FLAT MAIL PREPARATION OPTIMIZATION WORK GROUP #81 MTAC Report May 6, 2004.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
® Flats Track for Periodicals, Catalogs & Printers Automating Flat Mail Preparation in the Future Anita Pursley – Worldcolor Brent Raney - USPS National.
Advertisements

® Service Performance Measurement using Intelligent Mail & Seamless Acceptance.
® 1 Mail Prep and Entry Steering Committee Meeting May 14, 2013.
MTAC Workgroup 119 FSS Implementation Communication Peter Moore John Nagla November 20, 2008.
CO-PALLETIZATION AND CO-MAILING UPDATE Mailers’ Technical Advisory Committee (MTAC), May 17, Update on Co-Palletization and Co-Mailing May 17, 2006.
Automated Package Processing System [APPS] Update February 23, 2006.
1 R Mail Preparation Changes NCSC January 18, 2007.
AIMS™ (Assurety Integrated Mailing Solution) is a complete IDEAlliance, PostalOne! compliant mailing system with USPS FAST appointments for mailers and.
1 Product Redesign MTAC Update Cost-Based Rates for Periodicals and Standard Flats February 5, 2004.
Addressing, Automation & Presort Lloyd M. Moss. Agenda Overview of how Addressing, Automation and Presort earn postal discounts Addressing Requirements:
Price Change Effective April 26, 2015 Northeast Area Mailing Industry Focus Group Meeting February 25,
® New MTAC User Groups/Work Groups/Task Teams Work Group #167: Solutions for Pieces Excluded from Service Measurement Start date: 1/21/2015 Target Completion.
Reduce Postage Costs and Improve Delivery, Combined Mailing Solutions PCC Mailers Forum 2014 September 10 th, 2014 Deborah Damore Fairrington Transportation.
Advanced Package Processing System [APPS] MTAC – August 2004.
® MTAC WORKGROUP 113 ADDRESS / BARCODE REQUIREMENTS FOR FSS Update August 1, 2007.
FLAT MAIL PREPARATION OPTIMIZATION November 5, FLAT MAIL PREPARATION OPTIMIZATION Issue #81 MTAC November 5, 2003.
MTAC Workgroup 114 Periodicals Subgroup Update May 15, 2007.
National Postal Forum April 12, 2010 National Postal Forum ®
Greater New York Postal Customer Council
® Flats Update Rosa Fulton Executive Director, FSS Krista Finazzo Manager, Operational Requirements MTAC – November 2010.
® Flats Track for Periodicals, Catalogs & Printers David Mastervich Manager, Periodicals, Catalogs & Saturation Rosa Fulton Executive Director, FSS National.
Addressing, Automation & Presort Lloyd M. Moss Senior Product Manager Pitney Bowes Group 1 Software.
FLAT MAIL PREPARATION OPTIMIZATION WORK GROUP #81 MTAC Report February 5, 2004.
® MTAC WG #135 Transportation Management Systems (TMS) Combined Data Limitations August 2010.
1 MTAC 117 Intelligent Mail Barcodes and Electronic Documentation Workgroup Update.
Corporate Automation Plan PHASE 2 February 4, 2004Washington D.C.
Mailpiece Design Rose Flanagan Director of Mailing Services Transcontinental Direct.
® Intelligent Mail NPPC May 13, Intelligent Mail Vision Provide end-to-end visibility, throughout the entire supply chain, using:  Standardized.
® Mail Technical Advisory Committee Workgroup 142 Industry Sponsor - Wendy Smith Industry Co-chair – Tom Underkoffler USPS Co-chair – Robert Raines.
Corporate Flats Strategy MTAC November 7, Slide 2 Presentation Overview Background Near Term Actions (FY 2003 and 2004) Longer Term Planning (FY.
Optimizing Parcel Preparation & Entry for Seamless Acceptance Final Presentation MTAC Work Group # 109 Industry Leader: Wendy Smith USPS Leader: Jim Cochrane.
EInduction Overview 1 eDropship Post-Induction Process November 15, 2010 MTAC Workgroup 138.
1 PACKAGE VISIBILITY PROJECT Jim Cochrane & Gary Reblin Mailer’s Technical Advisory Committee.
MTAC Workgroup 115 Flat Mail Prep & Entry in FSS Environment November 18, 2009.
Product Redesign MTAC Update February 6, PRODUCT REDESIGN Bob O’Brien – Industry Co-Chair John DePiazza Joe Lubenow Clarence Banks Robert Lindsay.
MTAC Workgroup 106 Improve, integrate, and optimize data sources… Brian Euclide, Perry Judd’s Inc. Bob Galaher, USPS Marketing Nov 02, 2006 Washington.
MTAC Workgroup # 87 Update Improving the Drop Shipment Process Washington, D.C. May 18, 2006.
Workgroup #94 Service Performance Reporting Process Standardization MTAC Meeting Presentation August 17, 2005.
Mailing Services Prices Mailers’ Technical Advisory Committee February 19, 2009 Maura Robinson VP Pricing.
Optimizing Parcel Preparation & Entry for Seamless Acceptance MTAC Work Group # 109 Industry Leaders: Chris Finley & Wendy Smith USPS Leader: Jim Cochrane.
FSS PREP AND ENTRY (WG #115) MTAC, August FSS Prep and Entry Workgroup #115 August 1, 2007 Joe Schick – Quad Graphics Rod Barbee – USPS Engineering.
® Flats Symposium 2008 Bill Galligan Senior Vice President, Operations USPS National Postal Forum ® National Postal Forum 2008.
“In-Home Delivery” Instructions for Standard Mail MTAC Presentation February 05, 2003.
® Service Standards and Performance Measurement MTAC Workgroup 114 Status Report.
Electronic Mail Improvement Reporting (eMIR) Bundle Breakage Blitz Results July 22 – August 5, 2005.
1 Service Performance Measurement System & Intelligent Mail® Barcodes MTAC – January 31, 2008.
1 Seamless Acceptance, Performance- Based Verification Implementation, Benefits, Obstacles and Feedback Ty Taylor, JC Penney Pritha Mehra, USPS MTAC 117.
MTAC Workgroup 114 Establish Service Standards and Measurement Standard Mail Measurement July 30, 2007 Std Subgroup Meeting.
1 Product Redesign MTAC Update November 5, Steering Committee Will Continue To Meet –Regular Updates And Feedback Regarding USPS Activity on Key.
® MTAC WG #135 Transportation Management Systems (TMS) Combined Data Limitations May 20, 2010.
1 MTAC May 26, 2011 Washington D.C. Kelly Sigmon Vice-President, Engineering USPS Operations Plan for Flats & Technology Update.
1 Update on Proposed Prices and Standards Mailers’ Technical Advisory Committee Steve Kearney Vice President, Pricing & Classification Joe Moeller Manager,
Mailing Industry Changes ® PCC Workshop-in-a-Box Module 4 PCC Workshop-in-a-Box Module 4.
1 Start-the-Clock for Non Full-Service Mailings MTAC 139 November 17, 2010 Rose FlanaganChris Simone Data-Mail IncUSPS.
1 MTAC General Session Intelligent Mail Implementation Workgroup 122 April 29, 2009.
Newsstand Type Preparation for Automated Flats: R.R.Donnelley Chris Brown Hermann Kage July 16, 2002.
PRESORT OPTIMIZATION WORK GROUP February 6, PRESORT OPTIMIZATION Issue #11 WORK GROUP LEADERS Joe LubenowMarc McCrery Industry USPS.
Product Redesign MTAC Update November 7, Workgroups Joint Meeting of Workgroups –Originally Planning For Early 2003 –Primarily Information Sharing.
1 MTAC 117 – Periodicals Subgroup  USPS Co-Chairs: Bob Galaher, Ruth Stock  Industry Co-Chair: John Stark  Objective: Identify any constraints and define.
The Perfect Bundle Improving Bundle Preparation “A secure bundle with a fully visible address is a thing of beauty.” Presented by: (insert name here)
PRESORT OPTIMIZATION WORK GROUP November 6, PRESORT OPTIMIZATION Issue #11 WORK GROUP LEADERS Joe LubenowMarc McCrery Industry USPS.
MTAC – November 2006 Mailers’ Technical Advisory Committee Address Location for FSS Work Group #101 November 1 st, 2006.
1 MTAC WG #175 Update for Northeast Area Focus Group May 4 th,
FLAT MAIL PREPARATION OPTIMIZATION February 24, FLAT MAIL PREPARATION OPTIMIZATION Issue #81 MTAC February 24, 2005.
January 2017 Price Structure Considerations
Panel 2: Flats Containerization
Periodicals Simplification Ideas February 23, 2017 Key Points
MTAC Mail Prep & Entry Focus Group Sessions December 6, 2017
Intelligent Mail.
Presentation transcript:

FLAT MAIL PREPARATION OPTIMIZATION WORK GROUP #81 MTAC Report May 6, 2004

2 MAJOR TOPICS COVERED Simplified Mail Prep Proposal Full Merging of Non-AFSM 100 Flats APPS Issues: 1Address Block 2OEL Update 3“Clear” strapping and shrinkwrap Rename packages to bundles Cost-based rates market research

3 SIMPLIFIED MAIL PREP PROPOSAL Presented by Gary Hegsted Issue: adapt mail preparation for AFSM 100 Consider bypass of SPBS, APPS Orient mail on pallets for manual offloading Less shrinkwrapping and strapping Consider standard package sizes Applies to 3DG, SCF, ADC, BMC pallets

4 SIMPLIFIED MAIL PREP PROPOSAL Mailers save materials USPS reduces work hours Mail pieces need fewer handlings Concerns: differences from SPBS, APPS requirements Concerns: pallet integrity Concerns: skills required in mail production Concerns: software modifications

5 SIMPLIFIED MAIL PREP PROPOSAL Could fit in to future flats processing Further testing needed Looking for a test facility Not expected to be ready for next rate case

6 FULL MERGING OF NON-AFSM 100 FLATS Presented by Neil Berger Creates more pallet options Non-automation mail to bypass machines No “5% rule” for this situation Federal Register notice issued Comments needed by May 26

7 APPS ISSUES: ADDRESS BLOCK Presented by Barry Walsh Visibility of address block has been required in DMM Clarification to define that in terms of readability Upcoming Federal Register notice Linked to OEL revisions Linked to issue of clear strapping and shrinkwrap

8 APPS ISSUES: OEL UPDATE Revised proposal unchanged Based on 30 character line length Includes backup designation of package types Allows room for ACS codes USPS tests needed before final requirements definition Federal Register notice eventually

9 APPS ISSUES: CLEAR STRAPPING AND SHRINKWRAP Term “clear” needs definition Includes issues of welds, seams, bubbles USPS Engineering has been testing Industry seeks greater involvement Concern about costs of materials Concern about Federal Register notice too early in process USPS will facilitate industry participation Barry Walsh:

10 RENAME PACKAGES TO BUNDLES Presented by Cheryl Beller Current term “packages” is confusing Had earlier eliminated concept of packages being combined to make bundles Now want to change references to packages as strapped or wrapped mail pieces to “bundles” Packages would be akin to parcels Put in DMM, gradual transition for other references

11 COST-BASED RATES MARKET RESEARCH Presented by Cheryl Beller For Periodicals and Standard, begin with Standard Avoid conflict with complaint case in Periodicals Mailers could access scenarios Mailers would forecast responses to new rate structure using supplied “non-final” rates Consistent with simpler rules for small mailings