Beam Interaction with gas filled RF Cavities Alvin Tollestrup 11-30-2007 BNL Workshop.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Erdem Oz* USC E-164X,E167 Collaboration Plasma Dark Current in Self-Ionized Plasma Wake Field Accelerators
Advertisements

Beam Test of a High-Pressure GH 2 -Filled RF Cavity (for efficient muon beam cooling for a MC or NF, since the low-Z ionization energy-loss absorber and.
Beam Dynamics in MeRHIC Yue Hao On behalf of MeRHIC/eRHIC working group.
LIGHTNING PHENOMENON 1. The height of the cloud base above the surrounding ground level may vary from 160 to 9,500 m. The charged centres which are responsible.
(HP)RF Instrumentation Moses Chung APC, Fermilab MuCool RF Workshop III
Halo calculations in ATF DR Dou Wang (IHEP), Philip Bambade (LAL), Kaoru Yokoya (KEK), Theo Demma (LAL), Jie Gao (IHEP) FJPPL-FKPPL Workshop on ATF2 Accelerator.
FODO-based Quadrupole Cooling Channel M. Berz, D. Errede, C. Johnstone, K. Makino, Dave Neuffer, Andy Van Ginneken.
Fusion Physics - Energy Boon or Nuclear Gloom? David Schilter and Shivani Sharma.
CARE07, 29 Oct Alexej Grudiev, New CLIC parameters. The new CLIC parameters Alexej Grudiev.
RF workshop Alvin Tollestrup Nov /14/20101Alvin Tollestruo.
Physics of fusion power Lecture 11: Diagnostics / heating.
1 More on gas filled rf cavities Alvin Tollestrup RF One Day Workshop Oct 15, 2008.
number of coulombs in a mole mass of liberated substance.
Physics of fusion power Lecture 8 : The tokamak continued.
Physics of fusion power Lecture 14: Collisions / Transport.
University of Illinois Optical and Discharge Physics SPEED AND SELECTIVITY: CUSTOM WAVEFORMS 200 V (Slow, selective) MASK SiO 2 Si  15 mTorr, Ar/C 4 F.
Particle Interactions
1 Comments on gas filled RF cavity tests A.V. Tollestrup Aug 14,2007.
Helical Cooling Channel Simulation with ICOOL and G4BL K. Yonehara Muon collider meeting, Miami Dec. 13, 2004 Slide 1.
Diversion of Plasma in Beam Port with a Vertical Magnetic Field D. R. Welch, D. V. Rose, S. S. Yu and W. Sharp Presented at the ARIES Project Meeting April.
1 Chris Rogers MICE Collaboration Meeting 11th Feb 2005 Tracking and Cooling performance of G4MICE.
ALPHA Storage Ring Indiana University Xiaoying Pang.
David Johnson –APC -.  The Proton Improvement Plan is tasked with Booster upgrades which will increase the Booster throughput required for future operation.
Physics of fusion power Lecture 7: particle motion.
the Ionosphere as a Plasma
F.M.H. Cheung School of Physics, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Chapter 5 Diffusion and resistivity
Hydrogen Recombination Time (µs) RF Envelope (V) Here So We get Calculated from # of protons per bunch Calculated from energy loss (voltage drop) in the.
The LHC: an Accelerated Overview Jonathan Walsh May 2, 2006.
Chapter 14 The Ideal Gas Law and Kinetic Theory Molecular Mass, the Mole, and Avogadro’s Number To facilitate comparison of the mass of one atom.
Photocathode 1.5 (1, 3.5) cell superconducting RF gun with electric and magnetic RF focusing Transversal normalized rms emittance (no thermal emittance)
Why plasma processing? (1) UCLA Accurate etching of fine features.
Quantitative Optimisation Studies of the Muon Front-End for a Neutrino Factory S. J. Brooks, RAL, Chilton, Oxfordshire, U.K. Tracking Code Non-linearised.
Beam-based vacuum observations and their consequences Sergei Nagaitsev August 18, 2003.
Alpha and Beta Interactions
Ionospheric Current and Aurora CSI 662 / ASTR 769 Lect. 12 Spring 2007 April 24, 2007 References: Prolss: Chap , P (main) Tascione: Chap.
-Factory Front End Phase Rotation Gas-filled rf David Neuffer Fermilab Muons, Inc.
Calculation of Beam loss on foil septa C. Pai Brookhaven National Laboratory Collider-Accelerator Department
MCTF Andreas Jansson MUTAC Meeting 8-10 April MCTF EXPERIMENTAL ACTIVITES - towards demonstrating 6D cooling.
March 2, 2011 TJRPhysics Processes Missing from our Current Simulation Tools 1 Tom Roberts Muons, Inc. This is the current list − Please help us to complete.
Recent progress of RF cavity study at Mucool Test Area Katsuya Yonehara APC, Fermilab 1.
FFAG Studies at RAL G H Rees. FFAG Designs at RAL Hz, 4 MW, 3-10 GeV, Proton Driver (NFFAGI) Hz,1 MW, GeV, ISIS Upgrade (NFFAG) 3.
Interaction Region Backgrounds M. Sullivan for the MEIC Collaboration Meeting Oct. 5-7, 2015.
LDRD: Magnetized Source JLEIC Meeting November 20, 2015 Riad Suleiman and Matt Poelker.
A. Bross MICE CM17 February MuCool RF Program 805 and 201 MHz Studies.
Frictional Cooling A.Caldwell MPI f. Physik, Munich FNAL
An Estimation of Critical Electron Density at Just Starting Breakdown in Gases Mase. H Professor Emeritus of Ibaraki University.
Chapter 10 Rüdiger Schmidt (CERN) – Darmstadt TU , version E 2.4 Acceleration and longitudinal phase space.
Interactions with Rest Gas – Typical Case Interactions with Rest Gas – ELENA Quantitative analysis for ELENA Evaluations at 100 keV Ejection Energy Evaluations.
Robert R. Wilson Prize Talk John Peoples April APS Meeting: February 14,
Vacuum specifications in Linacs J-B. Jeanneret, G. Rumolo, D. Schulte in CLIC Workshop 09, 15 October 2009 Fast Ion Instability in Linacs and the simulation.
Progress of gas-filled RF hadron monitor study K. Yonehara APC, Fermilab 2/10/16K. Yonehara1.
Basic of muon ionization cooling K. Yonehara 8/29/11HPRF cavity physics seminar - I, K. Yonehara1.
Progress of high pressure hydrogen gas filled RF cavity K. Yonehara APC, Fermilab 11/02/111 Joint MAP & High Gradient RF Workshop, K. Yonehara.
Progress on high pressure gas filled RF cavity test program K. Yonehara & A. Tollestrup APC, Fermilab 3/4/121MAP collaboration meeting 2012.
Katsuya Yonehara Accelerator Physics Center, Fermilab On behalf of the Muon Accelerator Program 5/22/121International Particle Accelerator Conference,
Measurement of 400 MeV Proton Beam Intensity and Transmission Through Collimator of HPRF Cavity at Fermilab MuCool Test Area M. R. Jana 1, M. Chung 1,
Aaron Farricker 107/07/2014Aaron Farricker Beam Dynamics in the ESS Linac Under the Influence of Monopole and Dipole HOMs.
Progress of High Pressure Hydrogen Gas Filled RF Cavity Test Katsuya Yonehara Accelerator Physics Center, Fermilab Muon Accelerator Program Review Fermilab,
ESS | Non-Invasive Beam Profile Measurements| | C. Böhme Non-Invasive Beam Profile Measurement Overview of evaluated methods.
Dark Current in ILC Main Linac N.Solyak, A.Sukhanov, I.Tropin ALCW2015, Apr.23, 2015, KEK LCWS'15, Tsukuba, 04/2015Nikolay Solyak1.
Uncertainties in Cooling Simulations R.C. Fernow BNL Synergy Workshop FNAL 13 June 2008.
Linac4 Beam Characteristics
Calculation of Beam Equilibrium and Luminosities for
Primary estimation of CEPC beam dilution and beam halo
Physics Processes Missing from our Current Simulation Tools
A little physics about breakdown in HPRF cavities
Earth’s Ionosphere Lecture 13
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
Parameters Changed in New MEIC Design
Presentation transcript:

Beam Interaction with gas filled RF Cavities Alvin Tollestrup BNL Workshop

The black line is at E/P = 13.2 for breakdown in hydrogen. This comes from U e = eE λ and λ= 1/Nσ and the postulate that the physics depends only on the energy of the electrons at the point of collision. A more useful variable is E/N where N is the # molecules.cm 3. E/N for breakdown =

E/P is a measure of E x distance between electron collisions with the atoms. Doubling E and doubling the pressure should leave the physics the same. This is generally measured in Volts/cm/mmHg

Mobility v = ½ a t = ½ e/m E t = ½ e/m E V: drift velocity; Vr random velocity within the swarm. It is not related to kT of the molecules! λ = 1 / N σ v = ½ e/m E = μ E and is proportional to E /P or E/N. For high E, Vr is much higher than given by kT as the electrons absorb energy from the field and then scatter generating hot random electrons. μ is a function of E/P. deltaZ is given by the following formula:

Pi r o E-16 Some Cross sections for electrons on hydrogen

Fractional energy loss / collision for electrons in Hydrogen Bekefi & Brown. PR112,159, E-3

Inelastic cross sections

MEAN ELECTRON ENERGY IN THE SWARM The distribution is roughly gaussian. Heylen has fit the data with an analytical expression that is valid for: 0.1 < E/P < 100 with an accuracy of less than 16% This fit has been used for calculating deltaZ and other properties of the beam- cavity interaction

IONIZATION CROSS SECTION FOR e + H 2

Example

Vrf + Vrf - Cavity Vrf = 0 Cavity Neutral positive deltaZ Beam passes thru cavity at max Vrf as a delta function After a ¼ cycle the electrons have all drifted upwart by a distance deltaZ. This discharges the top plate and leaves a layer of positive charge against the bottom. The field in this region remains the same and the field outside decreases. A ¼ cycle later the image is reversed.

Conversion from N in the graph at left to gas density in the middle column and equivalent P in torr for the last column. I have found no measurements for H in our range DOES THE HIGH DENSITY INVALIDATE THE MOBILITY CALCULATION

See Bartels PR Pressure dependence of Electron drift Velocity in Hydrogen at 77.8 K. Pressure is normalized to 273 K 967 psia Does the calculation of mobility work at high density? E/P being considered for muons is of order 10.

Fig. 5 shows the charge collected for alpha particles for various gas pressures and drift fields. The peak point in MuonsInc plot is at 600 KV / cm and 54 atm and is far off scale to the right indicating almost complete charge collection. Fig.6 shows data on the mobility of electrons in high pressure hydrogen. The red point is calculated from the theory of Crompton and Sutton. Data from Kammel at PSI IS RECOMBINATION TAKING PLACE? Mobility correct?

I got 3 cavities from Yonahara for the HCC that were sized to the beam for 400, 800, and 1600 Mhz. The beam in each case was was 10 bunches of intensity 10 E10 = 10E11 total separated by 2.5 ns. There are 10 of these groups that are coalesced in the collider ring for an intensity of 10 E 12 The following calculations use 10E11 for the total bunch intensity in the cooling channel. The next slide gives the input data for the three cases. EXAMPLE FOR HCC

3 Examples from HCC: Emittance4.3 mm rad1.5 mm rad.91 mm rad Freq400 Mhz800 Mhz1600 Mhz Beta function.42 m.26 m.15 m Gradient16 MV/m Beam rms r27.6 mm12.8 mm7.6 mm Cavity length5.0 cm2.5 cm1.25 cm Q from plasma Joules Cav H gas density =.017 rgm/cm^3 = 200 atm at 270 deg C. Beam pulse 10 e10 per bunch 10 bunches = 10 e11 total 800 Mhz cavity radius 15.6 cm. Scaled with Freq. Joules gas/cycle

400 Mhz

800 Mhz

1600 Mhz

Recombination dN/dt = C N 2 N(t) = No / (1 + No C t) Not exponential! Very long tail. C is between and and No between and This gives a ½ life = 1 /(No C) or 1/10 sec to 10 micro sec. Two different species…for instance if N 2 is SF 6: dN 1 /dt = C N 1 N 2 If N 2 >>N 1 then this is an exponential decay of N 1. B field and diffusion The coefficient of diffusion perpendicular to the field is: D(B) = D(B=0) ω c 2 / [ω c 2 + ω B 2 ] where ω c is the electron collision frequency and ω B is the cyclotron freq. ω c is of the order of and ω B is of order The magnet field does not confine things!

Interesting Problem: Sweep field to clean out ions 1.If all of the electrons were swept out leaving only the positive ions, the radial field would be of the order of 10 9 volts/meter! A sweep field might be 100 V/cm and will be neutralized inside the plasma. See figure below. It isn’t clear whether the sweep field or diffusion will predominate in the expansion of the charges. At these high densities, at this low E field the electron velocity is of the order of 1000 cm/sec e11 muons going thur a 2.5 cm cavity with hydrogen density.017 grm/cm 3 generates a total charge of 90 micro Coulombs. If this could be swept out in 1 ms the current would be 90 ma E E s = E eo ; For instance 100 KV/meter requires a surface charge of 88 pC A factor of 10 6 less than the total charge in the ions.

MTA Test Consider 800 Mhz cavity in linac beam: 1. Bunch spacing 5 ns and 0.13 ns wide with about 10 e9/ bunch or less. So the bunches are delta functions crossing every 4 th cycle. We assume that the cavity is synched to the linac. The first couple of bunches may be smaller as the batch gets gated on. There can be up to 1000 bunches for a total to e12 protons with βγ=1 for a dE/dx= 6 MeV/gm/cm 2 or 1.5 times min. So each bunch is equivalent to e9 mip. Using the numbers from slide 2 of e-3 joules loss/cycle for 10e11 mip we get for 4 cycles and 1 bunch: / = joules/4 cycles (or bunch) Energy stoired in cavity =.72 joules So the energy loss/bunch is like the single bunches of particles but spread over 4 cycles. So one will be able to measure the loading of the cavity by the beam by measuring the loading of the cavity which increases linearly thru the linac pulse. Maybe one wants to turn off power to cavity before beam hits and watch it decay in order to measure loading.

Questions and things to measure 1.What is the mobility at high pressures? 2.Can we get an estimate of the recombination rate? How long do the ions hang around? Does it matter? 3.What is the recombination time with a little SF 6 added? 1/n1 dn1/dt = R n 2 If the right side is 10 9 and n 2 is 1% of the hydrogen (X 0 SF6 is 1/150 X H ) n 2 = /100 Then R = This R seems to be in range I can find for various processes. 4.Need measurements for narrow beam and high intensity as exist at end of cooling change. 5.Open cell cavities are different. There is a column of plasma and no end electrodes. B keeps the plasma from diffusing in radial direction very fast so at peak of cycle there are blobs of positive charge between cells.

6.The linac has 10 μSec pulse. Is there any way to get single bunches? 7.A small light pipe leading out of the cavity to observe light could be useful.

See “Example” for conditions other than density.

400 Mhz 800 Mhz 1600 Mhz