Quality assurance for TPC. Quality assurance ● Process: ● Detect the problems ● Define, what is the problem ● What do we expect? ● Defined in the TDR.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Kondo GNANVO Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne FL.
Advertisements

5/2/  Online  Offline 5/2/20072  Online  Raw data : within the DAQ monitoring framework  Reconstructed data : with the HLT monitoring framework.
March 24-28, 2003Computing for High-Energy Physics Configuration Database for BaBar On-line Rainer Bartoldus, Gregory Dubois-Felsmann, Yury Kolomensky,
Group Meeting 03/02/2004. Format of Weekly Group Meeting  Daily chore  Research report: electronic presentation required  Journal report.
Types of Data SimTracks: generated particles SimHits: energy depositions in a detector volume Digis: Single-channel pieces of the detector’s raw binary.
> IRTG – Heidelberg 2007 < Jochen Thäder – University of Heidelberg 1/18 ALICE HLT in the TPC Commissioning IRTG Seminar Heidelberg – January 2008 Jochen.
1 HLT – a source of calibration data One of the main tasks of HLT (especially in the first years) –Monitoring of the detector performance –Analysing calibration.
1 TPC Online Monitoring Guide – P. Christiansen (Lund) TPC Online Monitoring Guide P. Christiansen (Lund) “Old” online monitors (/ RAW data monitors) 
STAR HFT STAR Collaboration Meeting - LBNL IST Software Status Yaping Wang (University of Illinois at Chicago) Outline Offline software infrastructure.
Data Quality Monitoring of the CMS Tracker
SSD Status P. Christakoglou (NIKHEF-UU) for the SSD collaboration Thanks to: Marco vL, Enrico, Mino, Marek and Massimo.
CLAS12 CalCom Status Update CLAS Collaboration Meeting November 14, 2014.
Experience with analysis of TPC data Marian Ivanov.
PHOS offline status report Yuri Kharlov ALICE offline week 7 April 2008.
STAR Analysis Meeting, BNL, Dec 2004 Alexandre A. P. Suaide University of Sao Paulo Slide 1 BEMC software and calibration L3 display 200 GeV February.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1 EC / PCAL ENERGY CALIBRATION Cole Smith UVA PCAL EC Outline Why 2 calorimeters? Requirements Using.
ALICE Simulation Framework Ivana Hrivnacova 1 and Andreas Morsch 2 1 NPI ASCR, Rez, Czech Republic 2 CERN, Geneva, Switzerland For the ALICE Collaboration.
Detector Diagnostics Calibration Analysis Ped/LED/Laser RadDam Analysis Detector Optimization Lumi Detector Performance Monitoring DQM On/Offline Prompt.
CMS pixel data quality monitoring Petra Merkel, Purdue University For the CMS Pixel DQM Group Vertex 2008, Sweden.
Dec.11, 2008 ECL parallel session, Super B1 Results of the run with the new electronics A.Kuzmin, Yu.Usov, V.Shebalin, B.Shwartz 1.New electronics configuration.
4 th Workshop on ALICE Installation and Commissioning January 16 th & 17 th, CERN Muon Tracking (MUON_TRK, MCH, MTRK) Conclusion of the first ALICE COSMIC.
5/2/  Online  Offline 5/2/20072  Online  Raw data : within the DAQ monitoring framework  Reconstructed data : with the HLT monitoring framework.
HMPID offline status report D. Di Bari, L. Molnar, G. Volpe ALICE Offline Week, CERN, 22 June 2009.
AliRoot survey P.Hristov 11/06/2013. Offline framework  AliRoot in development since 1998  Directly based on ROOT  Used since the detector TDR’s for.
1 ITS Quality Assurance (& DQM) P. Cerello, P. Christakoglou, W. Ferrarese, M. Nicassio, M. Siciliano ALICE OFFLINE WEEK – April 2008.
C. Oppedisano, 9 October 2007, ALICE Offline Week 1 RECONSTRUCTION ALGORITHM CALIBRATION OBJECT ESD STRUCTURE ONGOING TASKS.
LM Feb SSD status and Plans for Year 5 Lilian Martin - SUBATECH STAR Collaboration Meeting BNL - February 2005.
TPC QA + experience with the AMORE framework Marian Ivanov, Peter Christiansen + GSI group.
Paul Scherrer Institut 5232 Villigen PSI ROME / / Matthias Schneebeli ROME Collaboration Meeting in Pisa Presented by Matthias Schneebeli.
 -bin Number Tower Calibration (ch/GeV) Desired E T matched gain s  =1.0  =2.0 from electrons slopesMIPs EEMC Towers Calibration Run 3 p+p Used 4 methods.
1 Checks on SDD Data Piergiorgio Cerello, Francesco Prino, Melinda Siciliano.
Statistical feature extraction, calibration and numerical debugging Marian Ivanov.
Features needed in the “final” AliRoot release P.Hristov 26/10/2006.
STAR Analysis Meeting, BNL – oct 2002 Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 1 EMC update Status of EMC analysis –Calibration –Transverse.
Digitization in EMC simulation Dmytro Melnychuk, Soltan Institute for Nuclear Studies, Warsaw, Poland.
Computing for Alice at GSI (Proposal) (Marian Ivanov)
AliRoot survey: Analysis P.Hristov 11/06/2013. Are you involved in analysis activities?(85.1% Yes, 14.9% No) 2 Involved since 4.5±2.4 years Dedicated.
ALICE Offline Week October 4 th 2006 Silvia Arcelli & Chiara Zampolli TOF Online Calibration - Strategy - TOF Detector Algorithm - TOF Preprocessor.
Development of the parallel TPC tracking Marian Ivanov CERN.
Online Consumers produce histograms (from a limited sample of events) which provide information about the status of the different sub-detectors. The DQM.
PHOS offline status report Yuri Kharlov ALICE offline week 7 July 2008.
Analysis experience at GSIAF Marian Ivanov. HEP data analysis ● Typical HEP data analysis (physic analysis, calibration, alignment) and any statistical.
A. SarratILC TPC meeting, DESY, 15/02/06 Simulation Of a TPC For T2K Near Detector Using Geant 4 Antony Sarrat CEA Saclay, Dapnia.
Calibration algorithm and detector monitoring - TPC Marian Ivanov.
AliRoot survey: Reconstruction P.Hristov 11/06/2013.
D. Elia (INFN Bari)Offline week / CERN Status of the SPD Offline Domenico Elia (INFN Bari) Overview:  Response simulation (timing info, dead/noisy.
AliRoot survey: Calibration P.Hristov 11/06/2013.
Barthélémy von Haller CERN PH/AID For the ALICE Collaboration The ALICE data quality monitoring system.
10/8/ HMPID offline status D. Di Bari, A. Mastroserio, L.Molnar, G. Volpe HMPID Group Alice Offline Week.
1 GlueX Software Oct. 21, 2004 D. Lawrence, JLab.
CALIBRATION: PREPARATION FOR RUN2 ALICE Offline Week, 25 June 2014 C. Zampolli.
Christoph Blume Offline Week, July, 2008
TPC status report Marian Ivanov.
CMS High Level Trigger Configuration Management
Marian Ivanov TPC status report.
DPG Activities DPG Session, ALICE Monthly Mini Week
TOF CALIBRATION DATABASE
v4-18-Release: really the last revision!
SDD Quality Assurance (& DQM)
Stress tests for CLAS12 software
Commissioning of the ALICE HLT, TPC and PHOS systems
HARPO Analysis.
HLT & Calibration.
Data Quality Monitoring of the CMS Silicon Strip Tracker Detector
QA tools – introduction and summary of activities
CMS Pixel Data Quality Monitoring
Commissioning of the ALICE-PHOS trigger
DQM for the RPC subdetector
CMS Pixel Data Quality Monitoring
Offline framework for conditions data
Presentation transcript:

Quality assurance for TPC

Quality assurance ● Process: ● Detect the problems ● Define, what is the problem ● What do we expect? ● Defined in the TDR and in the PPR on the basis of simulation ● Until which point the detector the information form the detector is reasonable? ● How far we are from the expectation? – Define the limits of working conditions ● Modify expectation

TPC Quality assurance (-1) ● TPC in lucky situation - TPC test in 2006 – Answer to the part of the questions ● The base things – according expectation – Space point resolution, cluster shape, dEdx resolution ● Some not – The noise edge effect – Floating wires with higher gain ● Current “feeling” - from reconstruction point of view such effect should not affect the performance of the TPC

Quality assurance (0) 1)Quality assurance based on the statistical properties of the data 1)Using data from calibration algorithm (Calibration viewer adopted to the AliEve) 2)Comparison of the MC data with the reconstructed data 1)Code in PWG1 2)Implemented as components 3)Usage in the AliAnalysis not yet tested-implemented (Work in progress) 3)Low level monitoring – e.g counters to be implemented 4)Some low level histograms – e.g. mean amplitude vs z, vs x only qualitative information 5)More details summarized in the amore.doc document (H.Helstrup)

Quality assurance ● Data quality monitoring based on statistical properties of data - Extracting in calibration procedure ● Low level – digit level: – Noise and pedestal calibration – Electronic gain calibration – Time 0 calibration ● Direct answer – Number of dead channels – Percentage of suspicious channels ● Alarms: – ? To be defined ? - Consult with Hardware people

CalibViewer Functionality: DrawHisto1D DrawHisto1D: Draws histogram for given sector with mean and different σ intervals – DrawHisto1D(char* type, Int_t sector, TVectorF& nsigma) – TvectorF vec(3); vec[0]=1;... – DrawHisto1D("CEQmean", 34, vec)

CalibViewer Functionality: SigmaCut SigmaCut: Shows fraction of rejected pads for different σ cuts – SigmaCut(char* type, Int_t sector, Float_t sigmaMax, Float_t sigmaStep) – SigmaCut("CEQmean", 34, 5, 0.05)

Quality assurance(2) ● Data quality monitoring based on statistical properties of data - Extracting in calibration procedure ● High level (track- cluster level): – Time 0 calibration - Detection of outliers (alarms) ● Gain calibration using cosmic – Detection of outliers (alarms) ● Space point resolution parametrization and cluster shape parametrization – Pulls for sectors, pad-rows, detection of outliers (alarms) ● DCA resolution, theta – fi dependence

The mean amplitude at different x,y,z position is not proportional to the gain The unknown energy deposit make a big influence The influence doucmented on the cosmic MC data

The energy deposit is particle and angular dependent Example, mean aplitude as function of z - comparison of the pp event and cosmic (MC) data

Calibration algorithm ● Component model – The input and output clearly defined – External event loop (Possibility to plugin component to the DAQ DA, HLT DA, OFFLINE code, selectors, AliAnalisys*) ● The data source - Input – Raw data – Set of clusters belonging to the track ● Output – Calibration component – Calibration components provides the functionality to generate different histograms, views, graphs ● The calibration constants can be grouped to the database (Ttree) with simple Query mechanism ● BASE feature to make simple and powerful data visualization

Usage of the Calibration algorithm in QA ● 2 Options: – Use the CA component to generate predefined views, histograms ● Problem: Duplication of the CPU requirements – Access the calibration data during the data taking ● Problem: Not possible in all of the cases (Restricted access) ● More details summarized in the amore.doc document (H.Helstrup)

DAQ DA HLT DA DA algorithms AMOR E calib classes tre e histogra m tre e histogra m monitoring object DAQHLT DAQ trees HLT trees Agent Level 2 full tree Automatic DQM histograms full tree Expert GUI GUI DC S

TPC Calibration Viewer GUI This demo can easily be opened with the following command at the aliroot prompt:( AliTPCCalibViewerGUI::ShowGUI("CalibTree.root") ( CalibTree.root is a file containing calibration data generated with MakeTree ) GUI realized as a TGCompositeFrame possibility to open different views in several tabs allows integration into existing frameworks (AliEve, AMORE, MOOD, HLT)

TPC Calibration Viewer GUI AliTPCCalibViewerGUI provides a graphical interface for visualization of calibration information. It utilises the AliTPCCalibViewer class for generating the diagrams.