Goreaud F. 1, Lhuillier C. 1, de Coligny F. 2 CAPSIS Meeting, 28/06/2006 - Montpellier Simulating mixed virtual stands with the "spatial" library in CAPSIS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Air Traffic Complexity : A new concept
Advertisements

Site and Stocking and Other Related Measurements.
EFIMED Advanced course on MODELLING MEDITERRANEAN FOREST STAND DYNAMICS FOR FOREST MANAGEMENT MARC PALAHI Head of EFIMED Office INDIVIDUAL TREE.
Temporal and Spatial Invasion. Time Generation and ‘a half’ Field invasion Large fires First generation poor wood quality – “wolf trees”
Uneven-aged beech stand, Germany. Uneven-aged mixed-hardwood stand, Michigan.
Uneven-aged management options to promote forest resilience:
Modeling Tree Growth Under Varying Silvicultural Prescriptions Leah Rathbun University of British Columbia Presented at Western Mensurationists 2010.
Modelling Mixedwoods at the Whole-Stand Level Oscar García University of Northern British Columbia.
Evaluating FVS-NI Basal Area Increment Model Revisions under Structural Based Prediction Robert Froese, Ph.D., R.P.F. School of Forest Resources and Environmental.
0 1 5/9/2015 Creating and Maintaining Multi-Strata Stands Is FVS wrong? GMUG 11/15/2013 Weikko Jaross DRAFT subject to change1.
Stretch: a spatially explicit individual based forest simulator Montpellier, France L.Soler, D. Harja Asmara, M. Laurans, C.Madeleine, J.Dauzat, G. Vincent,
Company LOGO Western Mensurationists 2013 Leavenworth, WA, USA, PhD, RPF Tesera Systems Inc. Valerie LeMay, PhD, RPFUniversity of British Columbia Western.
Comparison of pruning regimes for Stone pine (Pinus pinea L.) using a Functional- Structural Plant Model Peter Surovy.
Simulated harvesting scenarios in old-growth mixed southern beech (Nothofagus) forest determine composition and structure Jenny Hurst 1,3, Glenn Stewart.
Impact of plot size on the effect of competition in individual-tree models and their applications Jari Hynynen & Risto Ojansuu Finnish Forest Research.
The Capsis Methodology - PMA06 - Beijing - November 13-17, 2006 Efficient Building of Forestry Modelling Software with the Capsis Methodology Francois.
The Capsis Project – General presentation – UMR AMAP - September, 2005 The Capsis project Francois de Coligny INRA - National Institute for Agronomic Research.
DoD Software Summit,2001 Strategic Software Design Kevin Sullivan University of Virginia Department of Computer Science.
 Discuss silvicultural principles related to restoration/fuels treatments  Compare conditions from the 1900 Cheesman Lake reconstruction to current.
Summer School „Modelling and Simulation with GroIMP“ / Tutorial for beginners University of Göttingen (Germany), September, 2010 Winfried Kurth Modelling.
How Close-to-Nature is Forestry in Switzerland? Past and Present Development Andreas Zingg, dipl. Ing. ETH Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and.
When integrated models meet stakeholders and data (& vice-versa) WATER BASIN MODELS DATA STAKEHOLDERS POPULATION MODELLERS.
Bringing stand level fire risk to the landscape level: Fire risk assessment using FFE-FVS with the Landscape Management System. Kevin Ceder And James McCarter.
Pour mieux affirmer ses missions, le Cemagref devient Irstea Thomas Bourdier, Thomas Cordonnier, Georges Kunstler & Benoit Courbaud 9th IUFRO.
Nitin Kumar Yadav RMIT University, Melbourne Minor thesis - semester 2, 2009, under the supervision of Dr. Sebastian Sardina,
Modeling Crown Biomass for Three North Idaho Conifers Ann Abbott Rocky Mountain Research Station, Moscow Forestry Sciences Laboratory and University of.
REGENERATION IMPUTATION MODELS FOR INTERIOR CEDAR HEMLOCK STANDS Badre Tameme Hassani, M.Sc., Peter Marshall PhD., Valerie LeMay, PhD., Temesgen Hailemariam,
How do forest ecosystems respond to environmental change?
Generic Approaches to Model Validation Presented at Growth Model User’s Group August 10, 2005 David K. Walters.
3DCS Advanced Analyzer/Optimizer Module © Dimensional Control Systems Inc DCS Advanced Analyzer/Optimizer Equation Based Tolerance Analysis Quick.
GADA - A Simple Method for Derivation of Dynamic Equation Chris J. Cieszewski and Ian Moss.
TOWARDS THE EVALUATION OF THE SUSTAINABILITY OF A REGION, TAKING DIFFERENT SUSTAINABILITY CRITERIA INTO ACCOUNT. Bàrbara Sureda J.J. de Felipe Josep Xercavins.
Effect of retained trees on growth and structure of young Scots pine stands Juha Ruuska, Sauli Valkonen and Jouni Siipilehto Finnish Forest Research Institute,
Chapter 4 – Distance methods
Suborna Shekhor Ahmed Department of Forest Resources Management Faculty of Forestry, UBC Western Mensurationists Conference Missoula, MT June 20 to 22,
Thinning as a tool of close to nature forestry Igor Štefančík Forest Research Institute, Zvolen Slovakia.
Are we making the right choices with our jack pine plantations ? R. Schneider, F. Berninger Capsis workshop June 2008.
Xplo 1.0 Plant architecture « eXploration » 23/03/10 Sébastien Griffon.
SIMO SIMulation and Optimization ”New generation forest planning system” Antti Mäkinen & Jussi Rasinmäki Dept. of Forest Resource Management.
Course Review FORE 3218 Course Review  Sampling  Inventories  Growth and yield.
A Spatially Explicit Individual-based forest simulator Grégoire Vincent *, Luc Veillon and Hubert de Foresta Overview Individual trees of different species.
Spatial Statistics in Ecology: Point Pattern Analysis Lecture Two.
Point Pattern Analysis. Methods for analyzing completely censused population data F Entire extent of study area or F Each unit of an array of contiguous.
SIMO Python/XML Simulator Current situation 28/10/2005 SIMO Seminar Antti Mäkinen Dept. of Forest Resource Management / University of Helsinki.
An Agent Epidemic Model Toward a general model. Objectives n An epidemic is any attribute that is passed from one person to others in society è disease,
Spatial ABM H-E Interactions, Lecture 4 Dawn Parker, George Mason University Notes on Grimm and Railsback Chapter 1, “Individual-based modeling and ecology”
Special Lecture Stand Structural Diversity
Visual-FIR: A new platform for modeling and prediction of dynamical Systems Antoni Escobet 1 Àngela Nebot 2 François E. Cellier 3 1 Dept. ESAII Universitat.
The Effects of Spatial Patterns on Canopy Cover Estimated by FVS (Forest Vegetation Simulator) A Thesis Defense by Treg Christopher Committee Members:
Modelling of light transmission under heterogeneous forest canopy
Stand Dynamics and Yield in spruce-subalpine fir stands on the Aleza Lake Research Forest March 13, 2014 Craig Farnden PhD.
Tree and Stand Dynamics: Unravelling the Different Effects Of Site and Competition The impossible dream or an agenda for more research?
Population Ecology ZLY 101 Dr. Wasantha Weliange.
Puulajeittainen estimointi ja ei-parametriset menetelmät Multi-scale Geospatial Analysis of Forest Ecosystems Tahko Petteri Packalén Faculty.
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. PowerPoint Lectures for Biology: Concepts & Connections, Sixth Edition Campbell, Reece, Taylor, Simon, and Dickey.
Tree light capture and spatial variability of understory light increase with species mixing and tree size heterogeneity Gauthier Ligot 1, Aitor Ameztegui.
Modelagem Dinâmica com TerraME Aula 5 – Building simple models with TerraME Tiago Garcia de Senna Carneiro (UFOP) Gilberto Câmara (INPE)
What is a population? a group of conspecific individuals within a single area arbitrary boundaries.
Leah Rathbun PhD Candidate, University of British Columbia
Evaluation of two European growth models for Douglas fir
Jean-Michel Carnus, Hervé Jactel, Floor Vodde
MWMA Summary.
Temporal and spatial variability in stand structure and individual-tree growth for 10 years following commercial thinning in spruce-fir forests of northern.
Connecting the dots: data, simulation, and realism
Optimization Techniques for Natural Resources SEFS 540 / ESRM 490 B
Finding efficient management policies for forest plantations through simulation Models and Simulation Project
Dispersion spatial distribution of individuals within a population
Amblard F.*, Deffuant G.*, Weisbuch G.** *Cemagref-LISC **ENS-LPS
Chapter 52 ~ Population Ecology
Populations.
Presentation transcript:

Goreaud F. 1, Lhuillier C. 1, de Coligny F. 2 CAPSIS Meeting, 28/06/ Montpellier Simulating mixed virtual stands with the "spatial" library in CAPSIS : Application to Samsara module. 1 CEMAGREF - LISC, Clermont Ferrand. 2 INRA - AMAP, Montpellier.

1. Why a spatial library in CAPSIS ? 2. pure and regular stands. 3. mixed and uneven-aged stands. 4. Application to Samsara. 5. Next steps ? Simulating mixed virtual stands with the "spatial" library in CAPSIS : Application to Samsara module. CAPSIS Meeting, 28/06/ Montpellier

Attention Ce diaporama est un support de cours prévu pour être accompagné d'explications orales. Si vous n'avez pas assisté à l'exposé, la lecture des diapositives seules peut vous amener à faire des contresens.

1. Why a spatial library ?

To manage more complex stands Tree level models.... we need new models.

modelling the growth of each tree : (x,y) 11. Tree level models.

take spatial structure into account –location of each individuals (x,y) 11. Tree level models.

(x,y) take spatial structure into account –location of each individuals –local neighbourhood & dynamics –relevant for complex systems 11. Tree level models.

(x,y) Structure characterises neighbourhood : Spatial Structure Size Structure 12. Spatial structure & Dynamics.

Spatial Structure Size Structure neighbourhood 12. Spatial structure & Dynamics. Structure characterises neighbourhood :

Neighbourhood influences dynamics : Spatial Structure Size Structure neighbourhood Natural processes (growth, regeneration, death) or anthropic actions individual growth Competition index 12. Spatial structure & Dynamics.

Dynamics modifies structure : Spatial Structure Size Structure neighbourhood Natural processes (growth, regeneration, death) or anthropic actions individual growth Competition index 12. Spatial structure & Dynamics.

13. Initial state of the simulations. IBMs require detailed initial states.. –model the evolution of each individual IBM (tree level) initial state individual data results of the model time

Individual data are not always available –managers only have aggregated data IBM (tree level) initial state individual data Aggregated data (N, G, V,...) 13. Initial state of the simulations.

IBMs can not be used with aggregated data Aggregated data (N, G, V,...) IBM (tree level) 13. Initial state of the simulations.

We need to simulate detailed initial state –Concept of Virtual Stand Aggregated data (N, G, V,...) IBM (tree level) simulated initial structure (virtual stand) results of the model time 13. Initial state of the simulations.

Some crucial issues : –how to describe the structure of a stand ? –how to simulate it, esp. initial states ? –how does it influence the dynamics ? –how to take it into account in the models ? 14. Spatial structure & Forest modelling.

The needs for spatial.lib in CAPSIS? –characterise the spatial structure of a stand at a step through time 14. Spatial structure & Forest modelling.

The needs for spatial.lib in CAPSIS? –characterise the spatial structure of a stand at a step through time –simulate initial states of various structure to replace missing data to solve scale incompatibilities for sensitivity analysis 14. Spatial structure & Forest modelling.

2. Pure & Regular stands.

From forest stand to point pattern –each tree = one point 21. General principle. location of trees point pattern

From forest stand to point pattern –each tree = one point –only one population = set of points 21. General principle. location of trees point pattern

only one population = set of points There exist many methods... 2 are implemented in spatial.lib : –Clark & Evans index –Ripley's L(r) function 22. characterise the spatial structure.

Clark & Evans index –distance to nearest neighbour. 22. characterise the spatial structure.

Clark & Evans index Regular Random Clumped CE=1.44 CE=1.05 CE= characterise the spatial structure.

Clark & Evans index –evolution through time characterise the spatial structure.

Ripley's L(r) function –number of neighbours at distance <r. 22. characterise the spatial structure.

Ripley's L(r) function Aléatoire Régulière Agrégée L(r) distance d'analyse r 22. characterise the spatial structure.

Ripley's L(r) function 22. characterise the spatial structure.

only one population = set of points using point processes implemented in spatial.lib : –interfaces to define parameters –various point processes : Poisson, Neyman-Scott, Gibbs 23. simulate virtual stands.

Interfaces to define parameters 23. simulate virtual stands.

Results of simulations 23. simulate virtual stands.

3. Mixed & uneven-aged stands.

From forest stand to point pattern –each tree = one point 31. General principle. location of trees point pattern

From forest stand to point pattern –each tree = one point –different populations = different sets of points location of trees 31. General principle. marked point pattern

High variability of spatial structure : Independance Repulsion Attraction 31. General principle.

two strata Selection stand 31. General principle. High variability of spatial structure :

different populations –define the populations (species, diameter) 32. characterise the spatial structure.

different populations –define the populations (species, diameter) –characterise the structure of each population 32. characterise the spatial structure

different populations –define the populations (species, diameter) –characterise the structure of each population –and the relative structure between populations 32. characterise the spatial structure.

different populations –define the populations (species, diameter) –characterise the structure of each population –and the relative structure between populations 2 additional methods in spatial.lib : –Inter population CE 12 index –Intertype L 12 (r) function 32. characterise the spatial structure.

Inter population CE 12 index attraction independance repulsion CE=0.65 CE=1.89 CE 12 = characterise the spatial structure.

Intertype function L 12 (r) –relative location of type 1 / type 2 points 32. characterise the spatial structure.

Repulsionindependenceattraction 32. characterise the spatial structure. Intertype function L 12 (r)

32. characterise the spatial structure.

different populations = N sets of points using point processes implemented in spatial.lib : –interfaces to define parameters –various point processes : Poisson, Neyman-Scott, Gibbs Intertype Gibbs processes 33. simulate mixed virtual stands.

We have to simulate different sets of points –successively, from oldest to youngest 33. simulate mixed virtual stands.

Interfaces to define parameters 33. simulate mixed virtual stands. Number of populations

For each population : 33. simulate mixed virtual stands. species own independent spatial structure

For each population : 33. simulate mixed virtual stands. species dependent spatial structure

Simulation result : 33. simulate mixed virtual stands.

4. Application to Samsara : Influence of intertype initial spatial structure on the dynamics of mixed Spruce Fir stands. Corentin Lhuillier 2006

Simulating Spruce-Fir mixed stands –with Samsara in CAPSIS (Courbaud B.) 41. General principle. InitialisationEvolution Silviculture Operation Loading stand Creating plot Creating rays Growth dea th regeneration recruitement lightning

Simulating Spruce-Fir mixed stands –with Samsara in CAPSIS (Courbaud B.) –there is a sensibility to initial spatial structure with pure regular stands (see 2005) –what about initial mixed stands ? 41. General principle.

Using a real 1ha mixed plot (Saisie) –375 spruce –53 fir 41. General principle.

Changing the spatial structure –of spruce –or of fir 41. General principle.

Using mixed virtual stands simulations 41. General principle.

Spruce regeneration 42. Results.

Fir regeneration 42. Results.

Basal area for Spruce 42. Results.

Basal area for Fir 42. Results.

5. Next steps ?

improve spatial.lib –a new improved version –some options to add –easy to use interfaces ? –new tools could be developed 5. Next steps ?

integrate these tools in your modules –to simulate initial states –as with Samsara & Mountain –specific interfaces 5. Next steps ?

simulate REALISTIC virtual stands –similar to real stands ? –because models are sensitive to initial structure –unrealistic pattern => false results –Thesis of M.A. Ngo Bieng 5. Next steps ?

spatial.lib now has the tools for you to simulate complex initial stands ! Conclusion