Suppress our data? Deepali and Takao. Issue now Event size for HBD is large at HV=3500V –Is not very much appreciated. –Needs to set higher zero-suppression.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

6 Mar 2002Readout electronics1 Back to the drawing board Paul Dauncey Imperial College Outline: Real system New VFE chip A simple system Some questions.

Advertisements

General Statistics Ch En 475 Unit Operations. Quantifying variables (i.e. answering a question with a number) 1. Directly measure the variable. - referred.

1 HBD Update Itzhak Tserruya DC meeting, April 9, 2008 April 9, 2008.

Analysis of chip with 100 events, July 2001 Variation in pixel to pixel average ADC values (fixed pattern noise) Pixel ADC value event to event repeatability.

STAR 62 GeV CuCu Event totals (as of 3/16/05, noon ) Total: Mevts of BBC Narrow Goal > 20 Mevts. BBC Narrow Trigger has been operational for 6 full.

Study of Photon Sensors using the Laser System 05/7/12 Niigata University, Japan Sayaka Iba, Editha P. Jacosalem, Hiroaki Ono, Noriko.

On Noise Characterization Michel Lefebvre University of Victoria Physics and Astronomy 14 August 2003.

Checking the Acd hardware veto setting The hardware veto is generated in the front-end electronics Discriminator with coarse and fine settings Both are.

1Calice-UK Cambridge 9/9/05D.R. Ward David Ward Compare Feb’05 DESY data with Geant4 and Geant3 Monte Carlos. Work in progress – no definitive conclusions.

Analysis of AcdPedestal during EMI runs During the EMC-EMI scans we are looking for discrete changes in the behavior of the ACD as we scan the frequency.

Y. Karadzhov MICE Video Conference Thu April 9 Slide 1 Absolute Time Calibration Method General description of the TOF DAQ setup For the TOF Data Acquisition.

ATLAS MDT-ASD PRR – 30-August-2002George Brandenburg – Page 1 ATLAS MDT-ASD Operational Tests at Harvard George Brandenburg Michelle Dolinski Peter Hurst.

HCAL Digitization Rick Wilkinson. Program Flow CaloHitResponse CaloSamples (analog signal) HcalElectronicsSim HBHEDataFrame (or HF, or HO) SimHits DetId= ,

J. Estrada - Fermilab1 AFEII in the test cryostat at DAB J. Estrada, C. Garcia, B. Hoeneisen, P. Rubinov First VLPC spectrum with the TriP chip Z measurement.

ACD calibrations Pedestals Measured from online script Measure PHA w/ HV off, no charge injection Use cyclic triggers ~ ADC counts, very narrow.

CFT Calibration Calibration Workshop Calibration Requirements Calibration Scheme Online Calibration databases.

Dealing with central events in Run 10 Au+Au collisions Mihael Makek Weizmann Institute of Science HBD Meeting, 2/6/2010.

ITOP carrier amplifier test at Indiana University G. Visser 4/27/2015 (latest update) I use the recently (here) characterized JT0947 ch3 as input source.

HBD Operation in Run 9 Thomas K Hemmick for the HBD Crew.

Tests with JT0623 & JT0947 at Indiana University Nagoya PMT database test results for JT0623 at 3220V: This tube has somewhat higher than usual gain. 5×10.

Cube Measurements Tent Crew. Scintillation BNL 241 Am Semi- collimated  Spectralon Diffuse UV Reflector SBD  -Trigger Scint. Light Poisson.

General Statistics Ch En 475 Unit Operations. Quantifying variables (i.e. answering a question with a number) Each has some error or uncertainty.

HBD HV Control and Monitoring System A Gain vs. HV study throughout Run-9 – PART 1 – Manuel Proissl HBD Meeting 06/16/2009.

Updates on GEMs characterization with APV electronics K. Gnanvo, N. Liyanage, K. Saenboonruang.

VI th INTERNATIONAL MEETING ON FRONT END ELECTRONICS, Perugia, Italy A. Dorokhov, IPHC, Strasbourg, France 1 NMOS-based high gain amplifier for MAPS Andrei.

1 HBD Commissioning Itzhak Tserruya DC meeting, BNL, April 11, 2007.

General Statistics Ch En 475 Unit Operations. Quantifying variables (i.e. answering a question with a number) 1. Directly measure the variable. - referred.

1 xCAL monitoring Yu. Guz, IHEP, Protvino I.Machikhiliyan, ITEP, Moscow.

QGP France sept 2010Sanjoy Pal Performances of the tracking Chambers of the ALICE MUON Spectrometer 1.

STAR Collaboration Meeting, BNL, Feb 2005 Alexandre A. P. Suaide University of Sao Paulo Slide 1 BEMC software update L3 display 200 GeV February.

MPPC Measurements at LSU Brandon Hartfiel LSU Hardware Group Thomas Kutter, Jessica Brinson, Jason Goon, Jinmeng Liu, Jaroslaw Nowak Sam Reid January 2009.

8/26/02 D0 Calorimeter Task Force Stephanie Beauceron LPNHE - Paris 1 Offline zero suppression Aim: Understand the huge value of Missing E T at 1.5  Principally.

ScECAL BeamTest Analysis Asian ScECAL Meeting Jan 14 th, 2010 Adil, Satoru Uozumi, DongHee Kim.

1 HBD Update: DC Meeting June 2006 Thomas K Hemmick for the HBD Crew…

1Ben Constance7 th January 2010 FONT5 December 2009 feedback results During the final shift we ran K1-to-P2 position feedback 151.2ns bunch spacing, quadrupoles.

1 HBD Towards Run-9 Itzhak Tserruya H/L meeting, April 3, 2008 April 3, 2008.

HBD electronics status All the ADC and XMIT boards are installed. –Top 3 crates are for the ADC, XMIT boards –Bottom crate is for test pulse boards/future.

Latitude and Longitude. Latitude- the distance in degrees north or south of the equator The latitude of the equator is 0° (degrees)  What is latitude?

1 A first look at the KEK tracker data with G4MICE Malcolm Ellis 2 nd December 2005.

1 EMC Trigger Summery from RunII and discussion for RunIII H.Torii, Kyoto Univ. ERT Lvl-1 meeting.

GLAST Calorimeter Crystal Position Measurement Zach Fewtrell, NRL/Praxis GLAST Integration & Test Workshop SLAC July 14, 2005.

HBD Status for Run 10 C.Woody For the HBD Group Collaboration Meeting January 15, 2010.

DESY BT analysis - MPPC Saturation Correction - S. Uozumi Feb Sci-ECAL meeting 1.MPPC Gain Measurement (with LED data) 2.Inter-calibration of readout.

STAR Collaboration Meeting, BNL – march 2003 Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 1 EMC Update Update on EMC –Hardware installed and current.

F Don Lincoln, Fermilab f Fermilab/Boeing Test Results for HiSTE-VI Don Lincoln Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory.

2/18/2016I. Ravinovich1 HBD Run-10 data analysis I. Ravinovich WIS.

SCT WeekDecember 3, Block of Low Gain Analysis and Solutions A. Ciocio - LBNL.

HBD HV Control and Monitoring System RESISTORS, CALIBRATION & CO. Manuel Proissl HBD Meeting 12/23/2008.

HBD Status Report from Run 9 Craig Woody BNL DC Meeting July 8, 2009.

HBD Report Craig Woody BNL DC Meeting January 7, 2009.

1 HBD Commissioning Itzhak Tserruya DC meeting, BNL December 13, 2006 Progress from October 3 to November 28, 2006.

Micromegas-TPC Oct 2005 beam test in KEK Ar/isobutane 1T data Setting HMThreshold Analysis results of Run (220V/cm) Analysis results of Run (80V/cm),

Collection of Photoelectrons from a CsI Photocathode in Triple GEM Detectors C. Woody B.Azmuon 1, A Caccavano 1, Z.Citron 2, M.Durham 2, T.Hemmick 2, J.Kamin.

Comparison of filters for burst detection M.-A. Bizouard on behalf of the LAL-Orsay group GWDAW 7 th IIAS-Kyoto 2002/12/19.

Development of a pad interpolation algorithm using charge-sharing.

G. Eigen, Paris, Introduction The SiPM response is non-linear and depends on operating voltage (V-V bd ) and temperature  SiPMs need monitoring.

CALICE, CERN June 29, 2004J. Zálešák, APDs for tileHCAL1 APDs for tileHCAL MiniCal studies with APDs in e-test beam J. Zálešák, Prague with different preamplifiers.

Sensitivity of HO to Muons Shashi Dugad for HO group India-CMS Meeting 6-7 Oct

Recent Gain Changes C.Woody HBD Meeting March 23, 2010.

20 April 2007MICE Tracker Phone Meeting1 Analysis of cosmic/self-triggerd data of station 5 Hideyuki Sakamoto MICE Tracker Phone Meeting 20 th April 2007.

1M. Ellis - Tracker PC - 7th March 2007 VLPC Cassette Characterisation  Third application (as described in past tracker meeting and CM17) is now working.

Fourth Generation Leptons Linda Carpenter April 2011.

Charge Subtraction, Weizmann Clusterizer, and Pattern Recognition Mihael Makek Weizmann Institute of Science HBD Fest, Stony Brook, 2010.

Hot Cell Algorithms. Threshold – hot if recHit energy > certain value NADA – hot if recHit energy large compared to sum of neighbor cells Digi – hot if.

Setup for automated measurements (parametrization) of ASD2 chip

Florian Lütticke, Carlos Marinas, Norbert Wermes

On the Prototype beam test: (I) Noise and signal extraction

String-21 Flasher Analysis

Programs for the calibration of TOF measurement with the new pulser

Template application to detect KC-like activity.

Presentation transcript:

Suppress our data? Deepali and Takao

Issue now Event size for HBD is large at HV=3500V –Is not very much appreciated. –Needs to set higher zero-suppression threshold to get the size reduced But, we can not set very higher threshold at the given voltage. –According Ilia’s analysis, the average gain is ~ p.e. = 1.6*10^-4[fC] * 3000 / 0.1[fC/ch]= 5ch Typical Pedestal width: 2-2.5ch (See next slides) If we set the threshold 3 sigma above pedestal, we are already cutting 1.p.e. –Current maximum threshold: 8ch.

Data used to determine threshold Calibration data taken by Deepali last Saturday. WN WS EN ES Maximum set ~ 8ch even 3*sigma exceeded 8ch The idea was even at gain 5000, 8ch corresponds to 1.p.e. Fiber No.

Statistics fiber 22001: WN0/ B/evt fiber 22002: WN2/ B/evt fiber 22003: WN4/ B/evt fiber 22004: WS0/ B/evt fiber 22005: WS2/ B/evt fiber 22006: WS4/ B/evt fiber 22007: EN0/ B/evt fiber 22008: EN2/ B/evt fiber 22009: EN4/ B/evt fiber 22010: ES0/ B/evt fiber 22011: ES2/ B/evt fiber 22012: ES4/ B/evt Total: B/evt Threshold: 3sigma, RB fiber 22001: WN0/ B/evt fiber 22002: WN2/ B/evt fiber 22003: WN4/ B/evt fiber 22004: WS0/ B/evt fiber 22005: WS2/ B/evt fiber 22006: WS4/ B/evt fiber 22007: EN0/ B/evt fiber 22008: EN2/ B/evt fiber 22009: EN4/ B/evt fiber 22010: ES0/ B/evt fiber 22011: ES2/ B/evt fiber 22012: ES4/ B/evt Total: B/evt Threshold: 4sigma, RB Apparently the distribution is not gaussian, which is likely because we are looking at some signal

Statistics fiber 22001: WN0/ B/evt fiber 22002: WN2/ B/evt fiber 22003: WN4/ B/evt fiber 22004: WS0/ B/evt fiber 22005: WS2/ B/evt fiber 22006: WS4/ B/evt fiber 22007: EN0/ B/evt fiber 22008: EN2/ B/evt fiber 22009: EN4/ B/evt fiber 22010: ES0/ B/evt fiber 22011: ES2/ B/evt fiber 22012: ES4/ B/evt Total: B/evt Threshold: 5sigma for EN2-ES3, RB fiber 22001: WN0/ B/evt fiber 22002: WN2/ B/evt fiber 22003: WN4/ B/evt fiber 22004: WS0/ B/evt fiber 22005: WS2/ B/evt fiber 22006: WS4/ B/evt fiber 22007: EN0/ B/evt fiber 22008: EN2/ B/evt fiber 22009: EN4/ B/evt fiber 22010: ES0/ B/evt fiber 22011: ES2/ B/evt fiber 22012: ES4/ B/evt Total: B/evt Threshold: 3sigma, FB Even 5sigma is not effective in RB?

Compare! fiber 22001: WN0/ B/evt fiber 22002: WN2/ B/evt fiber 22003: WN4/ B/evt fiber 22004: WS0/ B/evt fiber 22005: WS2/ B/evt fiber 22006: WS4/ B/evt fiber 22007: EN0/ B/evt fiber 22008: EN2/ B/evt fiber 22009: EN4/ B/evt fiber 22010: ES0/ B/evt fiber 22011: ES2/ B/evt fiber 22012: ES4/ B/evt Total: B/evt fiber 22001: WN0/ B/evt fiber 22002: WN2/ B/evt fiber 22003: WN4/ B/evt fiber 22004: WS0/ B/evt fiber 22005: WS2/ B/evt fiber 22006: WS4/ B/evt fiber 22007: EN0/ B/evt fiber 22008: EN2/ B/evt fiber 22009: EN4/ B/evt fiber 22010: ES0/ B/evt fiber 22011: ES2/ B/evt fiber 22012: ES4/ B/evt Total: B/evt Threshold: 3sigma, FB Threshold: 3sigma, RB That different between FB and RB!

What are between RB and FB? Pedestal Run at RB and FB (East Only) Reverse Bias Forward Bias

What are between RB and FB? Event Run at RB and FB, FB is zero-suppressed.. Looks like RB have flatter tail.. (not clear, though) Reverse Bias Forward Bias

What would be next? Take FB run with zero suppression off. Obviously, we can not set too high threshold.. If we dump whole West, we can save some event volume.. ~20%? Find hot channels? –Somewhat higher sigma for edge pads. –Set higher thresholds for these pedestal.