1 1 Orbit Response Update 30September 2010 Jeff Rzepiela Update 9/30/10 J. Rzepiela Orbit Response Measurements.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Matching Injector To Linac. Caveats This is all loose and fuzzy – sort of religion We dont have real tight control over and knowledge of the machine –
Advertisements

Electron Beam Control and Alignment LCLS FEL Undulator Commissioning Workshop UCLA Jan , 2004 P. Emma, SLAC Undulator collimation and protection.
Emittance dilution due to misalignment of quads and cavities of ILC main linac K.Kubo For beam energy 250 GeV, TESLA-type optics for 24MV/m.
SESAME – TAC 2012: M. Attal Maher Attal SESAME Booster Characterization.
Update of EXT Stripline BPM Electronics with LCLS-style Digital BPM Processors Glen White, with slides by Steve Smith 15 December 2009 ATF2.
Main Linac Simulation - Main Linac Alignment Tolerances - From single bunch effect ILC-MDIR Workshop Kiyoshi KUBO References: TESLA TDR ILC-TRC-2.
Author - Title (Footer)1 LINEAR LATTICE ERRORS AT THE ESRF: MODELING AND CORRECTION A. Franchi, L. Farvacque, T. Perron.
University of Dortmund Marc Grewe, IWBS 2004, Grindelwald, CH 1/21 Orbit Correction Within Constrained Solution Spaces.
ATF2 FB/FF layout Javier Resta Lopez (JAI, Oxford University) for the FONT project group FONT meeting January 11, 2007.
RF de-bunching problem  The Beam Phase module measures the phase of each individual bunch and makes an average that is passed to the Low Level for updating.
Introduction to the orbit correction of electron storage rings. Theory, Practice and Reality Hiroshi Nishimura Advanced Light Source Lawrence Berkeley.
July 22, 2005Modeling1 Modeling CESR-c D. Rubin. July 22, 2005Modeling2 Simulation Comparison of simulation results with measurements Simulated Dependence.
Proportional/Integral/Derivative Control
Searching for Quantum LOVE at the Australian Synchrotron Light Source Eugene Tan On behalf of Rohan Dowd 120/10/2010Eugene Tan – IWLC 2010, Genega ASLS.
Ground Motion + Vibration Transfer Function for Final QD0/SD0 Cryomodule System at ILC Glen White, SLAC ALCPG11, Eugene March 21, 2011.
COMPTON POLARIMETRY Collected data Cavity power Status on counting methods Systematic errors and hardware issues.
Y. Ohnishi / KEK KEKB LER for ILC Damping Ring Study Lattice simulation of lattice errors and optics corrections. November 1, 2007 Y. Ohnishi / KEK.
1 IR with elliptical compensated solenoids in FCC-ee S. Sinyatkin Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics 13 July 2015, CERN.
FLS2006 Workshop, HamburgEduard Prat, DESY DISPERSION MEASUREMENT AND CORRECTION IN THE VUV-FEL (FLASH) Winni Decking, Torsten Limberg, Eduard Prat 37th.
Wire scanner controls at SLAC. Subgroup for one emittance measurement station Wire to select Scan range Park position Selection x,y,u Single scan Start.
Dynamic Aperture Study for the Ion Ring Lattice Options Min-Huey Wang, Yuri Nosochkov MEIC Collaboration Meeting Fall 2015 Jefferson Lab, Newport News,
How Errors Propagate Error in a Series Errors in a Sum Error in Redundant Measurement.
16 August 2005PT for US BC Task Force1 Two Stage Bunch Compressor Proposal Snowmass WG1 “It’s the latest wave That you’ve been craving for The old ideal.
The CLIC decelerator Instrumentation issues – a first look E. Adli, CERN AB/ABP / UiO October 17, 2007.
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Using Online Single Particle Model for SNS Accelerator Tuning Andrei Shishlo, Alexander Aleksandrov.
July 19-22, 2006, Vancouver KIRTI RANJAN1 ILC Curved Linac Simulation Kirti Ranjan, Francois Ostiguy, Nikolay Solyak Fermilab + Peter Tenenbaum (PT) SLAC.
RHIC Retreat 2006, July 10-12, N.Malitsky. Model update and progress Model Update and Progress L. Ahrens, K. Brown, A. Luccio, N. Malitsky, V.Ptitsyn,
1 H. Hayano for the ATF collaboration Low Emittance Beam Generation in ATF H. Hayano for the ATF collaboration BPM electronics improvement emittance tuning.
Vertical Emittance Tuning at the Australian Synchrotron Light Source Rohan Dowd Presented by Eugene Tan.
CLIC Decelerator Instrumentation - Ideas and outlooks – non exhaustive - Erik Adli, July 9, 2008.
Frequency Map Analysis Workshop 4/2/2004 Peter Kuske Refinements of the non-linear lattice model for the BESSY storage ring P. Kuske Linear Lattice My.
1 Alternative ILC Bunch Compressor 7 th Nov KNU (Kyungpook National Univ.) Eun-San Kim.
1 Alternative Bunch Compressor 30 th Sep KNU Eun-San Kim.
June 2006LHCCWG / J. Wenninger1 Orbit response measurements and analysis J. Wenninger AB-OP Principle Software status Example from SPS ring and lines Potential.
First Collision of BEPCII C.H. Yu May 10, Methods of collision tuning Procedures and data analysis Luminosity and background Summary.
Kiyoshi Kubo Electron beam in undulators of e+ source - Emittance and orbit angle with quad misalignment and corrections - Effect of beam pipe.
Advanced Optics Control, CERN, Masamitsu Aiba, PSI Recent optics measurements at SLS M. Aiba, M. Böge, Á. Saá Hernández, D. Mayilyan and.
February 5, 2005D. Rubin - Cornell1 CESR-c Status -Operations/Luminosity -Machine studies -Simulation and modeling -4.1GeV.
ATF2 beam operation status Toshiyuki OKUGI, KEK The 9 th TB&SGC meeting KEK, 3-gokan Seminar Hall 2009/ 12/ 16.
Beam Based Optics Measurements CTF3 Collaboration meeting CERN Yu-Chiu Chao, TJNAF.
Update of Booster Alignment & Magnet Moves February 20, 2013 Bill Marsh, Kiyomi Seiya, Dean Still, Kent Triplet Alex Waller.
Summary of Tuning, Corrections, and Commissioning ( Short summary of ATF2 meeting at SLAC in March 2007 ) and Hardware Issues for beam Tuning Toshiyuki.
Cavity BPM: Multi-bunch analysis N Joshi, S Boogert, A Lyapin, F. Cullinan, et al. Royal Holloway University of London,
BI MD# BSRT Measurements Beam 1 and 3.5 TeV 2 bunches with different emittances Bumps: -4, -2,0,2,4 mm Results: 3.5TeV.
LCLS Digital BPM Processor for ATF2 Extraction Line BPMs Steve Smith 26 August 2009.
Beam dynamics simulations with the measured SPARC gun- solenoid field G. Bazzano, P. Musumeci, L. Picardi, M. Preger, M. Quattromini, C. Ronsivalle, J.
Wakefield effect in ATF2 Kiyoshi Kubo
Booster lattice measurement and correction with LOCO C.Y. Tan & K. Seiya Booster workshop 23 Nov 2015.
Chapter 10Design & Analysis of Experiments 8E 2012 Montgomery 1.
8 th February 2006 Freddy Poirier ILC-LET workshop 1 Freddy Poirier DESY ILC-LET Workshop Dispersion Free Steering in the ILC using MERLIN.
PS2 Orbit Correction - Update Wolfgang Bartmann PS2 Meeting, 26 th March Mar-091PS2 Orbit Correction - Update.
Ultra-low Emittance Coupling, method and results from the Australian Synchrotron Light Source Rohan Dowd Accelerator Physicist Australian Synchrotron.
Threading / LTC/ JW1 How difficult is threading at the LHC ? When MADX meets the control system … J. Wenninger AB-OP &
Michele Faucci Giannelli
Active Learning Lecture Slides
Orbit Response Matrix Analysis
Saturday 21st April 00:33 Interlock during ramp on BLM HV
Coupling Correction at the Australian Synchrotron
ATF2 IP Tuning Task Simulation Updates
Beam-Based Feedback in LCLS-II
Work Update J. Rzepiela 8/17/10.
Orbit Response Measurement Update
Beam-Based Alignment Results
LHC Closed Orbit For Beam 2
Optics Measurements in the PSB
TI8 analysis / J. Wenninger
6.1.1 Deriving OLS OLS is obtained by minimizing the sum of the square errors. This is done using the partial derivative 6.
Yuri Nosochkov Yunhai Cai, Fanglei Lin, Vasiliy Morozov
Multipole Limit Survey of FFQ and Large-beta Dipole
Progress Update on the Electron Polarization Study in the JLEIC
Presentation transcript:

1 1 Orbit Response Update 30September 2010 Jeff Rzepiela Update 9/30/10 J. Rzepiela Orbit Response Measurements

2 2 Orbit Response Update 30September 2010 Jeff Rzepiela Orbit Response Program Any corrector in any sector is selectable The max range, number of kicks, and settle time are configurable Orbit response at each BPM in sector is measured for each kick Can display measured orbit response, model orbit response, etc.

3 3 Orbit Response Update 30September 2010 Jeff Rzepiela Measurements GeV, 250 pC LTU 4.3 GeV, 250 pC LI21, LI27-30, BSY, LTU, UND (partial)

4 4 Orbit Response Update 30September 2010 Jeff Rzepiela LI21 Results BPMS:LI21:233 (BPMS11)

5 5 Orbit Response Update 30September 2010 Jeff Rzepiela LI21 Results (XCOR) Larger signal in normal component (as compared to model) and near zero signal in skew component implies a error in scaling (as opposed to rotation

6 6 Orbit Response Update 30September 2010 Jeff Rzepiela LI21 Results BPMS:LI21:233 (BPMS11)

7 7 Orbit Response Update 30September 2010 Jeff Rzepiela LI21 (YCOR) Small error in normal component (as compared to model), large skew component

8 8 Orbit Response Update 30September 2010 Jeff Rzepiela Orbit Response Fitting Fit data from all x and y corrector kicks Use all BPM data. Fit gain and angle parameters for all BPMs. Correct BPM signals to account for scaling in x and y (g x, g y ) as well as rotation (φ).

9 9 Orbit Response Update 30September 2010 Jeff Rzepiela Corrected results (LI21) Fit results: Θ= -4º gx= gy=1.0604

10 Orbit Response Update 30September 2010 Jeff Rzepiela Corrected results (LI21) Fit results: Θ= -4º gx= gy=1.0604

11 Orbit Response Update 30September 2010 Jeff Rzepiela LI27 Results

12 Orbit Response Update 30September 2010 Jeff Rzepiela BSY Results

13 Orbit Response Update 30September 2010 Jeff Rzepiela LTU Results: X Corrs Xcorr 122 Xcorr 348 Xcorr 288 Xcorr 148 (offline) Xcorr 248 Xcorr 178

14 Orbit Response Update 30September 2010 Jeff Rzepiela LTU Results: X Corrs Xcorr 388 Xcorr 642 Xcorr 588 Xcorr 448 Xcorr 548 Xcorr 488

15 Orbit Response Update 30September 2010 Jeff Rzepiela LTU: X Corrs Xcorr 678Xcorr 718 Xcorr 758 Xcorr 738

16 Orbit Response Update 30September 2010 Jeff Rzepiela LTU: Y Corrs Ycorr 105 Ycorr 293 Ycorr 253 Ycorr 133 Ycorr 185 Ycorr 171

17 Orbit Response Update 30September 2010 Jeff Rzepiela LTU Results: Y Corrs Ycorr 353 Ycorr 593 Ycorr 553 Ycorr 393 Ycorr 493 Ycorr 453

18 Orbit Response Update 30September 2010 Jeff Rzepiela Y Corrs Ycorr 611 Ycorr 767 Ycorr 657 Ycorr 747 Ycorr 727

19 Orbit Response Update 30September 2010 Jeff Rzepiela General Observations Xcorr scans show generally good agreement with model Ycorr scans for Ycorr 453  767 show generally good agreement with model Ycorr scans for Ycorr 105  393 show poor agreement with model, particularly farther downstream (BPMs 110  450 show better agreement than BPMs downstream)

20 Orbit Response Update 30September 2010 Jeff Rzepiela

21 Orbit Response Update 30September 2010 Jeff Rzepiela Historical comparison 9/17/10: 4.3 GeV8/31/10: GeV 12/02/09: 5.8 GeV