COMET Working Group Progress Report. Contents of Report Provide COMET Recommendations, with May 6 revisions (Vote) –Competitive Meter Approval Process.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

1 Drop Submitted by Supplier Customer Supplier Distribution Company Supplier sends Drop Request to Distribution Company (??) Distribution Company receives.

Advertisements

Market True-Up Discussion RMS Meeting 03/13/02 Draft Only for Discussion Purposes.

Retail Market Subcommittee Update to TAC Kathy Scott January 28,

Profiling Working Group May 15, PWG Report By Ernie Podraza of Reliant Energy ERCOT PWG Chair for WMS Meeting June 18, 2003.

Retail Market Subcommittee Update to TAC February 5, 2004.

Standards and Certification Training Module B – Process B5Consensus Process for Standards Development ASME S&C Training Module B5 Consensus Process for.

1.  An inadvertent issue begins upon the discovery of an Inadvertent Gain or Move-In transaction submission. Upon identification of an Inadvertent Gain.

Retail Market Subcommittee Update to TAC Kathy Scott February 26,

School of Nursing Student Grade Appeal Procedure Prepared by cgalang Revised fkhoiny 4/2011.

MODULE B - PROCESS SUBMODULES B1.Organizational Structure B2.Standards Development: Roles and Responsibilities B3.Conformity Assessment: Roles and Responsibilities.

1 Pre-TX Set 1.5 Data Clean Up. 2 Pre-TX SET 1.5 Data Clean-up Process In-Review - currently 12 (Original Quantity = 863) –June RMS, count 207 In-Review.

Profiling Working Group January 11, PWG Update Report By Ernie Podraza of Reliant Energy ERCOT PWG Chair for RMS Meeting January 11, 2006.

Retail Market Update June 5, New meter is requested for a specific customer’s location. 2.Application is filed by customer and/or the customer’s.

1 Update to RMS February 03, January Meeting Update RMGRR126, Additional ERCOT Validations for Customer Billing Contact Information File RMGRR128,Reinstate.

Role of Account Management at ERCOT PRR 672 Collaborative Analysis Presentation to RMS November 8, 2006 DRAFT ONLY.

Update On The ERO Transition Activities To Comply With The 2005 EPAC ERCOT TAC Meeting March 9, 2006 Sam Jones, COO.

1 Update from ERCOT Retail Market Services to RMS Additional Material February 12, 2004.

1 ERCOT True-Up Resettlement Restart Criteria Discussion Retail Market Subcommittee Meeting, February 24, 2003.

1 RMS TAC Update March 6, Texas Test Plan Chair; Bill Bell Centerpoint Energy Vice Chair; Leanne Hayden Centrica COMET Chair; Terry Bates TXU.

Profiling Working Group August 2, PWG Update Report By Ernie Podraza of Reliant Energy ERCOT PWG Chair for COPS Meeting August 22, 2006.

1 RMS Update - ERCOT June 10, Supporting Reports Section.

RMS Update to TAC January 8, Voting Items From RMS meeting on 12/10/2008  RMGRR069: Texas SET Retail Market Guide Clean-up – Section 7: Historical.

Profiling Working Group December 11, PWG Update Report By Ernie Podraza of Reliant Energy ERCOT PWG Chair for RMS Meeting December 11, 2003.

1 Supporting materials for RMS Provided by Retail Customer Choice (RCC) team.

Protocol Revision Subcommittee Sandy Morris November 3, 2011.

1 PWG Update Report By Ed Echols Of Oncor ERCOT PWG Chair Jim Lee of Direct Energy ERCOT PWG Vice Chair for COPS Meeting Sept 10, 2014.

RMS Update to TAC April 7, RMS Voting Items  RMGRR032- Transaction Timing Matrix Corrections Includes updates to Appendix D to correct examples.

1 RMS TAC Update April 3, Test Plan Flight Dates It is the practice of RMS to approved the dates for future testing flights. This enables new.

1 RMS Update - ERCOT May 14, Supporting Reports Section.

Retail Metering Working Group Progress Report 04/15/09.

1 MVI/MVO Workshop June 3 – 12, 2002 Workshop Results.

Competitive Metering Working Group Market Readiness Update to the PUCT Second Quarter 2003.

DEV Task Force RMS Update 11/11/04. DEV Update Discussed Leap Frog Inadvertent with IAG TF. Rita to report and IAGTF to own Worked with ERCOT to resolve.

October 14, 2015 LRIS v2 / Self-scheduled Third party DR Provider Data Submission Proposal Carl L Raish.

October 9, 2012 Commercial Operations Subcommittee RMS Update Kathy Scott RMS Vice Chair.

Profiling Working Group October 16, PWG Update Report By Ernie Podraza of Reliant Energy ERCOT PWG Chair for RMS Meeting October 16, 2003.

AMS Indicator ERCOT Recommendations

Tuesday, October 6, 2015 (following RMS) COPS-RMS-WORKSHOPShttp://

Retail Market Subcommittee Update to COPS Kathy Scott February 11,

814_20 – Substation ID updates Background and Proposed Action Plan RMS – 11/07/07.

1 Critical Retail Issues RMS Update RMS Meeting Results 2/01 RMS Formed 3/01 RMS Identified “pent-up” issues Tx Set transaction development Service Order.

1 Supporting materials for RMS Provided by Retail Customer Choice (RCC) team.

Distributed Renewable Generation Profile Implementation Plan.

Feb 18, TAC Report to the ERCOT Board February 18, 2003.

Profiling Working Group August 14, PWG Update Report By Ernie Podraza of Reliant Energy ERCOT PWG Chair for RMS Meeting August 14, 2003.

Update to RMS August 4th, RMGRR129 – Revision to Customer Rescission Completion Timeline Timely execution of a customer rescission after completion.

1 TX SET Mass Transition Project RMS Update March 15, 2006.

Update to RMS December 18, Project(PR) 010_03 SCR756 Part B – High Level Timeline DRAFT:  Planning Phase: ~ (End of 2013) ◦ Business requirements.

1 Protocol Clarification: Section , Resolution of Dispute Notification of Financial Impact of Granted and Granted with Exception Disputes COPS.

Profiling Working Group March 18, PWG Update Report By Ernie Podraza of Reliant Energy ERCOT PWG Chair for RMS Meeting March 18, 2004.

February 2, 2016 RMS Meeting 1. * Reasons: * Per the ERCOT Board Report dated 8/5/14 there were 6.6M Advanced Metering System (AMS) Electric Service Identifiers.

RMS Update to TAC November 1, RMS Activity Summary RMGRR057, Competitive Metering Working Group Name Change (VOTE) Update on RMS Working Group and.

COMET Working Group Progress Report. Purpose of Report Provide Team Updates Potential Future Voting Items Draft Competitive Meter Ownership Timeline.

MIMO Stacking Document and the current RMG are inconsistent with current logic and should be updated.

Oil and Gas Profile Implementation Plan. 2 BUSOGFLT Background ERCOT received Oil and Gas Profile Segment request ERCOT completed.

MMWG Performance Measures Questionnaire. Performance Measure Reporting Requirements The reporting requirements allowed the commission to obtain information.

1 Customer Objections in Complete Status (CCO Clean-up Phase 3) Background Next Steps.

Mass Transition—Timelines & Volume Limitation RMGRR116—Acquisition Transfer Non-standard Metering Future Meetings 1.

Customer Proprietary Information RMS Presentation November 13, 2003.

1 Status of True-up Settlements Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec April 26, 2003 Date we expect to be back to.

1 Supporting materials for RMS Provided by Retail Customer Choice (RCC) team.

Profiling Working Group September 26, PWG Update Report By Ernie Podraza of Reliant Energy ERCOT PWG Chair for RMS Meeting September 26, 2003.

RMS Update to TAC June 7, RMS Activity Summary RMGRR052 File Naming Convention for Customer Billing Contact Information URGENT (Vote) RMS Procedures:

Retail Market Subcommittee Update to COPS Kathy Scott January 14,

COMET Working Group Progress Report 11/13/03

TEXAS NODAL (ERCOT REVISIONS)

Pro-Active Transaction Resolution Measures

Pro-Active Transaction Resolution Measures

Revisions to Codes and Standards

Specification on float equipment

Presentation transcript:

COMET Working Group Progress Report

Contents of Report Provide COMET Recommendations, with May 6 revisions (Vote) –Competitive Meter Approval Process –Competitive Meter Issue Resolution Process –ERCOT Competitive Meter Standards

Competitive Meter Approval Process 1.New meter is requested for a specific customer’s location. 2.Application is filed by customer and/or the customer’s meter representative to ERCOT Settlement Metering Group. Document submittals shall include: –Certification of compliance with applicable ANSI standards. –Letter from manufacturer indicating that they will supply free programming software & adequate training to TDSP within 30 days of receipt of meters. 3.ERCOT reviews the application for completeness, and to determine if information to demonstrate ANSI compliance has been submitted. –If accepted, ERCOT forwards application to TDSP 4.ERCOT notifies the market of submittal. 5.TDSPs will test meter using applicable standards and share data with other TDSP’s and ERCOT. 6.ERCOT approves application based on positive recommendation by a minimum of 80% of TDSP’s, otherwise application is rejected. –If approved, meter is added to list. –If rejected, ERCOT will provide TDSP documentation to the applicant of the specific reason(s) for rejection.. Note: Appeal to PUCT is available for all parties. TDSP’s refers to TDSP’s where competitive metering is available

COMET Motion for RMS Consideration Approve the Competitive Meter Approval Process as recommended with the revisions proposed by COMET at the May 6 meeting

Meter Issue Resolution Process 1.TDSP notifies the manufacturer of product issue. 2.If the product issue involves non-compliance with ERCOT approved competitive meter standards, TDSP shall notify ERCOT of the issue and the manufacturer’s response to the issue. 3.ERCOT reviews issue. 4.ERCOT confirms non-compliant product issue. 5.ERCOT sends a notification to all TDSP's, and to the meter manufacturer, if issue is confirmed. 6.Manufacturer must resolve issue with TDSP's and ERCOT, during which time further meter installations may be placed on hold. If resolved, remove meter from hold status, and Meter Issue Resolution Process is complete. 7.If not resolved, ERCOT creates de-certification form based on unanimous recommendation from TDSP’s. 8.ERCOT removes meter from ERCOT approved competitive meter list. Note: Appeal to PUCT is available for all parties. TDSP’s refers to TDSP’s where competitive metering is available

COMET Motion for RMS Consideration Approve the Meter Issue Resolution Process as recommended with the revisions proposed by COMET at the May 6 meeting

ERCOT Competitive Meter Standards Meter functionality shall meet the latest revision of ANSI standards as approved by ERCOT. All meters shall meet C12.10 and either C12.1 or C12.20, without exceptions. Meters shall have a minimum of three password levels: a) Programming, b) Read only, demand reset, and time syncing, c) Read only Meets firmware functionality as defined by ERCOT and as documented by manufacturer. Meets TDSP billing determinate requirements Conforms to TDSP meter reading/operating/billing systems Note: TDSP’s refers to TDSP’s where competitive metering is available

COMET Motion for RMS Consideration Approve the ERCOT Competitive Meter Standards as recommended with the revisions proposed by COMET at the May 6 meeting

Questions?????