Bunch Numbering P. Baudrenghien AB/RF for the LHC/RF team.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
01/11/2002SNS Software Final Design Review1 V123S Event Link Encoder, Transmission System and PLL Receiver Thomas M. Kerner (BNL) SNS Global Controls.
Advertisements

Numerology (P. Baudrenghien) For each ring: Convention 1: The 400 MHz RF defines buckets, spaced by one RF period, and numbered from 1 to Convention.
8:16 SB 25ns dumped by RF; integrated lumi 0.6 nb-1. 9:14 BIC problem in TI8 and CMS recovering their tracker 10:09 Abort gap cleaning commissioning. 16:29.
REPHASING TESTS DURING THE TWO BEAM IMPEDANCE MD P. Baudrenghien, J. Noirjean, T. Mastoridis 10/26/2012LSWG meeting 1 Oct 7 th,18:00 – Oct 8 th, 04:00.
Note: most of the slides shown here are picked from CERN accelerator workshops. Please refer to those workshop for further understanding of the accelerator.
Measurements on phase stability at CTF3 Giulio Morpurgo / CERN IWLC 2010.
Beam commissioning strategy Global machine checkout Essential 450 GeV commissioning System/beam commissioning Machine protection commissioning.
Friday, h10: Stable beams at 1.38 TeV. 09h03: Beam dump.  One bunch dropped too much in intensity and gave BPMS interlock (dump protection). 10h36:
RF de-bunching problem  The Beam Phase module measures the phase of each individual bunch and makes an average that is passed to the Low Level for updating.
Wednesday 12 th September Pumping, removal of vacuum equipment from tunnel in the morning TOTEM & ALFA, RP movement tests: OK 11:50 pre-cycle started,
The TIMING System … …as used in the PS accelerators.
Updates on RF synchronization and fast trigger distribution A. Butterworth, H. Damerau, W. Hofle Acknowledgements: T. Bohl, S. Doebert, I. Kozsar, J. Molendijk,
LHC Beam Dump System Technical Audit Trigger Synchronisation Unit.
Distribution of machine parameters over GMT in the PS, SPS and future machines J. Serrano, AB-CO-HT TC 6 December 2006.
● 08:30 Loaded by mistake squeeze function to 2 m  Dumped beams ● 10:30-13:00 Test of new algorithm for long. Emittance blow-up to minimize oscillations.
S. De Santis “Measurement of the Beam Longitudinal Profile in a Storage Ring by Non-Linear Laser Mixing” - BIW 2004 May, 5th Measurement of the Beam Longitudinal.
07-JUL-2003LEADE / JW1 Satellite bunches in the LHC Satellite “definition” Satellite luminosity Satellite detection & tolerances J. Wenninger AB/OP.
PSB Injection Sequencing in the Linac 4 Era PSB Injection Sequencing in the Linac 4 era Alfred BLAS 1 Synthesized information from: M.E. Angoletta, P.
CONTENT: Beam characteristics and parameters Filling schemes Operational settings OP procedure and COLL setting Planning Shift breakdown To define the.
Sophie BARON, PH-ESSLEADE - 07 Nov  TTC system status reminder  Upgrade principle  [Some] details about the infrastructure  Practical implementation.
ION COMMISSIONING REVISITED 1 Thanks to: John Jowett, Walter Venturini. Matteo Solfaroli.
Measurement opportunities with the LHC transverse damper W. Hofle, D. Valuch.
Booster Low Level Modules, Timing and some Measurements.
Timing Requirements for Spallation Neutron Sources Timing system clock synchronized to the storage ring’s revolution frequency. –LANSCE: MHz.
COGGING MEETING Cogging Semi-Fine Adjust without collisions? Fine Adjust When? Cogging Meeting – Sophie BARON.
ADT re-commissioning after LS1 A. Butterworth, W. Höfle, F. Killing, G. Kotzian, T. Levens, D. Valuch with many thanks to BE/OP LBOC, ADT re-commissioning.
W. Hofle LIU-SPS Meeting SPS BA2 Damper LS1 Progress and plans reported by W. Hofle LIU-SPS Meeting G. Kotzian T. Levens D. Valuch.
High Bandwidth damper Input from W.Hölfe Acknowledgement to all collaborators at SLAC, INFN, LBNL and CERNL Presentation of recent MD results (J.Cesaratto):
BEPCII Transverse Feedback System Yue Junhui Beam Instrumentation Group IHEP , Beijing.
ADT Tune Measurement F. Dubouchet, W. Hofle, D. Valuch Acknowledgement: R. Calaga, F. Roncarolo, E. Bravin, shift crews New developments and tests on August.
BEPC II TIMING SYSTEM EPICS Seminar Presented by Ma zhenhan IHEP 20.August 2002.
LHC RF re- commissioning for run 2 with planned operation at 6.5 TeV/c and 0.55 A DC current P. Baudrenghien BE-RF with contributions from J.E. Muller,
POWER REQUIREMENTS FOR THE LHC HARMONIC CAVITIES WITH THE FULL-DETUNING SCHEME P. Baudrenghien, T. Mastoridis, CERN BE-RF 2nd LHC Harmonic Cavity meeting,
Monday :00 Injection for physics fill # :00 Stable beams fill #1816, luminosity ~1.2x1033 cm-2s-1 11:08 Beams dumped. QPS trigger on detector.
Preliminary MEIC Ion Beam Formation Scheme Jiquan Guo for the MEIC design study team Oct. 5,
Sophie BARON, PH-ESSLEADE, 15/06/06 1 TTC upgrade Status May 2006  Overview  AB/RF optical links  Receiver crate  Status and schedules  Documentation.
SPS proton beam for AWAKE E. Shaposhnikova 13 th AWAKE PEB Meeting With contributions from T. Argyropoulos, T. Bohl, H. Bartosik, S. Cettour.
Other Utilities of ALBA LLRF
Thesis: Introduction Study for a failsafe trigger generation system for the Large Hadron Collider beam dump kicker magnets prepared by Martin Rampl.
Filling Schemes for the 2010 Heavy Ion Run Updated (3 rd iteration) version of BCWG presentation initially on 28 September, updated after discussions with.
SPS 200 MHz LLRF upgrade Part 2: Implementation Philippe Baudrenghien, Grégoire Hagmann,
Beam time structures 1 At any particular instance of time there will be only one kind of beam in the MI. It will be either protons or anti-protons. The.
Saturday 11.9 ● From Friday – Minimum required crossing angle is 100  rad in 2010 – Plenty of aperture at triplets: > 13  (n1 > 10) – Can stay with 170.
Beam loss and radiation in the SPS for higher intensities and injection energy G. Arduini 20 th November 2007 Acknowledgments: E. Shaposhnikova and all.
AWAKE synchronization with SPS Andy Butterworth, Thomas Bohl (BE/RF) Thanks to: Urs Wehrle (BE/RF), Ioan Kozsar, Jean-Claude Bau (BE/CO)
B2B Transfer System for FAIR (Conceptual Design [1]) Presenter: Jiaoni Bai Professor: Oliver Kester Supervisor: David Ondreka, Dietrich Beck.
Summary of ions measurements in 2015 and priorities for 2016 studies E. Shaposhnikova 3/02/2016 Based on input from H. Bartosik, T. Bohl, B. Goddard, V.
RF Commissioning D. Jacquet and M. Gruwé. November 8 th 2007D. Jacquet and M. Gruwé2 RF systems in a few words (I) A transverse dampers system ACCELERATING.
HP-PS beam acceleration and machine circumference A.LachaizeLAGUNA-LBNO General meeting Paris 18/09/13 On behalf of HP-PS design team.
RF acceleration and transverse damper systems
Commissioning the LHC LLRF
RF-TTC Joint News LEADE, June 2008
-9:00: Test IP transverse adjustment (CMS) and optics verification.
MD2036: UFO dynamics studies and UFO fast detection
Friday 07:00 Power glitch on the EDF network. Point 8 affected.
Upcoming longitudinal MDs
RF and Sequences Andy Butterworth BE/RF
PSB Injection scheme in the Linac 4 era
Strategy for long-term support of the TTC system
Week 46 Week 46: Machine coordinators: Roger Bailey – Gianluigi Arduini Main aims of the week: Stable beams with ions Scheduled stop for ion source refill.
Fill 1410 revisited Peak luminosity 1.4e32 Beam current 2.68/2.65 e13
BI cont. *** Summary Matching Monitor test *** We only had ~15minutes of inject and dump, but managed to see a profile with ~9e9 p (!)
Programme for Saturday 10 July
Wednesday 10:00 test of the un-squeeze to 90 m at 4 TeV.
Beam dynamics requirements after LS2
N. Terunuma (KEK) ILC2010, Beijing, March 29th, /2/28.
LHC Fast Timing Commissioning
Friday 14th September 03:15 Beta* at 1 km. Optics measurements, see yesterday. 07:00 Dump. 08:00 Refill with 3 nominal bunches for high beta. 11:15 Beams.
Tuesday 20 September 2011.
PSB – Linac 4 Interfacing
Presentation transcript:

Bunch Numbering P. Baudrenghien AB/RF for the LHC/RF team

March 11, 2007 LHCCWG meeting 2 Numerology For each ring: Convention 1: The 400 MHz RF defines buckets, spaced by one RF period, and numbered from 1 to Convention 2: Bucket 1 is the first bucket after the 3  s long abort gap (defined from bucket to 35640) For 25 ns operation the bunches will occupy buckets 1, 11, 21 etc. with gaps occurring every PS or SPS kicker gap. For 43 bunch operation the bunches will occupy buckets 1, 811, 1621, etc. (see LHC-OP-ES-0003 rev 1.0 for the different schemes).

March 11, 2007 LHCCWG meeting 3 For 25ns operation the bunches will occupy buckets 1, 11, 21 etc. with gaps occurring every PS or SPS kicker gap. (see Figure 1 above reproduced from LHC-OP-ES-0003 rev 1.0).

March 11, 2007 LHCCWG meeting 4 For 43 bunch operation the bunches will occupy buckets 1, 811, 1621, etc. (see Figure 3 above reproduced from LHC- OP-ES-0003 rev 1.0).

March 11, 2007 LHCCWG meeting 5 Revolution Frequency or Orbit For each ring: The revolution frequency (F rev or orbit) is a train of pulses, with one 5 ns long pulse per turn. This pulse “points” to bucket 1. The revolution frequency is obtained by dividing the RF by At a given place in the machine, and at a given beam energy (that is fixed RF frequency) the delay between the pulse and the passage of a bunch in bucket 1 will be fixed from run to run Drift during the ramp: Signals remain in phase with the corresponding beam in IP4 (RF cavities). During the acceleration, the revolution frequency increases by 2.2 ppm for protons ( MHz) and 14 ppm for Pb ( MHz). [See LHC Radio-Frequency Swing, P. Baudrenghien, 14 th Leade meeting, Dec 15 th, 2003]. At a given place, but varying energy (frequency) the F rev -bunch delay will drift during the acceleration ramp due to the difference between signal transmission delay and the beam time of flight. For protons we have 6.5 ps/km, for ions ps/km. Not a problem.

March 11, 2007 LHCCWG meeting 6 Bunch Clock For each ring: The Bunch Clock is a square wave obtained by dividing the RF by 10. The divider is synchronized on the Revolution Frequency (see page 8) At a given place in the machine, and at a given beam energy (RF frequency) the delay between the edge of the Bunch Clock and the passage of a bunch will be fixed from run to run Drift during the ramp: During the proton ramp the Bunch Clock frequency increases by 86.8 Hz (protons) and 550 Hz (Pb). At a given place, but varying energy (frequency) the edge will drift with respect to the bunch. (Same figures as for the Revolution Frequency pulses.)

March 11, 2007 LHCCWG meeting 7 Collision Pattern Ring 1 w.r.t. ring 2: While for each ring bucket 1 and its revolution frequency are locked together, the two bunch patterns can be “rotated” with respect to each other so as to move or set the collision points This is usually done before the injection process with collision (and crossing) points defined before filling. This is the preferred method as it keeps crossing points fixed from injection to physics It can also be done after injection by changing the phase of one RF system (and thereby the corresponding beam) with respect to the other (Machine Development) Convention 3: bunches in bucket 1 of the two rings collide in IP1 (or any other IP. To be agreed now…)

March 11, 2007 LHCCWG meeting 8 Clock Generation All signals are generated in SR4 They are transmitted to CMS (point 5) and BT (dumps) directly And they are transmitted to the other experiments and BI via CCR (optical splitter 1:4) Injection pulses are sent directly to the kickers (not shown above)

March 11, 2007 LHCCWG meeting 9 Reference Clock Generation The Ref Bunch Clock is a stable, constant frequency square wave at MHz (7 TeV proton) obtained by asynchronous division (1:10) of a 400 MHz Reference ( MHz). This 400 MHz Reference is generated by a commercial Low Noise Frequency Synthesizer On the flat top (7 TeV), but before physics starts, the 400 MHz RF1 and RF2 (and the corresponding beams) are rephased onto this 400 MHz Reference. The Bunch Clocks 1 and 2 follow automatically But the Ref Bunch Clock can still be off by 1 to MHz. To fix that the Ref Bunch Clock will be slowly phase shifted by the proper number of 400 MHz periods to bring it in phase with the bunch When physics starts, the delay between the edge of the Ref Bunch Clock and the passage of a bunch will be thus fixed from run to run

March 11, 2007 LHCCWG meeting 10 Availability of clocks during runs see also edms v1, TTC System Upgrade, S. Baron, Sept 29, /35640 and 1/10 dividers are resynchronized at each filling, once, before the first SPS-LHC transfer During resynchronization the output signal disappears for ~1 ms Signal presence and validity is then guaranteed, from shortly before filling until beam dump After beam dump it is not excluded that the RF manipulate its equipment (switch a crate off/on) and signal may disappear. Experiments should make sure that no manual reset is needed in that case Presence of signals is not guaranteed outside physics run due to maintenance needed on the RF equipment, or if basic control facilities are lacking. That applies in particular to shutdown periods The AB/RF group is responsible for the transmission up to the Fiber Optic receivers installed in the experiments (including on-call service). In return the experiments will make for an easy access to this equipment and help implement remote acquisition of the status of the Fiber Optic RX (optical power, presence and frequency of detected RF signal) so that AB/OP and AB/RF can quickly diagnose the transmission

March 11, 2007 LHCCWG meeting 11 Installation planning RF Synchronization equipment being installed/commissioned in SR4 Expect all running by mid-April

March 11, 2007 LHCCWG meeting 12 RF Synchro: Functionalities Synchronization of the SPS-LHC bunch into bucket transfer A train of pulses at the Fiducial Frequency F c (= F revLHC /7 = F revSPS /27 = 1.6 kHz) is sent to the SPS for synchronization By displacing this train by x RF periods the transfer will end-up in bucket+x -> Mechanism to select the injection bucket. Transparent to the SPS We have only one “hardware” bucket selector for both rings It is re-synchronized on two different F rev for the 2 rings -> Mechanism to rotate one ring with respect to the other (before injection) Generation of beam synchronous signals: 40 MHz bunch clocks, revolution frequencies, injection pulses

March 11, 2007 LHCCWG meeting 13 This divider will adjust the relative position of ring 2 vs ring 1. It must be adjusted only once at start-up This sets the RF frequencies before and at injection By changing the programmable delay in the bucket selector one chooses the LHC bucket for transfer. It will be adjusted continuously by OP to change the collision point or for multiple-batch injections. This module generates the pulses sent to the injection kickers LHC LLRF RF Synchronization

March 11, 2007 LHCCWG meeting 14 Commisioning Procedure Label Bucket 1 Beam 1 RF sets all its dividers (VTUs) to offset 0 (ring 1) Inject a single bunch pilot from SPS in ring 1 By definition: This pilot is in bucket 1 Get the pilot to make a few turns (OP) Adjust delay in the F rev sent to the beam dump. Observe our signal at the beam dump location. Compare to bunch position. Adjust. (BT). The abort gap ends just before the passage of pilot (Convention 2) Adjust delay in the 40 MHz/F rev clock received by the experiments (EXP). Best done by various EXP as RF has only 1 signal for all EXP but CMS

March 11, 2007 LHCCWG meeting 15 Commissioning Procedure Label Bucket 1 Beam 2 RF sets all its dividers (VTUs) to offset 0 (ring 2) Inject a single bunch pilot from SPS in ring 2 By definition: This pilot is in bucket 1 Get the pilot to make a few turns (OP) Adjust delay in the F rev sent to the beam dump. Observe our signal at the beam dump location. Compare to bunch position. Adjust. (BT). The abort gap ends just before the passage of pilot (Convention 2) Adjust delay in the 40 MHz/F rev clock received by the experiments (EXP).

March 11, 2007 LHCCWG meeting 16 Problem: Convention 3 is NOT respected. Bunches in bucket 1 must collide in IP1 -> we must rotate ring 2 with respect to ring 1 BI or EXP measures the time difference of passages of the 2 pilots (ring 1 vs ring 2) In IP1 (or another IP) The RF adjusts the VTU ring 2 thereby changing the collision point of the 2 pilots on next injection -> repeat until collision in IP (within ns). This adjustment does not change the position of the bunch ring 2 with respect to the F rev (orbit). (When triggering on F rev the bunch does not move). Conclusion: The RF will adjust the relative positions of the 2 rings but we need a measurement from BI or EXP. This measurement must come from a PU that sees both beams.

March 11, 2007 LHCCWG meeting 17 FAQ Q: Bunches in bucket 1 of both rings meet in IP1 and IP5. Can this be changed ? A: No…but if we want to have single bunch collisions in another IP we should inject in a different bucket of ring 2 (for example) using the bucket selector (page 13). For example for collision in IP2: Inject pilot in bucket 1 ring 1, and pilot in bucket /4 = 8911 ring 2. Reminder: For its Phase Loop to work properly the RF must be told in what bucket the bunch is injected via the Bunch Mask Pattern. By delaying the ring 2 injection bucket by ¼ turn we displace the collision point by 1 octant

March 11, 2007 LHCCWG meeting 18 Q: Should we count in 400 MHz bucket or in 40 MHz bunch clock? A: The RF Bucket Selector counts in RF periods but most hardware is designed for a minimum 25 ns spacing between bunches. So we can use both indexing: bucket 1 -> bunch clock period 1 bucket 11 -> bunch clock period 2 bucket 21 -> bunch clock period 3 …. bucket > bunch clock period 3564 or Q: How about the 43 bunch scheme. Will bunches be numbered 1 to 43? A: They should best be numbered in buckets (1, 811, 1621,…) or in bunch clocks (1, 82, 163, …)