Recent MIA Results Yiton T. Yan Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Acknowledgement: Y. Cai, F-J. Decker, S. Ecklund, J. Irwin, J. Seeman, M. Sullivan,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Crab crossing and crab waist at super KEKB K. Ohmi (KEK) Super B workshop at SLAC 15-17, June 2006 Thanks, M. Biagini, Y. Funakoshi, Y. Ohnishi, K.Oide,
Advertisements

1 Crab Waist Studies for SuperB and KEKB Y. Ohnishi/KEK SuperB Workshop V Paris 10/May/2007.
SuperKEKB Lattice and Dynamic Aperture H. Koiso Apr. 20, 2005 Super B Factory Workshop in Hawaii.
Author - Title (Footer)1 LINEAR LATTICE ERRORS AT THE ESRF: MODELING AND CORRECTION A. Franchi, L. Farvacque, T. Perron.
LER MAR13 Analysis Is MIA data less accurate than that taken in last year? Is phase measurement still Ok? Is coupling measurement still Ok? Or simply that.
2E34 Meeting and MCC News IR2 Vacuum Studies (Mike Sullivan) Plans for Lattice and Optics Work (Yunhai Cai)
Optics modeling and correction Yiton T. Yan Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Thanks to: Y. Cai, W. Colocho, F-J. Decker, M. Donald, Y. Nosochkov, J.
PEP-II B Factory Machine Status and Upgrades John T. Seeman for the PEP-II Staff SLAC DOE Site Review April 9, 2003.
1 Super-B Factory Scenarios John Seeman Assistant Director PPA Directorate SLAC SLUO Meeting September 11, 2006.
MIA optics knobs and IP knobs for PEP-II optics (+ dispersion) improvement and IP matching, and its fast iteration during MD for accommodating orbit drift.
Super-B Factory Workshop January 19-22, 2004 IR Upgrade M. Sullivan 1 PEP-II Interaction Region Upgrade M. Sullivan for the Super-B Factory Workshop Hawaii.
Beam-beam studies for Super KEKB K. Ohmi & M Tawada (KEK) Super B factories workshop in Hawaii Apr
July 22, 2005Modeling1 Modeling CESR-c D. Rubin. July 22, 2005Modeling2 Simulation Comparison of simulation results with measurements Simulated Dependence.
Status of the LHC optics T. Persson on behalf of the OMC-team.
Future Very High Luminosity Options for PEP-II John T. Seeman For the PEP-II Team e+e- Factories Workshop October 13-16, 2003.
Nov. 17, 2005Fermi Lab AP Seminar AC Dipole Based Diagnostics Mei Bai, C-A Department.
Searching for Quantum LOVE at the Australian Synchrotron Light Source Eugene Tan On behalf of Rohan Dowd 120/10/2010Eugene Tan – IWLC 2010, Genega ASLS.
Optics measurement, modeling, and correction - PEP-II experience Yiton Yan SLAC.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
W. KozaneckiMCC AP meeting, 29 July 04  Goal: measure the luminosity degradation associated with  parasitic crossings  horizontal crossing angle  Principle.
Optimization of the ESRF upgrade lattice lifetime and dynamic aperture using genetic algorithms Nicola Carmignani 11/03/2015.
6. betatron coupling sources: skew quadrupoles, solenoid fields concerns: reduction in dynamic (& effective physical) aperture; increase of intrinsic &
J. Turner 02/07/05 SLAC PEPII Accelerator Physics LER WIGGLER PLAN J. Turner, M. Donald, M. Sullivan, U. Wienands, J. Yocky Motivation and Concerns Details.
‘BBA’ Goals Understand BPM performance –validate use for precision optics tests –justify & specify hardware/software upgrades Beam – Based ‘Alignment’
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
Low emittance tuning in ATF Damping Ring - Experience and plan Sendai GDE Meeting Kiyoshi Kubo.
U. Wienands, Y. Cai, F.-J. Decker, M. Donald, W. Kozanecki, Yu. Nosochkov, T. Raubenheimer, J. Safranek, D. Sagan., A. Seryi, K. Sonnad, C. Steier, P.
Analysis of Multipole and Position Tolerances for the ATF2 Final Focus Line James Jones ASTeC, Daresbury Laboratory.
1 Dynamic aperture studies in e+e- factories with crab waist IR’07, November 9, 2007 E.Levichev Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk.
First Collision of BEPCII C.H. Yu May 10, Methods of collision tuning Procedures and data analysis Luminosity and background Summary.
Frequency map analysis workshop - Orsay 1 - 2/04/04Mahdia Belgroune 1 Role of the frequency map analysis in the choice of the working point of SOLEIL M.
Orbits, Optics and Beam Dynamics in PEP-II Yunhai Cai Beam Physics Department SLAC March 6, 2007 ILC damping ring meeting at Frascati, Italy.
February 5, 2005D. Rubin - Cornell1 CESR-c Status -Operations/Luminosity -Machine studies -Simulation and modeling -4.1GeV.
Isabell-A. Melzer-Pellmann LET Beam Dynamics Workshop, Lumi scans with wakefields in Merlin Lumi scans with wakefields in Merlin Isabell-A.
Emittance measurements with multiple wire-scanners and quadrupole scans in ATF EXT C. Rimbault, Brossard, P. Bambade (LAL) Main goal : - Try to improve.
Present MEIC IR Design Status Vasiliy Morozov, Yaroslav Derbenev MEIC Detector and IR Design Mini-Workshop, October 31, 2011.
RHIC Status April 8, 2011 RSC Meeting Haixin Huang.
Corrections for multi-pass eRHIC lattice with large chromaticity Chuyu Liu ERL workshop 2015 June 7, 2015.
Compensation of Detector Solenoid G.H. Wei, V.S. Morozov, Fanglei Lin JLEIC Collaboration Meeting Spring, 2016.
11/18/2004 FNAL Advanced Optics Measurements at Tevatron Vadim Sajaev ANL V. Lebedev, V. Nagaslaev, A. Valishev FNAL.
Introduction of Accelerators for Circular Colliders 高亮度 TAU-CHARM 工厂 & 先进光源, 2014/09.
Optics with Large Momentum Acceptance for Higgs Factory Yunhai Cai SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory Future Circular Collider Kick-off Meeting, February.
Orbit Response Matrix Analysis
Ben Cerio Office of Science, SULI Program 2006
NSLS-II Lattice Design Strategies Weiming Guo 07/10/08
Low Emittance Tuning Tests at the Diamond Light Source (Rutherford Labs) Dec R. Bartolini, S. Liuzzo, P. Raimondi SuperB XV Meeting Caltech, CA,
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Coupling Correction at the Australian Synchrotron
First Look at Nonlinear Dynamics in the Electron Collider Ring
Beam-based alignment measurements
The PEP-II Interaction e+e- Factories Workshop
Orbit Response Matrix Studies
Status and Plan for the PEP-II Lattices
Compensation of Detector Solenoid with Large Crossing Angle
SuperB CDR Machine P. Raimondi for the SuperB Team Paris, May 9, 2007.
Electron Rings Eduard Pozdeyev.
Simulation of the FCC-ee lattice with quadrupole and sextupole misalignments Sergey Sinyatkin.
Optics Measurements in the PSB
with Model Independent
Orbit Bumps in PEP-II to Maximize Luminosity
IR Lattice with Detector Solenoid
Yuri Nosochkov Yunhai Cai, Fanglei Lin, Vasiliy Morozov
Progress on Non-linear Beam Dynamic Study
Fanglei Lin, Yuhong Zhang JLEIC R&D Meeting, March 10, 2016
Update on study of chromaticity correction schemes for ion ring
Integration of Detector Solenoid into the JLEIC ion collider ring
Upgrade on Compensation of Detector Solenoid effects
Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016
DYNAMIC APERTURE OF JLEIC ELECTRON COLLIDER
100th FCC-ee Optics Design Meeting
Presentation transcript:

Recent MIA Results Yiton T. Yan Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Acknowledgement: Y. Cai, F-J. Decker, S. Ecklund, J. Irwin, J. Seeman, M. Sullivan, J. Turner, U. Wienands, etc. PEP-II MAC meeting April 16, 2004

Outline Part I. MIA review Buffer data acquisition Four independent orbits phases, beta functions, Greens Functions, Eigen ellipses Enhanced SVD-enhanced fitting – fast fitting process Typical MIA results (plots) - some shows current LER optics Virtual and wanted accelerators – MIA flow chart Part II. Recent Application to PEP-II HER Beta Beat studies Dynamic Beta from Beam-Beam effect Optics study on LER steering machine Summary

Buffer data acquisition Resonance excitation to offset radiation damping by a shaker at the horizontal betatron (eigen) tune and then at the vertical tune, each for about 1000 turns to get a complete set of data. Buffer data are stored in two sets of matrices, each set has two matrices, one for the x data and the other for y data.

4 independent orbits determines the linear optics.

Phase Advances

This is before MIA fitting

yy xx Preliminary beta function survey

The linear Greens functions They, along with the phase advances are used for SVD- enhanced fitting to obtain a virtual accelerator MIA does not trust the BPM accuracy – MIA figures out BPM gain and cross coupling errors. Where, in the measurement frame, R is a function of BPM gain and BPM cross-plane coupling. Q12 and Q34 are the two invariants representing the excitation strength

MIA can figure out BPM errors (recall Steve Smith’s morning talk

Summary of the measurable quantities (derivable from the 4 orbits) The phase advances among BPMs. Green’s functions R12, R34, R32, R14 among BPMs. Use of 6, …, 18, 30 greens; Eigen Ellipses’ parameters for all double-view BPMs: tilt angles and axis ratios. Form these measurable quantities into a sequence (a single vector) for easier Least-squares fitting. Linear coupling are completed treated without any discount. Eigen ellipses’ parameters may not be used in fitting but be reserved for checking fitting accuracy.

Summary of variables All quad families normal components. All skew (global and local) quad’s skew components. All sextupole feed-downs’ normal and skew components. All BPM gains and cross couplings. Additionally, all quad skew components and all skew quad normal components. Also form all these variables into a sequence (a single vector with data-structure pointers).

Enhanced SVD-enhanced Least Square fitting Need about two iterations of enhanced SVD-enhanced fittings.

Typical MIA results (plots) In the next pages we show the following plots Phase advance comparison plots Beta function plots Linear coupling plots at IP eigen ellipse tilt angles and axis ratios plots for fitting accuracy checking Linear coupling appraisal plots This is a complete set of linear optics (10 degrees of freedom) parameters. You can NOT get any more than this.

A typical  -function plots from MIA close to the current PEP-II LER

A typical linear coupling plots near IP current PEP-II LER

Check MIA fitting accuracy: Are eigen ellipse tilt angles and axis ratios automatically matched? Yan/mia/ler/2004/OCT28/1

A complete appraisal of the LER linear coupling LER/2004/OCt28/1

MIA flow chart minutes: collecting MIA data, 3 minutes: Phase advances and Beta function, dispersion measured and bad BPMs identified 6 minutes: MIA fitted with 6 greens for more accurate beta functions 20 minutes: virtual accelerator obtained with 18 greens

MIA came to work at the right time when SLAC PEP-II B- factory desperately needed advanced optics improvement in order to meet the promised performance progress. MIA successfully brought LER to a half integer working tune and improve LER beta beats and linear coupling. Instantly, LER beam became the stronger one of the two (LER and HER beams). Indeed LER became way too strong for the HER. Nonetheless, consequently, PEP-II achieved its record peak luminosity at 6.5 X 10^33 /cm*2/s in June It is still a single-bunch luminosity record. MIA was applied to improve PEP-II

HER optics after adjusting to match the very strong LER One can see a strong  X beat that is over 100% with a small  X * at about 27 cm. The  X beat can be fixed by tune trombone + global skews with MIA, but the  X * will be restored to 50 cm. We want the  X * be small while the large beta beat be fixed.

Part II: Recent application to PEP II A knob for adjusting HER beta beat while changing IP beta. Tried to fix the HER beta beat with beta bumps. Optics study on LER steering machine

HER virtual machine before dialing in MIA knob of only the trombones and the global skews on Nov. 4 Beta beat has increased by additional 100%

Dialing the MIA knob into the virtual machine showed that the HER could be brought back to low beta beat but restored to near the original design  X * value of 50 cm.

HER virtual machine after dial-in of the MIA beta beat knob. It shows very much the same as predicted by dialing the knob into the MIA virtual machine Proving MIA is a very accurate optics measurement tool.

HER Beta Beat fixes based on virtual HER of 3 Feb Beta Beats on 4 of the 6 arcs are completely fixed while the remaining 2 arcs adjacent to IP are set up with beta bumps to offset the extra chromaticity generated by the large doublet betas. Sextupole strengths may need to be adjusted slightly to optimize the chromaticity. But we need to understand why the beam life time is not good.

We have Much improved HER BPMs Excellent MIA data for excellent measurement and reliable MIA virtual machine

Beta Y function directly measured by MIA without fitting, showing that PEP-II HER BPMs have been much improved. It takes a couple of minutes to get this plot after MIA data taken.

Beta X function directly measured by MIA without fitting can immediately show the quality of beta beating. This plots can be obtained within a couple of minutes once MIA data are obtained.

Virtual HER obtained from 3 Feb, 2004 MIA data

MIA fitting is very good and HER linear coupling is very good.

QDS0XSR QFS1SR QDS1SR QFS2SR QDS2SR QFS3SR QF5L QF5R QFS3SR QDS2SR QFS2SR QDS1SR QFS1SR QDS0XSR QFP9R QDP8R QFP7R QDP6R QFPL QDPR QFP9R QDP8R QFP7R QDP6R SQG SQG SQG SQG MIA knob for fixing HER beta beat while keeping IR region the same (low Beta X) and chromaticity Ok with beta bumps. Trombone

Wanted HER approachable from the Real HER with a MIA konb

MIA knob generated wanted HER keeps linear coupling the same if not better.

Comparing the IP Betas Bottom plots: after dialing in the knob. Top plots: the virtual HER on 3 Feb. 2004

Top plots: the virtual HER on 3 Feb Bottom plots: after dialing in the knob Comparing IP region

Bottom plots: after dialing in the knob Top plots: the virtual HER on 3 Feb Comparing Beta functions

Virtual HER after 75% dialed-in of the knob Beta beats in 4 arcs are almost fixed while beta bump is kept Linear coupling is improved Unfortunately, there is no 100% dial-in MIA data. Martin Donald got his data for 100% dial-in that show very much as expected results as predicted by the virtual dial-in.

Summary for MIA HER beta bump knob This knob seems to go in the right direction. Do not give it up easily. Indeed, this is the kind of solution we have been looking for: (a) keeps the same small Beta X at IP; (b) beta beat fixes; (c) Chromaticity is all right. Need to understand why beam life time is not good.

Dynamic Beta from Beam-Beam effect John Seeman suggests putting a lens at IP to represent beam-beam effect in MIA virtual HER. Here are the results.

Beta beats ----Adding beam-beam effect lens on Virtual HER of 3FEB2004 No Beam beam Full Beam beam 2/7 Beam beam

No beam Full beam Dynamics Beta Adding beam-beam effect lens on the Virtual HER of 3FEB2004 2/7beam

Optics study for the LER Steering, MD data on

Virtual machine of the steering LER, MD on >200% beta beat Bad Coupling shown on the right Large IP waist shift

Work in progress for LER steering machine optics improvement Knob involves trombone quads, global skews, and 4 pairs of local skews (SK2,3,4,5 [R,L]) Beta beat much improved IP waist shift left alone tentatively Coupling improved. Need further improvement

Summary MIA has been used in weekly basis for studying the PEP-II accelerators optics – IP betas, linear couplings, beta functions (beta beats) etc. MIA has helped PEP-II improve the machines’ optics, bringing LER working tune to near half integer while fixing its beta beat and reducing its coupling, to reach a record single peak luminosity. MIA has been tested very positively for HER. Hopefully soon or later HER super large beta beat will be fixed. However, PEP-II is fine with this high beta beat in HER – not in a hurry.