Convergence in Proton Reconstruction Algorithm and final reference tests of Roman pots before installation in LHC Ayah Massoud Penn State University Supervisor:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LHC/HERA workshop, WG 4 (17. Jan. 2005)
Advertisements

Manchester Dec Dynamic Alignment of Roman Pots Konstantin Goulianos The Rockefeller University The Future of Forward Physics at the LHC Manchester,
Machine induced background in ALFA The ALFA detector elastic scattering and luminosity background generation, rejection and subtraction impact on luminosity.
Elastic Scattering at s=1.96 TeV Using the DØ Forward Proton Detector
M. Gallinaro - "Physics with the CT-PPS project" - LHC Forward - Sep. 23, Michele Gallinaro LIP Lisbon (on behalf of the CMS and TOTEM collaborations)
Proton polarization measurements in π° photo-production --On behalf of the Jefferson Lab Hall C GEp-III and GEp-2γ collaboration Wei Luo Lanzhou University.
Gueorgui ANTCHEVNEC’2013 – Varna, Bulgaria 1 The TOTEM Experiment Consolidation and Upgrade G. Antchev * On behalf of the TOTEM Collaboration * INRNE-BAS,
The First 1 ½ Years of TOTEM Roman Pot Operation at the LHC M. Deile, G. Antchev, I. Atanassov, V. Avati, J. Baechler, K. Eggert, J. Kašpar, F. Lucas Rodriguez,
Monte Carlo Comparison of RPCs and Liquid Scintillator R. Ray 5/14/04  RPCs with 1-dimensional readout (generated by RR) and liquid scintillator with.
Distributed Data Management Jeremy Ticey, Hampton University University of Michigan, CERN REU Program August 14, 2008 Jeremy Ticey, Hampton University.
Construction and Installation Readiness of TOTEM Roman Pots Detectors Federico Ravotti (PH/TOT) Gennaro Ruggiero (PH/TOT) LHCC minireview – 06 May 2009.
Optimizing Cost and Minimizing Energy Loss for Race-Track LHeC Design Jake Skrabacz University of Notre Dame Univ. of Michigan CERN REU 2008 CERN AB-department.
Ian Ross Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Mentor: Dr. Richard Teuscher University of Toronto ATLAS Group ATLAS Calorimetery: Cosmic Ray Commissioning.
Judson Locke, Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, Florida, USA Advisor: Richard Teuscher, Ph.D., University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
New measurements of forward physics in the TOTEM experiment at the LHC Hubert Niewiadomski on behalf of the TOTEM Collaboration ICHEP 2012, 4-11 July 2012,
Proton-Proton Elastic Scattering at RHIC
Design and development of micro-strip stacked module prototypes for tracking at S-LHC Motivations Tracking detectors at future hadron colliders will operate.
Lishep06 Gilvan Alves1 Overview of Diffraction from DØ Gilvan Alves Lafex/Brazil  Introduction  DØ RunI x RunII  Special Runs  Outlook.
1 PID & FPD Software Gilvan Alves (Lafex/CBPF) Q4Q4 D S Q2Q2 Q2Q2 Q3Q3 Q3Q3 Q4Q4 S A 1Q A1SA1S A 2Q A 2S P 1Q P 2S P 1S P 2Q p p Z(m) A D1 Detector Roman.
Planar Edgeless Silicon Detectors for the TOTEM Experiment 1.E-09 1.E-06 1.E /T, 1e3/K Current, A (294K) (256K)(227K)(204K) Gennaro Ruggiero,
Elastic Scattering and Diffraction at DØ Tamsin Edwards for the DØ collaboration 14 th - 18 th April, 2004 XII International Workshop on Deep Inelastic.
Small_X / 09/17 – 09/20Jorge Barreto – UFRJ The D0 Forward Proton Detector (FPD) Status Jorge Barreto UFRJ/CBPF - Brazil D1 TDC D2 TDC pbar p.
CERN Jan 2005Alignment of CDF Run II Roman Pots K. Goulianos1 HERA and the LHC K. Goulianos The Rockefeller University CERN January 2005 (talk.
APS April Meeting Detector Construction of the Forward Proton Detector at D0 Michael Strang University of Texas at Arlington Diffractive Events FPD.
TOTEM Experiment MasterClasses B. Bressan, G. Latino, and Jan Kaspar (TOTEM Collaboration) Measurement of dN el /dt in p-p collisions at LHC SG Meeting,
The RICH Detectors of the LHCb Experiment Carmelo D’Ambrosio (CERN) on behalf of the LHCb RICH Collaboration LHCb RICH1 and RICH2 The photon detector:
P. 1K. Eggert – Early TOTEM Running with the  * =90m Optics Karsten Eggert on behalf of the TOTEM Collaboration Politecnico di Bari and Sezione INFN Bari,
DIS 2001 Bologna Hard Diffraction at DØ Run I and Run II Christophe Royon DØ Collaboration / DAPNIA-SPP Saclay, UT Arlington, Brookhaven.
Track Selection Performance of the CMS Cathode Strip Chamber Track Finder and Level 1 Trigger Kristin Beck Advisors: Dan Holmes, Darin Acosta 14 August,
1 Constraining ME Flux Using ν + e Elastic Scattering Wenting Tan Hampton University Jaewon Park University of Rochester.
Karsten Eggert / PENN State - p. 1 Karsten Eggert CERN / PH Proton Detection at IP3 Enlarge the acceptance for diffractive protons to lower  p/p ~ 10.
Status of the TOTEM Experiment and Latest Results
Gennaro Ruggiero CERN, PH Depart. Planar Edgeless Detectors for the TOTEM Experiment On the behalf of the TOTEM Collaboration
Status and organization of the H8c area Mirko Berretti 08/07/2015 (with M.Bozzo, N.Minafra, E.Oliveri, X. Pons…)
Progress Report on GEANT Study of Containerized Detectors R. Ray 7/11/03 What’s New Since Last Time?  More detailed container description in GEANT o Slightly.
ATLAS Transition Radiation Tracker End-cap Quality Control and the Characterization of Straw Deformations Michael Kagan University of Michigan Supervisor:
Z & W Boson Reconstruction with Monte Carlo Simulations and ATLAS DATA Adam Lowery Supervisor: Dr. Jonas Strandberg Wednesday, August 11, 2010.
Backgrounds at FP420 Henri Kowalski DESY 18 th of May 2006.
A New Upper Limit for the Tau-Neutrino Magnetic Moment Reinhard Schwienhorst      ee ee
RP Software Collaboration Meeting 7 Mars 2007 Hubert Niewiadomski TOTEM, CERN Brunel University.
Compton Data Analysis Liping Gan University of North Carolina Wilmington.
Total Cross Section, Elastic Scattering and Diffraction Dissociation at the LHC V. Avati University of Helsinki on behalf of the TOTEM Collaboration
Mirko Berretti - Giuseppe Latino (University of Siena & INFN-Pisa) Track and Jet reconstruction in T2 “Forward Physics at LHC with TOTEM” Penn State University.
Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Hit Reconstruction for the Luminosity Monitor March 3 rd 2009 | T. Randriamalala, J. Ritman and T. Stockmanns.
An FPD quadrupole castle Elastic Scattering and High Mass Exclusive Dijets at DØ (  s=1.96 TeV) Andrew Brandt University of Texas, Arlington on behalf.
Kreuth, 2015/10/5-9 Csörgő, T. Evidence for non-exponential pp d/dt at low t and √s = 8 TeV by TOTEM T. Csörgő for the TOTEM Collaboration.
Status of the Experiment RRB - TOTEM 16 April 2013 S.Giani - CERN on behalf of the TOTEM Collaboration CERN-RRB
y x Vincenzo Monaco, University of Torino HERA-LHC workshop 18/1/2005
EUTelescope Testbeam Analysis: Summer 2014
Introduction Status before the 2009 run Results from the 2009 run
First data from TOTEM experiment at LHC
W mass reconstruction and jet calibration in ttbar events
Particle detection and reconstruction at the LHC (IV)
The Status of the Data Analysis of the Beam Test at FZJ
Recent Results from TOTEM
Results of dN/dt Elastic
Integration and alignment of ATLAS SCT
TOTEM early measurements
(with R. Arcidiacono, A. Solano)
Planar Edgeless Silicon Detectors for the TOTEM Experiment
Beam collimation for SPPC
Can micro channeling improve the TOTEM experiment
TOTEM experiment at the LHC
Compton Data Analysis Jing Feng China Atomic Institute Liping Gan
On behalf of the TOTEM Collaboration:
Project Presentations August 5th, 2004
Using Single Photons for WIMP Searches at the ILC
The D0 Forward Proton Detector (FPD) Status
Double Pomeron Exchange (DPE)
Results, Status and Perspectives for 2011
Presentation transcript:

Convergence in Proton Reconstruction Algorithm and final reference tests of Roman pots before installation in LHC Ayah Massoud Penn State University Supervisor: Hubert Niewiadomski

Outline Purpose of TOTEM Proton reconstruction Reconstruction results Roman pot detectors Tests: ▫Efficiency ▫Plane alignment ▫Cluster size Conclusions

TOTEM TOTEM (TOTal Elastic Measurement) Purpose: Measure total p-p cross section to an accuracy of 1% based on Optical Theorem Measure elastic scattering in the range <|t|<8 GeV 2 Deeper understanding of proton structure by studying elastic scattering with large momentum transfers

Proton Reconstruction Complicated software simulates pp and detectors and reconstructs the proton kinematics based on optical models Since  is measured and need to find , a minimization algorithm is implemented My task is to figure out what conditions lead to these divergences and minimize error Initial position Horizontal and vertical scattering angles Fractional momentum change

Reconstruction results

Conclusions Within the t-acceptance range, diffractively scattered protons are detected indepdent on their momentum loss For high momentum loss ( -ksi>0.11),due to machine dispersion, diffractively scattered protons can be observed independently of their t-value Failure occurs in large t independent of ksi

Reference tests of Roman pot detectors before installation in LHC

RP1 (147 m) RP2 (220 m) Roman Pot detectors Used in detection of very forward protons in movable beam insertions Each RP unit consists of 3 pots: 2 approaching the beam vertically and 1 approaching it horizontally

Roman Pot detectors

Edgeless silicon detector Each pot consists of a stack of 10 planes of 512 silicon microstrips allowing detection up to 50  m from their physical edge This is achieved by a voltage terminating structure that controls the potential distribution between the detector’s sensitive area and the cut edge to have a vanishing potential drop. Every 8 strips are connected to a VFAT chip that reads the hits.

Edgeless silicon detector

Selection algorithm of reference tracks dat file is generated by VFAT chips are hex numbers of each event xml file clusters strip position, detector id, strip number for each event I wrote scripts to select events with 7 or more different detector hits and evaluate the position of hit in each plane This roughly signifies a reference track through the planes

RP1

RP1: Hit multiplicity in each cluster

RP1 Efficiency Efficiency= total hits in 1 detector in a reference track/total hits in reference track

RP1: Alignment Offset: 3 strips Slope:1.02

RP1: Alignment Offset: 5 strips Slope: 0.99

RP2

RP2: Efficiency Threshold=15

RP2: Efficiency Threshold=10 A lower threshold improves the efficiency slightly but increases noise

Conclusions Defects in planes 3,6,8 in RP1 that will be put into consideration when using proton reconstruction and testing RP2 detectors are working properly under two different thresholds Detector efficiency is within range of 95% Alignment in detector planes are in order of 2-5 strips

Acknowledgments I would like to thank Prof. Jean Krisch, Prof. Myron Campbell, Prof. Homer Neal, Prof. Steven Goldfarb and Jeremy Herr for their help and making this summer program possible University of Michigan, NSF and Ford Motor Co. for REU funding All REU students for making it a fun summer

summer is over …. applying to grad school ….