Phenotypic Gambit Predict Focal Individual’s Behavior:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Announcements. Foraging and prey selection Optimal Foraging theory: Individuals will maximize benefit:cost Model predictions only as good as the parameters.
Advertisements

APPENDIX An Alternative View of the Payoff Matrix n Assume total maximum profits of all oligopolists is constant at 200 units. n Alternative policies.
Biology 484 – Ethology Chapter 7 – The Evolution of Feeding Behavior.
Evolution and Ecology – Chapter 2
EKONOMSKA ANALIZA PRAVA. Game Theory Outline of the lecture: I. What is game theory? II. Elements of a game III. Normal (matrix) and Extensive (tree)
1 Learning with continuous experts using Drifting Games work with Robert E. Schapire Princeton University work with Robert E. Schapire Princeton University.
Fish and Zooplankton Interactions Wetzel Chapter 16, pp
Decision making and optimal foraging Logic Elements Prey choice model Patch choice model.
Predation – Chapter 13. Types of Predators Herbivores – animals that prey on green plants or their seed and fruits. –Plants are usually damaged but not.
PREDATORS AND PREY. LOOK AT THREE ASPECTS: 1. Decisions made by animals in collecting food 2. Behaviour involved in collecting food 3. Ways to avoid being.
Functional Response Lab 10 Turn in proposals on front table.
Uroplatus Gecko This has nothing to do with today’s lecture but speaking of cryptic critters…
Feeding Behavior Forage – to look for food – Herbivore – Carnivore – Omnivore.
Chapter 7. Evolution of feeding behavior. A large amount of research has focused on applying optimality theory to foraging behavior. A large amount of.
Predator Behavior  Numerical Response –  Predators will gather around a high density prey area  Predators “learn” where prey is (by experience or watching.
Behavioral Investment Theory: A New Framework for Mind and Behavior
Resource Acquisition & Allocation Optimal Foraging Theory.
Ions Biochemistry.
Phenotypic Gambit Invoke Optimization of Behavior Mimic Assumed Stabilizing Selection Deduce Predictions From Hypothesized Currency of Fitness Specify.
Northwestern crow investigation Algebra 2 Activity.
Questions in the study of foraging behavior How do animals select prey? 2.When should animals leave one feeding site and.
Resource Acquisition & Allocation Ecological events and their outcomes, such as growth, reproduction, primary production and population size, are often.
Animal Behavior.
Adaptive Feeding Behavior -- Chapter 7. The Truth of Life All animals consume food and are potential food for others These two facts shape behavior Efficient.
Embedding Computation in Studies of Protein Structure and Function Chris Bailey-Kellogg & lab & collaborators Shobha Xiaoduan Wei John Chris Fei.
The Care and Feeding of Work Teams COS 4880 Bruce Barnard.
CurrencyCurrency –What is to be maximized Strategy set (decision)Strategy set (decision) –What the animal can do ConstraintsConstraints –The limits of.
Figure 7.9 Frequency-dependent selection
Chapter 7 – The Evolution of Feeding Behavior
Introduction to Game Theory Yale Braunstein Spring 2007.
Option E6.
List four mechanisms of evolution.
Tolerance Curves Principle of Allocation Ray Huey.
Behavior: Levels of Explanation Recall N. Tinbergen Proximate: Mechanisms (How? Most Biology) Ultimate: Adaptive Significance (Why?) Example, Compare.
Chapter 51: Behavioral Ecology
Behavioral Biology Ch 51.
1) Acclimation (reversible): short-term change in structure or function (biochemical pathways) shift in range of physiological tolerances of an individual.
Predator Behavior Numerical Response – –Predators will gather around a high density prey area Predators “learn” where prey is (by experience or watching.
Foraging Behavior. Behavior Models Models are tools that an able or researcher to predict what an animal will do in a given circumstance. Armed with these.
ANTs PI Meeting, Nov. 29, 2000W. Zhang, Washington University1 Flexible Methods for Multi-agent distributed resource Allocation by Exploiting Phase Transitions.
Optimal Foraging Behavior  Species should forage in an efficient manner that maximizes benefits and minimizes costs  Varies with species and environmental.
CHAPTER 51 BEHAVIORAL BIOLOGY Copyright © 2002 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Benjamin Cummings Section A: Introduction to Behavior and Behavioral.
Ecology 8310 Population (and Community) Ecology Patch selection (e.g., Marginal Value Theorem) Prey selection (optimal diet theory) Moving beyond feeding.
Dynamic programming A gentle introduction using zooplankton behaviour as an example.
CPS 270: Artificial Intelligence Game Theory Instructor: Vincent Conitzer.
Chapter 10 Adaptation, Perfection, Function Nicolas Crossley K Sex and Death Summer ‘05 E. Oberheim.
S ELECTION FOR INDIVIDUAL SURVIVAL AND REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS CAN EXPLAIN DIVERSE BEHAVIORS Chapter 51, Section 3 August 31, 2015-Septermber 1, 2015.
Foraging Strategies of Homo Criminalis Lessons From Behavioral Ecology Wim Bernasco — NSCR, the Netherlands, IPAM 2007.
Food & Habitat Selection
FUNCTIONAL RESPONSE. Fig in Molles 2008.
Foraging Psychology Introduction Foraging has been looked at from a functional angle for a long time Optimality models etc Then you have to look.
Parts of an Experiment Parts of an Experiment Variables All of the factors that could be changed in an experiment Constants Independent Dependent.
BEHAVIORAL BIOLOGY Section A: Introduction to Behavior and Behavioral Ecology 1.What is behavior? 2. Behavior has both proximate and ultimate causes 3.
First Exam Thursday 18 February
Optimal foraging theory and risk-sensitive foraging
Tinbergen’s Four Questions Causation Ontogeny Survival value Evolution.
Chapter 51 Behavioural Ecology. Recall... Behavioural ecologists distinguish between proximate and ultimate causes of behaviour What are the questions.
Adaptive Foraging Behavior ZOL 313 May 28, Adaptive Foraging Behavior ZOL 313 May 28, 2008 Objectives: 1. Become familiar with some adaptive foraging.
Behavioral Adaptations for Survival Chapter 5. Adaptationist Approach – Assumes a behavior is adaptive (trait confers greater reproductive success than.
7.1 Animals find food using a variety of sensory modalities Animals use several sensory modalities when searching for food (e.g., vision, olfaction, hearing)
Animal Behavior Chapter 51
Food Obtaining Behavior
Animal Behavior Chapter 51
Behavioral ecology Chapter 51.
אבולוציה והתאמות לסביבה
Animal Behaviour Part II
Natural selection favors behaviors that increase survival and reproductive success Concept 51.5 Nia Sanders.
Behavioral Ecology Interface of behavior, ecology and evolution
Warm-up Natural Systems are usually “open systems.” How are open systems different than “closed systems?” Human actions create ___________ in all other.
Mon. Tues. Wed. Thurs. Fri. Week of Sept. 22
Presentation transcript:

Phenotypic Gambit Predict Focal Individual’s Behavior: Does Behavior of Other Individual (s) Matter? NO: “Standard Optimization;” Find Maximal Currency of Fitness YES: Game Theory; Social Interaction Find Evolutionary Stable Strategy

Individual Behavior Crows Feeding on Whelks: references R. Zach (1978) Selection and dropping of whelks by Northwestern crows, Behaviour, 67, 134 - 147 R. Zach (1979) Shell dropping: Decision-Making and optimal foraging in Northwestern crows, Behaviour, 68, 106 – 117 http://www-rohan.sdsu.edu/~jmahaffy/courses/f00/math122/lectures/optimization

Crows Feeding on Whelks Northwestern crow (Corvus caurinus) Whelk (Thais lamellosa) Mollusc Search intertidal zone Fly to rocks, Drop prey Repeat, Shell breaks

Crows Feeding on Whelks Crows choose larger prey ~ Uniform size At rocks, Fly straight up, Drop whelk (Re-drop) Optimal foragers? “Optimize” H, height?

Crows Feeding on Whelks Number of drops versus height H Constraint on problem Large prey break easier Kinetic Energy: 𝐾= 1 2 𝑚𝑎𝑠𝑠 𝑣𝑒𝑙𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑡𝑦 2

Outline Model Hypothesis: Selection favors dropping whelk from height minimizing energetic cost to forager Individual Behavior: No Social Interaction Translate Height [H] into currency of fitness [Cost] Find H* where Cost minimal

Model: E = kHN E: Energy cost (Currency) H: Drop height (Decision) N(H): No. drops k > 0 constant Objective Function a = 15.9; b = 1.2

Deduce Prediction Derivative dE/dH = 0 H* = 5.6 m Minimizes cost

Prediction H = 5.6 m Mean close to H* Some variation How? Not issue Learned? Issue: Gain some understanding of energy efficiency?