Is Your Training Program REALLY Working? How to achieve the highest ROI for your training investment.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Building Viable Extension Programs People dont care what you know Until They know that you care.

Advertisements

This presentation will cover: Structure Units Differentiation Support.

Performance Management

Reasons for Evaluating Training Companies are investing millions of dollars in training programs to help gain a competitive advantage. To justify the costs.

 will be able to write a learning outcome from the student perspective  will understand the difference between writing about an activity and learning.

A SUCCESS THROUGH PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT WORKSHOP ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PACE UNIVERSITY Goal Setting and Establishing Performance.

Fred Barranger (N72) John Wishall (N721B) 24 February 2015

Practical approaches to return on investment Recap on Kirkpatrick Return – Self-assessed learning application – Use of organisational impact objectives.

DOCUMENTING YOUR HOPES & DREAMS Jim Moran Nancy Lucero.

Unit 10: Evaluating Training and Return on Investment 2009.

Evaluation of Training

Evaluating Training Programs E-learning Assignment Bret (one-t) Painter.

Chapter 6 Training Evaluation

RAISING AWARENESS: What have we learned? How far have we come? 1.Is diversity a problem? 2.Is diversity the sole responsibility of the HR Dept? 3.Is diversity.

Objectives and Indicators for MCH Programs

CHAPTER 9 TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT. Training and Development Training and DevelopmentTraining and Development –Represents an ongoing investment in employees.

Performance Management 2012 Creating and Modifying EWPS in Careers Office of Human Resources UMW: “Putting U First”

1 Review of NASBA Standards and Requirements Presented by Amy Greenhoe October 28, :30 Eastern Time.

HFT 2220 DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS. Development Programs Helps our employees get better every day Helps employees achieve their goals Puts the person in sync.

Chapter © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

Determining Essential Learnings or Essential Outcomes September 14, 2010.

A Security Training Program through Transformational Leadership and Practical Approaches Tanetta N. Isler Federal Information Systems Security Educators’

Instructional Design Eyad Hakami. Instructional Design Instructional design is a systematic process by which educational materials are created, developed,

Addictions Foundation of Manitoba Developing an evaluation of an accountability process in a provincial addiction agency David Patton, PhD. Addictions.

The eSSential L&D Shared Model. A VISION OF POSSIBILITIES.

Educational Solutions for Workforce Development Unit 8 – How to Evaluate Aim To provide an overview of how to effectively evaluate learning programmes.

Becoming a trainer – design of training. Aims and objectives Aim: to explore the design stage of the training cycle By the end of this workshop, you should.

Kirkpatrick’s Levels of Evaluation

Inspire Personal Skills Interpersonal & Organisational Awareness Developing People Deliver Creative Thinking & Problem Solving Decision Making, Prioritising,

Group HR Training & Development Welcome Good Evening 18 th September 2012 Sukanya Patwardhan.

RPPS Education Development Process Debbie Bender.

Evaluating Teacher Training changing classroom practices Richard Lambert, Ph.D.

Strategic Planning for Training Evaluation

P2e Driving Performance through Evaluation Richard McMorn PROGRAMMEIMPACTREACTIONREFLECTIONLEARNINGACTION An Impact.

Dr. Shulagna Sarkar Assistant Professor , Jt. Coordinator – PGDM – HRM

EVALUATION OF HRD PROGRAMS Jayendra Rimal. The Purpose of HRD Evaluation HRD Evaluation – the systematic collection of descriptive and judgmental information.

Penilaian Program Pembangunan Staf

Overview of Programs and Service Models at the Elementary Level Dr(s) Jennifer Scrivner & Georgann Toop RESA Model and Curriculum Course.

Evaluation of Strategic HRD Chapter 11. Why Evaluate ? The Purpose of Evaluation: Viewpoints & Challenges Evaluation is a core part of what makes us compete.

Chapter 6 Training Evaluation

Strategic Human resource Management Training & Developing.

The P Process Strategic Design

PLC Team Leader Meeting

8-1 Copyright ©2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Training the Workforce Chapter 8.

Guaranteed and Viable Curriculum

What is a Logic Model and What Does it Do?

Planit uses a simple but robust eight step process to promote the consistent formulation of quality internal communication plans. Eight step planning process.

Chapter © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.

Employee Development Human Resource Management. Employee Training: Trends n Four economic and demographic trends u Unskilled and undereducated youth u.

Evaluating Training The Kirkpatrick Model.

Training processes for extension education

Training Trainers and Educators Unit 8 – How to Evaluate

Delivery of Training & Monitoring & Evaluation

Building Better IT Leaders from the Bottom Up

9/12/2018 Product Knowledge.

BEST PRACTICES IN LIBRARY INSTRUCTION FORUM November 7, 2007

Chapter Six Training Evaluation.

Training Trainers and Educators Unit 8 – How to Evaluate

Learning & Development Technologies to Support Business Performance

SPIRIT OF HR.in TRAINING EVALUATION.

Orientation and Training

Orientation and Training

Trademark and Copyright Warning

Transitional Interim Pastor

Bellringer What do teachers do in a typical day?.

Education Theory and Practice B ETP520S

LINKS Peer to Peer Support Program

6 Chapter Training Evaluation.

Kirkpatrick’s Four Levels of Evaluation

Presentation transcript:

Is Your Training Program REALLY Working? How to achieve the highest ROI for your training investment

A Simple Review of the Basics Designing an effective training program Evaluating the Training Program

Designing the Training Program Step One: Identify specific measurable outcomes Step Two: Identify the behaviors that contribute to these defined results Step Three: Develop and deliver training to achieve these behaviors

WHAT actionable knowledge or skill is learned so that WHAT applied concept/behavior occurs so that WHAT measurable result happens?

Evaluating the Training Program Step One: Are the desired results being achieved? Step Two: Identify where the process is breaking down (Training or performance?) Step Three: If training, revisit content and delivery process.

Getting a Little More Advanced Performing an in-depth analysis of your training program Establishing performance accountabilities Measuring results

Evaluate Course Content Identify specific facts being taught Determine frequency of application (low- high) Determine relative complexity (low-high) Determine relative business impact (low- high) Assign priority compared with strategic business objectives

Review Delivery Methods Identify all delivery/reinforcement options currently being used Review for consistency Compare appropriateness of delivery method with priority level

Review Current Evaluation Methods Level One: Reaction - Did the participants like the program? Level Two: Learning - What knowledge, skills, etc, did the the participants gain? Level Three: Behavior - Do the participants behave (I.e., DO things) differently as a result of the program? Level Four: Results - What measurable results were gained from performance improvement? Donald Kirkpatrick, Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels (1994)

Establish clear accountabilities Manager: Help! I need training out here! Manager: I don’t have time for that. Just come out here and train them again! Manager: Hmmm. Good Point. How about them? Training: Tell them to do what I taught them to do! Training: Hey, who’s accountable here? Training: Now, we’re getting somewhere!

Contributed by: Suzanne Northcutt VP Training Gables Residential Trust 2859 Paces Ferry Road, Suite 1450 Atlanta GA