Upcoming replacements for NAD83, NAVD88 and IGLD85 Dru Smith, NGS Richard Snay, NGS Thomas Landon, NGS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lecture 15 – Geodetic Datums 23 February 2010 GISC3325.
Advertisements

GRAV-D Gravity for the Re-definition of the American Vertical Datum
Federal Geodetic Control Subcommittee Update Federal Geographic Data Committee Coordination Group Meeting Tuesday, November 3, 2009 Juliana Blackwell Director,
Better Positions and Improved Access to the National Spatial Reference System  Multi-Year CORS Solution  National Adjustment of 2011  New NGS Datasheet.
Refinements to the North American Datum of 1983 Multi-Year CORS Solution and the National Adjustment of 2011 Dr. Neil D. Weston Chief, Spatial Reference.
Modernizing the Geopotential Datum: Replacing NAVD 88 Daniel R. Roman, Ph.D.
Geographic Datums Y X Z The National Imagery and Mapping Agency (NIMA) and the Defense Mapping School Reviewed by:____________ Date:_________ Objective:
Juliana Blackwell, Director National Geodetic Survey, NOAA
45 th Annual Alaska Surveying & Mapping Conference February 21-25, 2011 Hilton Anchorage Hotel Impact of Airborne Gravity Surveys on Geoid Modeling in.
International Great Lakes Datum Overview Presented at a Height Modernization Program meeting January 9, 2014 by David Conner Geodetic Advisor to the State.
NGS HSRP Update Ronnie Taylor, Acting Director National Geodetic Survey, NOAA October 13, 2010.
GRAV-D Project A Height Mod. Project September 9, 2009 Fairbanks, Alaska September 9, 2009 Mark C. Eckl (Presenter – Chief, Observation and Analysis Division)
Vicki Childers, Daniel Winester, Mark Eckl, Dru Smith, Daniel Roman
The Future of the National Geodetic Survey Dr. Dru A. Smith Chief Geodesist, NGS/NOAA CSRC, Coordinating Council Spring Meeting La Jolla, CA April 28,
Advances and Best Practices in Airborne Gravimetry from the U.S. GRAV-D Project Theresa M. Damiani 1, Vicki Childers 1, Sandra Preaux 2, Simon Holmes 3,
A New & Improved National Spatial Reference System Refinements of the North American Datum of 1983 through the Multi-Year CORS Solution and the National.
GRAV-D Project Update Vicki Childers, Ph.D. GRAV-D Project Manager.
The Gravity for the Redefinition of the American Vertical Datum (GRAV-D) Project Dr. Theresa Diehl Research Geodesist Webinar Given on May 9, 2011.
Who Needs New Datums? NGS Says… ftp://ftp.ngs.noaa.gov/pub/marti Marti Ikehara California Geodetic Advisor, Sacramento.
GPS and Geodetic News You Can Use David Conner Geodetic Advisor to the State of Ohio National Geodetic Survey, NOAA 2008 Ohio GIS Conference September.
2010 Hydrographic Services Review Panel David Steele, PLS DNR Geodetic Survey Director & Spatial Reference Center of Washington.
Geoid Modeling at NOAA Dru A. Smith, Ph.D. National Geodetic Survey National Ocean Service, NOAA November 13, 2000.
Gravity for the Redefinition of the American Vertical: GRAV-D Anchorage, Alaska February 22, Alaska Surveying and Mapping Conference Renee.
GRAV-D the International Great Lakes Datum and a Tale of Subsidence Presented at a meeting of the Great Lakes Regional Height Modernization Consortium.
The National Geodetic Survey 10 Year Plan Mission, Vision and Strategy
Geoid Height Models at NGS Dan Roman Research Geodesist.
Integrated and Collaborative Organizations Create Geospatial Solutions Geospatial Solutions by DBZ Achieving Great Heights: Toward a Better Vertical Reference.
Towards the unification of the vertical datums over the North American continent D Smith 1, M Véronneau 2, D Roman 1, J L Huang 2, YM Wang 1, M Sideris.
Federal Geodetic Control Subcommittee Update Federal Geographic Data Committee Coordination Group Meeting Tuesday, November 3, 2009 Juliana Blackwell Director,
Height Modernization Making the Most of the Indiana HARN and the INDOT CORS March 14, 2007 By William A. Schmidt, PE, LS Manager of Aerial Engineering,
20 FEB 2009 Salt Lake City, UTACSM-MARLS-UCLS-WFPS Conference 2009 Geoid Modeling, GRAV-D and Height Mod.
Who Needs New Datums? NGS Says… ftp://ftp.ngs.noaa.gov/pub/marti Marti Ikehara California Geodetic Advisor, Sacramento.
Integration of Future Geoid Models Dan Roman and Yan M. Wang NOAA/NGS Silver Spring, MD USA December 3-4, 2008.
The GRAV-D Project and The Future of NAD 83 and NAVD 88 A briefing for FEMA leadership Dru Smith, Chief Geodesist NOAA’s National Geodetic Survey.
NOAA’s National Geodetic Survey USGG2009 & GEOID09: New geoid height models for surveying/GIS ACSM-MARLS-UCLS-WFPS Conference FEB 2009 Salt Lake.
The National Geodetic Survey Gravity Program Benefits and Opportunities Juliana Blackwell, Director National Geodetic Survey (NGS)
NOAA’s National Geodetic Survey United States Height Reference System Modernization Plan Ottawa, Canada April 21, 2009 Ronnie L. Taylor Chief, State Advisor.
Status and Plans of the National Geodetic Survey’s Gravity Database Update Daniel R. Roman and Yan Ming Wang October 13-14, 2005 Austin, Texas.
New Vertical Datum: plans, status, GRAV-D update FGCS San Diego, CA. July 11, 2011 Mark C. Eckl NGS Chief of Observation and Analysis Division, New Vertical.
GRAV-D Part II : Examining airborne gravity processing assumptions with an aim towards producing a better gravimetric geoid Theresa Diehl*, Sandra Preaux,
Establishing A Gravity Plan Ohio Department of Transportation October 14, 2011.
Use of High-Rate CORS for Airborne Positioning Theresa M. Damiani NOAA- National Geodetic Survey, Geosciences Research Division CGSIC 2013, Nashville 1b.
Vicki Childers National Geodetic Survey GRAV-D: The Gravity for the Re- definition of the American Vertical Datum ACSM 2009 Workshop.
MISSISSIPPI HEIGHT MODERNIZATION PROJECT JUNE 11, 2009 By Ronnie L. Taylor Chief, Geodetic Advisor Branch NOAA, National Geodetic Survey.
Redefinition of the U.S. Vertical Datum: Replacing NAVD 88
A Brief Introduction to Gravity UT Intro to Geophysics Class March 10, 2009 Austin-Bergstrom Airport Theresa Diehl, Ph.D. Research Geodesist NOAA National.
Revolution in Earth Measurement Traditional Surveying uses benchmarks as reference points Global Positioning uses fixed GPS receivers as reference points.
The Height Modernization Program in the United States and the Future of the National Vertical Reference Frame 1 Renee Shields National Geodetic Survey,
Benefits of the New Reference Frames Dru Smith Joe Evjen 60 minutes April 13, Geospatial Summit1.
Height Modernization in the U.S.: Implementing a Vertical Datum Referenced to a Gravimetric Geoid Model Renee Shields National Geodetic Survey, U.S.A.
Modernizing the NSRS: The NGS 10 year plan Dru Smith, Chief Geodesist NOAA’s National Geodetic Survey Federal Geospatial Summit12010 May 11.
Progress toward the Geopotential Reference Frame Dru Smith Dan Roman Vicki Childers 45 minutes April 13, Geospatial Summit1.
GRAV-D G ravity for the R e-definition of the A merican V ertical D atum Ronnie L. Taylor Chief, State Advisor Branch 1315 East West Highway, RM 9557 Silver.
The Delta Levees Program
Who Needs New Datums? NGS Says…
National Geodetic Survey Update Hydrographic Services Review Panel Honolulu, HI May 4, 2011 Juliana Blackwell Director National Geodetic Survey.
Height Modernization Activities at NGS Christine Gallagher National Partner Meeting April 30, 2014.
Foreign Data Distribution: On the public release of data, stored in NGS databases, for locations outside of the USA Dru Smith Chief Geodesist, NGS Briefing.
Geodetic Applications of GNSS within the United States Dr. Gerald L. Mader National Geodetic Survey NOS/NOAA Silver Spring, Maryland USA Munich Satellite.
GEOID03 in Louisiana and Alaska Dr. Yan M Wang and Dr. Daniel R Roman Geodesist, NGS/NOAA ACSM Annual Conference and Technology Exhibition Orlando, FL.
Lecture 15 – Geodetic Datums 5 March 2009 GISC3325.
Federal Geodetic Control Subcommittee Update Federal Geographic Data Committee Coordination Group Meeting 11 January 2011 Ronnie Taylor Acting Director,
Proposal for a comprehensive vertical datum for North America, Central America and the Caribbean Dru Smith, Dan Roman, Vicki Childers, Mark Eckl, Monica.
GRAV-D: NGS Gravity for the Re- definition of the American Vertical Datum Project V. A. Childers, D. R. Roman, D. A. Smith, and T. M. Diehl* U.S. National.
Overview of Datums Commonly Used in Michigan and the National Spatial Reference System Michigan Society of Professional Surveyors 70 th Annual Meeting.
The Future of the National Geodetic Survey Dr. Dru A. Smith Chief Geodesist, NGS/NOAA NGS Convocation Silver Spring, MD October 24, 2005.
Overview of New Datums A webinar for Monthly Height Mod Meeting Dru Smith Chief Geodesist NOAA’s National Geodetic Survey March 12, 2015Webinar for Monthly.
Subsidence Monitoring and the GRAV-D project Dru Smith, Dan Roman, Daniel Winester, Mark Eckl NOAA’s National Geodetic Survey Subsidence Workshop -
Some recent decisions: NOAA’s National Geodetic Survey
Advances and Best Practices in Airborne Gravimetry from the U. S
Presentation transcript:

Upcoming replacements for NAD83, NAVD88 and IGLD85 Dru Smith, NGS Richard Snay, NGS Thomas Landon, NGS

Outline History of North American Datums Current Issues Canadian and USA perspectives Future

History of North American Datums Horizontal Datums NAD 27 NAD 83

History of North American Datums Vertical Datums NGVD 29 NAVD 88 CGVD 28 Puerto Rico : PRVD 02 American Virgin Islands: VIVD 09 Hawaii? Nothing official… Not North America, but U.S. territories: ASVD 02 NMVD 03 GUVD 04

History of North American Datums Great Lakes Datums NGVD 29 NAVD 88 CGVD 28 Puerto Rico : PRVD 02 American Virgin Islands: VIVD 09 Hawaii? Nothing official… Not North America, but U.S. territories: ASVD 02 NMVD 03 GUVD 04

Vertical Datum – History (Orthometric Heights) 1807 – 1996 –Defined and Accessed – Leveling/Passive Marks –NAVD 88: 600,000+ Marks NGS detects hundreds moved/destroyed every year How many go undetected? –Post-Glacial-Rebound, Subsidence, Tectonics, Frost-Heave – lots of motion out there!

Why this briefing? NGS recently acquired a new airborne gravimeter –Intended to support GRAV-D GRAV-D is an ambitious new plan for NGS to accomplish part of its mission –Up front costs –Long-term savings –A huge contribution to GEOSS –Part of the NGS, NOS and NOAA missions

The first, middle and last point of GRAV-D: Gravity and Heights are inseparably connected Or (to borrow from a common bumper sticker): –No gravity, no height –Know gravity, know height Q: What is GRAV-D? A: Gravity to determine heights accurately

Dominant Height Systems in use in the USA Orthometric –Colloquially, but incorrectly, called “height above mean sea level” –On most topographic maps –Is a >99% successful method to tell which way water will flow Ellipsoid –Almost exclusively from GPS –Won’t tell water flow / floodplains Dynamic –Directly proportional to potential energy : always tells which way water will flow –Dynamic heights are not lengths! –More on this later… Requires Gravity Requires Gravity

Heights Most heights need to refer to some “reference surface” The reference surface is part of the “vertical datum”

Orthometric Height (H) The distance along the plumb line from the geoid up to the point of interest H Earth’s Surface The Geoid (Shape and location determined by Earth’s gravity field)

Ellipsoid Height (h) The distance along the ellipsoidal normal from some ellipsoid up to the point of interest h h Earth’s Surface An Ellipsoid (Shape and location are mathematical abstractions) Another Ellipsoid (Shape and location are mathematical abstractions)

Geoid Undulation (N) The distance along the ellipsoidal normal from some ellipsoid up to the geoid h H N The Geoid A chosen Ellipsoid H ≈ h-N

Vertical Datums in the USA Ellipsoid heights:NAD 83 Orthometric heights:NAVD 88

Vertical Datum – History (Orthometric Heights) 1807 – 1996 –Defined and Accessed – Leveling/Passive Marks –NAVD 88: 600,000+ Marks NGS detects hundreds moved/destroyed every year How many go undetected? –Post-Glacial-Rebound, Subsidence, Tectonics, Frost-Heave – lots of motion out there!

Leveling to define and use NAVD 88 Leveling –Measure geometric changes point to point –Correct for multiple physical effects –Attempts to yield differential geopotential (energy) levels –Convert from geopotential to dynamic height or orthometric height –Very time consuming and tedious

Why isn’t NAVD 88 good enough anymore? The GPS era brought fast, accurate ellipsoid heights – naturally this drove a desire for fast, accurate orthometric heights Leveling the country can not be done again –Too costly in time and money Leveling yields cross-country error build-up Leveling requires leaving behind marks –Bulldozers and crustal motion do their worst NAVD 88 H=0 level is known not to be the geoid –Biases, Tilts

Orthometric Height (H) The distance along the plumb line from the geoid up to the point of interest H Earth’s Surface The Geoid NAVD 88 reference level H (NAVD 88) Errors in NAVD 88 : ~50 cm ave, 100 cm CONUS tilt, 1-2 meters ave in Alaska NO tracking

Fast, Accurate Orthometric Heights GPS already gives fast accurate ellipsoid heights If the geoid were determined to highest accuracy… Voila… Fast, accurate orthometric heights –Anywhere in the nation –Time-changes to H determined through: GPS on CORS (h changes) Absolute gravity spot checks (N changes)

Intermission… To get fast, accurate, inexpensive orthometric heights, all pieces are in place except one: –A well known, and time-tracked geoid model Thus “GRAV-D” –Gravity for the Re-definition of the American Vertical Datum –Get good gravity once (airborne gravity) –Track gravity on a broad scale over time (absolute gravity) –Replace NAVD 88 with a sustainable, accurate, inexpensive vertical datum –Up front cost is “high”, but pay off is sustainability at low- cost!

Official NGS policy as of Nov 14, 2007 –$38.5M over 10 years Airborne Gravity Snapshot Absolute Gravity Tracking Re-define the Vertical Datum of the USA by 2017 Q: What is GRAV-D? A: A Plan (released Dec 2007)

Mission of NGS To define, maintain and provide access to the National Spatial Reference System to meet our nation’s economic, social, and environmental needs And To be a world leader in geospatial activities, including the development and promotion of standards, specifications, and guidelines.

Missions and GRAV-D NGS can neither fulfill their mission, nor contribute to the NOS and NOAA missions without modernizing the vertical datum component of the NSRS Only GRAV-D offers a sustainable, accurate method for doing this

National Scale has 2 parts: –High Resolution Snapshot (Campaign I) –Low Resolution Movie (Campaign II) Local/Regional Scale has 1 part: –High Resolution Movie (Campaign III) GRAV-D

National High Resolution Snapshot –Predominantly through airborne gravity –With Absolute Gravity for ties and checks –Relative Gravity for expanding local regions where airborne shows significant mismatch with existing terrestrial

Ship gravity Terrestrial gravity New Orleans km gravity gaps along coast

GRAV-D: Campaign I Phase I, Part 1 - Testing Test varieties of flight heights / speeds / spacings for optimal ratio of $$ : g-accuracy

GRAV-D: Campaign I Phase I, Part 2 - Testing Test area for proof of concept to define vertical datum from GPS + gravimetric geoid PR/VI cost would run ~$300k

GRAV-D: Campaign I Phase II - Operations In a carefully chosen order…

GRAV-D: Campaign II “Monitor Gravity over time” National Low Resolution “Movie” of gravity –Epochal (annual?) absolute gravity re- measurements at key areas –GRACE / GRACE-follow-on for more global signatures

GRAV-D: Campaign II Monitor Gravity (“Low Resolution Movie”) Measure gravity at each point, annually. Model gravity changes over time. Convert to geoid changes over time. Use with tracked GPS stations (CORS) to get orthometric height changes over time.

GRAV-D: Campaign III (Local/Regional Surveys) Regional High Resolution Movie –Certain regions may require repetitive surveys to model the diversity of mass changes occurring locally –Can not be done with NGS personnel as is –Survey Types: Gravity (absolute + relative) Co-located GPS+Leveling in space/time –Minimally constrained

GRAV-D Airborne –Critically needed as a one-time high resolution “snapshot” of gravity in the USA As opposed to the thousands of surveys, with hundreds of instruments and operators over dozens of years –One time survey Absolute –Cyclical for episodic checks in fixed locales –Co-incident with foundation CORS? –Two field meters plus one fixed SG Relative –More frequently attached to “Height Mod” surveys

GRAV-D Status 2007 Feb 12: NGS Releases Draft of 10 year plan (first public reference to re- definition of vertical datum redefinition) 2007 Apr 10-11: NGS Holds Gravity Seminar at Corbin 2007 Oct 25: NGS Acquires Airborne Gravimeter 2007 Nov 14: NGS Releases Final Version of the GRAV-D plan 2007 Nov 15-17: NGS Trains Airborne Gravimeter Operators 2008 Jan 9: NGS Finalizes 10 year plan (codifying re-definition of vertical datum through GRAV-D) 2008 Jan 14-Feb 15: Initial Flights of Airborne Gravimeter in Gulf Coast Coming soon: 2008 March: NGS seeking MOU’s with Federal, State and Academic partners to assist in funding and executing GRAV-D

Should anyone lose sight of why NGS cares about knowing and maintaining accurate heights…

Questions/Comments? Dr. Dru Smith Chief Geodesist, National Geodetic Survey x 144

Extra Slides

Airborne Meter First build (Oct 2007) Initial road tests (Nov 2007) Unit is TAGS (Turn-key Airborne Gravity System) Sensor, Software and Training sold as a package from Micro-G/LaCoste Has been flight tested and proven as the most accurate airborne meter available

Next Steps NGS has released the GRAV-D plan as its official way forward to fulfill the orthometric height portion of its mission Airborne “snapshot” –10 years –$38.5M (PPBES, MOUs, ???) Absolute “movie” (time tracking) –$200k (base) –This is the annual cost of sustaining fast, inexpensive, cm-accurate orthometric heights in a dynamic USA from GPS and a geoid model

Mission of NOS To provide products, services, and information that promote safe navigation, support coastal communities, sustain marine ecosystems, and mitigate coastal hazards.

Mission of NOAA To understand and predict changes in the Earth’s environment and conserve and manage coastal and marine resources to meet our nation’s economic, social and environmental needs