): Session #70 WG Opening Plenary Report IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE.
Bandwidth Request Channel Physical Layer Design IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE S802.16m-09/0222 Date Submitted:
Session # Maintenance Task Group Opening Report IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE maint-11/0028.
1 Modifications on Subband (SB) Partitioning Equations ( and ) IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number:
Basic and Enhanced 2-bit HARQ Feedback IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE S802.16m-09/0501r2 Date Submitted:
HARQ 1-bit Feedback Design IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE S802.16m-09/0223 Date Submitted: Source:
Session # Maintenance Task Group Opening Report IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE maint-11/0020.
IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number:
IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number:
Tri-State HARQ Feedback for Aggressive HARQ Transmission
IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number:
HARQ Soft Buffer Management for m
IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number:
Uplink Subframe Aggregation
MAP NACK Channel for Persistent Allocation
HARQ Feedback Channel for 2bit HARQ feedback
Uplink Subframe Aggregation
Network Coding Retransmission Design with Common Feedback Channel
Network Synchronization Considerations for n
HARQ Feedback Joint Coding
HARQ and ARQ Interactions
ARQ protocol in m IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9)
Presentation transcript:

HARQ Buffer Management for Aggressive HARQ transmission IEEE Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: IEEE S802.16m-09/0891r1 Date Submitted: Source: Zheng Yan-Xiu, Yu-Chuan Fang, Chang-Lan Tsai, Chung-Lien Ho, Hsi-Min Hsiao ITRI Venue: Re: IEEE m-09/0020, Call for contributions on 16m AWD content. Amendment Working Document (IEEE m-09/0010r1a). Chapter DL control information elements Base Contribution: Purpose: To be discussed and approval by IEEE m TG Notice: This document does not represent the agreed views of the IEEE Working Group or any of its subgroups. It represents only the views of the participants listed in the “Source(s)” field above. It is offered as a basis for discussion. It is not binding on the contributor(s), who reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this contribution, and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an IEEE Standards publication; to copyright in the IEEE’s name any IEEE Standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution; and at the IEEE’s sole discretion to permit others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards publication. The contributor also acknowledges and accepts that this contribution may be made public by IEEE Patent Policy: The contributor is familiar with the IEEE-SA Patent Policy and Procedures: and. Further information is located at and.

Motivation Buffer management is necessary to accommodate packet dropped on receiver side –Aggressive HARQ transmission releases buffer constraint from receiver side –HARQ entity can boost transmission rate beyond HARQ buffer capability –Receiver may not store the HARQ burst when buffer is full –Packet is dropped due to buffer outage –It further introduces HARQ failure and makes HARQ performance unpredicatible This contribution introduces tri-state HARQ feedback to maintain the reliable HARQ performance

Proposed Mechanism Tri-state HARQ mechanism –If decoded data is correct, MS feedbacks ACK –If decoded data is incorrect and the redundancy version can be stored in the HARQ buffer, MS feedbacks NACK –If decoded data is incorrect and redundancy version can not be stored in the HARQ buffer, MS feedbacks DROP –BS will retransmit the dropped packet when DROP is received, otherwise, BS will follow existing HARQ mechanism

Simulation Environments Three mechanisms are compared –Tri-State HARQ feedback –Two-State HARQ feedback with buffer constraint –Two-State HARQ feedback without buffer constraint Simulation Environments –HARQ burst = 600 bytes –Maximum 8 HARQ processes –Maximum 4 successful transmissions –HARQ buffer ranges from 10K~80K soft bits –Round trip delay=20ms –Peak rate= 1.92Mbps –No feedback error –PB 3km/hr, VA 30km/hr and 120km/hr –Aggregation buffer is applied

IR-HARQ with PB 3km/hr No CQI Report Error Transmission rate increases by 2~8 times for tri-state HARQ mechanism and two-state HARQ mechanism without buffer constraint Tri-state HARQ mechanism further provides throughput gain when buffer is insufficient Two-state HARQ mechanism introduces large HARQ failure rate when Buffer is insufficient

IR-HARQ with VA 30km/hr No CQI Report Error Transmission rate increases by 2~8 times for tri-state HARQ mechanism and Tri-state HARQ mechanism further provides throughput gain 30~80% throughput gain when HARQ buffer is below 20K soft bits Two-state HARQ mechanism introduces large HARQ failure rate when HARQ buffer is below than 60K soft bits

IR-HARQ with VA 120km/hr No CQI Report Error Transmission rate increases by 2~8 times for tri-state HARQ mechanism and Tri-state HARQ mechanism further provides throughput gain 30~80% throughput gain when HARQ buffer is below 20K soft bits Two-state HARQ mechanism introduces large HARQ failure rate when HARQ buffer is below than 60K soft bits

Conclusions Tri-State HARQ mechanism guarantees HARQ reliability even there is package drop due to buffer overflow Tri-State HARQ mechanism can boosts throughput by 5~8 times Tri-State HARQ mechanism is recommended to adopted to 16m to increase transmission rate with buffer constraint Recommend to adopt the proposed text #1 in C802.16m-09/0894r1 Recommend to adopt the proposed text #2 in C802.16m-09/0894r1 Recommend to adopt the proposed text #3 in C802.16m-09/0894r1 Recommend to adopt the proposed text #4 in C802.16m-09/0894r1 Recommend to adopt the proposed text #5 in C802.16m-09/0894r1

APPENDIX

AGGRESSIVE IR-HARQ TRANSMISSION WITH 3DB CQI REPORT ERROR

IR-HARQ with PB 3km/hr 3dB CQI Report Error Transmission rate increases by 2~8 times for tri-state HARQ mechanism and two-state HARQ mechanism without buffer constraint At high SNR, aggressive HARQ mechanism provides more transmission rate Tri-state HARQ mechanism further provides throughput gain when buffer is insufficient Two-state HARQ mechanism introduces large HARQ failure rate when Buffer is insufficient

IR-HARQ with VA 30km/hr 3dB CQI Report Error Transmission rate increases by 2~8 times for tri-state HARQ mechanism Aggressive HARQ mechanism increases more throughput when SNR is high Two-state HARQ mechanism introduces large HARQ failure rate when HARQ buffer is below than 60K soft bits or SNR is below than 16dB Two-state HARQ mechanism introduces less transmission rate due to high HARQ failure rate

IR-HARQ with VA 120km/hr 3dB CQI Report Error Transmission rate increases by 2~8 times for tri-state HARQ mechanism Aggressive HARQ mechanism increases more throughput when SNR is high Two-state HARQ mechanism introduces large HARQ failure rate when HARQ buffer is below than 60K soft bits or SNR is below than 16dB Two-state HARQ mechanism introduces less transmission rate due to high HARQ failure rate

AGGRESSIVE CC-HARQ TRANSMISSION WITH NO CQI REPORT ERROR

CC-HARQ with PB 3km/hr No CQI Report Error Transmission rate increases by 2~8 times for tri-state HARQ mechanism Two-state HARQ mechanism introduces large HARQ failure rate when HARQ buffer is below than 60K soft bits Link reliability significantly decreases due to highly correlated channel condition

CC-HARQ with VA 30km/hr No CQI Report Error Transmission rate increases by 2~8 times for tri-state HARQ mechanism Two-state HARQ mechanism introduces large HARQ failure rate when HARQ buffer is below than 60K soft bits Tri-State HARQ mechanism provides better link quality

CC-HARQ with VA 120km/hr No CQI Report Error Transmission rate increases by 2~8 times for tri-state HARQ mechanism Two-state HARQ mechanism introduces large HARQ failure rate when HARQ buffer is below than 60K soft bits Tri-State HARQ mechanism provides better link quality

AGGRESSIVE IR-HARQ TRANSMISSION WITH 3DB CQI REPORT ERROR

CC-HARQ with PB 3km/hr 3dB CQI Report Error Transmission rate increases by 2~8 times for tri-state HARQ mechanism Two-state HARQ mechanism introduces large HARQ failure rate when HARQ buffer is below than 60K soft bits Link reliability significantly decreases due to highly correlated channel condition

CC-HARQ with VA 30km/hr 3dB CQI Report Error Transmission rate increases by 2~8 times for tri-state HARQ mechanism Two-state HARQ mechanism introduces large HARQ failure rate when HARQ buffer is below than 60K soft bits Tri-State HARQ mechanism provides better link quality

CC-HARQ with VA 120km/hr 3dB CQI Report Error Transmission rate increases by 2~8 times for tri-state HARQ mechanism Two-state HARQ mechanism introduces large HARQ failure rate when HARQ buffer is below than 60K soft bits Tri-State HARQ mechanism provides better link quality