Advanced Research Designs u Designing Designs Designing Designs cause & effect. uEstablishing cause & effect. threats uMinimizing threats to validity?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Experimental and Quasiexperimental Designs Chapter 10 Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Canada, a division of Reed Elsevier Canada, Ltd.
Advertisements

Experimental Designs Dr. Farzin Madjidi Pepperdine University
1 COMM 301: Empirical Research in Communication Lecture 10 Kwan M Lee.
GROUP-LEVEL DESIGNS Chapter 9.
Collecting Data.
FUNDAMENTAL RESEARCH ISSUES © 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Correlation AND EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN
Slides to accompany Weathington, Cunningham & Pittenger (2010), Chapter 4: An Overview of Empirical Methods 1.
 Have a basic understanding of common research designs and when to use them.  Have a basic understanding of logic models, when and why to use them.
Experimental Design.
Experimental and Quasi- experimental Designs Having fun with X’s and O’s.
Relationships Among Pre-Post Designs. Pre-Post Designs l Randomized experiment (R) l Nonequivalent group design (N) l Regression-Discontinuity design.
Research Methods Experiment.
Designing Designs for Research. Designing Designs cause u How do you establish cause? minimize threats u How do you minimize threats to validity? construct.
Probability Sampling uses random selection
Experimental Design 264a Marketing Research. Criteria for Establishing a Causal Relationship Concomitant variation Temporal variation Control over other.
Non-true-experimental Designs, cont. PSY 231 Research Methods in Psychology.
Research Methods in Crime and Justice Chapter 5 Causality.
E XPERIMENTAL D ESIGNS AND A N I NTRODUCTION TO THE T T EST A NALYSIS P ROCEDURE.
2.4. Design in quantitative research Karl Popper’s notion of falsification and science – If a theory is testable and incompatible with possible empirical.
Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs
Research Methods in Psychology
Selecting a Research Design. Research Design Refers to the outline, plan, or strategy specifying the procedure to be used in answering research questions.
Research Design for Quantitative Studies
Research methods in clinical psychology: An introduction for students and practitioners Chris Barker, Nancy Pistrang, and Robert Elliott CHAPTER 8 Foundations.
Quasi-Experimental Designs Manipulated Treatment Variable but Groups Not Equated.
Methodology Describe Context & setting Design Participants Sampling Power Analysi s Interventions Outcome (study variables) Data Collection Procedures.
KNR 295 Quasi-Exptl Design Slide 1 Quasi-Experimental Design Ch. 8 – Non-random assignment.
Design Experimental Control. Experimental control allows causal inference (IV caused observed change in DV) Experiment has internal validity when it fulfills.
RESEARCH DESIGNS OVERVIEW. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGNS When the Research Question Deals “with what happens if”
Quasi Experimental Methods I Nethra Palaniswamy Development Strategy and Governance International Food Policy Research Institute.
Techniques of research control: -Extraneous variables (confounding) are: The variables which could have an unwanted effect on the dependent variable under.
Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Application, 9 th edition. Gay, Mills, & Airasian © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
URBDP 591 A Lecture 8: Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Design Objectives Basic Design Elements Experimental Designs Comparing Experimental Design Example.
INTERNAL VALIDITY AND BASIC RESEARCH DESIGN. Internal Validity  the approximate truth about inferences regarding cause-effect or causal relationships.
1 Experimental Research Cause + Effect Manipulation Control.
CAUSAL INFERENCE Presented by: Dan Dowhower Alysia Cohen H 615 Friday, October 4, 2013.
Research Methods for Counselors COUN 597 University of Saint Joseph Class # 4 Copyright © 2015 by R. Halstead. All rights reserved.
1 Copyright © 2011 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. Chapter 8 Clarifying Quantitative Research Designs.
After giving this lecture the student should be able to do the following: After giving this lecture the student should be able to do the following: List.
Establishing a Cause-Effect Relationship. Internal Validity The “treatment” and the “outcomes”The “treatment” and the “outcomes” The independent and dependent.
Learning Objectives In this chapter you will learn about the elements of the research process some basic research designs program evaluation the justification.
Internal Validity. All about whether the research design (and data analysis) warrants the conclusions. Concerned with: – Causal relationships – Various.
Establishing a Cause-Effect Relationship. Internal Validity What you did and what you sawWhat you did and what you saw Your program and your observationsYour.
PowerPoint presentation to accompany Research Design Explained 6th edition ; ©2007 Mark Mitchell & Janina Jolley Chapter 14 Single-n Designs and Quasi-Experiments.
Experimental & Quasi-Experimental Designs Dr. Guerette.
Slides to accompany Weathington, Cunningham & Pittenger (2010), Chapter 15: Single-Participant Experiments, Longitudinal Studies, and Quasi-Experimental.
Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Application, 9 th edition. Gay, Mills, & Airasian © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
11-1 Chapter 11 Experiments and Test Markets Learning Objectives Understand... uses for experimentation advantages and disadvantages of the experimental.
Research Design: Causal Studies l Quick Review: Three general forms of quantitative research studies –Descriptive: Describes a situation –Relational :
Quantitative and Mixed Research Designs V. Darleen Opfer.
Abstract critiques External, construct, internal….
Can you hear me now? Keeping threats to validity from muffling assessment messages Maureen Donohue-Smith, Ph.D., RN Elmira College.
Chapter 11 Experimental Designs PowerPoint presentation developed by: Sarah E. Bledsoe & E. Roberto Orellana.
Research designs Research designs Quantitative Research Designs.
William M. Trochim James P. Donnelly Kanika Arora 8 Introduction to Design.
Experimental Research Designs
Chapter 13 Experimental and Observational Studies
Review of Research Types
Making Causal Inferences and Ruling out Rival Explanations
Quantitative Research Designs
Introduction to Design
Single-Case Designs.
Evaluating research Is this valid research?.
Quasi-Experimental Design
The Nonequivalent Groups Design
9 Experimental Design.
Lesson Using Studies Wisely.
External Validity.
Experiments: Part 2.
Presentation transcript:

Advanced Research Designs u Designing Designs Designing Designs cause & effect. uEstablishing cause & effect. threats uMinimizing threats to validity? uConstructing uConstructing a design? good uWhat is a good design? u Relationship Among Pre-post Designs Relationship Among Pre-post Designs

Establishing Cause & Effect Temporal precedence Covariation of cause and effect No alternative explanationsCauseEffectthen time If X, then Y. If not X, then not Y. ProgramOutcome Causes? Alternative cause Alternative cause Alternative cause Alternative cause

Establishing Cause & Effect T ypical Outcome Evaluation u Is taken care of because you intervene before you measure outcome u Is taken care of because you control the intervention u Is the central issue of internal validity -- usually taken care of through your design Temporal Precedence Covariation of Cause & Effect No Alternative Explanations

Minimizing Threats to Validity. u By argument u By measurement or observation u By design u By analysis u By preventive action

Minimizing Threats to Validity by Argument By argument Simply say the threat isn’t reasonable.

Minimizing Threats by Measurement By measurement In some cases it is possible to measure that the threat didn’t happen.

Minimizing Threats by Design ROXOROXO Maturationthreat? How can the design be improved to address:

Minimizing Threats by Design Add a group to control for the threat. ROXOROOROXOROO To address a maturationthreat

Minimizing Threats by Analysis Mortality threat: Are your dropouts different from those retained in your study?

Minimizing Threats by Analysis --Mortality Threat example-- Show through analysis that the threat isn’t plausible. Pretest Means can show groups equivalent.

Minimizing Threats by Preventive Action By preventive action Rivalry?

Minimizing Threats by Preventive Action By preventive action Don’t allow the threat to happen in the first place. Rivalry Get program next semester

How Do You Construct a Design? u Time u Programs u Observations u Groups Start with basic design ( X O ), then expand across ???

Design Construction: Time XOXO Start with the simplest design. time. Expand across time.

Design Construction: Time time. Expand across time. OOXOOOXO OXOOOOXOOO

Design Construction: Programs programs. Expand across programs. OX1OOX2OOX3OOX1OOX2OOX3O Programvariations

Design Construction: Observations observations. Expand across observations. O 1 XO 1,2,3 O 1 O 1,2,3 Measurementvariations

Design Construction: Groups groups. Expand across groups. ROXOROXO ROOROO ROXOROXO ROOROO Add a replicate.

Design Construction: Groups & Time groups and time. Expand across groups and time. ROXOROONOROXOROONO Time Groups

Design Construction: Summary Overview XOXO Start

Design Construction: Summary Overview XOXO Start Expand (Brainstorm) ROXOOROOXONOXONOOROXOOROOXONOXONOO

Design Construction: Summary Overview XOXO Start Expand ROXOOROOXONOXONOOROXOOROOXONOXONOO ROXOROONOOROXOROONOO Contract (reality, cost, etc.)

What Is a Good Design? u Theory-grounded u Situational (adapted) u Feasible u Redundant u Efficient

Relationships Among Pre-Post Designs

Pre-Post Designs u Randomized experiment (R) u Nonequivalent group design (N) u Regression-Discontinuity design (C) O XO OO

The Main Issue u Selection threats u Are the groups similar before the treatment? u Related to assignment method in each design

Assignment Method Probability of Assignment to Treatment Given the Pretest Pretest

Assignment Method Probability of Assignment to Treatment Given the Pretest RE Pretest

Assignment Method Probability of Assignment to Treatment Given the Pretest RE RD Pretest

Assignment Method Probability of Assignment to Treatment Given the Pretest RE RD NEGD Pretest

Assignment Method Probability of Assignment to Treatment Given the Pretest RE RD NEGD Pretest

Pretest Equivalence Equivalent Maximally nonequivalent

Pretest Equivalence Equivalent Maximally nonequivalent RE

Pretest Equivalence Equivalent Maximally nonequivalent RDRE

Pretest Equivalence Equivalent Maximally nonequivalent RDNEGDRE

Assignment Rule Known 4 4 Regression-Discontinuity Randomized Experiment Nonequivalent Group Design