The technical approach is as follows: Study transit policies Identify potential future regional scenarios Adopt evaluation criteria for transit policies.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
KEEP MOVING TO KEEP AHEAD MAY MnDOT Vision and Mission Vision: Transportation leader, committed to upholding public needs and collaboration with.
Advertisements

VTrans2035 Update March 30, Dironna Belton Office of Intermodal Planning and Investment.
Updating the Washington Transportation Plan February 4,
Wade E. Kline, AICP Community Development Planner.
Complete & Connected: Tools for Planning a Balanced Transportation System Technical Workshop.
Presented to presented by East Central Florida Corridor Task Force Space Coast TPO 02/16/15 Huiwei Shen Systems Planning Florida Department of Transportation.
Infrastructure Planning and Funding MID-REGION COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS MID-REGION METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION MARCH 19, 2015 NAIOP-NEW MEXICO CHAPTER.
MAP-21 Performance Management Framework August 8, 2013 Sherry Riklin Bob Tuccillo Angela Dluger The Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21)
1 How to Succeed in Statewide and MPO Transportation Planning.
Nathan Masek, AICP 18 th ITS World Congress, October
Introduction to the State-Level Mitigation 20/20 TM Software for Management of State-Level Hazard Mitigation Planning and Programming A software program.
1 Prioritizing Long Term Multimodal Transportation Policies for Virginia Megan Kersh Asad Saqib Matthew Schroeder Ward Williams.
Talking Freight Seminars November 19, 2008 Caroline A. Mays, AICP Atlanta Regional Commission Integrating Freight and Land Use in the Atlanta Region.
Framework for Model Development General Model Design Highway Network/Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZs) Development of Synthetic Trip Tables Development of.
How to use this presentation This presentation is for use by transportation professionals to communicate the TSP concept. The presentation comprises a.
Moving Research into Practice.  Implementation is the routine use of a SHRP 2 product by users in their regular way of doing business.  Users can include.
Collaboration Collaboration Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) Housing choices and opportunities Housing choices and.
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 1 Multimodal Maturity of Virginia’s Transportation Corridors April 19, 2006 presented.
Freight Bottleneck Study Update to the Intermodal, Freight, and Safety Subcommittee of the Regional Transportation Council September 12, 2002 North Central.
Ohio Transportation Planning Conference July 16, 2014.
Overview to CDOT Policies and Guidance Transit and Rail Advisory Committee Meeting April 13, 2012.
Project Briefing Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments Transportation Policy Board Project Briefing Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments.
Quality Region Principles The New Visions Plan addresses the region’s quality of life in a number of important ways and provides a framework for improving.
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia Prioritization Methods For Multimodal Investments, Including Return on Investment.
Enav.it Channelling Finance and Innovation to Industry Steps towards the Air Traffic Management system modernisation.
Analytical Support for the Statewide Multimodal Long-Range Transportation Plan Prepared for the Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium University.
USDOT, RITA RITA: Oversight of USDOT’s R&D programs  University Transportation Centers $100M  UTC Consortia $80M  UTC Multimodal R&D $40M  Intelligent.
1 Scenario-Based Planning for the Impacts of Multimodal Transportation Policies James H. Lambert Matthew J. Schroeder October 14, 2008.
ADOT Multimodal Planning Division Planning Assistance for Rural Areas (PARA) Program Overview December 4, 2013.
Statewide Strategies for Coordinating Regional Transportation and Land Use Planning Katie Benouar, Senior Transportation Planner Office of Regional and.
1 Scenario-Based Planning for the Regional Impacts of Statewide Multimodal Transportation Policies Progress Report to the VTrans2035 Advisory Committee.
Bureau of Planning & Economic Development.  WisDOT and freight: responsibilities and plans  Freight Advisory Committee  State Freight Plan 2.
Forecasting and Evaluating Network Growth David Levinson Norah Montes de Oca Feng Xie.
Guide for Rural Local Officials Evaluating Your Input into the Statewide Transportation Planning Process Developed by the National Association of Development.
ODOT STIP Process and Funding Jerri Bohard –Planning Section Manager –Transportation Development Division Steve Leep –Program and Funding Services Manager.
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 1 Update for VTrans2025 Technical Committee April 12, 2006.
JUNE 27, 2013 ARB INFORMATIONAL UPDATE: ASSOCIATION OF BAY AREA GOVERNMENTS’/ METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION’S DRAFT SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES STRATEGY.
Environmental Justice: Context Sensitive Planning Grant Program California Department of Transportation Division of Transportation Planning Office of Community.
Process Development and Integration for the Six-Year Program and the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program Capstone Students: Eric L. Issadore,
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia Systems and Information Engineering 1 Business Process Modeling for a Highway.
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 1 Update for VTrans2025 Multimodal Advisory Committee August 8, 2006.
Multimodal Investment Network MIN Development Multimodal Investment Networks (MIN) are projects that the Commonwealth of Virginia will potentially implement.
Coalfield Route - Double Stack Initiative I. Introduction Concept The Coalfield Route Double Stack initiative is designed to facilitate the transfer of.
Workforce Symposium 2015: Star Jobs Transition Book Pg. 32 Forecasting Industry Employment Demand and Identifying Demand Occupations in Louisiana Workforce.
Washington Transportation Plan 2030 A comprehensive and balanced statewide transportation policy plan reflecting the multi-faceted needs of the state’s.
Program Development Session F-1 The Metropolitan Transportation Planning Process.
Virginia Office of Public-Private Partnerships (VAP3) Adopted Public-Private Transportation Act (PPTA) enabling legislation in 1995 Public-Private Education.
Regional Mobility Plan I. Introduction This process for creating a regional mobility plan is designed for geographic areas with a small to medium sized.
Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation Amy Inman Planning and Mobility Programs Administrator Department of Rail and Public Transportation.
URBAN AND METROPOLITAN POLICY—WHAT IS THE FUTURE?.
Investing in Infrastructure: Moving Massachusetts Forward Harvard 2015.
ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION AND CONGESTION MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGIES DEPLOYMENT (ATCMTD) PROGRAM 1 Bob Arnold, Director Office of Transportation Management,
Presented to presented by Metropolitan Planning Organization Advisory Council January 22, 2015 Jim Wood, Florida Department of Transportation.
Presented by Maryland Department of Transportation Office of Planning and Capital Programming Funding Prioritization Process Chapter 725 January 2016.
1.  Transportation Vision  Near-term Recommendations  Ongoing Work / Next Steps 2.
Rail Planning Efforts and Lessons Learned Nicole Katsikides Acting Director, Office of Freight & Multimodalism Maryland Department of Transportation Presentation.
 SCDOT has over 41,000 miles of pavements and over 8,400 bridges.  4 th largest state maintained system in the country.  Started working on the TAMP.
Effectiveness of Funding Mechanisms and
Office of Transportation Planning Modal Planning Update
Project Overview – Phase 1
Coordinating and Prioritizing Multimodal Transportation Projects
Presentation to DATA on VTrans 2040 / HB2
MnDOT District Bicycle Plans
Public Transit Case Study
Commonwealth Transportation Board
What is an MPO Anyway? (and why should I care?)
STP Shared Local Fund: Project Evaluation Criteria
Coordinating And Prioritizing Multimodal Transportation Projects
MODULE 11: Creating a TSMO Program Plan
Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana Regional Council of Governments
Presentation transcript:

The technical approach is as follows: Study transit policies Identify potential future regional scenarios Adopt evaluation criteria for transit policies Evaluate policy impacts for region Determine policy robustness to future scenarios Support the prioritization of policies by agencies and public officials Scenario-Based Planning for the Regional Impacts of Statewide Multimodal Transportation Policies Megan N. Kersh, Asad A. Saqib, Matthew J. Schroeder, Edward E. Williams IV, James H. Lambert Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems and Department of Systems Engineering, University of Virginia Sponsored in part by the Commonwealth of Virginia’s Office of Multimodal Transportation Planning and Investment and the Virginia Transportation Research Council Prepared for the 2008 IEEE Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium Motivation and Problem Definition The Commonwealth of Virginia Office of Multimodal Transportation Planning and Investment seeks understanding of regional impacts of VTrans2035 statewide transportation policies across performance criteria under various future scenarios. We developed a software decision tool that enables regional planners to characterize the impacts of twenty-one policies across forty-two performance criteria for up to five critical regional scenarios. A case study was developed for the Roanoke Valley Area Metropolitan Organization. Technical Approach Results and Conclusions Performance Criteria Default Criteria Weights S.02 Sprawl accelerates S.17 Retirement S.18 Natural disaster S.03 IT amenities grow S.19 Decrease in air quality C.1 Safety and Security16.7%─↑↑ ↓─ C.2 Preservation and Management16.7%↑ ──── C.3 Efficient Movement of People and Goods16.7%↑ ─ C.4 Economic Vitality16.7%↑ ↑↑ ↑ C.5 Quality of Life16.7%↑─↑↑↑ C.6 Program Delivery16.7%───── ↑ ↑─↓↓ Level of Impact Major Increase Minor Increase No Change Minor Decrease Major Decrease Ratio2:11.5:11:11:1.51:2 The table to the left describes the scenario impacts across the performance criteria for a particular region. We compare the median, maximum, and minimum ranks for the twenty-one policies, studying the robustness of the policies to the five scenarios. The methodology will be deployed to the regions and localities of the Commonwealth of Virginia, in support of the evolving statewide long-range transportation plan VTrans2035. Performance CriteriaFuture ScenariosStatewide Policies C.1 Safety and Security C.2 Preservation and Management C.3 Efficient Movement of People and Goods C.4 Economic Vitality C.5 Quality of Life C.6 Program Delivery S.02 Sprawl Accelerates S.03 IT Amenities Grow S.17 Retirement S.18 Natural Disaster S.19 Decrease in Air Quality … P.04 Fund Rail P.06 Strengthen Planning and Modeling P.10 Improve Connections P.20 Continue Technical Committee P.21 Establish a Commission … Statewide PolicyMedian Rank Min Rank Max Rank P.15 Plan Multimodally 112 P.13 Invest in Technology 212 P.11 Think Multimodally 334 P.22 Smart Growth447 P.2 Support Transit547 Sample of Five Statewide Policies with Highest Regional Impacts: