Health and Safety Executive Health and Safety Executive Changes to emergency planning requirements SIESO, 13 May 2013 Christina Roberts, Chemical Industries.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tips and Resources IASC Cluster/Sector Leadership Training
Advertisements

Seveso III Directive Moving from Seveso II to Seveso III
Major Accident Prevention Policy (MAPP) and Safety Management System (SMS) in the Context of the Seveso II Directive.
SUPPORTED BY THE EUROPEAN UNION’S OBNOVA AND PHARE PROGRAMMES EIA TRAINING RESOURCE MANUAL FOR SOUTH EASTERN EUROPE Scoping.
Scoping in the EIA process Proposal Identification Screening
1 Continuity Planning for transportation agencies.
Alexander Brandl ERHS 561 Emergency Response Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences.
Enforcement of the Seveso II Directive Enforcement of the Seveso II Directive.
Session 2.3: IASC OPERATIONAL GUIDELINES ON THE PROTECTION OF PERSONS IN SITUATIONS OF NATURAL DISASTERS Human Rights and Protection in Natural Disasters.
California Accidental Release Prevention Program California Accidental Release Prevention (CalARP) Program.
Getting it right for e ery child  Children & Young People (Scotland) Act 2014 Briefing on GIRFEC Provisions Scottish.
Ministry of Environment, Energy and Climate Change Mouzakis George, Dipl. Chem. Engineer GR-147 Patission Str ATHENS - GREECE Tel: ,
Regulatory Body MODIFIED Day 8 – Lecture 3.
Safety and health at work is everyone’s concern. It’s good for you. It’s good for business. European Survey on New & Emerging Risks (ESENER) - Overview.
Health and safety at work
TRAINING AND DRILLS. Training and Drills Ensure A comprehensive, coordinated, and documented program as an integral part of the emergency management program.
1 GEF and Adaptation to Climate Change Mauritius, April 2003.
FDA’s Perspective Continued - Where We Are ?. GMP Task Groups.
Seveso II in the UK Mark Maleham tel + 44 (0)
EuropeAid/131555/C/SER/RS Safety Procedures in the Chemical Industry Ernst SIMON, Styrian Regional Government, Austria Belgrade, December 2013.
UNECE and OSCE joint event, Almaty, May 2012
This Project is funded by the European Union Project implemented by Human Dynamics Consortium This project is funded by the European Union Projekat finansira.
EuropeAid/131555/C/SER/RS Major Accident Prevention Policy Safety Management System Ernst SIMON, Styrian Regional Government, Austria Belgrade, December.
University of Huddersfield School of Education & Professional Development Citizenship - how is it being addressed?
Health and Safety Executive Health and Safety Executive Seveso III Directive Moving from Seveso II to Seveso III Sandra Ashcroft, HSE 19 March 2013.
INTRODUCTION TO LAND-USE ISSUES. Land-use planning Seveso II provisions (Art. 12) in case of: New establishments Modifications to existing ones Developments.
Health and Safety Executive Health and Safety Executive Competent Authority & Data Reporting HSE/DECC Consultation Events - Spring 2014 EU Offshore Directive.
October Training 8 HR Ref. Content Overhead Utilities Risk Assessments Task Safety Environmental Analysis Health and Safety Plan Components of a HASP Questions?
This Project is funded by the European Union Project implemented by Human Dynamics Consortium This project is funded by the European Union Projekat finansira.
Review of the Operational Policies and Guidelines: key issues from a civil society perspective Sven Harmeling, Germanwatch Held.
Health and Safety Executive Health and Safety Executive HSE/SIESO Workshop Competent Authority Guidance for Inspectors on Emergency Arrangements for COMAH.
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Inspection Part II.
Introduction Research indicates benefits to companies who establish effective worker safety and health programs: –Reduction in the extent and severity.
EU Seveso II Directive Operators obligations & Competent Authorities duties 2.3 Activity workshop Angeliki Tsatsou Dritsa Chemist, TA Key Expert 2 Zagreb.
Proposed Review of the National Framework for Continuing Care.
Welcome 2011 California Statewide Medical and Health Exercise.
UNECE PRTR Protocol EPER/E-PRTR module ECENA training workshop Szentendre,15/16 October 2007 Michel Amand Belgian Head of delegation PRTR Chair of the.
Environmental Impact Assessment of public and private projects EIA Directive 85/337/EEC as amended by 97/11/EC and 2003/35/EC Recent developments Laura.
The European SEA Directive Simon Marsden School of International Business, University of South Australia Module 1: Basics of SEA.
SEA in the Czech Republic Prague, 24 September 2008.
SENJIT Code of Practice update and SEND Support Plans.
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Inspection Part III.
EuropeAid/131555/C/SER/RS Communication to the public Ernst SIMON, Styrian Regional Government, Austria Belgrade, December 2013.
Seveso II Review Stakeholder Consultation Meeting EPSC Position Richard Gowland Technical Director Manchester March
Civil Contingencies Act Enhancement Programme (CCAEP) Civil Contingencies Secretariat March 2010.
“EU Directive Seveso II, 96/82/EC Notification 2.3 Activity workshop Angeliki Tsatsou Dritsa Chemist, TA Key Expert 2 Zagreb June 2011.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency EPR-Public Communications L-08 Sources of Information.
Update on EU Issues 10 th March 2010 Manchester Conference Centre Health and Safety Executive Major Hazards Policy Team Paul Edwards.
DG ENV Environmental assessment procedures for energy infrastructure projects of common interest (PCIs)
Managing Fire Safety In Common Parts of Flats and Mixed Use Buildings Simon Gibbins Merseyside Fire and Rescue Service.
An Overview Of The MBP CM Leadership Manual Presented by: Robert J. Carter, CCM Robert M. Pfeiffer, CCM.
Public Consultation Session: Consultation and Transparency Requirements for Offshore Petroleum Activities Francesca Astolfi A/g General Manager, Offshore.
Capacity-building from the perspective of the ECE Industrial Accidents Convention Virginia Fusé, UNECE secretariatIspra26/03/2015.
Redefining the Role of the Overall Responsible Operator May 18, rd Annual Northeastern Ontario Water Works Conference Alex Salewski Ministry of.
Ian Speirs HBC Robin Derry NYCC Community Emergency Plans – Is your community prepared?
IPA 2007 – Project funded by the European Union Seveso II Directive: Articles 11 & 13 External Emergency Plans and Public Information Tom Pine United Kingdom.
INSPECTION PROGRAMS Robert Mout DCMR – Environment Agency
Overview of public participation in strategic decision-making in the UNECE area David Aspinwall.
FDA GUI Summary of Contract Manufacturing Arrangement for Drugs: Quality Agreements November This summary was prepared by the Rx-360.
The Administrative Control of Industrial/Chemical Parks in Germany
Jerzy Jendrośka Transboundary procedures
Nick Bonvoisin Secretary to the Convention on the
The partnership principle in the implementation of the CSF funds ___ Elements for a European Code of Conduct.
DOMINO EFFECTS & OTHER SAFETY CHALLENGES IN INDUSTRIAL PARKS
AERODROME CERTIFICATION COURSE
European Commission, DG Environment Air & Industrial Emissions Unit
INDUSTRIAL PARKS AND MULTI-OPERATOR SITES: THE ITALIAN SITUATION
Neopay Practical Guides #2 PSD2 (Should I be worried?)
Analysis of likelihood, risks and consequences of major accidents involving category acute toxic 3 dermal substances and assessment of the impact of covering.
Main S+D Provisions of the WTO-Agreement on Trade Facilitation
Presentation transcript:

Health and Safety Executive Health and Safety Executive Changes to emergency planning requirements SIESO, 13 May 2013 Christina Roberts, Chemical Industries Policy Nic Butcher, HM Specialist Inspector

Purpose of session To outline key differences in emergency planning requirements between COMAH Regs 1999 and Seveso III Directive To address some key issues To discuss how best to implement the requirements (syndicate work) To gather delegate responses

What stays the same? Top tier operators required to draw up onsite emergency plan and provide sufficient information to offsite emergency planners Local emergency planning authority to draw up offsite emergency plans Train, test, review etc Lower tier requirements

What are the key differences? Issues? Differences: Content of off site emergency plan Timescales for preparation of emergency plans Public concerned given early opportunity to give opinion on off site emergency plan Information to the public Issues to consider: Link to civil contingencies Lower tier establishments

Differences between COMAH Regs 1999 and Seveso III requirements 1. Content of off site emergency plans Extra info required for off site emergency plans –Arrangements for off site mitigatory action to include: Responses to major accident scenarios from the safety report Considering possible domino effects Including environmental impact of above –Arrangements for providing neighbouring establishments – not just defined ‘domino’ ones - and other neighbouring sites with information on accidents and actions to be taken. Will this make much of a difference?

Seveso III Directive types of establishment Before looking at timescales for emergency plan preparation, need to understand establishment definitions: New –Comes into scope after 31 May 2015 –Operating prior to 1 June 2015, but comes into scope or changes tier due to voluntary modifications leading to changes in inventory. Existing –In scope on 31 May 2015 and is still in scope on 1 June 2015 with no changes in tier. Other –Comes into scope or changes tier due to involuntary modifications e.g. substance category change

Differences between COMAH Regs 1999 and Seveso III requirements 2. Timescales for provision of information by operator for offsite emergency planning –‘New’ establishments – reasonable period of time prior to operation. –‘Existing’ establishments – by 1 June 2016 for additional info (unless already provided). –‘Other’ establishments – will have 2 yrs to provide information. Plus a further 2 yrs to produce off site emergency plan from when information received i.e. up to 4 yrs in total for ‘other’ establishments! Concerns???

Differences between COMAH Regs 1999 and Seveso III requirements 3. ‘Public concerned’ given early opportunity to give opinion on external emergency plans Who is ‘public concerned’? How do we deal with a transient population? How can we best contact the ‘public concerned’?

Differences between COMAH Regs 1999 and Seveso III requirements 4. Information to the public More on this later today… but with respect to emergency planning: Requirement for information to be permanently available, including electronically. Includes: –How the public concerned is warned –Appropriate behaviour in the event of an accident / or where they can find this information Applies to lower tier sites – how will we do this? Also for top tier sites: –Appropriate information from off site emergency plan – what should this information be?

Issues to consider 1. Link to civil contingencies What are the current links? Are the current arrangements working?

Issues to consider 2. Lower tier establishments No specific requirements to draw up a onsite or offsite plan under article 12 However, within the requirements for safety management systems: Planning for emergencies - adoption and implementation of procedures to identify foreseeable emergencies by systematic analysis, to prepare, test and review emergency plans to respond to such emergencies and provide specific training for the staff concerned... Etc. Note – there is no change from Seveso II But are existing arrangements adequate??

Others??? Are there any other key differences?

Syndicate work How best to implement the requirements

Staying in touch Seveso website Seveso ebulletin Consultation – informal & formal Guidance including recent COMAH CA information Thanks!