Frisby v. Schultz Alyssa Goodwin. Background Brookfield, Wisconsin Pro-life picketing Sandra Schultz Robert Braun Targeted Ordinance Residential area.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
West Virginia Board of Ed v. Barnette
Advertisements

Chapter Eight, Section 3 & 4. The U.S. Supreme Court / Deciding Cases at the Supreme Court.
Good News Club v. Milford Central School
Chapter 1 Legal Framework Affecting Public Schools
Washington v. Glucksberg (1997) By: Makayla Stovall.
Marbury vs. Madison (1803) Essential Skill:
TEXAS V. JOHNSON. WHAT HAPPENED 1984 Gregory Lee Johnson was a member of the Revolutionary Communist Youth Brigade At a rally he burned the American flag.
From the Courtroom to the Classroom © 2006 Constitutional Rights Foundation, Los Angeles, CA All rights reserved. Chicago v. Morales.
American Government and Politics Today
Lemon v. Kurtzman by Jake Olsen. The Facts Two separate laws were at issue in this case – The Rhode Island Salary Supplement Act of 1969 – Pennsylvania.
Vivek Barbhaiya and John Coriasco
Gitlow vs. New York Background Information  Gitlow v. New York was a Supreme Court decision which ruled that the Fourteenth Amendment had extended.
U.S. Constitution 1 st Amendment Certain explicit materials and various forms of expression found in media, presentations and performances ARE PROTECTED.
HAZELWOOD SCHOOL DISTRICT V. KUHLMEIER JANUARY 13, 1988 Vicky Zysk & Cheyenne Fletcher Period 8 January 5, 2015 Image: N/A.
NAACP v. ALABAMA ~National Association for the Advancement of Colored People~ 1 st amendment case: 1958.
Bethel School District v. Fraser (478 U.S. 675, 1986) Anthony Miller Summer 2011 Oakland University EL 620.
Does the First Amendment protect free speech if humanitarian groups want to provide support to designated terrorist organizations? Must a humanitarian.
Some Issues re Intermediate Scrutiny of Content- Neutral Regulations Intermediate scrutiny - Law must be narrowly drawn to meet important state interest.
Loren Gallimore. Background Daryl Renard Atkins, the plaintiff, went against the defendant, the state of Virginia, as he was convicted of abduction, robbery,
Judicial Branch Judicial Branch.
School Law and the Public Schools: A Practical Guide for Educational Leaders, 5e © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 1 Legal Framework.
The Supreme Court. Judicial Review  Judicial Review is one of the most important powers of the Supreme Court It is the power to overturn any law that.
The Judicial Branch Chapter 10.
Chapter 5: Citizenship and Constitution. Learning Goal…  What are the three types of powers given to the Central and State governments?  What are the.
Chapter 10: The Judicial Branch
Chapter 5: Citizenship and Constitution. Learning Goal…  What are the three types of powers given to the Central and State governments?  What are the.
The Judicial Branch of the Federal Government
[June 23, 2003] By Wayland Goode.   Historic injustices on minority groups promoted this state program.  It applies not only to college applications,
How is Democracy Socially Constructed? Is it Through Conflict We Find Social Reality? Presented by: Chelsea Jonson Spring
De Jonge v. Oregon John Salinkas. Case facts  Case heard: December 9th,1936  Defendant: Dirk De Jonge  Decided by Chief Justice Charles E. Hughes 
Texas vs. Johnson Argued: March 21, 1989 Decided: June 21, 1989 By: Garialdy De Jesus.
Wallace vs. Jaffree Alabama, 1985 Father versus Mobile County School – Ishmael Jaffree claimed his kids were being subjected to regular religious practices.
2000: By a 6 to 3 majority, the Supreme Court in Santa Fe School District v. Doe, 530 U.S. 290, … Affirmed that no government body can favor believers.
Citizenship and the Constitution Understanding the Constitution CHAPTER 6, SECTION 1 PAGES
Miranda v. Arizona GREYSON PETTUS PLS 211 MR. NOEL DECEMBER 2ND, 2015.
The function of the 9 th and 10 th amendments is to….? Protect rights not addressed by the first eight amendments.
How the Federal Government Works: The Judicial Branch 8.28 Describe the significance of the Magna Carta, the English Bill of Rights, and the Mayflower.
Chapter 7: The Judicial Branch. The U.S. Supreme Court.
THE JUDICIAL BRANCH The United States Government.
{ Capitol Square Review v. Pinette Riley Poling PLS 211 Mr. John Noel December 8, 2015.
1 Chapter 5: The Court System. 2 Trial Courts Trial courts listen to testimony, consider evidence, and decide the facts in disputes. There are 2 parties.
The Warren Court ( ) Appointed by Eisenhower Liberal period in court’s history Protected Civil Liberties & First Amendment Rights Malapportionment.
The U.S. Supreme Court. The Supreme Court Justices.
Judicial and First Amendment Supreme CourtJudicial BranchMore Supreme Court Freedom of Religion Freedom of Speech
THIS IS Welcome Contestants... Today ’ s Judicial Basics CourtsS.C. CasesCivil Liberties Vocabulary Grab Bag.
The Judicial Branch – Oregon Court Systems. Definitions Jurisdiction Jurisdiction The area in which a court has authority The area in which a court has.
Brandi Miller Drake EDL 276: Applications of School Law February, 2016
Freedom of Speech: First Amendment “The test of democracy is freedom of criticism.” ~David Ben-Gurion.
Landmark Supreme Court Cases: (Insert Name of Case) DATES YOUR NAME.
American Government and Politics Today Chapter 15 The Courts.
Argued: March 19, 2007 Decided: June 25, =2&i= &w=580&fh=&fw=&ll=&pl=&r=
Gratz v. Bollinger (2003) Supreme Court Case Project Created by: Christina Dork.
YOUR NAME DATE OF PRESENTATION COURSE NAME Texas vs. Johnson Flag Burning/Freedom of Speech.
Chicago v. Morales © 2006 Constitutional Rights Foundation, Los Angeles, CA All rights reserved.
Sign Amendment First of two amendments proposed to sign ordinance
The U. S. Federal Courts.
Article III U.S. Constitution
The Constitution & Bill of Rights
Landmark Supreme Court Cases: (Insert Name of Case)
From the Courtroom to the Classroom
1st Amendment & School (8 cases = 7 revolving around school and 1 NOT)
American Government and Politics Today
Article III U.S. Constitution
Chapter 8 Section 1.
The Court System Appeals.
Federal and Supreme Court
Court Procedures The Supreme Court is not required to hear all cases presented before it and carefully chooses the cases it will consider. Section 4.
How the Federal Gov’t Works: The Judicial Branch
Jeopardy COURT LINGO MISC Q $100 Q $100 Q $100 Q $100 Q $100 Q $200
The Supreme Court Report
Presentation transcript:

Frisby v. Schultz Alyssa Goodwin

Background Brookfield, Wisconsin Pro-life picketing Sandra Schultz Robert Braun Targeted Ordinance Residential area People from ,12z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m2!3m1!1s0x880506dd510b5b6b:0xf370e7d69487c16b

Town Ordinance “It is unlawful for any person to engage in picketing before or about the residence or dwelling of any individual in the Town of Brookfield.”

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin Relief from ordinance Claimed ordinance violated rights under the First Amendment Defendants: three members of the Town Board, the Chief of Police, the town attorney, and the town of Brookfield Plaintiff: Mrs. Shultz and Mr. Braun

Decision of the Appeals Court Found the ordinance unconstitutional Not tailored enough to restrict freedom of speech or assembly Defendants needed to appeal the injunction and/or request a trial

The Supreme Court June 27, 1988 Opinion Delivered by Justice O’Connor Opinion: Ordinance still allows for other means of communications Case did serve a significant government interest Determined what a “home” is Decision Contrary judgement of the Court of Appeals was reversed baylor.edu/mediacommunications/news.php?a ction=story&story=114026

Dissenting Opinions Justice Brennman The ordinance “over did it” Picketing could have been managed differently No evidence that supports targeting Justice Stevens Too broad because it eliminates all picketing Would restrict a fifth grader from carrying a poster in a residence for a period of time displaying a friendly message to its intended audience

Political Impact Focuses on the freedoms given to us by the First Amendment Americans do have the right to freedom of speech and assembly, however, There are different types of forums to which the freedom applies Public forum Public forum designated by the government Nonpublic forum People cannot intrude on other’s rights Role of the government is to protect the people

Works Cited "FRISBY ET AL. V. SCHULTZ ET AL." Supreme Court of the United States. Accessed December 2, "Frisby v. Schultz, 487 U.S. 474 (1988)." Justia. Accessed December 2, "Frisby v. Schultz, United States Supreme Court." Quimbee. Accessed December 2, "Frisby v. Schultz." Cornell University of Law. Accessed December 2,