2 and 3-jet Analysis in Flux-tube Model J.B.Choi, M.Q.Whang, S.K.Lee (Chonbuk National University, Korea)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Effects of minijet degradation on hadron observables in heavy-ion collisions Lilin Zhu Sichuan University QPT2013, Chengdu.
Advertisements

Recombination for JET Shower MC: Status and Discussion Rainer Fries Texas A&M University JET NLO & MC Meeting Wayne State University, August 23, 2013 On.
Jet and Jet Shapes in CMS
Quark recombination in high energy collisions for different energies Steven Rose Worcester Polytechnic Institute Mentor: Dr. Rainer Fries Texas A&M University.
Lecture I: pQCD and spectra. 2 What is QCD? From: T. Schaefer, QM08 student talk.
Jet Fragmentation Ali Hanks JClub June 21, 2006 Ali Hanks - JClub.
We distinguish two hadronization mechanisms:  Fragmentation Fragmentation builds on the idea of a single quark in the vacuum, it doesn’t consider many.
A Comparison of Three-jet Events in p Collisions to Predictions from a NLO QCD Calculation Sally Seidel QCD’04 July 2004.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
Lattice QCD 2007Near Light Cone QCD Near Light Cone QCD On The Lattice H.J. Pirner, D. Grünewald E.-M. Ilgenfritz, E. Prokhvatilov Partially funded by.
1 Methods of Experimental Particle Physics Alexei Safonov Lecture #14.
Jets and QCD resummation Albrecht Kyrieleis. BFKL at NLO Gaps between Jets.
Working group C summary Hadronic final states theory Mrinal Dasgupta.
Identified Particle Ratios at large p T in Au+Au collisions at  s NN = 200 GeV Matthew A. C. Lamont for the STAR Collaboration - Talk Outline - Physics.
Working Group C: Hadronic Final States David Milstead The University of Liverpool Review of Experiments 27 experiment and 11 theory contributions.
QM 年 11 月 日 Shanghai, China 梁作堂 (Liang Zuo-tang) 山东大学 1 For The 19th International Conference on Ultra-Relativistic Nucleus-Nucleus Collisions.
Single (transverse) Spin Asymmetry & QCD Factorization Single (transverse) Spin Asymmetry & QCD Factorization Xiangdong Ji University of Maryland — Workshop.
Particle Physics Chris Parkes Experimental QCD Kinematics Deep Inelastic Scattering Structure Functions Observation of Partons Scaling Violations Jets.
Vcb and Vub Determinations Changhao Jin University of Melbourne BEACH 2002, Vancouver.
EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE FOR HADRONIC DECONFINEMENT In p-p Collisions at 1.8 TeV * L. Gutay - 1 * Phys. Lett. B528(2002)43-48 (FNAL, E-735 Collaboration Purdue,
Jim Stewart DESY Measurement of Quark Polarizations in Transversely and Longitudinally Polarized Nucleons at HERMES for the Hermes collaboration Introduction.
QCD-2004 Lesson 2 :Perturbative QCD II 1)Preliminaries: Basic quantities in field theory 2)Preliminaries: COLOUR 3) The QCD Lagrangian and Feynman rules.
D0 Meeting September 6, 2002 Rick Field - Florida/CDFPage 1 The “Underlying Event” in Hard Scattering Processes  What happens when a proton and an antiproton.
Kang Seog Lee Chonnam National University, Korea Dynamical Recombination model of QGP Introduction – recombination model Dynamic recomination calculation.
David Milstead – Experimental Tests of QCD ITEP06 Winter School, Moscow Experimental Tests of QCD at Colliders: Part 2 David Milstead Stockholm University.
June 25, 2004 Jianwei Qiu, ISU 1 Introduction to Heavy Quark Production Jianwei Qiu Iowa State University CTEQ Summer School on QCD Analysis and Phenomenology.
7 th April 2003PHOTON 2003, Frascati1 Photon structure as revealed in ep collisions Alice Valkárová Institute of Particle and Nuclear Physics Charles University.
大西 陽一 (阪 大) QCDの有効模型に基づく光円錐波動関数を用い た 一般化パートン分布関数の研究 若松 正志 (阪大)
What do we learn from PHENIX high pt results Jiangyong Jia For the PHENIX Collaboration State University of NewYork at
QCD Physics with ATLAS Mike Seymour University of Manchester/CERN PH-TH ATLAS seminar January 25 th / February 22 nd 2005.
12004, TorinoAram Kotzinian Monte Carlo Event Generators The basic lepton-quark scattering processes have well defined cross section formulae within the.
HERMES による パートン helicity 分布関数の QCD 解析 Tokyo Inst. of Tech. 1. Quantum Chromo-Dynamics (QCD) 2. Parton Helicity Distribution and Nucleon Spin Problem 3.
Heavy hadron phenomenology on light front Zheng-Tao Wei Nankai University 年两岸粒子物理与宇宙学 研讨会,重庆, 5.7—5.12 。
Andrey Korytov, University of Florida ICHEP2004 August 15-22, 2004, Beijing 1 Quark and Gluon Jet Fragmentation Differences Abstracts covered in this talk.
 Measurement of  x E  (Fig. 4) Assorted correlations between a fixed high-p T trigger hadron (  p Ttrig  =4.7GeV/c) and lower p T associated hadrons.
Jets and α S in DIS Maxime GOUZEVITCH Laboratoire Leprince-Ringuet Ecole Polytechnique – CNRS/IN2P3, France On behalf of the collaboration On behalf of.
Parton energy loss Marco van Leeuwen. 2 Hard probes of QCD matter Use ‘quasi-free’ partons from hard scatterings to probe ‘quasi-thermal’ QCD matter Interactions.
The Underlying Event in Jet Physics at TeV Colliders Arthur M. Moraes University of Glasgow PPE – ATLAS IOP HEPP Conference - Dublin, 21 st – 23 rd March.
Heavy-Ion Physics - Hydrodynamic Approach Introduction Hydrodynamic aspect Observables explained Recombination model Summary 전남대 이강석 HIM
Implications for LHC pA Run from RHIC Results CGC Glasma Initial Singularity Thermalized sQGP Hadron Gas sQGP Asymptotic.
Jet Hadronization in Vacuum and in the Medium Rainer Fries Texas A&M University Quark Matter 2015 Kobe, September 28, 2015 With Kyongchol Han Che Ming.
1 Jets in PHENIX Jiangyong Jia, Columbia Univerisity How to measure jet properties using two particle correlation method (In PHENIX)? Discuss formula for.
Color Reconnection in W Pair Events Guillaume Leibenguth Université Catholique de Louvain Belgium DIS 2003, St. Petersburg On behalf of the LEP collaborations.
Azimuthal correlations of forward di-hadrons in d+Au collisions at RHIC Cyrille Marquet Theory Division - CERN Based on :C.M., Nucl. Phys. A796 (2007)
April 18, 2007A. Levy: Exclusive VM, DIS07, Munich1 Exclusive ρ 0 electroproduction Aharon Levy DESY/Tel Aviv University on behalf of the ZEUS Collaboration.
Duke University 野中 千穂 Hadron production in heavy ion collision: Fragmentation and recombination in Collaboration with R. J. Fries (Duke), B. Muller (Duke),
Inclusive jet photoproduction at HERA B.Andrieu (LPNHE, Paris) On behalf of the collaboration Outline: Introduction & motivation QCD calculations and Monte.
seminar at Academia Sinica
QCD CORRECTIONS TO bb →h h
Parton Cascade Simulation – Heavy Ion Collisions
Automated Tree-Level Feynman Diagram and Event Generation
Sílvia Bravo i Gallart IFAE, Barcelona Moriond-QCD, 18 March 2002
With water up to the neck!
Searching for intrinsic motion effects in SIDIS
B physics at hadron collider
“Min-Bias” and the “Underlying Event” at CDF
kT Asymmetry in Longitudinally Polarized pp Collisions
New d+Au RHIC data show evidence for parton saturation
New Results on 0 Production at HERMES
“Min-Bias” and the “Underlying Event” in Run 2 at CDF and the LHC
Near-Side Ridge and Early Parton Momentum Distribution
Fragmentation or Recombination at High pT?
Heavy-to-light transitions on the light cone
Spin effects and partonic intrinsic k┴
Identified Charged Hadron Production
Jet fragmentation results at CDF
Hadron Multiplicity from Color Glass Condensate at LHC
PYTHIA 6.2 “Tunes” for Run II
Peter Loch University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona USA
Measurement of b-jet Shapes at CDF
Presentation transcript:

2 and 3-jet Analysis in Flux-tube Model J.B.Choi, M.Q.Whang, S.K.Lee (Chonbuk National University, Korea)

Ⅰ. Generals Ⅱ. Flux-tubes in Coordinate Space Ⅲ. Momentum Space Flux-tube Model Ⅳ. 2-jet Analysis Ⅴ. 3-jet Analysis Ⅵ. Look forward

I. Generals  Purpose of LC  Production Processes  Factorization  Hadronization into Jets  Jet Overlapping

Purpose of LC  Higgs → 2, 4 jets → 4, 6 jets → 4, 6 jets → 8, 10 jets → 8, 10 jets  6 jets   SUSY  Extra-dim

Production Processes 4 jets

Loop corrections no. of loops no. of diagrams drawings calculations no. of loops no. of diagrams drawings calculations 0 ~10 0 H H1 ~10 1 H H 2 ~10 2 HH/C 3 ~10 3 H/CH/C 4 ~10 4 C C 5 ~10 5 C 6 ~10 6 C (H : Hand) (H : Hand) (C : Computer) (C : Computer)

Factorization  1 st rule ; perturbative expansion in ; perturbative expansion in ; non-perturbative models ; non-perturbative models  Corrections asymptotic expansions asymptotic expansions exponentiation + resummation exponentiation + resummation Uncertainty exists ! Uncertainty exists !

Hadronization into Jets  : 2 jets 2 or 4 jets 2 or 4 jets  : 4 or 6 jets  : 6 jets  : 8 or 10 jets  models based on local parton-hadron duality cluster → HERWIG cluster → HERWIG string → JETSET string → JETSET …

Jet Overlapping  4 jets Consider the cone Consider the cone overlap solid angle ; overlap solid angle ; ∴ probability to overlap ∴ probability to overlap (maybe OK.) (maybe OK.)  5 jets for fixed 4 jets for fixed 4 jets ; (difficult to check) ; (difficult to check)

Processes Processes 6 jets 6 jets  8 jets BG : BG : ; nearly always overlap ; nearly always overlap need new method need new method

II. Flux-tubes in Coordinate Space  Flux-Tube Classification  Connection Amplitude  Gluon Density  Mesons  Baryons  4-quark States  Pentaquarks

Flux-tube Classification a : no. of quarks (sources) a : no. of quarks (sources) b : no. of antiquarks (sinks) b : no. of antiquarks (sinks)glueballmeson baryon pentaquark hexaquark

Connection Amplitude  A : The amplitude for a quark to be connected to another one through given flux-tube. to another one through given flux-tube.  M(A) : measure of A ▫. assumptions ▫. assumptions (1) M(A) decreases as A increases. (1) M(A) decreases as A increases. (2) M(A 1 ) + M(A 2 ) = M(A 1 A 2 ) (2) M(A 1 ) + M(A 2 ) = M(A 1 A 2 ) ( when A 1 and A 2 are independent) ( when A 1 and A 2 are independent)  Solution A 0 : normalization constant A 0 : normalization constant k : parameter k : parameter

Form of M  For M ∝ | x-y | ν, flux-tube shape is determined by  | x-y | ν = | x-z | ν + | z-y | ν   General A becomes    For and xy z : Weight factor : Weight factor : Integration limit : Integration limit

Gluon Density  Overlap function probability amplitude to have quark pairs probability amplitude to have quark pairs  For a meson We can assume We can assume probability to have quark pair ∝ gluon density probability to have quark pair ∝ gluon density

Mesons

Baryons Proton Neutron

4-quark States (1) square

4-quark States (2)

Pentaquarks-1

Pentaquarks-2

Ⅲ. Momentum Space Flux-tube Model  Momentum Space Connection  Definition of Jets  Phase Space  Angular Ordering  Momentum Distributions

Momentum Space Connection Final particles are connected in momentum! Final particles are connected in momentum! → momentum space flux-tube model → momentum space flux-tube model

Definition of Jets  Fragmentation process by quark pair creations by quark pair creations... gluonic flux-tube descriptions gluonic flux-tube descriptions (1) Probability amplitude ∝ overlap function (1) Probability amplitude ∝ overlap function ( in mementum space) ( in mementum space) (2) Phase space (2) Phase space ; parton model assumptions ; parton model assumptions

Phase Space  Parton model assumptions about quark fragmentation (1) Longitudinal momentum components (1) Longitudinal momentum components ∝ total jet (parton) energy ∝ total jet (parton) energy (2) Transverse momentum components (2) Transverse momentum components from soft processes (small uncertainty) from soft processes (small uncertainty) → parameters → parameters → Trapezoid → Trapezoid e d P L ∝ E (jet) e d P L ∝ E (jet) P T : two parameters d, e P T : two parameters d, e

Angular Ordering  Prediction of gluon jet direction ? A = A 1 A 2 A = A 1 A 2 (1) for fixed P 2 (p 1 ≡1.0), (1) for fixed P 2 (p 1 ≡1.0), vary P 3 and θ vary P 3 and θ (2) vary P 2 and angle (2) vary P 2 and angle between P 1 and P 2 between P 1 and P 2 P1P1 P2P2 P3P3 A1A1 A2A2 θ

Angular Ordering

Momentum Distributions  2-jet case P1P1 P2P2 P θ

Ⅳ. 2-jet Analysis P1P1P1P1 P2P2P2P2 e dhL1 L2 Connection amplitude Probability  Phase Space

Parameters – k,d,e

Fits

Ⅴ. 3-jet Analysis I. II. III.  Phase Space

◎. Phase space 2 ◦ gluonic effect f

Analysis  3 jet

(A)(B)

Fits

◎. Phase space 3 aa

◎ 1. A0, a, e, k, d, f 1. A0, a, e, k, d, f 2. Data Analysis 2. Data Analysis Parameter s

Parameters - a

Parameters – A0

Parameters - e

Parameters - d

Parameters - f

Parameters - k

Fits 1

Fits 2

Fits 3

Fits 4

Fits 5

Fits 6

Ⅵ. Look Forward  3-dim. Structures  Momentum Distributions  Jet Parameter Calculations  Discrimination of Overlapped Jets  Possibilities