Multi-Racial but not Multicultural  By early 1900 the city's population became increasingly diversified. Scandinavians came for fishing and lumbering,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Civil Rights Define Explain how it relates to the Civil Rights Story in America Choose a picture that relates to the meaning.
Advertisements

© 2007 by West Legal Studies in Business / A Division of Thomson Learning CHAPTER 19 Land-Use Control and Real Property.
Florida Real Estate Principles, Practices & Law 38th Edition
Seattle’s Segregation Story
The Legal Geography of Housing, Land Use and the Construction of Denver’s Racial Fault Lines Tom I. Romero, II
© OnCourse Learning. All Rights Reserved. Fair Housing Learning Objectives  Describe the provisions of the Federal Fair Housing Act of 1968 as amended.
SCLC Moves North: The 1966 Chicago Campaign HIS 265.
World War I through the New Deal
Japanese Americans, At Home, In Camp Historical and Cultural Context History of discrimination against Japanese and Japanese Americans Immigration from.
Real Estate Principles and Practices Chapter 19 Fair Housing Laws © 2014 OnCourse Learning.
The Small Cities’ CDBG Program and the Obligation to Affirmatively Further Fair Housing.
Zoning The legislative division of an area into separate districts with different regulations within each district for land use, building size, and the.
Urban Government Urban Crisis 5. Overview Effects of Urban/Surburban Divide Metropolitan Government and Regionalization.
Fair Housing Act of 1968 Jose Vasquez Jesus Melendez HCOM 266 Professor Larkin.
WOMEN AND MINORITIES IN THE UNITED STATES PAST AND CURRENT DISCRIMINATION.
Constitutional Law Part 5: Civil Rights and Civil Liberties Lecture 2: Application of the Bill of Rights and the Constitution to Private Conduct.
© 2010 Rockwell Publishing Lesson 14: Civil Rights and Fair Housing Principles of California Real Estate.
Principles of California Real Estate
A State of Growth Essential Question
American Citizenship…. Civil War Amendments 13-15…
Chapter 4 Fair Housing 2010©Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
September 27, 2011 Segregation and Discrimination.
Reconstruction and the Rise of the New South
A State of Growth Essential Question How did Washington’s economy and population change in the era following statehood?
The Fair Housing Act of 1968 Jordan Caccamise Morgan Byers Brittney Morgan October 31, 2012.
 Citizens are people who have certain rights and duties.  Citizens owe their loyalty to their government.
Unit 1 Segregation and Discrimination. Voting Restrictions :  Literacy requirement - Some states required voters to be literate and administered a literacy.
Immigration: There’s No Place Like Home Between 1860 and 1900, almost 14 million people came to America looking for new opportunities and a new home.
© 2015 OnCourse Learning Chapter 4 Fair Housing. IN THIS CHAPTER “Separate but equal” used to justify segregation. The courts and legislature dealt with.
2004 National African American History Month Celebrating The 50th Anniversary of the Supreme Court's 1954 Decision in Brown V. Board of Education.
Ch. 11 Vocabulary Words Social Studies: Reconstruction.
THE UNFAIR TREATMENT OF MEMBERS OF MAJORITY GROUPS(WHITES) CAUSED FROM PREFERENTIAL POLICIES, AS IN COLLEGE ADMISSIONS OR EMPLOYMENT, PROPOSED TO HELP.
Pedestrian Master Plan Technical Update Seattle Pedestrian Advisory Board Michelle Marx, Ian Macek November 10, 2015.
Reconstruction Chapter 16. Vocab Reconstruction The period from during which the states that were part of the Confederacy were controlled buy.
Real Estate Principles and Practices Chapter 19 Fair Housing Laws © 2010 by South-Western, Cengage Learning.
Reconstruction Reconstruction Legislation. The 13 th Amendment (1865) Abolishes Slavery Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as.
Chapter 8 Ethnic and Racial Diversity in the United States
New Approaches to Civil Rights Chapter 26 Section 3.
South Africa--Apartheid Africa. South Africa A. Apartheid--[separateness]--a system of racial segregation enforced in South Africa from –1.
Chapter 17, Section 2.  Reports sent to Congress that Confederate flags were being sold in the southern cities.  Patrons sang Confederate songs.  This.
Segregation and Discrimination Mr. White’s US History 1.
People on the Move Chapter 8 section 2. Discussion Questions What were the experiences of immigrants in the late 1800s and early 1900s? What different.
CIVIL RIGHTS IN THE US FROM THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE TO THE 1940S.
HUD Community Development Block Grant Program Public Hearing For The PY 2015 Action Plan & Pre-Application Workshop March 19, 2015.
Rise and Fall of Cotton Timeline  During the Antebellum period and Civil War “cotton was king.”  After the Civil War sharecropping began, but cotton.
Segregation & Discrimination Gina Dominico Portia Davidson November 20, rd Period Pages:
1880’s-1950’s History and Start of Civil Rights. A Nation Divided Racial Segregation was a common and a forced way of life Blacks were told to believe.
Introduction to Lorraine Hansberry’s A Raisin in the Sun.
Chapter 11: Civil Rights Section 1: Civil Rights & Discrimination (pgs )
American History II Ms. Moore
Catherine E. Ybarra, Esq Simone & Associates th Avenue
Chapter 4 Section 4.
South Africa and Apartheid
“The Civil Rights Struggle”
How Can We Explain Residential Segregation?
Introduction to Lorraine Hansberry’s A Raisin in the Sun
Lorraine Hansberry A Raisin in the Sun
South Africa and Apartheid
Civil Rights in the 1950s and early 1960s
Civil Rights and Equality
#4 - Europe’s Lasting Impact
“The Civil Rights Struggle”
Lecture 46 Discrimination X
Current conditions.
Immigration & Urbanization
Section 3 Segregation and Discrimination
© OnCourse Learning.
Racial Disparities in Homelessness
The Power of the Past 919 E Main St. Suite 610, Richmond, VA 23219
Presentation transcript:

Multi-Racial but not Multicultural  By early 1900 the city's population became increasingly diversified. Scandinavians came for fishing and lumbering, African Americans as railroad porters and waiters, Japanese for trucking, gardening and hotels.; and communities of Italians, Chinese, Jews, and Filipinos. The International District, home to several Asian ethnic groups, was largely developed during this period.

Segregated Seattle

What's In Your Deed?  The language of segregation still haunts Seattle. It lurks in the deeds of tens of thousands of homeowners living in neighborhoods outside of the Central Area and the International District. Look deep in the fine print. Many Queen Anne residents, have this clause in their deeds :  "No person or persons of Asiatic, African or Negro blood, lineage, or extraction shall be permitted to occupy a portion of said property.“  4/2014docs/covenants_print.pdf

Racial Restrictions Grew With the City  World War II sparked an economic rebound - The Boeing Company, a modestly successful airplane manufacturer founded in 1916, increased its workforce more than 1,200 percent and its sales from $10 million to $600 million annually. The war's end,, brought an economic slump -When Boeing successfully introduced the 707 commercial jet airliner in the late 1950s, it heralded another burst of optimism.

Between 1935 and 1944,  Bill Boeing and his wife Bertha set aside a massive tract of land north of Seattle city limits for subdivision, including the future communities of Richmond Beach, Richmond Heights, Innis Arden, Blue Ridge and Shoreview. As they plotted those developments, Bill and Bertha added racial restrictive covenants to property deeds.

W.E. Boeing Neighborhood Developments  “No property in said addition shall at any time be sold, conveyed, rented, or leased in whole or in part to any person or persons not of the White or Caucasian race. No person other than one of the White or Caucasian race shall be permitted to occupy any property in said addition or portion thereof or building thereon except a domestic servant actually employed by a person of the White or Caucasian race where the latter is an occupant of such property.”

Restrictive Covenants: Boeing Development 1940 

Trust Companies Restricting Shoreline and Lake Forest Park  The Seattle Trust Company, another large developer which developed large areas of Shoreline, parts of Lake Forest Park, and the Bryant and Haller Lake areas, likewise allowed only members of the White or Caucasian race to purchase or rent their restricted properties.  A set of 1946 restrictive covenants established by the Puget Mill Company for the Lake Forest Park area listed Hawaiians as a restricted race. The Puget Mill Company also named specific Asian countries in covenants applied to Sheridan Park, prohibiting Chinese and Japanese individuals from moving to that neighborhood.

Greenwood  “That neither the said premises or any house building or improvement thereon erected shall at any time be occupied by persons of the Ethiopian race or by Japanese or Chinese or any other Malay or Asiatic race save and except as domestic servants in the employ of person not coming within that restriction”

South Seattle Land Company  Developers like the South Seattle Land Company often listed the specific races restricted from purchasing their properties. For example, covenants established by the South Seattle Land Company frequently maintained that  no “part of said property hereby conveyed shall ever be used or occupied by any person of the Ethiopian, Malay, or any Asiatic race.”[[ Madronna  “The parties hereto signing and executing this instrument... hereby mutually covenant, promise and agree each with the others, and for their respective heirs and assigns, that no part of said lands owned by them as described following their signatures to this instrument, shall never be used, occupied by or sold, conveyed, leased, rented or given to Negroes, or any person or persons of the Negro blood. “

Sandpoint (Westhaven)  “No part of said property hereby conveyed shall ever be used or occupied by any person of the Ethiopian, Malay, or any Asiatic race.”  Richard Ornstein, a Jewish refugee from Austria, contracted to purchase a home in the Sand Point Country Club area of Seattle in late The property’s deed contained a restrictive covenant barring the sale or rental of the home to non- Whites and people of Jewish descent. In spite of the U.S. Supreme Court ruling that deemed racial restrictive covenants unenforceable in 1948,

(Laurelhurst, Victory Heights, Green Lake Circle) October 31, No person of other than the Caucasian race shall use or occupy any building or lot except as servants domesticated with any owner or tenant. In 1960 only 27 African Americans lived in Wallingford or Fremont, along with 21,823 Whites and 335 persons identified in the census as “other races.” This can be seen on the residential distribution maps on the Seattle Civil Rights and Labor History Project’s website.

Financial Incentive for Restrictive Covenants The National Housing Act of 1934 passed during the Great Depression to protect affordable housing, introduced the practice of “redlining,” or drawing lines on city maps delineating the ideal geographic areas for bank investment and the sale of mortgages - to ensure that banks would not over-extend themselves financially - it encouraged land developers, realtors and community residents to write racial restrictive covenants to keep neighborhoods from being redlined. ”

The Seattle Civic Unity Committee In February 1948, the Seattle Civic Unity Committee denounces restrictive covenants which deny housing to minorities, principally African Americans. These restrictions effectively confine African Americans to the Central Area and a corridor along South Jackson Street, and prevent them from moving to neighborhoods such as Mount Baker, Capitol Hill and Broadmoor

(Capitol Hill Homeowners Organize) November 1927 – “The parties... agree each with the others that no part of the lands owned by them shall ever be used or occupied by or sold, conveyed, leased, rented or given to Negroes or any person of Negro blood.”  Capitol Hill Community Club. In a letter written 20 years later, Martha B. Cook, a club leader, stated that “a small group of interested people worked and kept 90 blocks [of Capitol Hill] safe through racial restrictions.”

Matthews Beach “No lot or portion of a lot shall be sold to, leased to or occupied by any person other than of the Caucasian race, but this restriction does not prevent occupancy by domestic servants of a different race or nationality actually employed in good faith by the owners or tenants.”

Racial Restrictive Covenants Followed non-Whites to the Grave Several Seattle cemeteries enforced “White Only” policies, with the racial restrictive covenants written into the deeds for individual grave-sites. According to a 1948 investigation by the Christian Friends for Racial Equality (CFRE), this practice “made it difficult or impossible for non-Caucasians to purchase burial plots.” … Acacia Memorial Park in the Shoreline neighborhood of Seattle was one of the cemeteries preventing two Japanese- Americans from purchasing burial plots, having made use of a restrictive covenant from 1929 through The Acacia Memorial Park covenant stated: “the grantee agrees that no transfer of said (lot) or portion thereof shall be valid unless conveyed to a member of the Caucasian race”

In 1948, the Supreme Court held that restrictive covenants were illegal and that government could not help to enforce them (Shelley v. Kraemer). This left open the possibility of voluntary agreements between realtors and homeowners which allowed housing discrimination to continue. In 1964, Seattle voters rejected a referendum that prohibited housing discrimination. In April 1968, the city council passed an open housing ordinance, making restrictive covenants illegal. 7&context=sulr

Segregation Through the Civil Rights Era and Beyond