11 T Dipole Status May 2012 M. Karppinen CERN TE-MSC On behalf of CERN-FNAL collaboration.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Superconducting Magnet Program S. Gourlay CERN March 11-12, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory IR Quad R&D Program LHC IR Upgrade Stephen A.
Advertisements

Mechanical Design & Analysis Igor Novitski. Outlines Electromagnetic Forces in the Magnet Goals of Finite Element Analysis Mechanical Concept Description.
Mikko Karppinen Nb3Sn Coil Production for 11 T Dipole Model Magnets.
11 T Dipole for DS Status of CERN Activities M. Karppinen CERN TE-MSC On behalf of B. Auchmann, L. Bottura, B. Holzer, L. Oberli, L. Rossi, D. Smekens,
EuCARD-HFM ESAC review of the high field dipole design, 20/01/2011, Maria Durante, 1/40 EuCARD-HFM ESAC Review of the high field dipole design Fabrication.
Racetrack Coil Technology – G. Ambrosio 1 LARP DOE review – FNAL, June. 5-6, 2007 BNL - FNAL - LBNL - SLAC Racetrack Coil Technology (LR, SQ) & other Supporting.
S. Caspi, LBNL HQS Progress Report High Field Nb 3 Sn Quadrupole Magnet Shlomo Caspi LBNL Collaboration Meeting – CM11 FNAL October 27-28, 2008.
Preliminary Design of Nb 3 Sn Quadrupoles for FCC-hh M. Karppinen CERN TE-MSC.
ILC Main Linac Superconducting Cryogen Free Splittable Quadrupole Progress Report V. Kashikhin for Superconducting Magnet Team.
Superconducting Large Bore Sextupole for ILC
Coil working group video-meeting P. Ferracin, J. C. Perez, S. Izquierdo Bermudez, X. Sarasola February 4th, 2014.
Long Racetrack (LR) strategy – G. Ambrosio 1 LARP DOE review - FNAL, June 12-14, 2006 BNL - FNAL - LBNL - SLAC OUTLINE: LR R&D goals & plans Long Racetrack.
Fred Nobrega. 9 Dec 2014 Model Design & Fabrication – FNAL Fred Nobrega 2 Outline Background Mechanical Design Model Magnet Features Coil Technology and.
Magnets for muon collider ring and interaction regions V.V. Kashikhin, FNAL December 03, 2009.
Design Features: still to be determined and open questions P. Ferracin 4 th Joint HiLumi LHC-LARP Annual Meeting November 17-21, 2014 KEK, Tsukuba.
Development of the EuCARD Nb 3 Sn Dipole Magnet FRESCA2 P. Ferracin, M. Devaux, M. Durante, P. Fazilleau, P. Fessia, P. Manil, A. Milanese, J. E. Munoz.
SC magnet developments at CEA/Saclay Maria Durante Hélène Felice CEA Saclay DSM/DAPNIA/SACM/LEAS.
LQ status and plans – G. Ambrosio 1 LARP Collaboration Meeting - LBNL, April , 2006 BNL - FNAL - LBNL - SLAC OUTLINE: Goals, Input and Output Sub-tasks.
11 T Nb3Sn Demonstrator Dipole R&D Strategy and Status
11 T Dipole Experience M. Karppinen CERN TE-MSC On behalf of CERN-FNAL project teams The HiLumi LHC Design Study (a sub-system of HL-LHC) is co-funded.
Eucard-WP7-HFM 9 th Collaboration Meeting at Warsaw University of Technology Status on SMC & RMC Models J.C Perez on behalf of SMC collaboration team.
Plans and schedule for QXF Giorgio Ambrosio and Paolo Ferracin Joint LARP/CM20 HiLumi meeting Napa Valley, CA, USA 8-10 April, 2013 The HiLumi LHC Design.
11 T Dipole Status at FNAL Fred Nobrega January 21, 2014.
Fred Nobrega, Nikolai Andreev 21 September, 2015.
11 T Dipole Informal Coil and Assembly Readiness Review CERN September 2013 Review committee: Herman Ten Kate CERN (Chair) Fred Nobrega FNAL Davide.
S. Caspi, LBNL HQ Progress and Schedule Shlomo Caspi LBNL LARP Collaboration Meeting – CM13 Port Jefferson November 4-6, 2009.
Helene Felice 11/16/2011 LARP Collaboration Meeting 17 1 st HiLumi Collaboration Meeting CERN Status on HQ Coil Design and Fabrication.
MQXF support structure An extension of LARP experience Helene Felice MQXF Design Review December 10 th to 12 th, 2014 CERN.
CERN Accelerator School Superconductivity for Accelerators Case study 1 Paolo Ferracin ( ) European Organization for Nuclear Research.
LARP Magnets FNAL contribution to LARP (LHC Accelerator Research Program) FNAL core-program support to LARP DOE Annual Program Review - May 16-18, 2006.
LARP Magnet Progress Michael Lamm For the LARP Collaboration bnl - fnal - lbnl - slac US LHC Accelerator Research Program All Experimenters’ Meeting Monday,
Subscale quadrupole (SQ) series Paolo Ferracin LARP DoE Review FNAL June 12-14, 2006.
GROUP C – Case study no.4 Dr. Nadezda BAGRETS (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology) Dr. Andrea CORNACCHINI (CERN EN Dept.) Mr. Miguel FERNANDES (CERN BE.
Magnet design, final parameters Paolo Ferracin and Attilio Milanese EuCARD ESAC review for the FRESCA2 dipole CERN March, 2012.
Dipole design at the 16 T frontier - Magnet R&D for a Future Circular Collider (FCC) at Fermilab Alexander Zlobin Fermilab.
11 T Dipole Project Goals and Deliverables M. Karppinen on behalf of CERN-FNAL collaboration “Demonstrate the feasibility of Nb3Sn technology for the DS.
Helene Felice HQ Test Results Review Thursday December 16 th Overview of HQ coils and Magnet.
LARP Collaboration Meeting Racetrack Coil Fabrication
11 T Dipole Project CERN Status M. Karppinen 11 T Management meeting 1 July 2013.
1 BNL -FNAL - LBNL - SLAC P. Wanderer IR’07 - Frascati 7 November 2007 U.S. LARP Magnet Programme.
DESIGN STUDIES IR Magnet Design P. Wanderer LARP Collaboration Meeting April 27, 2006.
Long Quad (LQ) & High Gradient (HQ) Series Alexander Zlobin bnl - fnal- lbnl - slac US LHC Accelerator Research Program DOE LARP review Fermilab, June.
DOE Review of LARP – February 17-18, 2014 SQXF Coil Design and Fabrication Winding and Curing Miao Yu February 17,
Program overview: motivation, target parameters, timeline A.V. Zlobin 15 T dipole design review 28 April 2016.
Cold Mass and Assembly Tooling Design, Procurement Status and Assembly Plan Igor Novitski Fermilab 15 T Dipole Design Review April 2016 April 28-29,
CERN MBHSM0101 and Plan for Future Models F. Savary on behalf of the 11T Dipole Project Team.
S. Caspi, LBNL HQ Magnet Program Shlomo Caspi LBNL LARP DOE Review FNAL June 1-2, 2011 BNL Jesse Schmalze Mike Anarella Peter Wanderer Arup Gosh FNAL Rodger.
Answers to the review committee G. Ambrosio, B.Bordini, P. Ferracin MQXF Conductor Review November 5-6, 2014 CERN.
MQXFSD3 laminated structure J.C Perez N. Bourcey, B. Favrat, P. Ferracin, P. Moyret.
2 nd LARP / HiLumi Collaboration Mtg, May 9, 2012LHQ Goals and Status – G. Ambrosio 11 LHQ Goals and Status Giorgio Ambrosio Fermilab 2 nd LARP / HiLumi.
CERN QXF Conductor Procurement and Cable R&D A.Ballarino, B. Bordini and L. Oberli CERN, TE-MSC-SCD LARP Meeting, Napa, 9 April 2013.
MQXC Nb-Ti 120mm 120T/m 2m models
Model magnet test results at FNAL
11 T Dipole Integration & Plans M. Karppinen
HQ Mirror Assembly R. Bossert
Rodger Bossert/Shlomo Caspi
11 T cable development and procurement strategy at CERN
LARP Technology Quadrupole Review
At ICFA Mini-Workshop on High Field Magnets for pp Colliders,
11T Dipole – Single Aperture 2m Model
Mechanical Modelling of the PSI CD1 Dipole
P. Ferracin and G. Ambrosio
the MDP High Field Dipole Demonstrator
11 T Dipole Project Overview and Status
Introduction to the technical content The Q4 magnet (MQYY) for HL-LHC
MKQXF FEA Model Haris Kokkinos
MQXF updates P. Ferracin October 9th, 2014.
PROGRESS TOWARDS AN OPEN MIDPLANE SEPARATION DIPOLE
Design of Nb3Sn IR quadrupoles with apertures larger than 120 mm
Design of Nb3Sn IR quadrupoles with apertures larger than 120 mm
Presentation transcript:

11 T Dipole Status May 2012 M. Karppinen CERN TE-MSC On behalf of CERN-FNAL collaboration

11 T Nb 3 Sn DS Upgrade  Create space for additional (cryo) collimators by replacing 8.33 T MB with 11 T Nb 3 Sn dipoles compatible with LHC lattice and main systems. M. Karppinen CERN TE-MSC 2 MB.B8R/L MB.B11R/L 5.5 m Nb 3 Sn 3 m Collim. 5.5 m Nb 3 Sn 3 m Collim  Joint development program between CERN and FNAL underway since Oct to demonstrate the feasibility of Nb 3 Sn technology for this upgrade by ,66 m (IC to IC plane)  LS2 2018: IR-2  LS3 2022: IR-1,5, Point-3,7 24/05/2012

11 T Dipole & Collimator Cryo-Assembly options M. Karppinen CERN TE-MSC 3 15,66 m (IC to IC plane) 10,6 m (L mag ) 3 m (collimator) 11,48 m (L CM ) beam tubes Line X (H.exch.) Line M (B.Bar line) 5,3 m (L mag ) 3 m (collimator) 5,3 m (L mag ) 2,27 m (collimator) 5,3 m (L mag ) 6,18 m (L CM ) 12 m (L CM ) 6,18 m (L CM ) 24/05/2012

11 T Design Challenges  Iron saturation effects  Transfer function matching with MB  Coil magnetization effects o Conductor development o Cable development  Quench protection o Heater development o QPS  Mechanical structure o Forces almost 2 X MB  Coil fabrication technique o Reproducibility o Handling  Thermal o Resin impregnated coils  Integration o Optics o Cold-mass o Collimator o Machine systems M. Karppinen CERN TE-MSC 4 24/05/2012

o Large aspect ratio, low compaction. Presently 20 µm additional compaction o FNAL roll the cable in two stages with an intermediate anneal o CERN use single pass process Strand & Cable 24/05/ M. Karppinen CERN TE-MSC Cable samples made with and without SS core show I c -degradation well within the initial goal of 10 %. Cored cable with RRP 151/169 being developed at FNAL.

11 T Dipole Coil Design M. Karppinen CERN TE-MSC 6  Coil optimization o >11 T at kA with 20% margin at 1.9 K o Field errors below the level  6-block design, 56 turns (IL 22, OL 34) o mm-wide 40-strand Rutherford cable, no internal splice o Several X-sections were analyzed with and without core o Coil ends optimized for low field harmonics and minimum strain in the cable B 0 (11.85 kA) = T B 0 (11.85 kA) = T 24/05/2012

Iron Saturation M. Karppinen CERN TE-MSC 7  Yoke design o The cut-outs on top of the aperture reduce the b 3 variation by 4.7 units as compared to a circular shape. o The holes in the yoke reduce the b 3 variation by 2.4 units. o The two holes in the yoke insert reduce the b 2 variation from 16 to 12 units. Relative permeabilityRelative FQ (units) 24/05/2012

Transfer Function M. Karppinen CERN TE-MSC 8  TF of 11 T dipole is different from MB: o More turns than MB (56 vs. 40)  11 T dipole is stronger at low field. o More saturation  reduction of transfer function at high field. Courtesy of H. Thiessen MB 11 T 300 A Monopolar Trim PC 2.4 Tm 24/05/2012

Coil Magnetization M. Karppinen CERN TE-MSC 9 MB (NbTi) 11 T Dipole Nb3Sn Mid-Plane Inner Layer Mid-plane Outer layer Inner Layer Pole Outer Layer Pole >10 X 24/05/2012

11 T Dipole Model Program 10 M. Karppinen CERN TE-MSC24/05/2012

11 T Model Dipole Parameters 11M. Karppinen CERN TE-MSC  FNAL 1-in-1 demonstrator based on existing HFD components. Coils with integrated poles.  CERN 1-in-1 model based on CTF (MB). Coils with non- integrated poles (pole-loading concept).  2 m long 2-in-1 magnets of both concepts. 24/05/2012

Titanium Poles with stress-relive slot Phosphor Bronze Key CS-Bump controls Inner Yoke Gap AL Clamp controls Outer Yoke Gap Uniform MP Shims Stainless Steel Skin Aluminum Clamp Iron Yoke Nb 3 Sn Coil Stainless Steel Collars Coil mechanical support is provided by stainless collars, vertically split iron yoke, aluminium clamp and welded stainless steel skin. Strong collars and iron yoke create the “rigidity belt” around Nb 3 Sn coil for conductor protection. Coil mid-plane and radial shims generate initial coil azimuthal pre-stress at collaring stage. Skin and clamp tensions deform the iron and produce the desired coil compression. The collar also acts as gap-controller. Collar-yoke-clamp-skin interfaces are tuned to sustain the horizontal EM force component. 1-in-1 Demonstrator Mechanical Concept 24/05/ M. Karppinen CERN TE-MSC Shims I. Novitski FNAL

 Two alternative design concepts 2-in-1 Demonstrator Design 24/05/ M. Karppinen CERN TE-MSC Pole loading designIntegrated pole design

Pole Loading Concept 24/05/ M. Karppinen CERN TE-MSC Pole wedge Loading plateShim Filler wedge

CERN 2-in-1 Model 24/05/ M. Karppinen CERN TE-MSC

 2 coils completed and fully instrumented with strain gauges and V-taps. CMM revealed dimensional distortions the origin of which is yet to be fully understood. All three coils made so far appear to be similar.  Spare coil wound from CERN supplied cable has been reacted and is ready for epoxy impregnation.  Mechanical model of the straight part (about 500 mm) was assembled and used for determining the initial shimming for the Demonstrator.  Cold mass assembly completed. Electrical connections (splice, instrumentation, heaters) underway  Magnet test expected as of 4 June. FNAL 1-in-1 Demonstrator Status 24/05/2012M. Karppinen CERN TE-MSC 16

Coil Fabrication WindReaction Epoxy impregnationInstrumentation Cure 24/05/2012M. Karppinen CERN TE-MSC 17

MBH mm from RE 1 box =.004” MBH mm from RE 1 box =.004” PC mm from RE  Reasons for dimensional distortions being investigated.  All 3 coils appear similar.  Different from previous coils made at FNAL.  Post-assembly measurement show smaller (approx. 50 µm) distortions. Coil Dimensions 24/05/2012M. Karppinen CERN TE-MSC 18

 Mechanical model based on Nb3Sn practice coil (PC-0) instrumented with strain gauges  Assembly parameters were explored with 5 different sets of shims  Validation of the assembly tooling and procedure  Coil and collared coil dimensional control before and after the assembly Mechanical model 1 24/05/2012M. Karppinen CERN TE-MSC 19

552 mm from RE 652 mm from RE 1260 mm from RE 1160 mm from RE MM Measurement Locations (4)

455 mm from RE 705 mm from RE 552 mm from RE 652 mm from RE Before MMAfter MM

 Measured signals from the strain gauges in line with the mechanical model. Demonstrator Collaring 24/05/2012M. Karppinen CERN TE-MSC 22

Demonstrator Cold-mass Assembly 24/05/2012M. Karppinen CERN TE-MSC 23

 Demo test in June  2 lengths of cored RRP 151/169 cable available for 1 m coils.  Cabling trials in progress to validate single pass process (like CERN).  Design of 5.5 m long coil fabrication tooling in progress.  Infrastructure for 5.5 m long coils exists (winding, curing, reaction, impregnation, coil assy, collaring). FNAL Activities 24/05/2012M. Karppinen CERN TE-MSC 24

 1-in-1 Demonstrator test Jun-12  1 m model(cored RRP-151/169) o Coil fabrication Jun..Aug-12 o Cold mass assemblyNov-12 o TestDec-12  2-in-1 Demonstrator (2 m) o Coils for aperture-1Aug..Oct-12 o 1-in-1 assembly and testFeb-13 o Coils for aperture-2Nov..Feb-13 o 1-in-1 assembly and testQ2-13 o 2-in-1 assembly and test  5.5 m prototype magnet o Practice coil (Cu)Q2-13 o Practice coil (Nb3Sn)Q4-13 o Coils for aperture-1 & mirror testsQ2-14 o Collared coilQ3-14 FNAL Milestones 24/05/2012M. Karppinen CERN TE-MSC 25

 1-in-1 (2 m) magnet assembly and fabrication drawings being completed.  2-in-1 (2 m) magnet assembly in progress.  Design of 5.5 m long tooling has begun.  Collaring tooling design complete.  Conceptual design of coil handling and assembly tooling complete. Fabrication design in progress. CERN Design Effort 24/05/2012M. Karppinen CERN TE-MSC 26

 Collar laminations for the mechanical model were delivered and inspected in CERN metrology lab. The order for collars for the aperture #1 was raised. Invitation to tender for the supply of collar laminations for aperture #2 to #5 being launched.  1-in-1 yoke laminations ordered.  Order for the outer shells to raise.  ODS copper alloy based wedges (Discup C3/30 material) expected in July.  Winding tooling completed and commissioned.  Curing tooling delivered.  Reaction tooling delivered at CERN. Dimensional control underway.  Reaction furnace commissioning planned for late July.  Vacuum impregnation tooling order placed (lead-time 18 w)  Vacuum impregnation tank expected in August. Procurement 24/05/2012M. Karppinen CERN TE-MSC 27

 Practice coils (2 m) o Practice coils #1-#2 (Cu) Jun..Aug-12 o Practice coil #3 (ITER Nb 3 Sn) Aug..Sep-12 o Practice coil #4 (LARP RRP 54/61) Oct..Nov-12 o Mirror test at FNALJan-12  2-in-1 Demonstrator (2 m) o Coils for aperture-1 (RRP 108/127)Jan..Mar-13 o 1-in-1 assembly and testQ2-13 o Coils for aperture-2 (PIT)Apr..Jun-13 o 1-in-1 assembly and testQ3-13 o 2-in-1 assembly and testQ4-13  5.5 m prototype magnet o Practice coil (Cu)Q1-14 o Practice coil (Nb 3 Sn)Q2-14 o Coils for aperture-1 & mirror testsQ4-14 o Collared coilQ1-15 o 2-in-1 cold-mass and cryo-magnetQ2-15 o Cold testQ3-15 CERN Milestones 24/05/2012M. Karppinen CERN TE-MSC 28