Subtitle Title Date Cris Ross, co-chair Anita Somplasky, co-chair January 8, 2016 Certified Technology Comparison (CTC) Task Force.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Usage statistics in context - panel discussion on understanding usage, measuring success Peter Shepherd Project Director COUNTER AAP/PSP 9 February 2005.

Advertisements

SIM- Data Infrastructure Subcommittee January 8, 2014.

Accountable Care Workgroup December 13, Agenda Call to Order/Roll Call Discussion – Discuss Key Messages/Takeaways from the Accountable Care Workgroup.

Quality Measures Vendor Tiger Team December 13, 2013.

Kick-Off Meeting Semantic Standards James Ferguson, co-chair Rebecca Kush, co-chair December 1, 2014.

National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics Executive Subcommittee Hearing on "Meaningful Use" of Health Information Technology Certification of.

Strategy 2022: A Holistic View Tony Hayes International President ISACA © 2012, ISACA. All rights reserved.

Task Force Session Standards & Interoperability Task Force Stan Huff, Co-Chair Arien Malec, Co-Chair February 17, 2015.

Bree Collaborative Cardiology Report: Appropriateness of Percutaneous Cardiac Interventions (PCI) Bree Collaborative Meeting November 30, 2012.

Use Case Development Social Journey Template. A “Use Case” is simply a defined way of using Yammer to accomplish a goal or complete a task. Define the.

ESPA Comprehensive Aquifer Management Plan Presentation to the Governor’s Water Summit April 17, 2007 Idaho Water Resource Board Jonathan Bartsch and Diane.

Quality Measurement Task Force Summary Deck 2016 Inpatient Prospective Payment System June 15, 2015 Cheryl Damberg, Co-Chair Kathleen Blake, Co-Chair.

Better, Smarter, Healthier Delivery System Reform Presentation to the Health IT Policy Committee March 10, 2015 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Interoperability Standards Advisory Summary of Public Comments and Next Steps June 24, 2015 Chris Muir.

HIE Request for Information March 26, 2013 Information Exchange Workgroup Micky Tripathi.

HIT Policy Committee Accountable Care Workgroup – Kickoff Meeting May 17, :00 – 2:00 PM Eastern.

FDASIA REGULATIONS SUBCOMMITTEE May 22, Agenda 4:00 p.m.Call to Order – MacKenzie Robertson Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information.

Test Organization and Management

Strategic Objectives Benefits Significantly reduce costs Better outcomes for residents Better quality of service Fewer services/ providers subject to safeguarding.

Best Practices: Aligning Process, Culture and Tools Michael Jordan Senior Project Manager - Microsoft Consulting Services

Demystifying the Business Analysis Body of Knowledge Central Iowa IIBA Chapter December 7, 2005.

Health Plan User Groups Leapfrog Town Hall Call January 13 & 15, 2004 Founded By The Business Roundtable with Support From the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.

Health Care Cost Database Presented by the Office of the Commissioner of Securities and Insurance January 2011.

HIT Standards Committee Privacy and Security Workgroup: Initial Reactions Dixie Baker, SAIC Steven Findlay, Consumers Union June 23, 2009.

Draft – discussion only Content Standards WG (Documents and Data) Proposed HITSC Workgroup Evolution 1 Architecture, Services & APIs WG Transport and Security.

Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System DRG-Based Inpatient Hospital Payment System Project Overview June 14, 2012.

Risk Assessments: Patient Safety and Innovation Innovation Discussion 02 July 2013.

Networking and Health Information Exchange Unit 6b EHR Functional Model Standards.

Halifax, 31 Oct – 3 Nov 2011ICT Accessibility For All SMART GRID ICT: SECURITY, INTEROPERABILITY & NEXT STEPS John O’Neill, Senior Project Manager CSA.

Implementation Overview SHRP 2 Oversight Committee June 18, 2012.

HIT Policy Committee Meaningful Use Workgroup Presentation to HIT Policy Committee Paul Tang, Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Chair George Hripcsak, Columbia.

GOVERNOR’S EARLY CHILDHOOD ADVISORY COUNCIL (ECAC) September 9, 2014.

State of Kansas Financial Management System Needs Assessment Validation Steering Committee Meeting October 25, 2006.

Task Force Discussion Standards & Interoperability Task Force Stan Huff, Co-Chair Arien Malec, Co-Chair January 30, 2015.

“Reaching across Arizona to provide comprehensive quality health care for those in need” AHCCCS/ADHS Report Summary & Recommendations.

Clinical Quality Public Hearing June 7, 2012 HIT Standards & Policy Committees Summary: June 20, 2012 Marjorie Rallins, Clinical Quality WG, HIT Standards.

Shaping a Health Statistics Vision for the 21 st Century 2002 NCHS Data Users Conference 16 July 2002 Daniel J. Friedman, PhD Massachusetts Department.

Cris Ross, co-chair Anita Somplasky, co-chair December 1, 2015 Certified Technology Comparison (CTC) Task Force.

Kickoff Meeting Cris Ross, co-chair Anita Somplasky, co-chair November 17, 2015 Certified Technology Comparison (CTC) Task Force.

March 7, 2008 Web Advisory Committee. Overview of Presentation Completed Activities –Campus Survey of Web administrators –Assessment of the current Common.

Certified Technology Comparison (CTC) Task Force Cris Ross, co-chair Anita Somplasky, co-chair December 10, 2015.

Discussion - HITSC / HITPC Joint Meeting Transport & Security Standards Workgroup October 22, 2014.

Subtitle Title Date Josh Mandel, co-chair Meg Marshall, co-chair January 12, 2016 API Task Force.

Update to HITSC Standards & Interoperability Task Force Stan Huff, Co-Chair Arien Malec, Co-Chair January 27, 2015.

Overview of ONC Report to Congress on Health Information Blocking Presented to the Health IT Policy Committee, Task Force on Clinical, Technical, Organizational,

Electronic Clinical Quality Measures – Session #1 ONC Resource Center.

The Data Sharing Working Group 24 th meeting of the GEO Executive Committee Geneva, Switzerland March 2012 Report of the Data Sharing Working Group.

John N. Lavis, MD, PhD Professor and Canada Research Chair in Knowledge Transfer and Exchange McMaster University Program in Policy Decision-Making McMaster.

Subtitle Title Date Cris Ross, co-chair Anita Somplasky, co-chair January 20, 2016 Certified Technology Comparison (CTC) Task Force Final Recommendations.

Subtitle Title Date Cris Ross, co-chair Anita Somplasky, co-chair January 7, 2016 Certified Technology Comparison (CTC) Task Force.

Interoperability Roadmap Implementation, Certification, and Testing Workgroup Liz Johnson, Co-Chair Christopher Ross, Co-Chair February 13, 2015.

API Task Force Josh Mandel, Co-Chair Meg Marshall, Co-Chair December 4, 2015.

Wednesday, November 4 th 2015 Transitional Vocabulary Task Force Christopher Chute, Co-Chair Floyd Eisenberg, Co-Chair.

Presented by Eliot Christian, USGS Accessibility, usability, and preservation of government information (Section 207 of the E-Government Act) April 28,

Subtitle Title Date Cris Ross, co-chair Anita Somplasky, co-chair January 19, 2016 Certified Technology Comparison (CTC) Task Force Recommendations for.

Priority Research Direction (use one slide for each) Key challenges What will you do to address the challenges?Brief overview of the barriers and gaps.

Open Public Meeting February 28, pm – 5 pm 1 Ashburton Place, Boston MassHealth Demonstration to Integrate Care for Dual Eligibles.

Certified Technology Comparison Task Force Virtual Hearing Jan. 15, 2016 Todd Rothenhaus, MD SVP and Chief Medical Officer.

ACWG Charge Make recommendations to the Health IT Policy Committee on how HHS policies and programs can advance the evolution of a health IT infrastructure.

Virtual Hearing: Panel 3: Certified Health IT Vendors Certified Technology Comparison Task Force Peter N. Kaufman, MD Chief Medical Officer DrFirst.

Kathleen Blake, MD, MPH January 15, 2016 What’s In a Certified Health IT Comparison Tool: Quality Improvement and Alternative Payment Capabilities.

MyFloridaMarketPlace Quality Improvement Plan. Page 2 MFMP Quality Improvement Plan  The MFMP team has developed a quality improvement plan that addresses.

Draft – discussion only Advanced Health Models and Meaningful Use Workgroup February 17, 2015 Paul Tang, chair Joe Kimura, co-chair.

Update from the Faster Payments Task Force

Work Group Purpose Identify Barriers Share Best Practices

Health IT Policy Committee Workgroup Evolution

Priority Research Direction (use one slide for each)

IAASB-IESBA Coordination

Digital Preservation and Trusted Digital Repositories

Priority Research Direction (use one slide for each)

Presentation transcript:

Subtitle Title Date Cris Ross, co-chair Anita Somplasky, co-chair January 8, 2016 Certified Technology Comparison (CTC) Task Force

Agenda Opening Remarks Develop draft recommendations Next steps 1

How does this information relate to the task force charge? The task force is charged with providing recommendations on the benefits of, and resources needed to develop and maintain, a certified health IT comparison tool. This task force will: – Identify the different health IT needs for providers across the adoption and implementation spectrum, with particular focus on providers with limited resources and/or lower adoption rates – Identify user needs for a comparison tool – Identify gaps in the current tool marketplace, and the barriers to addressing those gaps 2

Benefits of certified health IT comparison tool General consensus that tool is needed Would be useful for providers: – Making first purchase of health IT product – Considering modular component purchase to meet new health IT needs – Part of ongoing IT strategy to determine what products are in the market and assess future purchase needs 3

Identify the different health IT needs for providers across the adoption and implementation spectrum Health IT purchasing needs vary dramatically by practice size, location, specialty, and provider type Tools should allow health IT products to be sorted (e.g., practice size, provider types) – Should be searchable by multiple categories at a time; not useful if searchable on only one criterion 4

Gaps in existing comparison tools Not meeting specific needs of small practice providers or specialists Comprehensive CHIT cost information not available for comparison Usability (workflow & safety) information is not available for comparison Need information in comparison tools beyond what is captured through certification program Vacuum of comparable information and comparison metrics for health IT products needed to meet evolving requirements*: products may not exist, or comparison metrics still need to be defined. 5 *Alternative payment models (APMs), Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS)

Cost Lack of transparency Most important for features that the provider must have or feels should be a standard part of any health IT product (e.g., regulatory, privacy & security, interoperability) How best to be presented? – Ranges – Base cost – Total cost of use (1/3/5 year) – how is this defined? 6

Usability Complex Subjective Are there certain requirements every system should meet? Need peer-to-peer and 3 rd party independent reviews 7

RESOURCES NEEDED 8

Resources needed Making data publically available may reach more audiences – Specialty organizations could bring relevant data to the providers Scoring/rating system Need both peer-to-peer user reviews and independent 3 rd party evaluation – Clear delineation of information source 9

Peer-to-Peer Input Survey or crowd-sourcing? Questions to consider: Are you a current system user? – Would you recommend the system? If not, what system might better meet your needs? Cost – Is cost consistent with what you were told when you purchased it? 10

Vendor Input Targeted market (e.g., hospital, small practice, specialty, etc.) on predefined areas Suitability for setting of care – Can this be condensed into attributes for specialties (e.g., face-to-face information, G codes)? Level of connectability – How many and who are the products you can connect to? References – Selected or complete list of users? Cost transparency 11

Neutral, independent authority Usability Cost transparency Ability of products to integrate with other systems 12

NEXT STEPS 13

Task Force Work Plan 14 Meeting DateMeeting Tasks Tue, Nov 17, :00am Overview of charge and plan Initial considerations from committee Overview of market research to date Tues, Dec 1, :30pm Review comparison framework Thurs, Dec 3, 2015 – Administrative Call Refine virtual hearing questions and panelists December 10, Draft Recommendations to HITSC Status of current TF work Expectations for what will be learned from the virtual hearing Thu, Jan 7, :00am Virtual Hearing Fri, Jan 8, :00pm Summarize hearing, begin drafting recommendations Fri, Jan, :00 am Virtual Hearing Tue, Jan, 19, :00pm Finalize recommendations January 20, Final Recs Joint HITPC/HITSC Presentation

15