The Bologna Process, Faculty, Curriculum and Teaching Christopher C. Morphew Institute of Higher Education University of Georgia Prepared for workshops.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Graduation and Employment: Program Evaluation Using Dr. Michele F. Ernst Chief Academic Officer Globe Education Network.
Advertisements

Course development. Course development and modification We are constantly adding new courses to our curriculum in response to needs of students and their.
What is it? What is it? Quality Matters (QM) is a nationally recognized, faculty- centered, peer review process designed to certify the quality of online.
What can we do?.  The primary purpose of assessment and evaluation is to improve student learning.  We must know our learners.  Fairness means meeting.
FACULTY DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE – 23/2/2008 THE SYLLABUS CORNERSTONE OF EFFECTIVE LEARNING FACILITATOR: Professor Pandeli Glavanis (PhD) Associate Director,
Information Literacy Demonstration – Partnership of Faculty and Library Gergana Georgieva Information Literacy Librarian August 25, 2008.
Assessment Rubrics Los Angeles City College Assessment Team.
OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT Developing and Implementing an Effective Plan.
Measuring Student Learning March 10, 2015 Cathy Sanders Director of Assessment.
International Outcomes Assessment Dr. Barbara Wheeling Montana State University Billings Coordinator for Institutional Assessment College of Business Director.
Carolyn Bew Anne Boddington University of Brighton
1 Bilkent University School of Applied Technology & Management (SATM) Department of Tourism & Hotel Management (THM) THM 348 Mid-Semester Evaluation.
Peer Evaluation of Teaching (PET) Dept. of Apparel, Interiors, Housing & Merchandising Oregon State University  Dept. protocol or process  Guidelines.
Rubrics Source: Schultz, K. A. (2004). Rubrics: Roadmaps to success. Educational Leadership, 58(4).
1 Outcomes-based Curricula: a general overview Dr Ciara O’Farrell.
Chapter 1 Course Syllabus. Knowing what is expected in each of your courses reduces misunderstandings.
WELCOME TO BUS 302 The Gateway Experience Prof Chapman’s Gateway web-site: Generic Gateway web-site:
PPA Advisory Board Meeting, May 12, 2006 Assessment Summary.
1 Bilkent University School of Applied Technology & Management (SATM) Department of Tourism & Hotel Management (THM) THM 243 Mid-Semester Evaluation.
NSE Assessment (Session 1): The Academic Plan Assignment for MEP
Faculty Assembly New Faculty Resources Nita McKinley, FA Chair
Principles of Assessment
COMPETENCES FOR DEMOCRATIC CULTURE The European Resource Centre on Education for Human Rights, Democratic Citizenship and Intercultural Understanding.
Learning & Teaching in FCA: Pathways and Loops!
What is it? How can you avoid it?. What is plagiarism?  Plagiarism comes from the Latin word plagiarius which means “kidnapper.”  Plagiarism is literary.
00 Workshop 2 “Elaboration of educational programmes according to qualifications framework” 16. und 17. February 2011 Georgia, Bakuriani Margret Schermutzki.
COURSE ADDITION CATALOG DESCRIPTION To include credit hours, type of course, term(s) offered, prerequisites and/or restrictions. (75 words maximum.) 4/1/091Course.
Overview of the Department’s ABET Criterion 3 Assessment Process.
Student Centered Teaching Through Universal Instructional Design Part II.
The Bologna Process: A quick review The Bologna Process is primarily designed to construct a European Higher Education Area, thereby promoting the mobility.
NAVIGATING THE PROCESS OF STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES: DEVELOPMENT, EVALUATION, AND IMPROVEMENT Shannon M. Sexton, Julia M. Williams, & Timothy Chow Rose-Hulman.
Unit 1 – Preparation for Assessment LO 1.1&1.2&1.3.
Understanding Student Expectations & Effective Teaching Presented by: Dr. Laura Marler Associate Professor of Management College of Business Mississippi.
Understanding the Academic Structure of the US Classroom: Syllabus.
national qualification framework and the learning outcomes based education Petar Bezinović University of Rijeka and Institute for Social Research in Zagreb.
North Carolina Network for Excellence in Teaching  The Assessment Toolkit.
Establishing an Assessment Process for a Computing Program Cheryl Aasheim, Georgia Southern University Art Gowan, Georgia Southern University Han Reichgelt,
Build a Syllabus for Learning January 20, 2005 Presenter : Tine Reimers, Director, Center for Effective Teaching and Learning
Practicing Meaningful Learning Outcomes Assessment at UGA Department of Crop and Soil Sciences August 10, 2015 Dr. Leslie Gordon Associate Director for.
ARMENIA LAW AND HEALTH COURSES. 1. “HEALTH LAW,” Ministry of Health and National Institute of Health Goal- to introduce students to the legal issues that.
Adapted from “Best Practices for Student Learning, Assessment in Online Courses”“Best Practices for Student Learning, Assessment in Online Courses”
THE SYLLABUS: A ROAD MAP FOR EVERY CLASS. THE SYLLABUS: A ROAD MAP FOR EVERY CLASS Syllabus: noun, plural syllabuses, syllabi [sil-uh-bahy]: An outline.
Fair and Appropriate Grading
IENG 450 INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT Bakiye YALINC MSc- Consulting and Business Policy.
Agenda Introduction QUIZ Ancient History/Process Discussion items – Master syllabus – Class syllabus – Alternate Delivery syllabus Information Items.
Information Literacy Module for FYI Available to any FYI Tony Penny, Research Librarian – Goddard Library Research & Library Instruction Services We support.
Anne Hanley Director of Graduate Studies Department of History Northern Illinois University The Teaching Portfolio for Ph.D Candidacy Examinations.
Developing Common Course Syllabi November 20, 2010 Heather Sass, Education Consultant Preview.
How to best use your syllabi. What is a syllabus? Contract between you and your instructor Organized layout of the entire term Key reference point throughout.
Undergraduate Programs Spring Enrollment Spring 2007Spring 2008 Turfgrass Mgmt.2831 Water & Soil Resources/Environmental Soil Science 2421 Environmental.
Introduction to Academic Assessment John Duffield Office of Academic Assessment Georgia State University September 2013.
Rigor PLC. What are the components of core instruction? From Student Achievement Partners and Achieve the Core.
WELCOME TO BUS 302 The Gateway Experience For more information visit:
Effective Grading Babson Faculty Workshop August 23, 2012 “I love to teach, but get paid to grade.” Anon.
Criterion 1 – Program Mission, Objectives and Outcomes Weight = 0.05 Factors Score 1 Does the program have documented measurable objectives that support.
JACKSON STATE UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE WORKSHOP By: Dr. Shemeka McClung Director Ms. Arnitra Hunter Research Associate Institutional Research.
Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board Dr. Christopher L. Markwood Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi January 23, 2014.
TUSK - Faculty Overview. General information Describe your course material: Create and modify course objectives Outline the attendance and grading policies.
Overview of ECA IEN Harutyun Aleksanyan ECA Manager.
Developing a Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Plan and Report
Diagnostics Indicators / Rubric for Demarest Middle School
ARMENIA LAW AND HEALTH COURSES.
Director, Institute for Faculty Development
STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES
We VALUE HIPs Utilizing VALUE Rubrics and HIP QA Tools in Course Revitalization Presented by Melynda Conner, TBR OSS HIP Specialist 2019.
Criminal Justice A.A.S. School of Science, Health and Criminal Justice Fall 2015 Assessment Report
Curriculum Coordinator: Marela Fiacco Date : February 29, 2015
Program Director: D. Para January 2016
Presentation transcript:

The Bologna Process, Faculty, Curriculum and Teaching Christopher C. Morphew Institute of Higher Education University of Georgia Prepared for workshops at State Agrarian University of Armenia June 4-12, 2007

Developing or modifying courses What is purpose of course? –How does it fit into rest of program curriculum? –What should students learn? How will we ensure students learn? How will we organize students’ learning? How can we know when students have learned?

Developing or modifying courses Who is taking course? –What types of students? –What will they already know? How can we build on what students already know? At what level must we begin student learning?

Developing or modifying courses What is core knowledge in this subject area? How should course material be organized? What types of knowledge/skills should course generate for students? –Memorization –Skills –Analysis –Critical thinking –Communication

Presenting information and Evaluating Students What is optimal way to present information? –Lecture –Interaction –Student-led learning –Practica What is optimal way to evaluate students? –Oral exam –Written exam Multiple-choice True-false Open-ended questions –Quizzes –Papers –Open or closed-book

Grading students How should students be graded? –ECTS system versus local –Using a Rubric –Weighting assignments

Components of a Rubric Element: the major, critical attributes that are parts of the assignment Scale: the possible points to be assigned (high to low) to each element Criteria: how the elements are evaluated Standard: a description of how well the criteria must be met for the performance to be considered good. Descriptors: statements that describe each level of the performance. Indicators: specific, concrete examples or telltale signs of what to look for at each level of the performance

Fairness and ethics Ensuring fairness in teaching, grading and student relations –Academic honesty –Syllabus = contract –Acknowledging differences in learning styles

Academic honesty Developing a policy of academic honesty for faculty, students and academic staff “I will be academically honest in all of my academic work and will not tolerate academic dishonesty of others.” –UGA Student Honor Code