Using the Web to Support Data-based Decision Making Jay Buzhardt, Dale Walker, Charles Greenwood Juniper Gardens Children’s Project Division of Early Childhood.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Delaware Building BLOCKS EARLY CHILDHOOD MONITORING – INSTRUCTION – ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEM FOR YOUNG CHILDREN Delaware Special Education Meeting September.
Advertisements

 Provide some background on use of Individual Growth and Development Indicators for Continuous Progress Monitoring  Show an example of one IGDI: Early.
Researchers as Partners with State Part C and Preschool Special Education Agencies in Collecting Data on Child Outcomes Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI International.
Individual Growth and Development Indicators for Infants and Toddlers Using Progress Monitoring to Support RTI Services for Infants and.
CPM M R EC Continuous Progress Monitoring Measures for Intervention Research and Accountability in Early Childhood Charles R. Greenwood, Dale Walker, Jay.
Growth Indicators for Infants and Toddlers Charles R. Greenwood, Ph.D. Juniper Gardens Children’s Project University of Kansas DEC, Boston, December, 2001.
Embedding the Early Brain & Child Development Framework into Quality Rating and Improvement Systems Meeting Name Presenter Name Date 1.
C4K – Building an efficient and effective delivery system to impact critical outcomes for kids Our initial focus as we build this system is early literacy.
Iowa Department of Education Early Literacy Implementation & Support Summer / Fall 2014.
Beth Rous University of Kentucky Working With Multiple Agencies to Plan And Implement Effective Transitions For Head Start Children Beth Rous University.
Using the Online Data System for Infant and Toddler IGDIs Dale Walker, PhD, Jay Buzhardt, PhD & Barbara Terry, PhD Juniper Gardens Children’s Project,
RtI in Early Childhood Lisa Kelly-Vance, UNO and Kristy Feden, Papillion- LaVista Schools.
Early Communication Indicators: Monitoring the Progress of Infants and Toddlers Dale Walker, Judith J. Carta, and Charles R. Greenwood Dale Walker, Judith.
Background of the Early Communication Indicator for Infants and Toddlers Dale Walker, Judith Carta, and Charles Greenwood.
Learning How To Use the ECI Website Charles Greenwood, Dale Walker, and Judith Carta.
Early Childhood Outcomes Center Using the Child Outcomes Summary Form February 2007.
Getting Started at Your Own Site and Teaching Others How to Use the ECI.
What Are IGDIs and Why Use Them? Dale Walker, PhD, Jay Buzhardt, PhD & Barbara Terry, PhD Juniper Gardens Children’s Project, University of Kansas.
Using ECI Data for Decision- Making about Individual Children Dale Walker, PhD, Jay Buzhardt, PhD & Barbara Terry, PhD Juniper Gardens Children’s Project,
NEW ECI Website and Individualization Workshop September 22-23, 2005 Juniper Gardens Children’s Project Presenters: Jay Buzhardt & Charlie Greenwood.
EEC’s Parental Consent Form Authorization to Collect and Use Child Data January 31, 2013 and February 1,
PBIS Applications NWPBIS Washington Conference November 5, 2012.
Washington PBIS Conference Northwest PBIS Network Spokane, WA November 2013 Nadia K. Sampson & Dr. Kelsey R. Morris University of Oregon.
IPCI! Indicator of Parent-Child Interaction A Practitioner-Friendly Tool for Monitoring Progress in Parent- Child Interaction
Assessment for Child Monitoring and Program Planning: Creating Strong Links June 11, 2007JJ June 11, 2007 Lexington, KY First Steps Biannual PLE Meeting.
Developing Professional Learning Communities To Promote Response to Intervention Linda Campbell Melissa Nantais.
School Readiness: We’re Better Together
Office of Child Development & Early Learning Tom Corbett, Governor | Ronald Tomalis, Secretary of Education | Gary D. Alexander, Secretary of Public Welfare.
1 Using a Statewide Evaluation Tool for Child Outcomes & Program Improvement Terry Harrison, Part C Coordinator Susan Evans, Autism Project Specialist.
What’s New?. Planning for Child Evaluator Training First Steps is using Survey Monkey to support planning in the coming year The Kentucky PLE Needs Assessment/
Progress Monitoring in Early Childhood: Generating a Discussion Judy Carta, Juniper Gardens, University of Kansas Nan Vendegna, Colorado Results Matter.
© Institute for Child Success COORDINATING COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH CARE WITH HOME VISITS FOR NEW FAMILIES: A Case Study of Home Visitation Integration with.
Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia Results of FFY 2007 Monitoring Indicators For The Annual Performance Report & State Performance Plan.
The mission of TnT is threefold: (1) to study prevalence, policy and resources, individualized decision making, training and support and other factors.
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Oregon Response to Intervention Vision: Every child.
Building Outcome Data into a State On-Line Data System A birth through five project in Kansas Margy Hornback, Ed.D., Kansas Part B 619 Coordinator Kansas.
1 ELPA Initial Screening Policies and Procedures ELPA Initial Screening Policies and Procedures Fall 2009 Michigan Department of Education.
PERFORMANCE MEASURES A MISSOURI WIC PROJECT. PURPOSE Performance Measures is a collaboration between the State WIC office and Local WIC Providers to focus.
Wisconsin PBIS Leadership Conference E8 ISIS/SWIS Overview Marla Dewhirst ISIS/SWIS Trainer of Trainers
Response to Instruction Training Wednesday, October 30, 2013.
RTQII Indicator Reporting
Early Childhood Outcomes Center Orientation for New Outcomes Conference Participants Kathy Hebbeler Lynne Kahn The Early Childhood Outcomes (ECO) Center.
Using ECI Data to Make Individual and Program Level Decisions Judy Carta, Ph.D & Dale Walker Ph.D. Part 2: ECI Workshop Juniper Gardens Children’s Project.
Embedding Progress Monitoring in Interventions to Support Social-Emotional and Communication Development I Kathleen Baggett, Ph.D. Kathryn Bigelow, Ph.D.
DIBELS: Doing it Right –. Big Ideas of Today’s Presentation Reading success is built upon a foundation of skills DIBELS (Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early.
Summary Statements. The problem... Progress data included –5 progress categories –For each of 3 outcomes –Total of 15 numbers reported each year Too many.
Moving ON Audits Illawarra Retirement Trust. Foundation An opinion without data is just another opinion Real data helps services and managers to make.
Introduction to the Pennsylvania Kindergarten Entry Inventory.
Developing Strong Transition Protocols Infant Toddler Program, Head Start and Early Childhood Special Education Shannon Dunstan Idaho State Department.
Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance Network PAPBS Network Coaches Day January 28, Fidelity Measures Lisa Brunschwyler- School Age- School.
Johnson, J., Rahn, N., and Bricker, D., 2015 ECSE 672 Fall 2015 ACTIVITY-BASED APPROACH TO EARLY INTERVENTION.
1 Assuring the Quality of Data from the Child Outcomes Summary Form.
What do we know and what does it look like? Judith Carta & Virginia Buysse OSEP National Early Childhood Conference December 8, 2008 Washington DC.
Measuring EC Outcomes DEC Conference Presentation 2010 Cornelia Taylor, ECO Christina Kasprzak, ECO/NECTAC Lisa Backer, MN DOE 1.
Universal GO 4 IT Training. Welcome and Introductions.
Child Outcomes Measurement and Data Quality Abby Winer Schachner & Kathleen Hebbeler International Society on Early Intervention Conference Stockholm,
Purpose The purpose of Module 1 is to orient new staff to child outcomes measurement and the Child Outcomes Summary Form (COSF).
Child Outcomes Summary Process April 26, 2017
Phase I Strategies to Improve Social-Emotional Outcomes
Panel Discussion: What is being done by assessment tool developers and publishers to address OSEP reporting needs? Dale Walker, Charles Greenwood, University.
Data-Based Instructional Decision Making
Early Childhood Outcomes Data (Indicator C3 and B7)
A non-profit organization providing support to North Carolina parents and professionals for more than 25 years.
IMS Data Summary Third in a series November 2010
Building Capacity to Use Child Outcomes Data to Improve Systems and Practices 2018 DEC Conference.
This is a SAMPLE Powerpoint
Researchers as Partners with State Part C and Preschool Special Education Agencies in Collecting Data on Child Outcomes Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI International.
Welcome to the Workshop!
Introduction to the Child Outcomes Summary Form (COSF)
Early Childhood Outcomes Data (Indicator C3 and B7)
Presentation transcript:

Using the Web to Support Data-based Decision Making Jay Buzhardt, Dale Walker, Charles Greenwood Juniper Gardens Children’s Project Division of Early Childhood Conference October 15, 2010

IGDI Website: Publicly accessible material IGDI descriptions IGDI descriptions Materials needed for IGDI implementation Materials needed for IGDI implementation Scoring definitions Scoring definitions Scoring sheets Scoring sheets Administration checklists Administration checklists Toys for administration Toys for administration Psychometric properties Psychometric properties Training and certification resources Training and certification resources Intervention materials Intervention materials Contact information Contact information Online data system (password-protected) Data management Web-based certification Assessor management Child rosters and demographics Program-wide aggregated reports Data-based intervention decision making tools Making Online Decisions (MOD)

Current Data System and MOD Use IGDI Online data system use IGDI Online data system use Over 32,000 assessments entered into the data system Over 32,000 assessments entered into the data system Over 11,000 infants and toddlers assessed Over 11,000 infants and toddlers assessed Approximately 1,100 user accounts (certified assessors, program directors, data entry personnel, trainees, etc.) Approximately 1,100 user accounts (certified assessors, program directors, data entry personnel, trainees, etc.) Usage covers 22 states and three countries Usage covers 22 states and three countries MOD currently being tested in a limited number of midwestern Early Head Start and Part C programs MOD currently being tested in a limited number of midwestern Early Head Start and Part C programs Five Kansas Early Head Start programs currently using the MOD Five Kansas Early Head Start programs currently using the MOD Iowa Heartland Area Agency (Part C) Iowa Heartland Area Agency (Part C)

Graphs and Reports that Support Data-based Decision Making Base level support… Base level support… Progress Monitoring Graphs Progress Monitoring Graphs Weighted Total Communication Weighted Total Communication Key Skill Elements Key Skill Elements Program Reports Program Reports Identify children falling below benchmark Identify children falling below benchmark Identify children due for an assessment Identify children due for an assessment Individual Child Reports Individual Child Reports

Child’s Data Summary Child’s Data Table Individual Child Report

Progress Monitoring Graph: Weighted Total Early Communication Slightly Below Benchmark Below Benchmark

Key Skill Elements: Gestures Graph

Key Skill Elements: Vocalizations Graph

Key Skill Elements: Single Words Graph

Key Skill Elements: Multiple Words Graph

Additional Support: Making Online Decisions (MOD) System Automate identification of low-performing children Automate identification of low-performing children Document decision making progress within the data system Document decision making progress within the data system Intervention(s) used Intervention(s) used Work with caregivers on implementing intervention strategies Work with caregivers on implementing intervention strategies Caregiver intervention implementation Caregiver intervention implementation Intervention changes Intervention changes Analysis of child’s response to the intervention Analysis of child’s response to the intervention

Yes MOD Overview No Quarterly ECI Assessments How is the intervention being used? What intervention should be used Yes What is causing the problem? Is there a problem? No Is the intervention working?

Randomized Trial of the MOD’s Efficacy Primary Research Questions Primary Research Questions Does the MOD impact child outcomes? Does the MOD impact child outcomes? Does the MOD affect service providers’ decision-making behavior? Does the MOD affect service providers’ decision-making behavior? Participants: 5 Kansas Early Head Start programs Participants: 5 Kansas Early Head Start programs Home visitors in each program randomly assigned to either use the MOD (n=28) or continue standard services (n=24) Home visitors in each program randomly assigned to either use the MOD (n=28) or continue standard services (n=24) NonMOD group (standard services): used the ECI, entered data into data system, provided and/or referred child for intervention services as needed NonMOD group (standard services): used the ECI, entered data into data system, provided and/or referred child for intervention services as needed MOD group: Standard services + the MOD MOD group: Standard services + the MOD Children whose ECI score fell at least 1 sd below benchmark either receive MOD services (n=45) or standard services (n=53) Children whose ECI score fell at least 1 sd below benchmark either receive MOD services (n=45) or standard services (n=53)

Effect of the MOD on ECI Outcomes Level-1 Analysis (Children who score at least 1 sd below benchmark on the ECI)

Effect of the MOD on ECI Outcomes Level-2 Analysis (Children who score at least 1 sd below benchmark on the ECI)

Effect of the MOD on Home Visitors’ Intervention Services

Home Visitor Perception of the MOD